Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 23-28.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Combining Ability and Genetic Parameters of Ear Characters of Ten Maize Inbred Lines

Lu Bingsheng,Gao Hongmin,Yao Yongxiang,Bai Xiangli,Chen Zengqi   

  1. Dandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Fengcheng 118109,Liaoning,China
  • Received:2017-01-03 Revised:2017-02-08 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Hongmin Gao

Abstract:

Seven new female maize inbred lines were tested with the design of P1×P2 incomplete diallel crossing of NCⅡ method to study on combining ability and genetic parameters of ear characters. The results showed that the lines of K6, X69, X18 and XLL had higher common combining ability, which could be used directly. The combinations of XLL×K6 and X69×K6 with stronger heterosis had potential in increasing yield. Based on the analysis of genetic parameters, ear length, ear rows, row grains, 100-kernel weight, and percentage of kernel weight in ear weight should be selected earlier, and yield, ear diameter and bald should be selected earlier or later according to situation.

Key words: Maize, Inbred lines, Ear characters, Combining ability, Heritability

Table 1

The variance analysis of 8 traits (F value)"

变异来源
Source of variation
自由度
df
穗长
Ear length
秃尖长
Bar tip length
穗粗
Ear diameter
穗行数
Kernel row
number per ear
行粒数
Kernel number
per row
百粒重
100-kernel
weight
出子率(%)
Grain index
小区产量
Plot yield
区组间 2 2.8199 0.9738 2.6276 10.8195** 0.4393 0.3083 3.8708* 1.7029
组合间 20 506.8630** 27.0787** 8.4499** 482.4875** 2 045.5656** 1 011.6921** 130.9094** 69.7105**
P1 6 1.7102 1.2441 1.1539 8.4325** 1.9048 2.9180 11.5960** 1.2881
P2 2 8.0369** 1.1242 4.6269* 12.9189** 6.4009* 6.3564* 5.6695* 14.7801**
P1×P2 12 264.4402** 24.9424** 5.9977** 109.1197** 1 129.1958** 479.2367** 28.1783** 28.2864**
误差 40

Table 2

The relative effect value of general combining ability of 8 traits of 10 inbred lines"

自交系
Inbred line
穗长
Ear length
秃尖长
Bar tip length
穗粗
Ear diameter
穗行数
Kernel row number per ear
行粒数
Kernel number per row
百粒重
100-kernel weight
出子率
Grain index
小区产量
Plot yield
CA6 15.287 -22.956 -3.448 -16.528 15.550 12.957 -5.093 -19.819
DKM -5.893 51.887 -2.178 0.153 -8.500 -7.846 2.576 0.028
6ML -4.590 -27.359 -1.119 3.953 -4.428 -8.771 -3.339 -3.487
X18 3.035 91.509 -0.907 11.541 -3.603 -0.024 3.207 7.797
X69 -1.592 -40.566 0.998 1.304 2.501 -0.829 1.579 14.120
X96 -7.914 -33.962 3.751 3.959 -6.466 1.522 0.482 -5.189
XLL 1.667 -18.554 2.904 -4.381 4.946 2.991 0.588 6.550
D59 -9.980 -31.132 -1.633 1.793 -6.726 -7.796 -0.731 -19.778
K6 11.945 -0.943 -2.359 -7.808 11.529 1.909 1.627 27.466
S12 -1.964 32.076 3.993 6.015 -4.803 5.886 -0.897 -7.688

Table 3

The relative effect value of special combining ability of 8 traits of 21 combinations"

组合
Combination
穗长
Ear length
秃尖长
Bar tip length
穗粗
Ear diameter
穗行数
Kernel row number per ear
行粒数
Kernel number per row
百粒重
100-kernel weight
出子率
Grain index
小区产量
Plot yield
CA6×D59 -6.769 -45.912 0.363 1.255 -0.604 -5.160 0.223 -17.024
DKM×D59 7.960 -1.887 5.445 2.766 -0.407 10.896 -0.297 12.378
6ML×D59 2.747 83.962 -5.777 -5.587 1.625 -4.591 1.197 1.349
X18×D59 -2.141 -21.698 3.539 5.036 -8.972 1.063 -2.397 5.885
X69×D59 -5.139 -28.302 -2.178 -2.938 0.208 0.082 1.757 3.305
X96×D59 1.182 -34.906 -1.119 1.255 6.118 -2.122 0.210 6.452
XLL×D59 2.160 48.742 -0.272 -1.787 2.032 -0.167 -0.692 -12.346
CA6×K6 17.643 122.013 -1.452 -2.821 10.477 5.255 -1.495 20.365
DKM×K6 -2.821 -12.264 -5.898 -8.120 5.182 -3.989 1.601 -14.622
6ML×K6 -14.682 -71.698 4.477 8.567 -11.729 -0.709 -0.862 -20.207
X18×K6 -4.711 -32.076 -1.452 0.979 -2.763 -11.516 0.822 -17.968
X69×K6 7.541 -58.491 6.171 3.249 8.853 -0.294 -1.524 8.968
X96×K6 -7.839 -12.264 -2.299 -2.821 -15.204 8.126 1.272 1.738
XLL×K6 4.869 64.780 0.454 0.967 5.185 3.127 0.185 21.726
CA6×S12 -10.874 -76.101 1.089 1.566 -9.873 -0.095 1.271 -3.342
DKM×S12 -5.139 14.151 0.454 5.354 -4.775 -6.907 -1.304 2.244
6ML×S12 11.936 -12.264 1.301 -2.980 10.105 5.300 -0.335 18.859
X18×S12 6.852 53.774 -2.087 -6.015 11.735 10.454 1.575 12.082
X69×S12 -2.402 86.793 -3.993 -0.312 -9.061 0.212 -0.234 -12.273
X96×S12 6.657 47.170 3.418 1.566 9.086 -6.004 -1.482 -8.190
XLL×S12 -7.029 -113.522 -0.182 0.820 -7.217 -2.960 0.507 -9.381

Table 4

The rank of general combining ability effect, effect value of special combining ability and yield"

组合
Combination
Duncan's多重比较的显著水平
Significance level of Duncan's multiple comparisons
一般配合力
General combining ability
特殊配合力
Special combining ability
总配合力
Total combining ability
小区产量
Plot yield (kg)
5%
1%
排名
Rank
母本
Female
父本
Male
效应值
Effect value
排名
Rank
效应值
Effect value
排名
rank
XLL×K6 6.10 a A 1 6.55 27.47 21.73 1 55.74 1
X69×K6 5.90 a A 2 14.12 27.47 8.97 6 50.55 2
CA6×K6 5.02 b B 3 -19.82 27.47 20.37 2 28.01 3
X96×K6 4.86 bc BC 4 -5.19 27.47 1.74 11 24.01 4
X18×K6 4.60 cd BCD 5 7.80 27.47 -17.97 20 17.30 5
DKM×K6 4.42 de CDE 6 0.03 27.47 -14.62 18 12.87 6
X18×S12 4.40 de CDE 7 7.80 -7.69 12.08 5 12.19 7
6ML×S12 4.22 de DEF 8 -3.49 -7.69 18.86 3 7.68 8
6ML×K6 4.07 ef EFG 9 -3.49 27.47 -20.21 21 3.77 9
X69×D59 3.83 fg FGH 10 14.12 -19.78 3.31 9 -2.35 10
DKM×S12 3.71 fg FGHI 11 0.03 -7.69 2.24 10 -5.42 11
X69×S12 3.69 fg GHI 12 14.12 -7.69 -12.27 16 -5.84 12
X18×D59 3.68 fg GHI 13 7.80 -19.78 5.89 8 -6.10 13
DKM×D59 3.63 g GHI 14 0.03 -19.78 12.38 4 -7.37 14
XLL×S12 3.51 gh HIJ 15 6.55 -7.69 -9.38 15 -10.52 15
X96×D59 3.19 hi IJK 16 -5.19 -19.78 6.45 7 -18.51 16
X96×S12 3.09 ij JK 17 -5.19 -7.69 -8.19 14 -21.07 17
6ML×D59 3.06 ij JK 18 -3.49 -19.78 1.35 12 -21.92 18
XLL×D59 2.92 ij K 19 6.55 -19.78 -12.35 17 -25.57 19
CA6×S12 2.71 j K 20 -19.82 -7.69 -3.34 13 -30.85 20
CA6×D59 1.70 k L 21 -19.82 -19.78 -17.02 19 -56.62 21

Table 5

The genetic parameters of 8 traits"

遗传参数
Genetic parameter
穗长
Ear length
秃尖长
Bar tip length
穗粗
Ear diameter
穗行数
Kernel row
number per ear
行粒数
Kernel number
per row
百粒重
100-kernel
weight
出子率
Grain index
小区产量
Plot yield
σ2P1 0.738 0.013 0.003 2.080 3.551 4.027 5.743 0.042
σ2P2 3.132 0.003 0.026 1.430 9.085 4.819 1.085 0.862
σ2P1×P2 3.104 0.152 0.042 0.832 11.765 6.285 1.568 0.423
Ve 0.035 0.019 0.025 0.023 0.031 0.039 0.173 0.047
Vg(%) 55.49 9.36 40.60 80.84 51.79 58.46 81.32 68.16
Vs(%) 44.51 90.64 59.40 19.16 48.21 41.54 18.68 31.84
hb2(%) 99.50 89.80 73.71 99.47 99.87 99.74 97.98 96.62
hn2(%) 55.21 8.40 29.92 80.41 51.72 58.31 79.68 65.85
[1] 杨爱国, 张世煌, 李明顺 , 等. CIMMYT和中国玉米种质群体的配合力及杂种优势分析. 作物学报, 2006,32(9):1329-1337.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.09.011
[2] 陈彦惠, 张世煌, 吴连成 , 等. 中国主要玉米改良群体杂种优势组合模式的初步评价. 华北农学报, 2002,17(4):30-36.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2002.04.008
[3] 吴景锋 . 我国主要玉米杂交种种质基础评述.中国农业科学, 1983(2):1-8.
[4] 曾三省 . 中国玉米杂交种的种质基础. 中国农业科学, 1990,23(4):1-9.
[5] 王懿波, 王振华, 王永普 , 等. 中国玉米主要种质杂种优势群划分与利用. 华北农学报, 1998,13(1):74-80.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1998.01.015
[6] 王懿波, 王振华, 王永普 , 等. 中国玉米主要种质杂交优势利用模式研究. 中国农业科学, 1997,30(4):16-24.
[7] 王懿波, 王振华, 王永普 , 等. 中国玉米主要种质的改良与杂优模式的利用. 玉米科学, 1999,7(1):1-8.
[8] 张天真 . 作物育种学总论.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[9] 邵红雨, 韩登旭 , 阿布来提·阿布拉,等.早熟玉米自交系配合力分析及应用评价. 新疆农业科学, 2010,47(1):54-58.
[10] 刘纪麟, 徐尚忠, 熊秀珠 , 等. 玉米育种学.北京: 农业出版社, 1991: 160-198.
[11] 叶雨盛, 曾桂萍, 李哲 , 等. 19个玉米自交系主要数量性状配合力分析. 玉米科学, 2007,15(Z1):86-89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2007.z1.043
[12] 左淑珍, 许崇香, 王红霞 , 等. 8个玉米自交系配合力分析及应用评价. 玉米科学, 2005,13(2):39-41,44.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2005.02.012
[13] 石海春, 李莹, 柯永培 , 等. 玉米远缘选系主要性状的遗传及配合力分析. 玉米科学, 2011,19(1):14-20.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Su Guihua, Li Chunlei, Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties#br# by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[5] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[6] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149-153.
[7] Shaokun Li,Wanxu Zhang,Keru Wang,Wanbing Yu,Yongsheng Chen,Dongsheng Han,Xiaoxia Yang,Chaowei Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Yizhou Wang,Fenghe Liu,Jianglu Chen,Jingjing Yang,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Selection of High Yield Maize Cultivars Suitable for Dense Planting and Grain Mechanical Harvesting in North of Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 62-68.
[8] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[9] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[10] Shaokun Li,Keru Wang,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. The Quality of Mechanical Harvesting Maize Grain and Its Influencing Factors in Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 162-167.
[11] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[12] Lei Shi,Guohong Wang,Yanbo Wang,Dawei Wang,Haiyan Zhao. Preliminary Study on Grain Dehydration Rate of Maize Hybrids and Their Parents [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 84-89.
[13] Keru Wang,Shaokun Li,Yanbo Wang,Haiyan Zhao,Yuzhong Shen,Dandan Cai,Wanxin Xiao,Wenye Jiang,Zhaofu Huang,Lichao Zhai,Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Peng Hou,Bo Ming. Screening Maize Varieties Suitable for Mechanical Harvesting Grain in the Central Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 97-102.
[14] Lulu Li,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Bo Ming,Peng Hou,Shaokun Li. Effects of Peeling Husk on Grain Dehydration of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 114-117.
[15] Rui Li,Jianrong Bai,Xiuhong Wang,Congzhuo Zhang,Xiaomei Zhang,Lei Yan,Ruijuan Yang. Population Genetic Diversity of 144 Sweet Maizes [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 17-24.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .