Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 128-134.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Cooperative Technology of Flue-Cured Tobacco based on Transplanting-Date, Fertilization and Variety in Yunnan

Liu Qingli1,Li Zhihong1,Xu Yanli1,Li Junying2,Zhang Yungui1   

  1. 1 Institute of Agricultural Resource and Agricultural Planning,CAAS, Beijing 100081,China
    2 Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences,Yuxi 653100,Yunnan,China
  • Received:2016-07-25 Revised:2016-10-31 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

122

Abstract:

The yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco are combined effect resulting from the ecological environment, cultivation technology and genetic factors. The transplanting-date, fertilization and variety are the key control measures of the three factors. In this paper, the orthogonal experiment of three factors, including transplanting-date, fertilization and variety, was used. Under the cooperative action of ecology, cultivation and inheritance, the effects of transplanting date, fertilization and variety on the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco were studied, which determined the effect of different control measures on flue-cured tobacco. The findings suggested that the influence of transplanting-date on flue-cured tobacco was the largest, which contributed 46.80%, 64.75% and 78.10% to smoking quality, yield and output value, respectively. Effect of fertilization on flue-cured tobacco was the second. The contribution rate of fertilization on smoking quality, yield and output value were 34.95%, 20.15% and 12.60% respectively. Comprehensive consideration of tobacco quality, production value and cost, 75kgN/hm 2 was better than 90kgN/hm 2 and 105kgN/hm 2. Under the joint function of transplanting-date and fertilization, yield and quality, there was not significant difference among K326, Yunyan87, NC71 and Hongda. Variety contribution rate was 18.25%, 15.10% and 9.30% to smoking quality, yield and output value, respectively. In general, to determine the reasonable transplanting-date is prerequisites for the production of high quality of tobacco. Fertilization is the core technical problem at the regulation on yield and quality of tobacco leaves. Therefore, under the premise of ensuring the normal growth of the flue-cured tobacco, transplanting-date should be sooner rather than later, nitrogen fertilizer should be lower. It was optimized for flue-cured tobacco to transplant in mid to late April with K326 and 75kgN/hm 2.

Key words: Transplanting-date, Fertilization, Variety, The quality of flue-cured tobacco

Table 1

Physical and chemical characteristics of the experimental fields"

试验点
Experiment fields		 土壤类型
Soil type		 pH 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Alkali-hydrolyzable N		 速效磷(mg/kg)
Olsen-P		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available K
峨山Eshan 水稻土Paddy soil 6.5 32.5 121.3 35.0 182.2
华宁Huaning 红壤Red soil 5.8 28.4 130.5 27.5 176.8

Table 2

Factors and levels for orthogonal test"

处理Treat 编号Code
地点Site 移栽时间（年/月/日）
Transplanting-date		 施肥Fertilization(kg/hm2) 品种
Varieties		 移栽时间
Transplanting-date		 施肥
Fertilization		 品种
Varieties
N P2O5 K2O
峨山Eshan 2012/4/30 75 60.0 270 K326 T1 N1 V1
2012/4/20 90 60.0 270 云烟87 Yunyan87 T2 N2 V2
2012/5/10 105 60.0 270 NC71 T3 N3 V3
华宁Huaning 2013/4/29 75 157.5 315 K326 T1 N1 V1
2013/4/15 105 157.5 315 云烟87 Yunyan87 T2 N2 V2
2013/5/13 135 157.5 315 红大Hongda T3 N3 V3

Table 3

Meteorological conditions at different stage of flue-cured tobacco"

峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
打顶前Before topping
（0~63d）		 降水量Precipitation (mm) 223.8 199.3 196.0 191.8 163.3 164.6
日均气温Daily average temperature (℃) 21.8 21.5 22.0 20.5 19.8 21.1
日照时数Sunshine hours (h) 333.0 387.7 310.8 466.0 526.6 416.8
昼夜温差Day and night temperature difference (℃) 8.7 9.3 8.2 10.4 11.7 9.7
打顶后After topping
（64d~成熟Mature）		 降水量Precipitation (mm) 245.8 204.8 294.2 314.1 274.2 331.1
日均气温Daily average temperature (℃) 21.4 21.6 20.7 20.3 20.8 19.7
日照时数Sunshine hours (h) 265.8 225.7 299.8 306.2 307.1 327.2
昼夜温差Day and night temperature difference (℃) 8.2 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.8 8.0

Table 4

Effects of transplanting-date on the smoking quality of flue-cured Tobacco"

峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning
T1 T2 T3 T1 T2 T3
香气特性(40)
Aroma characteristic		 本香Aroma（10） 7.94a 7.94a 7.81b 8.19a 8.00a 7.50b
香气量Aroma volume（15） 12.90a 12.90a 12.79a 12.96a 12.92a 12.69b
香气质Aroma Quality（15） 12.90a 12.88a 12.60b 13.04a 12.81ab 12.63b
烟气特性(40)
Smoke characteristic		 浓度Concentration（10） 8.00a 8.00a 7.98a 8.06a 8.00a 7.69b
刺激性Irritancy（15） 12.92a 12.92a 12.67b 12.94a 12.40b 12.44b
劲头Strength（5） 4.98a 4.98a 4.71b 4.83a 4.85a 4.69b
杂气Offensive taste（10） 7.48a 7.50a 7.38b 7.96a 7.83a 7.56b
口感特性(20)
Taste characteristic		 干净度Purity（10） 7.39a 7.52a 7.27b 7.88a 7.83a 7.50b
湿润感Moist feeling（5） 4.00a 4.00a 4.00a 3.92a 3.88ab 3.69b
回味After taste（5） 3.67a 3.65a 3.54b 3.83a 3.69ab 3.63b
感官质量（100）Smoking quality 82.16a 82.27a 80.75b 83.60a 82.21a 80.00b

Table 5

Effects of transplanting-date on yield and output of flue-cured tobacco"

地点
Site		 移栽期
Transplanting-date		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 产值(元/hm2)
Output
峨山Eshan T2 2 870.4a 65 841.3a
T1 2 656.7b 57 491.0a
T3 2 339.7c 35 979.3b
华宁Huaning T2 2 600.9a 51 270.2a
T1 2 841.8a 54 500.6a
T3 1 183.0b 20 363.9b

Table 6

Effects of fertilization on the smoking quality of flue-cured tobacco"

峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning
N1 N2 N3 N1 N2 N3
香气特性(40)
Aroma characteristic		 本香Aroma（10） 7.98a 7.88a 7.83a 8.06a 8.28a 7.94a
香气量Aroma volume（15） 12.92a 12.90a 12.77a 12.91a 12.94a 12.97a
香气质Aroma Quality（15） 12.94a 12.79a 12.65b 12.88a 13.19a 12.72a
烟气特性(40)
Smoke characteristic
 浓度Concentration（10） 8.00a 8.00a 7.98a 7.97a 8.00a 8.13a
刺激性Irritancy（15） 12.98a 12.83ab 12.69b 12.41a 12.94a 12.66a
劲头Strength（5） 5.00a 4.85a 4.81a 4.84a 4.88a 4.81a
杂气Offensive taste（10） 7.52a 7.50a 7.33b 7.81a 8.06a 7.81a
口感特性(20)
Taste characteristic
 干净度Purity（10） 7.50a 7.38ab 7.31b 7.84a 7.97a 7.75a
湿润感Moist feeling（5） 4.00a 4.00a 4.00a 3.94a 3.97a 3.78a
回味After taste（5） 3.65a 3.63ab 3.58b 3.72a 3.91a 3.66a
感官质量（100）Smoking quality 82.48a 81.75ab 80.96b 82.38a 84.13a 82.22a

Table 7

Effects of fertilization on yield and output of flue-cured tobacco"

地点
Site		 施肥处理Fertilization treats 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 产值(元/hm2)
Output
峨山Eshan N1 2 501.0b 52 899.0a
N2 2 616.9ab 50 713.6a
N3 2 749.0a 55 699.0a
华宁Huaning N1 2 387.7a 45 497.9a
N2 2 143.2a 40 177.3a
N3 2 094.8a 40 459.5a

Table 8

Effects of varieties on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco"

峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning
K326 云烟87 Yunyan87 NC71 K326 云烟87 Yunyan87 红大Hongda
香气特性（40）
Aroma characteristic		 本香Aroma（10） 7.90a 7.92a 7.88a 8.03a 8.25a 8.00a
香气量Aroma volume（15） 12.92a 12.81a 12.85a 12.72a 13.09a 13.00a
香气质Aroma quality（15） 12.81a 12.81a 12.75a 12.91a 13.03a 12.84a
烟气特性（40）
Smoke characteristic		 浓度Concentration（10） 7.98a 8.00a 8.00a 7.88a 8.19a 8.03a
刺激性Irritancy（15） 12.81a 12.92a 12.77a 12.81a 12.91a 12.28 a
劲头Strength（5） 4.85a 4.98a 4.83a 4.78a 4.88a 4.88a
杂气Offensive taste（10） 7.44a 7.48a 7.44a 7.84a 8.03a 7.81a
口感特性（20）
Taste characteristic		 干净度Purity（10） 7.43a 7.44a 7.31a 7.75a 8.00a 7.81a
湿润感Moist feeling（5） 4.00a 4.00a 4.00a 3.94a 3.88a 3.88a
回味After taste（5） 3.67a 3.56a 3.63a 3.81a 3.72a 3.75a
感官质量（100）Smoking quality 81.81a 81.92a 81.46a 82.47a 83.97a 82.28a
产量Yield (kg/hm2) 2 595.7a 2 581.8a 2 689.4a 2 395.6a 1 964.7a 2 265.3a
产值Output (元/hm2) 54 254.6a 53 125.9a 51 931.1a 43 494.1a 38 562.8a 44 077.9a

Table 9

Effects transplanting-date,fertilization and varieties on yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco"

指标Index 因素Factors 感官质量Smoking quality 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 产值Output (元/hm2)
峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning 峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning 峨山Eshan 华宁Huaning
极差The range 移栽期Transplanting-date 1.52* 3.60** 530.7** 1 658.8** 29 862.0** 34 136.7**
施肥Fertilization 1.52* 1.91 248.0* 292.9 4 985.4 5 320.6
品种Varieties 0.46 1.69 107.6 430.9 2 323.5 5 515.1
贡献率Contribution rate(%) 移栽期Transplanting-date 43.50 50.10 59.90 69.60 80.30 75.90
施肥Fertilization 43.40 26.50 28.00 12.30 13.40 11.80
品种Varieties 13.10 23.40 12.10 18.10 6.30 12.30
[1] 刘好宝 . 清甜香烤烟质量特色成因及其关键栽培技术研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2012.
[2] 彭新辉 . 土壤和气候及其互作对湖南优质烟区烤烟品质的影响. 湖南:湖南农业大学, 2009.
[3] 李强 . 曲靖烤烟品质特征及主要生态因素对其影响的研究. 湖南:湖南农业大学, 2011.
[4] 蔡涛, 马丽征, 张春红 , 等. 卢氏烤烟移栽期与气象条件的关系分析. 气象与环境科学, 2008,31(B09):181-182.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7148.2008.z1.053
[5] 胡钟胜, 杨春江, 施旭 , 等. 烤烟不同移栽期的生育期气象条件和产量品质对比. 气象与环境学报, 2012,28(2):66-70.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2012.02.013
[6] 李新, 孔银亮, 李俊营 , 等. 平顶山市烟草移栽与气候条件分析. 气象与环境科学, 2009,32(B09):162-164.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7148.2009.z1.041
[7] 刘吉振, 张天平, 徐卫红 . 国内优质烤烟施肥研究进展. 广西农业科学, 2006,36(6):539-543.
[8] 王怀珠, 李洪勋, 田景先 . 5个烤烟品种在贵州地区的区域适应性试验.江苏农业科学, 2011(1):111-112.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.01.040
[9] 韦建玉, 金亚波, 吴峰 , 等 .烤烟品种 K326、云烟85及云烟87的适应性研究. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(6):2362-2363.
[10] 陆永恒 . 生态条件对烟叶品质影响的研究进展. 中国烟草科学, 2007,28(3):43-46.
[11] 黄忠文, 孙广玉 . 农艺措施对烤烟叶片质量的影响研究进展. 现代化农业, 2006 ( 10):14-16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0254.2005.10.002
[12] 陈前锋, 田明慧, 彭芳芳 , 等. 7个烤烟品种烟叶质量和经济性状及上部烟叶的比较研究.湖南农业科学, 2010(8):14-17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2010.15.005
[13] 梁艳萍, 刘静, 王少先 , 等. 不同烤烟品种烟叶品质特性研究.湖南农业科学, 2010(5):19-21.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2010.09.007
[14] YC/T138, 烟草及烟草制品感官评价方法, 1998.
[15] 董如何, 肖必华, 方永水 . 正交试验设计的理论分析方法及应用. 安徽建筑工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2005,12(6):103-106.
[16] 徐仲安, 王天保, 李常英 , 等. 正交试验设计法简介. 科技情报开发与经济, 2002,12(5):148-150.
[17] 张丰收, 程传策, 李伟 , 等. 品种和栽培模式及其互作对烤烟生长和主要质量性状的影响. 江西农业学报, 2012,24(4):129-134.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2012.04.039
[18] 陈钊, 魏子全, 张骞 , 等. 移栽期对烤烟品种龙江851生长规律的影响.现代化农业, 2011(8):25-28.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0254.2011.08.019
[19] 刘德玉, 李树峰, 罗德华 , 等. 移栽期对烤烟产量、质量和光合特性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2007,13(3):40-46.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2007.03.009
[20] 浦吉存, 陈坚, 李素华 . 合理利用气候资源,促进烤烟优质适产. 广西气象, 2007,27(A03):45-49.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8411.2006.z3.018
[21] 中国农业科学院烟草研究所. 中国烟草栽培学.上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2005.
[22] 易迪, 彭海峰, 屠乃美 . 施氮量及留叶数与烤烟产质量关系的研究进展. 作物研究, 2008,22(5):476-479.
[23] 丁燕芳, 杨铁钊, 李亚培 , 等. 生态与品种及其互作对烤烟多酚类物质的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2013,34(1):17-21.
[24] 李亚培, 曹景林, 程君奇 , 等. 生态与品种互作对烤烟新品系经济性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(1):193-199.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[3] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[4] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8-12.
[5] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[6] Chen He,Guiping Zheng,Haicheng Zhao,Liqiang Chen,Hongyu Li,Yandong Lü,Jiang Song. Effects of Increasing Humic Acid but Reducing Fertilization on Panicle Traits and Yield of Rice in Saline-Alkali Soil [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 129-134.
[7] Lina Jiang,Ying Yue,Jinna Li,Yawen Zhang,Yalin Zhu,Chunxi Li. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Allocation and Nitrogen Utilization after Anthesis in Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 80-86.
[8] Ge Qu,Zhengguang Chen,Xue Wang. Identification of Rice Varieties Using NIR Spectroscopy and SIMCA, PLS-DA Methods [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 166-170.
[9] Shaohui Huang,Yunma Yang,Ketong Liu,Junfang Yang,Suli Xing,Yanming Sun,Liangliang Jia. Effects of Different Fertilization Method on Wheat Yield and Fertilizer Contribution Rate in Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 113-117.
[10] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141-146.
[11] Li Song,Wanyou Liao,Yejun Wang,Youjian Su,Yongli Zhang,Yi Luo,Jun Liao,Weiguo Wu. Research Progress in Intercropping Upland Crops with Green Manure [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 7-11.
[12] Changhai Zhang. The Grain Filling Characteristics of Large Panicle Mid-Season Indica Hybrid Rice Influenced by Different Weather [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 109-119.
[13] Haihua Luo,Deyi Shao,Gong Chen,Xiumin Xu,Xin Gao,Changkai Yuan,Jinjian Peng,Feiyu Tang. Comparative Analysis of Trait Correlation between Conventional Varieties (Lines) and Hybrids of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 31-37.
[14] Ruifeng Guo,Yongfu Zhang,Yuemei Ren,Zhong Yang. Effects of Saline-Alkali Stress on Millet Germination and Shoots Growth and Saline-Alkali Tolerance Variety Screening [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 63-66.
[15] Zheng Yan,Xiaohong Zhang,Zhengrong Wang. Application of Grey Multidimensional Relation Analysis in Evaluation of Purple Sweet Potato Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 58-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .