Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 135-141.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Exogenous GA3 and IAA on Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Shaanxi Province

Hu Qiang1,Jin Baofeng1,Zheng Pufan2,Chen Fucai2,Li Sitong2,Mao Kailun2,Liu Hailun3,Tang Yonghong3,Zhang Lixin2   

  1. 1 Technology Center,China Tobacco Guangdong Industrial Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510385,Guangdong,China
    2 College of Life Sciences,Northwest A & F University,Yangling 712100,Shaanxi,China;
    3 Tobacco Company of Shaanxi Province,Xi’an 710061,Shaanxi,China;
  • Received:2016-06-15 Revised:2016-10-20 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

222

Abstract:

To explore an efficient way for improving the quality of upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco in Southern Shaanxi province, a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of gibberellin (GA3) and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) on contents of total carbon, soluble total sugar, reducing sugar, starch, total nitrogen and nicotine, the economic characters and chemical compositions in upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco using Yunyan 99 as material. There were significant increases in the contents of total carbon, total potassium, total soluble sugar and reducing sugar by 23.80%, 46.58%, 38.10% and 48.55% , respectively , under the combination treatment of GA3 50mg/L and IAA 30mg/L at 30 days after toping. Moreover, it was also showed increases in the ratio of sugar to alkali and the ratio of total nitrogen to nicotine, while decreases in the nicotine and starch content of the upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco under the same spraying treatment. And, the improvement was better under combination than single application treatment, especially for yield, the proportion of superior tobacco leaves, total sugar content and reducing sugar content of baking tobacco leaves (P<0.01). In conclusion, the combination application of GA3 50mg/L and IAA 30mg/L was the best treatment to improve carbon and nitrogen metabolism resulting in enhancement of quality in upper leaves of flue-cured tobacco.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Gibberellin (GA3), Indole acetic acid (IAA), Yield and quality

Table 1

Test design"

处理Treatments
CK 清水
T1 IAA 30mg/L
T2 IAA 60mg/L
T3 GA3 50mg/L
T4 GA3 100mg/L
T5 GA3 50mg/L+IAA 30mg/L
T6 GA3 50mg/L+IAA 60mg/L
T7 GA3 100mg/L+IAA 30mg/L
T8 GA3 100mg/L+IAA 60mg/L

Table 2

Effects of GA3 and IAA on total carbon content and total potassium content of flue-cured tobacco leaves %"

处理
Treatments		 打顶后30d After topping 30d
全碳
Total carbon content		 全钾
Total potassium content
CK 50.49±0.41d 1.46±0.01e
T1 59.38±0.24b 2.12±0.01a
T2 46.40±0.24e 1.55±0.01d
T3 51.21±0.41cd 1.85±0.02c
T4 38.95±0.41fg 1.84±0.01c
T5 62.51±0.63a 2.14±0.05a
T6 39.91±0.24f 1.94±0.01b
T7 52.89±0.96c 1.79±0.01c
T8 36.78±0.41g 1.29±0.05f

Table 3

Effects of GA3 and IAA on soluble sugar content, reducing sugar content and starch content of flue-cured tobacco leaves %"

处理
Treatments		 打顶后30d After topping 30d
可溶性总糖Soluble sugar content 还原糖Reducing sugar content 淀粉Sarch content
CK 15.46±0.21d 10.38±0.06g 10.81±0.04e
T1 21.77±0.06a 12.02±0.06e 12.43±0.06a
T2 13.13±0.10f 11.03±0.17f 12.32±0.06ab
T3 21.27±0.10a 11.75±0.06e 12.09±0.06bc
T4 17.45±0.12c 14.48±0.08b 10.13±0.05f
T5 21.35±0.19a 15.42±0.08a 12.56±0.07a
T6 18.07±0.25b 13.19±0.08d 11.80±0.12d
T7 17.60±0.25bc 13.41±0.13d 11.94±0.07cd
T8 12.63±0.19f 13.91±0.05c 12.32±0.14ab

Table 4

Effects of GA3 and IAA on total nitrogen content and nicotine content of flue-cured tobacco leaves %"

处理
Treatments		 打顶后30d After topping 30d
全氮
Total nitrogen content		 烟碱
Nicotine content
CK 1.67±0.03d 3.22±0.04a
T1 2.53±0.02a 2.73±0.05e
T2 1.74±0.02d 2.84±0.07cde
T3 1.87±0.03c 2.81±0.08de
T4 1.92±0.03c 3.09±0.02ab
T5 2.22±0.03b 2.69±0.00e
T6 1.90±0.06c 2.96±0.02bcd
T7 1.87±0.05c 2.92±0.05cd
T8 1.98±0.02c 3.00±0.04bc

Table 5

Effects of GA3 and IAA on economic character of flue-cured tobacco"

处理Treatments 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 产值Output value (元/hm2) 上等烟比例Proportion of superior tobacco leaves(%)
CK 2 370.15±58.25b 53 518.05±1 397.5bc 44.25±0.61bc
T1 2 396.70±56.77b 54 237.30±1 162.96bc 43.81±0.44c
T2 2 504.85±58.22ab 56 488.65±1 404.37abc 44.31±0.64bc
T3 2 500.80±60.75ab 56 318.55±2 074.70abc 44.78±0.83abc
T4 2 403.15±57.26ab 53 839.05±1 218.53bc 43.11±0.61c
T5 2 584.65±58.76a 59 012.85±1 556.95a 46.78±0.55a
T6 2 547.60±58.26ab 58 161.75±1 432.51ab 46.12±0.52ab
T7 2 520.45±55.89ab 57 502.20±1 138.26ab 46.23±0.84ab
T8 2 407.95±55.37ab 52 445.10±826.79c 39.82±0.50d

Table 6

Effects of GA3 and IAA on chemical compositions of flue-cured tobacco leaves after baking"

处理
Treatments		 可溶性总糖(%)
Total sugar
content		 还原糖(%)
Reducing sugar content		 淀粉(%)
Starch
content		 烟碱(%)
Nicotine
content		 钾(%)
Potassium
content		 总氮(%)
Total nitrogen content		 糖碱比
Ratio of sugar
to alkali		 氮碱比
Ratio of total
nitrogen to nicotine
CK 21.27±0.03f 18.61±0.03d 4.37±0.03a 3.65±0.13a 1.44±0.03a 1.74±0.03a 5.11±0.34e 0.48±0.03b
T1 25.21±0.13de 21.57±0.13a 3.26±0.13b 3.51±0.12ab 1.68±0.13a 1.98±0.13a 6.16±0.29b 0.56±0.02ab
T2 32.09±0.06b 19.41±0.06c 4.45±0.06a 3.58±0.06a 1.48±0.06a 1.97±0.06a 5.43±0.2de 0.55±0.03ab
T3 25.50±0.38de 17.97±0.38d 1.60±0.38d 3.32±0.01bc 1.61±0.38a 2.30±0.38a 5.41±0.18de 0.69±0.11a
T4 24.92±0.06e 20.85±0.06b 2.39±0.06c 3.51±0.02ab 1.46±0.06a 1.86±0.06a 5.94±0.02bc 0.53±0.02ab
T5 25.67±0.07d 21.00±0.07ab 1.83±0.07cd 2.92±0.01e 1.95±0.07a 2.11±0.07a 7.19±0.01a 0.72±0.02a
T6 25.56±0.13de 18.31±0.13d 1.89±0.13cd 3.09±0.01de 1.75±0.13a 1.93±0.13a 5.93±0.09bc 0.62±0.04ab
T7 35.34±0.26a 19.71±0.26c 1.95±0.26cd 3.31±0.02bc 1.48±0.26a 1.95±0.26a 5.96±0.19bc 0.59±0.08ab
T8 30.94±0.32c 18.20±0.32d 3.28±0.32b 3.21±0.03cd 1.27±0.32a 1.87±0.32a 5.67±0.09cd 0.58±0.1ab

Table 7

F-test on economic character and chemical compositions of leaves of flue-cured tobacco after baking"

处理
Treatments		 产量
Yield		 上等烟比例
Proportion of superior
tobacco leaves		 可溶性总糖含量
Total sugar
content		 还原糖含量
Reducing sugar
content		 淀粉含量
Starch
content		 钾含量
Potassium
content		 总氮含量
Total nitrogen
content
GA3 1 380.81** 153.36** 513.92** 11.34* 97.85** 2.58 1.19
IAA 535.63** 94.75** 693.47** 91.46** 13.79** 1.01 0.15
GA3+IAA 354.11** 94.10** 365.89** 39.59** 4.60 0.23 0.61

Table 8

Path analysis and decision analysis between the indicators and output value of flue-cured tobacco"

因素
Factors		 简单相关系数
Correlation coefficient		 直接通径系数
Direct path coefficient		 间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient 间接通径系数合计
Sum of indirect path coefficient		 决策系数
Decision coefficient
全钾
Total potassium content		 总氮
Total nitrogen content		 淀粉
Starch content		 还原糖
Reducing sugar content
全钾 Total potassium 0.585 1.025 - -0.652 0.120 0.091 -0.440 0.149
总氮Total nitrogen 0.021 -1.020 0.655 - 0.291 0.094 1.040 -1.083
淀粉Starch 0.394 0.648 0.191 -0.458 - 0.013 -0.254 0.091
还原糖 Reducing sugar 0.273 0.253 0.369 -0.381 0.033 - 0.021 0.074
[1] 王冠 . N素调控对烤烟碳氮代谢规律及产质量影响研究. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2013.
[2] 杨磊, 易克, 简永兴 , 等. 提高烤烟上部叶可用性研究进展. 作物研究, 2011,25(1):71-75.
[3] 宫长荣, 刘霞, 宋朝鹏 , 等. 影响烤烟上部叶质量的因素及提高其可用性的措施. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(3):103-108.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.03.024
[4] 简永兴, 易建华, 蒲文宣 , 等. α-萘乙酸棉球扎顶对烤烟上部烟叶烟碱含量及糖碱比值的影响.作物杂志, 2008(6):22-25.
[5] 刘健康 . 不同外源植物激素配比对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2004.
[6] 李健忠, 薛立新, 朱金峰 , 等. 打顶后喷施油菜素内酯和生长素对烤烟田间生长、碳氮代谢及烟叶品质的影响.中国生态农业学报, 2015(11):1404-1412.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.150513
[7] 招启柏 . 烤烟烟碱含量农艺调节原理研究. 南京:南京农业大学, 2004.
[8] 陈启新, 彭金良, 李清 . 烤烟打顶后GA3和2,4-D联合施用对上部烟叶产质量的影响.湖南农业科学, 2012(21):26-28.
[9] 张文明, 邱慧珍, 何秀成 , 等. 外源激素对陇东旱塬烤烟主要品质指标和产量、产值的影响.干旱地区农业研究, 2012(3):180-183,193.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.03.032
[10] 颜侃, 陈宗瑜, 王娟 , 等. 不同生态区烤烟叶片稳定碳同位素组成特征.生态学报, 2015(11):3846-3853.
[11] 张喜峰, 张立新, 高梅 , 等. 不同移栽期对陕南烤烟氮钾含量、光合特性及经济性状的影响.中国烟草科学, 2013(4):20-24.
[12] 张婷 . 打顶后施用生长素和钾肥对烤烟生理特性与品质的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2006.
doi: 10.7666/d.y962528
[13] 高俊凤 . 植物生理学实验指导.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 144.
[14] 张喜峰, 张立新, 高梅 , 等. 密度与氮肥互作对烤烟圆顶期农艺及经济性状的影响.中国烟草科学, 2012(5):36-41.
[15] 周继华, 聂红资, 豆显武 , 等. 外源GA3与ABA对烤烟叶片内源激素及钾素含量的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2009,44(5):61-66.
[16] 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏 . 中国烟草种植区划.北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 4.
[17] Leymonie J P, Etourneaud F . Fertilizer and tobacco. Tobacco Reporter, 1996,4:69-72.
[18] 刘中阳 . 打顶和生长调节剂对烟草生长及钾素营养的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2004.
[19] 李章海, 刘登乾, 田必文 , 等. 打顶和施用NAA对烟株生长、烟碱合成和钾素吸收的影响.烟草科技, 2008(9):52-55.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2008.09.013
[20] 和丽忠, 张晓林, 陈锦玉 , 等. 打顶后施用植物生长调节剂对烤烟钾和烟碱的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2009,15(2):75-79.
[21] 郭芳军, 韩锦峰, 张建忠 . 喷施生长素对烤烟酶活性和化学成分的影响. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(8):279-281.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2006.08.071
[22] Pilot G, Gaymard F, Mouline K , et al. Regulated expression of Arabidopsis Shaker K + channel genes involved in K + uptake and distribution in the plant . Plant Molecular Biology, 2003,51(5):773-787
doi: 10.1023/A:1022597102282
[23] Morris S E, Cox M C H, Ross J J , et al.Auxin dynamics after decapitation are not correlated with the initial growth of axillary buds. Plant Physiology, 2005,138(3):1665-1672.
doi: 10.1104/pp.104.058743 pmid: 15965021
[24] 陈振国, 杨艳华, 李进平 , 等. IAA缓释处理对白肋烟产量、质量及内在主要化学成分含量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2013,52(2):352-354,386.
[25] 杜咏梅, 郭承芳, 张怀宝 , 等. 水溶性糖、烟碱、总氮含量与烤烟吃味品质的关系研究. 中国烟草科学, 2000,21(1):9-12.
[26] 胡溶容, 周冀衡, 张一扬 , 等. 烤烟糖含量的空间变异特征. 生态学杂志, 2007,26(11):1804-1810.
[27] 王林, 李健忠, 许仪 , 等. 打顶后喷施不同生物制剂对烤烟品质的影响.中国农业科技导报, 2015(3):136-143.
[28] 徐晓燕, 武丽, 张烽林 , 等. 植物生长调节剂对烤烟内源激素、烟碱、多酚含量的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2007,13(3):61-63.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2007.03.013
[29] 刘华山, 朱大恒, 韩锦峰 , 等. 喷施IAA对烤烟烟碱含量及其合成酶的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2005,11(6):41-43.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2005.06.009
[30] 招启柏 . 烤烟烟碱含量农艺调节原理研究. 南京:南京农业大学, 2004.
[31] 韩锦峰, 赫冬梅, 刘华山 , 等. 不同植物激素处理方法对烤烟内烟碱含量的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2001,7(2):22-25.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2001.02.005
[32] 孙丹 . 打顶后涂抹NAA对烤烟碳氮代谢及品质调节效应的研究. 福州:福建农林大学, 2010.
doi: 10.7666/d.y1748084
[33] 黄先忠, 蒋才富, 廖立力 , 等. 赤霉素作用机理的分子基础与调控模式研究进展. 植物学报, 2006,23(5):499-510.
[34] 张国华, 张艳洁, 丛日晨 , 等. 赤霉素作用机制研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2009,29(2):412-419.
[35] Frigerio M, Alabadi D , Perez-gomez J,et al.Transcriptional regulation of gibberellin metabolism genes by auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 2006,142(2):553-563.
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084871 pmid: 1690566910001000
[36] 简永兴, 杨磊, 董道竹 , 等. 生长调节剂2,4-D灌施对烤烟上部叶常规化学成分的影响.作物杂志, 2006(6):20-23.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2006.06.007
[37] 李炜 . 植物生长调节剂对毕节烤烟上部叶生理特性及品质的影响. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2013.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y2432269
[1] Yaning Wang,Jinpeng Yang,Chunlei Yang,Fangsen Xu,Xiang Zhang,Liang Li. Effects of Well-Cellar Transplanting with Triangulation on Growth, Development,Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 116-122.
[2] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
[3] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[4] Linjian Dai,Wu Chen,Tian Zhou,Jun Zhong. Selection Mutant of Resistant to Black Shank on Tobacco by Anther Culture [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 66-70.
[5] Han Yan,Hanglin Song,Li Zhang,Jing Yan,Xianji Shi,Shimiao Zhu,Lu Liu,Hulin Li. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Agronomic Traits and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 156-161.
[6] Qingli Liu,Zhihong Li,Yanli Xu,Junying Li,Yungui Zhang. Research on the Cooperative Technology of Flue-Cured Tobacco based on Transplanting-Date, Fertilization and Variety in Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 128-134.
[7] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 49-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .