Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 134-138.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.03.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of No-Tillage with Stubble Mulch on Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activities and Oat Yield

Wang Runlian1,Zhang Zhidong2,3,Liu Jinghui2,Liu Huijun4,Zhao Baoping2   

  1. 1 Vocational and Technical College of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Tumd Right Banner 014109,Inner Mongolia,China
    2 Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Huhhot 010019,Inner Mongolia,China
    3 Development Research Center of Inner Mongolia,Huhhot 010098,Inner Mongolia,China
    4 Agriculture and Husbandry Bureau of Ongniud Bannar,Ongniud Bannar 024500,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2016-03-16 Revised:2016-04-14 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Zhidong Zhang

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

147

Abstract:

In order to provide theoretical basis for the implementation of no-tillage technology in the local oat production, the effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil nutrients, soil enzyme activities and oat yield were studied. There were five no-tillage treatments (high mulch with high stubble, high mulch with low stubble, low mulch with high stubble, low mulch with low stubble, and conventional tillage). The results showed that no-tillage with stubble mulch could increase soil organic matter, total nutrients and available nutrients significantly. With the oat growing, soil enzyme activities firstly increased and then decreased. No-tillage with stubble mulch could significantly (P < 0.05) increased the activities of soil urease, alkaline phosphatase, sucrase and invertase. All soil enzyme activities showed an order as high mulch with high stubble > high mulch with low stubble > low mulch with high stubble > low mulch with low stubble > conventional tillage. No-tillage with stubble mulch could improve oat yield significantly. The highest yield was 2 111.4kg/hm 2 under the treatment of high mulch with high stubble, and increased by 18.6% compared with conventional tillage. The yield showed an order as high mulch with high stubble > high mulch with low stubble > low mulch with high stubble > low mulch with low stubble > conventional tillage.

Key words: Oat, No-tillage, Stubble mulching, Soil nutrient content, Soil enzyme activities, Yield

Table 1

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil nutrients"

处理
Treatments		 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 全氮(g/kg)
Total N		 全磷(g/kg)
Total P		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Available N		 速效磷(mg/kg)
Available P		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available K
CK 6.51cC 0.58cC 0.43cB 35.63dD 9.16cC 64.23cC
LL 7.76bB 0.69bB 0.51bA 38.74cC 11.57bB 73.17bB
HL 7.84bAB 0.70bAB 0.53abA 39.57bB 11.58bB 75.88bB
LH 8.61aA 0.75aA 0.57aA 40.82aA 12.64aA 79.42aA
HH 8.82aA 0.77aA 0.57aA 41.37aA 12.86aA 81.35aA

Table 2

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil urease activity NH4-N mg/g.24h"

处理 Treatments 播种前
Before sowing		 苗期 Seeding 拔节期 Jointing 成熟期 Maturity 收获后
After harvest
CK 2.15bA 2.67cB 3.52cB 3.32dC 2.81cC
LL 2.54abA 3.35bcAB 4.55bA 4.15cB 3.88bB
HL 2.63aA 3.65abAB 4.84abA 4.31bcB 4.05bAB
LH 2.45abA 3.90abA 4.76abA 4.54bAB 4.18abAB
HH 2.18bA 4.26aA 5.09aA 4.86aA 4.47aA

Table 3

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil alkaline phosphatase activity phenolic mg/g"

处理
Treatments		 播种前
Before sowing		 苗期
Seeding		 拔节期
Jointing		 成熟期 Maturity 收获后
After harvest
CK 1.25bA 1.65dC 2.40cC 2.65cB 2.10cB
LL 1.38abA 2.56cB 2.95bB 3.55bA 2.94bAB
HL 1.41abA 2.84bcAB 3.15bB 3.56bA 3.19abA
LH 1.42aA 3.40abAB 3.58aA 3.92abA 3.53abA
HH 1.35abA 3.51aA 3.69aA 4.21aA 3.69aA

Table 4

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil invertase activity Glucose mg/g.24h"

处理
Treatments		 播种前
Before sowing		 苗期
Seeding		 拔节期
Jointing		 成熟期
Maturity		 收获后
After harvest
CK 2.54aA 3.20cC 4.25dC 4.56cB 3.87cC
LL 3.09aA 4.33bB 4.90cBC 5.68abA 4.89bAB
HL 2.84aA 4.56bAB 5.08bcB 5.55bA 4.79bB
LH 3.38aA 4.99aA 5.43abAB 5.98abA 5.40aAB
HH 3.12aA 5.12aA 5.80aA 6.13aA 5.47aA

Table 5

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on soil catalase activity KMnO4 mL/g"

处理
Treatments		 播种前
Before sowing		 苗期
Seeding		 拔节期
Jointing		 成熟期
Maturity		 收获后
After harvest
CK 1.04cB 1.69bA 2.86cC 2.48cB 1.89cC
LL 1.42bA 2.29abA 3.38bBC 2.93bcAB 2.13bcBC
HL 1.62abA 2.41abA 3.46bAB 3.17abAB 2.28abAB
LH 1.59abA 2.92abA 3.84aAB 3.72aA 2.49aA
HH 1.66aA 3.04aA 3.99aA 3.82aA 2.51aA

Table 6

Effects of no-tillage with stubble mulch on oat yield and its components"

处理 Treatments 穗数 Panicle (万/hm2) 穗粒数 Grains per spike 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) 产量 Yield (kg/hm2)
CK 310.5bB 22.8bB 25.7cB 1 780.9dD
LL 322.4abAB 25.9aA 27.5abAB 1 916.5bcC
LH 335.2aA 26.1aA 27.9aA 2 018.8bAB
HL 338.6aA 24.9aAB 26.5bcAB 1 948.9cBC
HH 342.3aA 25.3aAB 28.3aA 2 111.4aA
[1] 盖志佳, 刘婧琦, 刘爱群 , 等.大豆保护性耕作研究进展.作物杂志,2013(6):4-8.
[2] 刘世平, 聂新涛, 张洪程 , 等. 稻麦两熟条件下不同土壤耕作方式与秸秆还田效用分析. 农业工程学报, 2006,22(7):48-51.
[3] 卜玉山, 苗果园, 周乃健 , 等. 地膜和秸秆覆盖土壤肥力效应分析与比较. 中国农业科学, 2006,39(5):1069-1075.
[4] 郝洪波, 崔海英, 李明哲 , 等.免耕对谷子生长发育及产量的影响.作物杂志,2013(5):104-108.
[5] 王福军, 张明园, 张海林 , 等. 耕作措施对华北夏玉米田土壤温度和酶活性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2012,21(5):848-852.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2012.05.009
[6] 徐春阳, 沈其荣, 冉炜 , 等. 长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响. 土壤通报, 2002,39(1):89-96.
doi: 10.11766/trxb200103110113
[7] 张星杰, 刘景辉, 李立军 , 等. 保护性耕作方式下土壤养分、微生物及酶活性研究. 土壤通报, 2009,40(3):542-546.
[8] 任天志 . 持续农业中的土壤微生物指标. 中国农业科学, 2000,33(1):68-75.
[9] 陶宝先, 张金池, 崔志华 , 等. 苏南丘陵区林地土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的相关性. 生态与农村环境学报, 2009,25(2):44-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2009.02.009
[10] 路怡青, 朱安宁, 张佳宝 , 等. 免耕和秸秆还田对小麦生长期内土壤酶活性的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013,29(3):329-334.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2013.03.010
[11] 苗林, 王立, 黄高宝 , 等. 保护性耕作对旱地麦田土壤酶活性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009,27(1):6-11.
[12] 张德健, 路战远, 张向前 , 等. 不同耕作措施对玉米产量和土壤理化性质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(12):209-213.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2019
[13] 刘瑜, 梁永超, 褚贵新 , 等. 长期棉花连作对北疆棉区土壤生物活性与酶学性状的影响. 生态环境学报, 2010,19(7):1586-1592.
[14] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析.北京:中国农业出版社, 2000: 42-56.
[15] 关松荫 . 土壤酶学研究方法.北京:农业出版社, 1986: 220-249.
[16] 姜桂英, 黄绍敏, 郭斗斗 . 不同耕作和轮作方式下作物生育期内土壤酶活性的动态变化特征. 河南农业大学学报, 2009,43(3):335-342.
[17] 崔凤娟, 李立军, 刘景辉 , 等. 免耕留茬覆盖对土壤呼吸和土壤酶活性及养分的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(21):147-153.
[18] 李月梅 . 保护性耕作对土壤养分及部分物理性状的影响.农机化研究,2011(11):148-152.
[19] 刘威, 黄丽, 鲁剑巍 , 等. 两种保护性耕作对土壤养分、结构和产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2015,46(2):420-427.
[20] 任万军, 黄云, 吴锦秀 . 免耕与秸秆高留茬还田对抛秧稻田土壤酶活性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(11):2913-2918.
[21] 刘秀梅, 李琪, 梁文举 , 等. 潮棕壤免耕农田土壤酶活性的动态变化. 应用生态学报, 2006,17(12):2347-2351.
[22] 李小磊, 刘文菊, 赵全利 , 等. 微生物菌剂与 2种耕作方式下冬小麦生育期内土壤酶活性的动态变化. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(3):20-25.
[23] 马春梅, 庄倩倩, 龚振平 . 保护性耕作对寒地土壤酶活性的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2012,43(11):40-44.
[24] 晋凡生, 张宝林 . 免耕覆盖玉米秸秆对旱源地土壤环境的影响. 生态农业研究, 2000,8(3):47-50.
[25] 江永红, 宇振荣, 马永良 . 秸秆还田对农田生态系统及作物生长的影响. 土壤通报, 2001,32(5):209-213.
[26] 郭晓霞, 刘景辉, 张星杰 , 等. 免耕对旱作燕麦田耕层土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响. 土壤学报, 2012,49(3):575-582.
[27] 马霓, 张春雷, 马皓 , 等.免耕栽培措施对稻田油菜生长及产量的影响.作物杂志,2009(5):55-59.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114-120.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .