Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 129-133.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.06.020

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Panicle Fertilizer Management on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Late Japonica Rice

Zhou Qiancong(), Chen Le, Luo Kang, Liu Mengjie, Song Yongping, Xie Xiaobing, Zeng Yongjun()   

  1. Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education/Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding/Collaborative Innovation Center for the Modernization Production of Double Cropping Rice, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2020-12-28 Revised:2021-03-11 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: Zeng Yongjun E-mail:1115959066@qq.com;zengyj2002@163.com

Abstract:

In order to explore the suitable panicle fertilizer management mode of high-quality hybrid late Japonica rice planted in double cropping rice area, four panicle fertilizer management modes, SF0 (no panicle fertilizer, control), SF1 (60kg/ha panicle fertilizer at the final second leaf stage), SF2 (60kg/ha panicle fertilizer at the final fourth leaf stage), SF3 (30kg/ha panicle fertilizer was applied at the final second and fourth leaf stages, respectively) were applied to hybrid Japonica to ascertain the effects of panicle fertilizer management modes on rice yield and quality optimization in double cropping rice area. The results showed that compared with SF0 treatment, the dry matter amount, total spikelets and harvest indexes increased, and the yields of SF1, SF2 and SF3 treatments increased by 10.88%, 11.08% and 12.73%, respectively. The total spikelets and apparent conversion rate in SF2 and SF3 treatments were higher than those of SF1 treatment, and the dry matter production ratio after flowering of SF2 and SF3 treatments were lower than that of SF1 treatment. Compared with the SF0, the quality of the processing of panicle fertilizer treatments were better, the crude protein contents were increased, but the appearance quality and cooking quality were worse, and the taste values were decreased. In addition, the peak viscosity and disintegration values also decreased, but SF2 treatment showed no significant difference with SF0. In general, the quality indexes of SF2 treatment were better than those of SF1 and SF3 treatments. It could be seen that applying panicle fertilizer significantly increased the yield of high-quality hybrid Japonica rice. While the single application of panicle fertilizer at the final fourth leaf stage could give consideration to high yield and high quality.

Key words: Hybrid Japonica rice, Panicle fertilizer management, Yield, Quality

Table 1

The nitrogen application rate of different treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment
基肥
Basal
fertilizer
分蘖肥
Tillering
fertilizer
穗肥Panicle fertilizer
倒2叶
The final
second leaf
倒4叶
The final
fourth leaf
SF0 100 50 0 0
SF1 100 50 60 0
SF2 100 50 0 60
SF3 100 50 30 30

Table 2

Effects of nitrogen panicle fertilizer management on late Japonica rice yield and its components"

处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicles (×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per panicle
总颖花量
Total spikelets (×108/hm2)
结实率
Seed setting rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
SF0 391.24c 96.84b 3.79b 83.49a 28.38ab 8280.02b
SF1 393.80bc 103.62ab 4.08ab 82.40ab 28.86a 9181.23a
SF2 406.45ab 109.49a 4.45a 81.06b 27.28c 9197.90a
SF3 412.37a 108.18a 4.46a 81.76ab 27.73bc 9334.05a

Table 3

Effects of nitrogen panicle fertilizer management on late Japonica rice dry matter amount and harvest index"

处理
Treatment
干物质量Dry matter amount (t/hm2) 表观转化率
Apparent conversion
rate (%)
花后干物质生产比例
Dry matter production
ratio after flowering (%)
收获指数
Harvest
index (%)
齐穗期
Heading
成熟期
Maturity
SF0 11.35c 16.11b 45.56a 29.52a 43.95b
SF1 12.10b 17.17a 38.63b 29.48a 45.73a
SF2 13.53a 17.34a 48.36a 21.94b 45.28a
SF3 13.15a 17.62a 44.56a 25.36ab 44.52a

Table 4

Effects of nitrogen panicle fertilizer management on the main quality indexes of late Japonica rice"

处理
Treatment
出糙率
Brown rice
rate (%)
精米率
Milled rice
rate (%)
整精米率
Head milled
rice rate (%)
垩白粒率
Chalkiness
rate (%)
垩白度
Chalkiness
degree (%)
胶稠度
Gel consistency
(mm)
直链淀粉含量
Amylose
content (%)
粗蛋白含量
Crude protein
content (%)
食味值
Taste
value
SF0 83.5b 72.5b 65.2a 20.9c 4.7b 82.84a 16.54b 7.1c 72.7a
SF1 84.5a 73.5a 64.9a 24.7a 5.9a 73.29c 17.23a 8.3a 63.7c
SF2 84.5a 73.5a 62.6c 18.8d 4.6b 77.27b 16.71b 7.3b 70.7b
SF3 84.4a 72.9ab 63.7b 23.0b 5.8a 76.10bc 17.29a 8.4a 63.0c

Table 5

Effects of nitrogen panicle fertilizer management on the rapid viscosity analyzer (RVA) profiles of late Japonica rice"

处理
Treatment
峰值黏度
Peak viscosity
(cp)
热浆黏度
Hot viscosity
(cp)
冷胶黏度
Cool viscosity
(cp)
崩解值
Breakdown
(cp)
消减值
Setback
(cp)
回复值
Consistence
(cp)
峰值时间
Peak time
(min)
糊化温度
Pasting temperature
(℃)
SF0 3240a 1901b 3149b 1373a 91b 1282ab 6.16b 73.93b
SF1 3056b 2021a 3193ab 1035c 137a 1172b 6.27a 75.52a
SF2 3236a 1982a 3300a 1254b 64ab 1318a 6.27a 75.00ab
SF3 3101ab 1887b 3141b 1214b 73ab 1254ab 6.26a 74.98ab
[1] Boutrif E. Institutions involved in food safety:food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO). Encyclopedia of Food Safety, 2014, 4:354-358.
[2] 陈波, 周年兵, 郭保卫, 等. 南方稻区“籼改粳”研究进展. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 38(1):67-72,88.
[3] 殷敏, 刘少文, 褚光, 等. 长江下游稻区不同类型双季晚粳稻产量与生育特性差异. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(5):890-903.
[4] Hu Y J, Xue J T, Li L, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on grain quality of different cultivars of Japonica rice. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 21(2):1-8.
[5] 赵海成, 杜春影, 魏媛媛, 等. 施肥方式和氮肥运筹对寒地水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):76-86.
[6] 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 等. 氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43(3):420-431.
[7] 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 等. 氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(11):1666-1676.
[8] 秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 等. 氮素穗肥运筹对两个杂交中籼稻叶片形态、光合生产及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4):391-399.
[9] 徐红, 马卉, 李成, 等. 穗肥不同施用期对南粳9108群体质量和产量品质的影响. 北方水稻, 2016, 46(3):22-24,32.
[10] 陈建明, 卢王印. 穗肥施用对籼粳杂交稻甬优15生育期及产量的影响. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(3):96-97,99.
[11] 余锋, 刘洋, 何小娥, 等. 穗肥施用时期对杂交水稻稻米品质的影响. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(5):35-39.
[12] 范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福, 等. 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10):1872-1884.
[13] 夏琼梅, 胡家权, 董林波, 等. 氮肥减量后移对云南高原水旱轮作下粳稻群体质量及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3):266-277.
[14] 成臣, 曾勇军, 王祺, 等. 氮肥运筹对南方双季晚粳稻产量及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5):1386-1395.
[15] 蒋琪, 许国春, 王强盛, 等. 氮素穗肥对超级稻颖果发育及经济性状的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(2):191-197.
[16] 李贵勇, 何清兰, 朱建宇, 等. 不同叶龄期穗肥对籼稻产量及氮肥利用效率的影响. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4):147-150.
[17] 万靓军, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 等. 氮肥运筹对超级杂交粳稻产量、品质及氮素利用率的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(2):175-182.
[18] 万靓军, 霍中洋, 龚振恺, 等. 氮肥运筹对杂交稻主要品质性状及淀粉RVA谱特征的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10):1491-1497.
[19] 陈梦云, 李晓峰, 程金秋, 等. 秸秆全量还田与氮肥运筹对机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12):1802-1816.
[20] 朱建方, 冯伟勋, 陈水华. 密度和氮肥运筹对稻米品质的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2003(5):35-60.
[21] 周瑞庆. 施肥对稻米品质和产量影响的研究. 湖南农学院学报, 1989(3):1-6.
[1] Tang Gang, Liao Ping, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Moldboard Plow Tillage under all Straw Returning in Late Rice Season on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Yield in Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 101-107.
[2] Su Wenping, Wang Huan, Aimulaguli·Kuerban , Zhao Xinlin, Xue Lihua, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Jun, Sun Shiren. Comparison of Growth Characteristics and Yields of Different Wheat Varieties Planted in the Approaching Winter in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 108-114.
[3] Yang Na, Xi Jilong, Wang Ke, Xi Tianyuan, Zhang Jiancheng, Yao Jingzhen, Wang Jian. Effects of Spring Irrigation on Yield and Water Utilization of Late-Sowing Winter Wheat in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 115-121.
[4] Gao Jia, Wang Jiao, Wang Song, Liu Hongjian, Kang Jia, Shen Hong, Wang Haili, Ren Shaoyong. Effects of Biochar-Based Fertilizer on Soil Urease Activity and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 134-138.
[5] Li Xinhao, Li Jun, Wan Lin, Liu Lixin, Liu Junquan, Ma Ni. Effects of No-Tillage and Drilling on Growth, Root System and Yield of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in Hilly Area [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 139-144.
[6] Wang Qi, Li Meijuan, Zhang Jia’en, Tang Jiaxin, Zeng Wenjing, Zhou Lei, Yang Qingxin, Jiang Mingmin, Wu Jiayuan, Luo Mingzhu. Effects of Rice-Fish Co-Culture on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield in Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 145-151.
[7] Guo Mingming, Wang Kangjun, Zhang Guangxu, Sun Zhongwei, Li Jun, Zhang Yueshu, Dai Dandan, Chen Feng, Fan Jiwei. Regulation of Sowing Date and Row Spacing on Grain Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 152-158.
[8] Zhang Panpan, Zhang Hongpeng, Guo Yaning. Effects of Two Plant Growth Regulators on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Proso Millet [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 159-163.
[9] Li Yang, Yang Xiaolong, Wang Benfu, Zhang Zhisheng, Chen Shaoyu, Li Jinlan, Cheng Jianping. Effects of Main Season Stubble Height on Ratoon Season Yield and Rice Quality [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 164-170.
[10] Wang Xin, Wang Cai. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Seeding Rates on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 182-188.
[11] Cai Lijun, Zhang Jingtao, Liu Jingqi, Gai Zhijia, Guo Zhenhua, Zhao Guifan. Effects of Long-Term No-Tillage Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon and Soybean Yield in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 189-192.
[12] Liu Weixing, Fan Xiaoyu, Zhang Fengye, He Qunling, Chen Lei, Li Ke, Wu Jihua. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Seed Coating Agent Dosage on Peanut Diseases, Pests and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 199-204.
[13] Li Xin, Jin Guanghui, Wang Pengcheng, Wang Ziwen. Analysis of Stability of Potato Varieties (Strains) Starch and Yield Performance [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 51-57.
[14] Gao Tiantian, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Chang Xuhong, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Different Spring Wheat Varieties to Nitrogen Treatment [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 67-71.
[15] Chen Zhongcheng, Jin Xijun, Li He, Zhou Weixin, Qiang Binbin, Liu Jia, Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth, Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield Components of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 88-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!