Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 52-56.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.02.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Grey Correlation Analysis of Introduced Tartary Buckwheat in the Northern Shanxi

Jin Jiangang(), Tian Zaifang()   

  1. Youyu Experimental Station, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Youyu 037200, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2020-06-10 Revised:2020-08-03 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-04-16
  • Contact: Tian Zaifang E-mail:sxyyjjg@126.com;sxyytzf@126.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

202

Abstract:

The main agronomic traits of twelve tartary buckwheat varieties were analyzed by using the grey correlative system. The results showed that the tartary buckwheat varieties of Jinqiao5, Xianmaxuan 1, KQ-1-6, Xinong 9909, and Yunku 5 had better production performance compared with the other varieties. The weights of tested agronomic traits in the grey correlative analysis were ordered as growth period > primary branch number > plant height > primary stalk pitch number > 1000-seed weight > yield. The scientific evidence for introducing and developing tartary buckwheat production in Northern Shanxi was provided by these results.

Key words: Tartary buckwheat, Introduction, Agronomic traits, Grey correlation analysis

Table 1

Sources and varieties (materials) of buckwheat in the experiment"

品种编号
Variety
number		 品种
Variety		 来源
Source
x1 西农9909 西北农林科技大学农学院
x2 冼马选1号 中国农业科学院
x3 定苦荞1号 定西市农业科学研究院
x4 通苦1号 内蒙古通辽市农业科学研究院
x5 KQ-1-6 西北农林科技大学农学院
x6 云苦5号 云南省农业科学院生物技术研究所
x7 晋荞5号 山西省农业科学院高粱研究所
x8 J406-1 山西省农业科学院右玉农业试验站
x9 广苦2号 山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所
x10 黔苦5号 贵州省威宁农业科学研究所
x11 昭苦4号 云南省昭通市农业科学研究所
x12 黑丰1号 山西省农业科学院品种资源研究所

Table 2

The agronomic characteristics of both standard variety and tested varieties"

品种编号
Variety number		 生育期
Growth
period (d)		 株高
Plant
height (cm)		 主茎分枝数
Primary branch
number		 主茎节数
Primary stalk
pitch number		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)
x0 112 171.5 14.7 19.9 23.2 2850
x1 103 167.3 14.2 19.8 18.4 1950
x2 107 171.5 13.8 17.9 23.2 2200
x3 102 142.5 11.4 17.6 18.6 2175
x4 102 152.5 13.1 10.4 19.1 2375
x5 105 156.4 13.2 16.7 21.4 2850
x6 103 149.2 14.1 18.2 19.3 2575
x7 112 131.5 14.7 19.9 22.7 2825
x8 108 157.2 12.1 16.9 18.7 2700
x9 105 149.1 12.2 18.1 17.1 1600
x10 102 159.7 11.3 18.7 18.2 2450
x11 109 151.6 12.6 17.2 9.3 1475
x12 98 124.7 13.3 14.5 20.2 2075
均值Mean 104.7 151.1 13.0 17.2 18.9 2270.8
标准差Standard deviation 3.8 13.4 1.1 2.6 3.5 447.3
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 3.7 8.9 8.5 15.0 18.7 19.7

Table 3

Dimensionless treatment of original data"

品种编号
Variety number		 生育期
Growth period		 株高
Plant height		 主茎分枝数
Primary branch number		 主茎节数
Primary stalk pitch number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 产量
Yield
x0 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
x1 0.9196 0.9755 0.9660 0.9950 0.7931 0.6842
x2 0.9554 1.0000 0.9388 0.8995 1.0000 0.7719
x3 0.9107 0.8309 0.7755 0.8844 0.8017 0.7632
x4 0.9107 0.8892 0.8912 0.5226 0.8233 0.8333
x5 0.9375 0.9120 0.8980 0.8392 0.9224 1.0000
x6 0.9196 0.8700 0.9592 0.9146 0.8319 0.9035
x7 1.0000 0.7668 1.0000 1.0000 0.9784 0.9912
x8 0.9643 0.9166 0.8231 0.8492 0.8060 0.9474
x9 0.9375 0.8694 0.8299 0.9095 0.7371 0.5614
x10 0.9107 0.9312 0.7687 0.9397 0.7845 0.8596
x11 0.9732 0.8840 0.8571 0.8643 0.4009 0.5175
x12 0.8750 0.7271 0.9048 0.7286 0.8707 0.7281

Table 4

Grey correlation coefficients of tested varieties"

关联系数
Correlation coefficient		 生育期
Growth period		 株高
Plant height		 主茎分枝数
Primary branch number		 主茎节数
Primary stalk pitch number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 产量
Yield
ξ1 0.7885 0.9244 0.8980 0.9835 0.5915 0.4868
ξ2 0.8703 1.0000 0.8303 0.7488 1.0000 0.5678
ξ3 0.7704 0.6392 0.5716 0.7216 0.6017 0.5585
ξ4 0.7704 0.7300 0.7335 0.3856 0.6290 0.6425
ξ5 0.8274 0.7729 0.7459 0.6507 0.7943 1.0000
ξ6 0.7885 0.6973 0.8801 0.7781 0.6406 0.7564
ξ7 1.0000 0.5622 1.0000 1.0000 0.9329 0.9716
ξ8 0.8935 0.7823 0.6288 0.6652 0.6070 0.8506
ξ9 0.8274 0.6964 0.6379 0.7681 0.5326 0.4058
ξ10 0.7704 0.8132 0.5643 0.8324 0.5816 0.6810
ξ11 0.9179 0.7208 0.6771 0.6883 0.3333 0.3831
ξ12 0.7056 0.5233 0.7588 0.5247 0.6985 0.5242

Table 5

Correlation degrees and weights of agronomic charateristics of tested varieties"

参数
Parameter		 生育期
Growth period		 株高
Plant height		 主茎分枝数
Primary branch number		 主茎节数
Primary stalk pitch number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 产量
Yield
gi 0.8275 0.7385 0.7439 0.7289 0.6619 0.6523
ωi 0.1901 0.1697 0.1709 0.1674 0.1521 0.1499

Table 6

Weighted relevancy values of tested varieties (g′i)"

品种编号
Variety number		 品种
Variety		 加权关联度
Weighted relevancy value		 排名
Rank
x1 西农9909 0.7878 4
x2 冼马选1号 0.8395 2
x3 定苦荞1号 0.6486 10
x4 通苦1号 0.6521 9
x5 KQ-1-6 0.7955 3
x6 云苦5号 0.7596 5
x7 晋荞5号 0.9113 1
x8 J406-1 0.7412 6
x9 广苦2号 0.6548 8
x10 黔苦5号 0.7107 7
x11 昭苦4号 0.6358 11
x12 黑丰1号 0.6252 12
[1] 赵刚, 唐宇, 王安虎. 苦荞麦的成分功能研究与开发应用. 四川农业大学学报, 2001(19):355-358.
[2] 杨克理. 我国荞麦种质资源研究现状与展望. 作物品种资源, 1995,5(3):10-13.
[3] 赵丽娟, 张宗文, 黎裕, 等. 苦荞种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2006,7(2):159-164.
[4] 韩启秀. 运用灰色关联度对山东小麦新品种(系)综合表现的评价. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(2):312-314.
[5] 郑敏娜, 李荫藩, 梁秀芝, 等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价. 草地学报, 2014,22(3):631-637.
[6] 柳延涛, 王友德, 陈树斌, 等. 新疆绿洲甜玉米灰色关联度综合评价. 湖北农业科学, 2010,49(9):2082-2084.
[7] 解云, 郭世华. 谷子品种农艺性状的灰色关联度分析及综合评价. 分子植物育种. [2020-04-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20200416.1317.008.html.
[8] 曹鹏鹏, 田艺心, 高凤菊. 鲁西北地区间作大豆/玉米品种组合综合性状的灰色关联度分析. 大豆科学, 2020,39(3):414-421.
[9] 周启龙, 多吉顿珠, 益西央宗. 拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价. 草地学报, 2020,28(2):389-396.
[10] 尚宏. 苦荞在内蒙古呼和浩特地区引种试验研究. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
[11] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统基本方法. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1988.
[12] 梁天刚, 蒋文兰, 樊晓冬. 北大营示范场黑麦草引种与品比试验研究. 草业学报, 2001,12(4):77-84.
[13] 杨曌, 张新全, 李向林, 等. 应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能. 草业学报, 2009,18(5):67-72.
[14] 汪燕芬, 田俊明, 詹和明, 等. 云南省玉米杂交种产量和产量构成因素的灰色关联度分析. 西南农业学报, 2008,21(4):925-928.
[15] 潘凡, 石桃雄, 陈其皎, 等. 苦荞种质主要农业性状的变异及其对单株粒重的贡献研究. 植物科学学报, 2015,33(6):829-839.
[16] 李春花, 尹桂芳, 王艳青, 等. 云南苦荞种质资源主要性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016,17(6):993-999.
[17] 邓琳琼, 张以忠. 毕节市苦荞种质资源农艺性状的鉴定与评价. 湖北农业科学, 2015,54(15):3604-3607.
[18] 汪灿, 胡丹, 杨浩, 等. 苦荞主要农艺性状与产量关系的多重分析. 作物杂志, 2013(6):18-22.
[19] 徐芦, 高金锋, 王鹏科, 等. 灰色关联分析在苦荞区试产量性状上的应用. 种子, 2010,29(6):64-66.
[20] 殷丽丽, 邢宝龙. 晋北地区不同芸豆品种(系)的适应性评价. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(4):151-157.
[21] 李月, 石桃雄, 黄凯丰, 等. 苦荞生态因子及农艺性状与产量的相关分析. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(1):35-41.
[22] 陈稳良, 赵雪英, 李秀莲, 等. 苦荞产量与主要性状的灰色关联度评价. 山西农业科学, 2009,37(10):23-25.
[23] Zhang L J, Ma M C, Liu L L, et al. Study on germplasm resources of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) in Shanxi province. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016,17(5):1217-1222,1270.
[24] 陈喜明, 王鹏科, 韩云丽, 等. 13个苦荞国家区域试验品种(北方组)的丰产、稳产性评价分析. 种子, 2009,37(5):122-125.
[25] 姜涛, 孔令聪, 王光宇, 等. 安徽省苦荞麦种质资源引种观察及鉴定. 农学学报, 2013,3(7):8-10.
[26] 程晓彬, 向达兵, 赵钢, 等. 川西高原不同苦荞品种生态适应性研究. 资源与利用, 2017,36(10):63-65,68.
[1] Hao Yani, Pei Hongbin, Gao Zhenfeng, Zhang Yijun, Yang Zhenping. Effects of Bacillus vallismortis and Straw Replacing Phosphorus Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Quality of Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 204-213.
[2] Zhang Lu, Li Dengming, Zhai Xiaoyu, Wu Junying, Gao Shihua, Zhao Yufei. Differences in Agronomic and Quality Traits of Oat at Cutting Time and Their Relationships with Regeneration Performance [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 220-228.
[3] Sun Yuantao, Long Wenjing, Li Yuan, Liu Tianpeng, Zhao Ganlin, Ding Guoxiang, Ni Xianlin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 45 Glutinous Sorghum Germplasms Based on Major Agronomic Traits and SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 57-64.
[4] Zhao Feng, Bao Qijun, Pan Yongdong, Liu Xiaoning, Zhang Huayu, Niu Xiaoxia. Comprehensive Evaluation of Genetic Diversity in 70 Barley Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 54-61.
[5] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[6] Liu Hui, Long Xueyi, Jiao Yan, Wang Lihong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 238-248.
[7] Zhang Shangpei, Yang Junxue, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Zhang Xiaojuan, Cheng Bingwen. Genetic Diversity and Yielding Ability Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 37-42.
[8] Ge Changbin, Qin Suyan, Qiao Jiliang, Wang Jun, Qi Shuangli, Lu Wenying, Zhang Zhenyong. Comparative Analysis of Agronomic Traits, Quality and Disease Evolution of Approved Wheat Varieties in Southern Henan and Southern Huai River in Jiangsu from 2001 to 2021 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 49-58.
[9] ChenZhikai , Hou Wanwei. Evaluation and Selection of Pisumsativum L. Germplasm Resources Based on Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 38-43.
[10] Chen Yuanyuan, Li Guangsheng, Liu Yang, He Yuqi, Zhou Meiliang, Fang Zhengwu. Molecular Cloning and Functional Identification of Resistance Gene FtTIR of Tartary Buckwheat to Blight [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 44-51.
[11] Zhao Yun, Feng Guojun, Hu Xiangwei, Wumaierjiang·Kuerban , Li Pengbing, Li Cuimei, Akebota·Muheyati . Preliminary Report on Selection of Herbicide-Resistant Foxtail Millet Varieties Suitable for Planting in Kashgar, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 126-133.
[12] Bai Kaihong, Abie Xiaobing, Xu Xiaoli, Jiang Na, Li Jianqiang, Luo Laixin. Analysis of Fungal Diversity in Seeds of Tartary Buckwheat from Liangshan, Sichuan Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 260-266.
[13] Li Guangsheng, Lu Xiang, Lai Dili, Zhang Kaixuan, Wang Haihua, Zhou Meiliang. Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of Resistance Gene FtABCG12 of Tartary Buckwheat to Blight [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 43-50.
[14] Ma Ruiqi, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Topdressing Nitrogen Amount on Yield and Agronomic Traits of Different Gluten Type Wheat Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 131-137.
[15] Huang Guibin, Guan Yaobing, Niu Yongqi, Zhou Lilei, Zhao Yongfeng. Comprehensive Evaluation of 12 Major Agronomic Traits of 103 Chickpea Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 6-13.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!