Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 191-195.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.04.029

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparative Analysis on Agronomic and Quality Characters of Sugarcane with Equivalent Fertilizer Formula

Wang Xiaoming1,Liao Zhengda1,He Yixiang2,Sun Xiaobo1,Wei Zenglin3,Wei Xi4,Su Xide5   

  1. 1 Department of Food & Biochemical Engineering College, Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University,Laibin 546199, Guangxi, China;
    2 Laibin Science and Technology Development Center, Laibin 546199,Guangxi, China
    3 Laibin Xingbin District Station of Sugarcane Technology Promotion, Laibin 546138,Guangxi, China
    4 Guangxi Laibin Eastern Sugar Qianjiang Co.Ltd., Laibin 546119, Guangxi, China
    5 Guangxi Laibin Xianggui Sugar Industry Co.,Ltd, Laibin 546100, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2018-09-04 Revised:2019-06-25 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-06

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

181

Abstract:

In order to study the agronomic characters and yield benefit of sucrose equivalent fertilizer formula, fertilization formulations suitable for this area were selected. The green high yield and high sugar content of sugarcane was taken as the target, five fertilization formulations and conventional fertilization formula (CK), and Xintaitang 22 were selected as material. The agronomic characters and yield benefit of sugarcane under different fertilization formulas were compared and analyzed by using the combination of plot test and field demonstration (demonstration test). The results showed that the formula of sugarcane fertilizer was F2 and F5, and the ratio of theoretical yield of sugarcane to sugarcane yield was higher than that of F5 in Laibin of Guangxi. The theory yield increased 5.97 (6.74%) and 1.80t/hm 2 (2.03%) than CK. Sucrose content increased by 0.18 and 0.06 percentage points than CK, respectively. The theoretical sugar yield of F2 and F5 increased 1.00 (8.16%) and 0.31t/hm 2 (2.53%) than that of CK, respectively. On the whole, the ratio of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of F2 was more uniform than that of CK, which contained higher nitrogen fertilizer but in phosphorus fertilizer and potassium fertilizer. Based on the analysis of soil nutrient status of sugarcane field in Laibin, the results showed that the application rate and proportion of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was reasonable, and the application of trace elements could promote sugarcane yield. There was no significant difference between the F5 and CK. F5 fertilizer formula reapplied bio-organic fertilizer, reduced the amount of chemical fertilizer, and gradually improved and fertilized the soil, which was in line with the development concept of green and ecological agriculture. The results of field demonstration were basically consistent with the results of plot test.

Key words: Sugarcane, Formula fertilizer, Agronomic character, Quality character, Comparative analysis

Table 1

Design of fertilization formula for sugarcane"

施肥配方
Fertilizer
formula		 尿素
(kg/hm2)
Urea		 钙镁磷肥(kg/hm2)
Calcium magnesium
phosphate fertilizer		 氯化钾肥(kg/hm2)
Potassium chloride
fertilizer		 复合肥(kg/hm2)
Compound
fertilizer		 生物有机肥(kg/hm2)
Biological organic
fertilizer		 肥料成本(元/hm2)
Fertilizer cost
(yuan/hm2)
常规(CK) Convention 750 0 225 1 500 0 7 335
F1 450 0 0 2 040 0 7 335
F2 900 750 525 810 0 7 350
F3 600 1 200 450 1 050 0 7 350
F4 1 050 1 800 300 660 0 7 335
F5 450 750 450 0 1 957 7 350

Table 2

Agronomic characters and borer damage of sugarcane in early stage of plot trial"

施肥配方
Fertilizer formula		 出苗率(%)
Emergence rate		 分蘖率(%)
Tillering rate		 螟虫为害节率(%)
Damage rate of borer		 生长速度(cm/月)
Rate of growth (cm/month)
常规(CK) Convention 46.17±2.86a 42.36±2.67a 13.56±1.52a 62.90±3.29b
F1 45.36±2.53a 40.57±2.36b 15.21±1.35a 59.50±3.12bc
F2 51.87±2.66a 42.35±2.28a 14.78±1.26a 62.70±3.54b
F3 46.45±2.32a 39.55±2.12b 12.67±1.42a 57.60±2.97c
F4 42.75±2.48b 38.45±2.32b 12.32±1.28a 55.40±3.18c
F5 47.68±2.12a 43.16±2.29a 13.64±1.23a 65.80±3.67a

Table 3

Agronomic characters and theoretical sugarcane yield of sugarcane in plot test"

施肥配方
Fertilizer formula		 有效茎数(stem/hm2)
Number of productive tiller		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎粗(cm)
Stalk diameter		 理论产蔗量(t/hm2)
Theoretical cane yield
常规(CK) Convention 61 573±280a 257±17b 2.67±0.18b 88.60±2.37bc
F1 61 378±348a 255±21b 2.62±0.16c 85.37±2.14d
F2 62 621±266a 260±19a 2.73±0.19a 94.57±2.59a
F3 62 634±273a 256±20b 2.63±0.20c 87.11±2.32c
F4 63 236±252a 257±18b 2.62±0.21c 87.62±2.07c
F5 61 852±302a 263±14a 2.66±0.18b 90.40±2.20b

Table 4

Sucrose content and theoretical sugar yield of sugarcane in plot test"

施肥配方Fertilizer
formula		 理论产蔗量Theoretical cane
yield (t/hm2)		 蔗糖分
Sucrose
content (%)		 理论产糖量Theoretical sugar
yield (t/hm2)
常规(CK)
Convention		 88.60b 13.83±0.56b 12.25±0.37bc
F1 85.37c 13.78±0.43bc 11.76±0.41c
F2 94.57a 14.01±0.59a 13.25±0.52a
F3 87.11bc 13.66±0.39c 11.90±0.44c
F4 87.62b 13.65±0.50c 11.96±0.33c
F5 90.40b 13.89±0.40ab 12.56±0.42b

Table 5

Demonstration of theoretical sugarcane yield, sucrose content and theoretical sugar yield in field test"

施肥配方Fertilizer
formula		 理论产蔗量Theoretical cane
yield (t/hm2)		 蔗糖分
Sucrose
content (%)		 理论产糖量Theoretical sugar
yield (t/hm2)
常规(CK)Convention 87.12±6.65b 13.56±1.18b 11.81±1.21b
F1 84.85±7.12c 13.48±1.35c 11.44±1.23c
F2 92.31±7.31a 13.86±1.41a 12.79±1.13a
F3 88.62±6.43b 13.69±1.24ab 12.13±1.31b
F4 86.54±6.67b 13.57±1.12b 11.74±1.15bc
F5 90.67±6.88a 13.77±1.07a 12.49±1.28a
[1] 张北赢, 陈天林, 王兵 . 长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(11):182-187.
[2] 石元亮, 王玲莉, 刘世彬 , 等. 中国化学肥料发展及其对农业的作用. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):853-864.
[3] 王小明, 覃逸明, 李大成 , 等. 绿色双高糖料蔗生产技术现状与发展对策研究——以广西来宾市为例. 作物杂志, 2017(5):14-20.
[4] 罗广盘 . 来宾市兴宾区甘蔗施肥存在的问题与改进措施. 现代农业科技, 2015(5): 229, 238.
[5] 李恒锐, 邱文武, 马文清 , 等. 不同类型肥料对甘蔗产量及品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2014,42(10):83-85.
[6] 叶怡然, 达布希拉图, 沙本才 , 等. 不同肥料对冬马铃薯光合特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(3):135-140.
[7] 李杨瑞 . 现代甘蔗学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010.
[8] 李新爱, 童成立, 蒋平 , 等. 长期不同施肥对稻田土壤有机质和全氮的影响. 土壤, 2006,38(3):298-303.
[9] 王小明, 覃逸明, 廖政达 , 等. 糖料蔗生产中土壤劣变原因、机理与治理对策综述. 江苏农业科学, 2018,46(21):6-11.
[10] 王继红, 刘景双, 于君宝 , 等. 氮磷肥对黑土玉米农田生态系统土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响. 水土保持学报, 2004,18(2):35-38.
[11] 杨尚东, 李荣担, 谭宏伟 , 等. 长期单施化肥和有机无机配合条件下红壤蔗区土壤生物学性状及细菌多样性差异. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(4):1024-1030.
[12] 路磊, 李忠佩, 车玉萍 . 不同施肥处理对黄泥土微生物生物量碳氮和酶活性的影响. 土壤, 2006,38(3):309-314.
[13] 廖楠 . 广西甘蔗根际土壤丛枝菌根(AM)真菌多样性研究. 桂林:广西师范大学, 2016.
[14] 何天春, 闫青云 . 来宾市兴宾区蔗区土壤养分普查结果简报. 广西蔗糖, 2004(2):12-16.
[15] 刘艳, 李波, 孙文涛 , 等. 生物有机肥对盐碱地春玉米生理特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):98-103.
[16] 吴建富, 卢志红, 胡丹丹 . 科学认识有机肥料在农业生产中的作用. 作物杂志, 2017(5):1-6.
[17] Martin P J, Stephens W . The potential for biomass production on restored landfill caps. Aspects of Applied Biology, 2001,65:337-344.
[18] 任凤玲, 张旭博, 孙楠 , 等. 施用有机肥对中国农田土壤微生物量影响的整合分析. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(1):119-128.
[19] 王小明, 覃逸明, 蓝峻峰 , 等. 广西来宾绿色双高糖料蔗问题分析与发展对策研究. 中国热带农业, 2017(6):16-19,9.
[20] 蒙世欢 . 广西甘蔗施肥现状、问题及对策. 广西农学报, 2011(5):7-9.
[21] 李杨瑞, 杨丽涛, 谭宏伟 , 等. 广西甘蔗栽培技术的发展进步. 南方农业学报, 2014,45(10):1770-1775.
[22] 程亮, 张保林, 王杰 , 等. 腐植酸肥料的研究进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(5):1-6.
[23] 孙蓟锋, 王旭 . 土壤调理剂的研究和应用进展. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(1):1-7.
[24] 陈龙, 孙广正, 姚拓 , 等. 干旱区微生物肥料替代部分化肥对玉米生长及土壤微生物的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016,30(7):108-113.
[1] Qu Zhihua,Bai Wei,Zhang Lili,Li Feng,Hu Yang,Qiao Haiming. Main Agronomic Characteristics Analysis on 170 Flax Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 77-83.
[2] Ren Honglei,Li Chunxia,Gong Shichen,Li Guoliang,Hu Guanghui,Wang Mingquan,Yang Jianfei. Genetic Correlation and Path Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize Hybrids in SPSS Software [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 86-90.
[3] Tan Qinliang,Zhu Pengjin,Cheng Qin,Li Jiahui,Lü Ping,Pang Xinhua,Zhou Quanguang. Comparison Study on the Yield Components and Quality of Different Sugarcane Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 49-54.
[4] Xiaoming Wang,Dacheng Li,Zhengda Liao,Yuanchu Gan,Huixiu Chen,Xide Su,Zenglin Wei. Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 50-55.
[5] Di Yining,Liu Lufeng,Xie Linyan,Li Yongmei,He Pengfei,Cui Wenyan,Li Fusheng,He Lilian. Identification and Characterization of a Phosphate-Solubilizing Endophyte from Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 68-75.
[6] Haibin Luo, Shengli Jiang, Chengmei Huang, Huiqing Cao, Zhinian Deng, Kaichao Wu, Lin Xu, Zhen Lu, Yuanwen Wei. Cloning and Expression of ScHAK10 Gene in Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 53-61.
[7] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131-137.
[9] Zhequn Cao,Furong Xiao,Shuying Chen,Lilian He,Fusheng Li. Identification of Cold Tolerance in Seven Wild Sugarcane and Three Offsprings at Seedling Stage [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 43-48.
[10] Xiaoming Wang,Yiming Qin,Dacheng Li,Junfeng Lan,Hongjin Huang,Liangman Zhang,Xi Wei. Present Situation and Development Countermeasure for Production Technology of Green Double High Sugarcane in Laibin City, Guangxi Province [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 14-20.
[11] Juan Wang,Yinfan Li,Xiuzhi Liang,Minna Zheng. Morphological Diversity of Main Oat Germplasm Resources in Northern China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 27-32.
[12] Chaowu Zeng,Xiaodong Liang,Jianjiang Li. Genetic Diversity Analysis on Main Characters of Spring Wheat Germplasms in Central Asia [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 67-71.
[13] Jingyu Shi,Lilian He,Xianhong Wang,Fusheng Li. Optimization of the Total Flavonoids Extraction Technology in Sugarcane Leaves [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 19-24.
[14] Haiyang Hu,Qingqing Fu,Lilian He,Fusheng Li. Influence of New Type Fertilizer Haishengyuan on Cold Resistance of Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 73-78.
[15] Xinhua Pang,Pengjin Zhu,Quanguang Zhou,Qinliang Tan,Chun Liang,Kewei Ou,Qiang Huang,Jingli Ou. Comparative Study of Introduced Sugarcane Varieties (Lines) in Guangxi [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 73-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[2] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[3] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[4] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9"[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89 -94 .
[5] Liangmei Chen,Jiangxia Li,Zhaoyun Hu,Wenling Ye,Wenge Wu,Youhua Ma. Review on Application of Low Accumulation Crops on Remediation of Farmland Contaminated by Heavy Metals[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 16 -24 .
[6] Shanshan Lu,Chenglai Wu,Yan Li,Chunqing Zhang. The Molecular Basis of Holding the Feature and Genetic Purity for Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 41 -48 .
[7] Leiyue Geng,Wei Zhang,Tuo Zou,Zhenyu Zheng,Lige Geng,Juan Sun,Qixing Zhang. Analysis on Quality Traits Diversity of Rice Landraces in Hebei[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 49 -55 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(2): 93 -94 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2005, 21(1): 47 -48 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 1990, 6(2): 1 -2 .