Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 49-54.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.03.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison Study on the Yield Components and Quality of Different Sugarcane Varieties (Lines)

Tan Qinliang1,2,Zhu Pengjin1,2,Cheng Qin1,2,Li Jiahui1,2,Lü Ping1,2,Pang Xinhua1,2,Zhou Quanguang1,2   

  1. 1 Guangxi Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China
    2 Sugarcane Research Institute for Guangxi State Farms, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2018-10-08 Revised:2019-04-12 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Xinhua Pang

RichHTML

13

PDF (PC)

579

Abstract:

In this experiment, ROC22 was used as the control (CK), and nine sugarcane varieties (lines) were tested in the field for plant cane and first ratoon. The agronomic traits, stress resistance and yield traits were investigated and comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that there were six varieties (lines) that increased yield and increased sugar content compared with CK. Among them, the indexes of rate of tillering, rate of perennial root sprout, sugarcane yield, sugar content and effective productive stalk had obvious advantages with CK on Guire 2 and Liangzhe 02-186. The Dead heart rate and tip rot rate of Funong 41 was the highest. The sucrose contents of Liangzhe 07-53, Liangzhe 03-23 and Liangzhe 03-81 were lower, and there was not much difference among other sugarcane varieties (lines). Guire 2, Liangzhe 02-186, and Guitang 42 had excellent performance in yield and total sugar content therefore they are suitable for large-scale demonstration and promotion in Nanning, Guangxi or climate similar sugarcane area.

Key words: Sugarcane, Agronomic trait, Yield component, Comparison test

Table 1

Comparison of main agronomic traits in the different sugarcane varieties (lines)"

品种(系)
Variety (line)		 萌芽率(%)
Germination rate		 发株率(%)
Ratoon germination rate		 分蘖率(%)
Tillering rate		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎径(cm)
Stalk diameter		 有效茎数(条/hm2)
Available cane (tiao/hm2)
ROC22 (CK) 35.85d 111.00c 89.57bc 292ab 2.53d 56 985e
桂热2号Guire 2 55.77abc 136.07ab 116.93ab 302a 2.67abc 81 195a
凉蔗02-186 Liangzhe 02-186 48.67bc 135.66ab 118.10ab 288b 2.62cd 72 225c
桂糖46号Guitang 46 58.15ab 73.94e 52.96c 275cd 2.76ab 58 965de
凉蔗07-53 Liangzhe 07-53 53.11abc 112.01c 114.08ab 286bc 2.67abc 76 065b
凉蔗03-23 Liangzhe 03-23 49.56bc 129.66b 81.83bc 271d 2.71abc 59 565de
凉蔗03-81 Liangzhe 03-81 46.96bc 140.73a 139.08a 263d 2.66bc 77 220b
桂糖42号Guitang 42 62.52a 73.94e 55.11c 304a 2.80a 58 335de
福农41号Funong 41 45.00cd 84.89d 86.18bc 266d 2.69abc 48 405f
桂柳05-136 Guiliu 05-136 54.89abc 79.71de 53.04c 298ab 2.74abc 61 305d

Table 2

The field performance of the main diseases and insect pests in the different sugarcane varieties (lines)"

品种(系)
Variety (line)		 枯心苗率(%)
Dead heart rate		 黑穗病率(%)
Smut disease rate		 梢腐病率(%)
Tip rot rate		 抗花叶病能力
Mosaic disease resistance		 蓟马危害情况
Thrips hazard situation		 抗倒伏能力
Lodging resistance
ROC22 (CK) 3.34ab 3.14a 1.58b 中 重 中
桂热2号Guire 2 2.57b 0.13b 0.36b 强 轻微 中
凉蔗02-186 Liangzhe 02-186 2.43b 0.14b 1.38b 强 轻微 中
桂糖46号Guitang 46 1.90b 0.22b 1.78b 强 轻微 强
凉蔗07-53 Liangzhe 07-53 2.12b 0.71b 1.89b 中 重 弱
凉蔗03-23 Liangzhe 03-23 4.90a 0.40b 1.09b 中 轻微 弱
凉蔗03-81 Liangzhe 03-81 2.03b 0.61b 1.26b 中 轻微 弱
桂糖42号Guitang 42 4.98a 0.73b 0.88b 强 轻微 中
福农41号Funong 41 4.39a 0.79b 4.40a 中 重 弱
桂柳05-136 Guiliu 05-136 4.59a 0.39b 3.49a 强 轻微 强

Table 3

Comparison of stalk height and growth speed in the different sugarcane varieties (lines)"

品种(系)
Variety (line)		 株高Stalk height (cm) 月生长速度Growth speed per month (cm)
7月
Jul.		 8月
Aug.		 9月
Sep.		 10月
Oct.		 11月
Nov.		 12月
Dec.		 7月
Jul.		 8月
Aug		 9月
Sep.		 10月
Oct.		 11月
Nov.
ROC22 (CK) 128.0 198.0 226.8 256.0 277.9 290.5 70.0 28.8 29.2 21.9 12.7
桂热2号Guire 2 137.7 205.8 238.9 265.5 280.9 297.4 68.1 33.1 26.6 15.4 16.6
凉蔗02-186 Liangzhe 02-186 127.9 194.0 217.1 253.6 269.5 281.4 66.2 23.2 36.5 15.9 11.9
桂糖46号Guitang 46 114.0 189.6 209.8 235.6 256.7 267.1 75.6 20.2 25.8 21.1 10.5
凉蔗07-53 Liangzhe 07-53 123.7 185.3 207.3 237.4 248.4 256.3 61.6 22.1 30.1 11.0 7.9
凉蔗03-23 Liangzhe 03-23 119.7 196.8 216.8 238.4 247.7 255.3 77.1 20.0 21.7 9.3 7.6
凉蔗03-81 Liangzhe 03-81 113.5 176.7 203.7 223.9 236.0 246.1 63.2 27.0 20.2 12.2 10.1
桂糖42号Guitang 42 127.0 198.9 223.3 253.5 276.7 290.1 71.9 24.4 30.2 23.2 13.5
福农41号Funong 41 117.9 177.3 201.0 220.4 231.9 244.3 59.4 23.8 19.4 11.5 12.5
桂柳05-136 Guiliu 05-136 116.5 188.3 218.5 245.0 258.9 275.5 71.8 30.3 26.5 13.9 16.6

Table 4

Comparison of sucrose content in the different sugarcane varieties (lines) %"

品种（系）Variety (line) 11月Nov. 12月Dec. 1月Jan. 2月Feb. 11-2月平均November to February average ±CK
ROC22(CK) 12.99 13.93 13.65 14.89 13.87 -
桂热2号Guire 2 11.17 13.61 13.88 14.56 13.31 -0.56
凉蔗02-186 Liangzhe 02-186 11.21 14.39 14.10 14.85 13.64 -0.23
桂糖46号Guitang 46 12.25 14.13 14.75 16.04 14.29 0.43
凉蔗07-53 Liangzhe 07-53 8.68 11.74 11.77 14.13 11.58 -2.29
凉蔗03-23 Liangzhe 03-23 10.80 13.20 12.88 14.38 12.82 -1.05
凉蔗03-81 Liangzhe 03-81 9.43 12.24 11.98 14.24 11.97 -1.89
桂糖42号Guitang 42 13.82 15.40 15.22 16.55 15.25 1.38
福农41号Funong 41 13.98 15.21 15.09 16.80 15.27 1.41
桂柳05-136 Guiliu 05-136 14.05 15.18 14.98 15.17 14.85 0.98

Table 5

Comparison of sugarcane stem yield and sugar content in the different sugarcane varieties (lines)"

品种(系)
Variety (line)		 蔗茎产量(kg/hm2)
Sugarcane
stem yield		 与CK相比(%)
Compared with
the CK		 蔗茎产量排名
The ranking of
sugarcane stem yield		 含糖量
(kg/hm2)
Sugar content		 与CK相比(%)
Compared
with the CK		 含糖量排名
The ranking of
sugar content
ROC22 (CK) 86 775 - 7 12 105 - 7
桂热2号Guire 2 117 975 +35.96 1 16 410 +35.59 1
凉蔗02-186 Liangzhe 02-186 97 140 +11.95 3 13 785 +13.89 3
桂糖46号Guitang 46 86 385 -0.45 8 12 960 +7.06 5
凉蔗07-53 Liangzhe 07-53 105 045 +21.06 2 12 585 +3.97 6
凉蔗03-23 Liangzhe 03-23 78 915 -9.06 9 10 125 -16.36 9
凉蔗03-81 Liangzhe 03-81 94 500 +8.90 4 11 145 -7.93 8
桂糖42号Guitang 42 91 680 +5.65 5 14 055 +16.11 2
福农41号Funong 41 57 390 -33.86 10 8 385 -30.73 10
桂柳05-136 Guiliu 05-136 88 590 +2.09 6 13 260 +9.54 4
[1] 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛 . 20世纪90年代以来我国甘蔗产业和科技的新发展. 西南农业学报, 2009,22(5):1469-1476.
[2] 韦昌联 . 广西蔗区新台糖22号种性退化现状分析及对策措施. 南方农业科学, 2012,43(12):2113-2117.
[3] 贺贵柏, 覃振强, 黄文武 , 等. 广西蔗区优良甘蔗品种多系布局的途径探讨. 甘蔗糖业, 2015(1):61-64.
[4] 邓宇驰, 王伦旺, 韦金凡 , 等. 广西蔗区甘蔗品种结构优化的途径及思考. 种子, 2018,5(37):110-112.
[5] 王维赞, 何红, 朱秋珍 , 等. 甘蔗引进新品种种性比较试验初报. 广西农业科学, 2009,40(12):1533-1537.
[6] 覃耀冠, 周忠凤, 周颀 , 等. 广西甘蔗新品种区试柳州点7个甘蔗新品种DTOPSIS法综合评价. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(6):938-943.
[7] 徐林, 刘晓静, 庞华莒 . 广西甘蔗品种比较试验. 安徽农业科学, 2017,45(10):25-28.
[8] 甘崇琨, 陈荣发, 范业赓 , 等. 桂糖系列甘蔗新品种(系)比较试验. 中国糖料, 2018,40(1):30-32.
[9] 李少游, 王世称 . 广西特色经济分析与确认研究. 经济地理, 2005(1):60-63.
[10] 潘海利, 梁健爱 . 基于钻石模型广西制糖业竞争力分析. 广西轻工业, 2009(1):117-118,46.
[11] 李翔, 王伦旺, 唐仕云 , 等. 2012-2013年广西甘蔗品种区域试验初报. 广东农业科学, 2014(10):5-13.
[12] 李杨瑞 . 现代甘蔗栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010: 14-20.
[13] 黄文武, 李文教, 贺贵柏 , 等. 2011-2012年广西甘蔗品种区试百色试点报告. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(2):194-199.
[14] 李翔, 王伦旺, 唐仕云 , 等. 2012-2013年广西甘蔗品种区域试验初报. 广东农业科学, 2014(10):5-8,13.
[15] 王伦旺, 廖江雄, 谭芳 , 等. 高产高糖抗倒伏甘蔗新品种桂糖42号的选育及高产栽培技术. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(8):1361-1366.
[16] 邓宇驰, 王伦旺, 林善海 , 等. 甘蔗新品种桂糖46号的丰产性及稳产性分析. 种子, 2017,36(11):109-111.
[17] 吕日华, 陆辉德 . 甘蔗新品种桂柳05-136昌菱蔗区引种表现及栽培措施. 农技服务, 2016(6):38-39.
[18] 陈燕丽, 冯利平, 丁美花 , 等. 气象因子对广西新植蔗和宿根蔗茎伸长的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(4):583-590.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00583
[19] 庞新华, 朱鹏锦, 周全光 , 等. 广西蔗区引进甘蔗品种(系)的比较试验. 作物杂志, 2016(2):73-78.
[20] 陆中华 . 甘蔗产量构成因素与产量的关系. 种子, 2002(3):38-39,65.
[1] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29-36.
[2] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[3] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[4] Xiaoming Wang,Dacheng Li,Zhengda Liao,Yuanchu Gan,Huixiu Chen,Xide Su,Zenglin Wei. Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 50-55.
[5] Ruiyu Ren,Jihong He,Kongjun Dong,Lei Zhang,Tianpeng Liu,Tianyu Yang. Analysis on Suitable Sowing Date of Four Main Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet in Huining, Gansu [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 152-158.
[6] Di Yining,Liu Lufeng,Xie Linyan,Li Yongmei,He Pengfei,Cui Wenyan,Li Fusheng,He Lilian. Identification and Characterization of a Phosphate-Solubilizing Endophyte from Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 68-75.
[7] Wang Lei,Zhang Xiangping,Li Runxi,Niu Xiaoxia,Yang Shimei,Yan Zongshan,Zhang Ziqiang. Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[8] Zhang Ruidong,Cao Xiong,Yue Zhongxiao,Liang Xiaohong,Liu Jing,Huang Minjia. Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[9] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[10] Haibin Luo, Shengli Jiang, Chengmei Huang, Huiqing Cao, Zhinian Deng, Kaichao Wu, Lin Xu, Zhen Lu, Yuanwen Wei. Cloning and Expression of ScHAK10 Gene in Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 53-61.
[11] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131-137.
[12] Bin Zhang,Jinxiu Li,Zhen Wang,Hao Feng,Jinbang Li. Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Wheat Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 57-60.
[13] Maolin Yue,Weirong Xue,Ruidong Zhang,Zhongxiao Yue,RuiZhou Lü,Pengyan Guo. Effects of Different Row Spaces on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 93-96.
[14] Junshuai Lu,Yunxiang Li,Xingfu Wang,Guohua Gao,Xia Yang,Jing Liang. Effects of High-Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Maize Varieties in Yellow River Irrigation Areas of Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 97-102.
[15] Ruixin Zhang,Tianbao Ren,Zhe Zhao,Gang Wen,Mingqin Zhao. Effects of Transplanting Date on Quality and Main Economic Characters of Cigar in Five Fingers Group [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 148-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yudong Fang,Tianfu Han. Research Progress in Speed Breeding of Crops[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 1 -7 .
[2] Zhang Meng,Gou Jiulan,Wei Quanquan,Chen Long,He Jiafang. Effects of Different Biological Organic Fertilizers on the Growth of Spring Potato and Soil Fertility at High Altitude Region in Guizhou Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 132 -136 .
[3] Fu Jing,Sun Ningning,Liu Tianxue,Ma Junfeng,Yang Yulong,Zhao Xia,Mu Xinyuan,Li Chaohai. The Effects of High Temperature at Spike Stage on Grain-Filling Physiology and Yield of Maize[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 118 -125 .
[4] Quan Baoquan,Lü Ruizhou,Wang Guijiang,Ren Jiecheng. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures during Vegetative Propagation on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 158 -161 .
[5] Lu Shouping,Zhang Hua,Meng Zhaodong,Mu Chunhua. Improvement of Grain Oil Content in Maize Inbred Lines by Molecular Markering Technology[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 24 -28 .
[6] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29 -36 .
[7] Ma Mingchuan,Liu Longlong,Zhang Lijun,Cui Lin,Zhou Jianping. Morphological Identification and Analysis of EMS-Induced Mutants from Ciqiao[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 37 -41 .
[8] Fan Huiling,Bai Shengwen,Zhu Xuefeng,Li Zhenzhou,Qin Minggang,He Zhijun. Difference of Salt-Alkaline Tolerance of Three Rape and Its Two Relatives at Germination Stage[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 178 -184 .
[9] Ye Wenbin,He Yupeng,Wang Yu,Wang Han,Zhao Qingfang. Effects of Alkalized Olive Oil Processing Liquid Wastes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Zea mays L.[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 185 -191 .
[10] Wang Yonggang,Ji Mingze,Zhao Xuhan,Yu Lihe,Xue Yingwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 106 -111 .