Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 17-21.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.01.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on Quality Traits of Rice Varieties (Lines) with Different Maturity Stages in Liaoning Province

Lü Jun,Jiang Xiuying,Xie Wenxiao,Liu Jun,Jiang Hongbo,Shen Feng,Han Yong()   

  1. Liaoning Rice Research Institute, Shenyang 110101, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2019-07-08 Revised:2019-11-28 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-23
  • Contact: Yong Han E-mail:lndaozuo@126.com

Abstract:

The quality traits of rice varieties different in maturity in Liaoning Province were comprehensively analyzed to provide reference for rice quality breeding and cultivation. Sixty-five rice varieties (lines) with varying maturity time were studied to analyze the difference in quality traits and their correlation between rice varieties (lines) different in maturity in Liaoning Province. The results showed that the variation coefficients of chalky grain rate, chalkiness degree and transparency were high, and the performance was basically the same between rice varieties (lines), differ in maturity. The quality traits of the early-maturity varieties (lines) were good overall, and the high quality rate of chalkiness was low, which indicated that chalkiness characters were the key points of rice quality improvement in the future. Correlation analysis showed that chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree were positively correlated with amylose content and negatively correlated with gel consistency. Brown rice percentage was significantly positive correlated with milled rice percentage, head rice percentage, and gel consistency. The rice quality breeding in Liaoning Province can reduce the chalky grain rate and chalkiness degree, improve the head rice percentage, and achieve the overall improvement of quality by adjusting the amylose content reasonably.

Key words: Liaoning, Rice, Maturity, Quality

Table 1

The variation analysis on milling and appearance quality characteristics of rice varieties (lines) different in maturity"

熟期
Maturity
项目
Item
糙米率(%)
Brown rice
percentage
精米率(%)
Milled rice
percentage
整精米率(%)
Head rice
percentage
粒长(mm)
Grain
length
粒长/粒宽
Grain
length/width
垩白粒率(%)
Chalky
grain rate
垩白度(%)
Chalkiness
degree
透明度(级)
Transparency
(level)
中早熟 平均Average 80.20aA 73.89aA 72.90aA 5.02aA 01.94aA 17.54abA 04.79abA 01.46aA
Early-maturity 标准差
Standard deviation
01.05 01.52 02.14 0.20 00.14 07.31 01.60 00.52
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
01.31 02.06 02.94 4.08 07.46 41.68 33.49 35.50
中熟 平均Average 78.09bAB 69.81bB 68.31bB 4.99aA 01.90aA 20.57aA 04.96aA 01.43aA
Mid-maturity 标准差
Standard deviation
01.94 02.20 02.70 0.21 00.16 04.64 01.05 00.51
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
02.48 03.15 03.96 4.26 08.26 22.54 21.14 35.95
中晚熟 平均Average 76.32cB 66.53cC 63.82cC 5.14aA 01.93aA 19.35abA 04.64abA 01.23aA
Mid-late maturity 标准差
Standard deviation
02.37 02.42 02.59 0.25 00.15 10.50 02.49 00.51
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
03.11 03.64 04.06 4.86 07.58 54.27 53.71 41.80
晚熟 平均值Average 77.14cB 67.86cBC 61.63cC 4.98aA 01.90aA 13.92bA 03.49bA 01.15aA
Late-maturity 标准差
Standard deviation
02.53 02.92 02.99 0.30 00.19 04.97 01.36 00.38
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
03.28 04.30 04.85 6.01 10.08 35.73 38.87 32.55
总体Total 平均值Average 77.62 68.94 66.13 5.05 01.92 18.18 04.51 01.30
标准差
Standard deviation
02.53 03.58 04.79 0.25 00.16 08.16 01.92 00.50
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation
03.26 05.20 07.24 4.93 08.08 44.89 42.62 38.00

Table 2

The variation analysis on nutrition and taste quality characteristics of rice varieties (lines) different in maturity"

熟期
Maturity
项目
Item
直链淀粉含量(%)
Amylose content
胶稠度(mm)
Gel consistency
碱消值(级)
Alkali digestion value (level)
蛋白质含量(%)
Protein content
中早熟Early-maturity 平均Average 16.10aA 66.31bB 06.77aA 7.25bB
标准差Standard deviation 00.50 05.17 00.26 0.22
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 03.11 07.80 03.83 3.06
中熟Mid-maturity 平均Average 15.38bAB 73.00aA 06.32abAB 7.68aA
标准差Standard deviation 00.59 06.30 00.82 0.43
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 03.81 08.63 13.02 5.65
中晚熟Mid-late maturity 平均Average 15.44bB 73.58aA 06.36aAB 7.71aA
标准差Standard deviation 00.96 06.81 00.67 0.37
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 06.20 09.26 10.46 4.82
晚熟Late-maturity 平均Average 15.09bB 71.54bAB 05.69bB 7.61aAB
标准差Standard deviation 00.41 03.67 01.35 0.39
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 02.71 05.12 23.66 5.15
总体Total 平均值Average 15.49 71.62 06.30 7.59
标准差Standard deviation 00.78 06.39 00.88 0.40
变异系数Coefficient of variation (%) 05.04 08.92 13.95 5.25

Table 3

The high quality rate of rice varieties (lines) different in maturity"

熟期
Maturity
级别
Level
糙米率(%)
Brown rice percentage
整精米率(%)
Head rice percentage
垩白度(%)
Chalkiness degree
透明度(级)
Transparency
(level)
碱消值(级)
Alkali digestion
value (level)
胶稠度(mm)
Gel
consistency
直链淀粉
含量(%)
Amylose content
中早熟 一级1nd class 30.70 100.00 0.00 53.85 100.00 100.00 100.00
Early-maturity 二级2nd class 100.00 100.00 7.69 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
三级3rd class 100.00 100.00 53.85 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
中熟Mid-maturity 一级1nd class 0.00 100.00 0.00 57.14 92.86 100.00 100.00
二级2nd class 50.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 92.86 100.00 100.00
三级3rd class 92.86 100.00 35.71 100.00 92.86 100.00 100.00
中晚熟 一级1nd class 0.00 96.15 0.00 80.77 96.15 96.15 92.31
Mid-late maturity 二级2nd class 34.62 100.00 30.77 96.15 96.15 96.15 100.00
三级3rd class 42.31 100.00 65.38 96.15 96.15 100.00 100.00
晚熟Late-maturity 一级1nd class 0.00 84.62 7.69 84.62 61.54 100.00 100.00
二级2nd class 46.15 100.00 30.77 100.00 61.54 100.00 100.00
三级3rd class 61.54 100.00 84.62 100.00 76.92 100.00 100.00
总体Total 一级1nd class 4.55 95.45 1.45 71.21 90.91 98.48 96.97
二级2nd class 53.03 100.00 18.84 98.48 90.91 98.48 100.00
三级3rd class 68.18 100.00 57.97 98.48 92.42 100.00 100.00

Table 4

Correlation analysis among quality traits of rice varieties (lines) in Liaoning Povince"

性状Trait 糙米率Brown rice percentage 精米率Milled rice percentage 整精米率Head rice percentage 垩白粒率Chalky grain rate 垩白度
Chalkiness degree
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content
胶稠度
Gel consistency
碱消值
Alkali digestion value
透明度Transparency
精米率
Milled rice percentage
-0.816**
整精米率
Head rice percentage
-0.678** -0.877**
垩白粒率
Chalky grain rate
-0.063 -0.048 -0.018
垩白度
Chalkiness degree
-0.019 -0.086 -0.088 -0.849**
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content
-0.193 -0.158 -0.188 -0.346** -0.532**
胶稠度
Gel consistency
-0.325** -0.323** -0.256* -0.251* -0.430** -0.770**
碱消值
Alkali digestion value
-0.287* -0.273* -0.387** -0.057 -0.190 -0.410** -0.450**
透明度
Transparency
-0.064 -0.153 -0.202 -0.155 -0.286* -0.230 -0.251* -0.086
蛋白质含量
Protein content
-0.109 -0.140 -0.161 -0.198 -0.161 -0.072 -0.002 0.027 -0.108
[1] 景立权, 户少武, 穆海蓉 , 等. 大气环境变化导致水稻品质总体变劣. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(13):2462-2457.
[2] Krishnan R, Ramakrishnan B, Reddy K R , et al. High-temperature effects on rice growth,yield,and grain quality. Advances in Agronomy,2011(111):87-206.
[3] Xiong D L, Ling X X, Huang J L , et al. Meta-analysis and dose-response analysis of high temperature effects on rice yield and quality. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017,141:1-9.
[4] 徐锡明, 张欣, 施利利 , 等. 直链淀粉含量偏低型杂交粳稻组合的稻米品质评价. 作物杂志,2016(6):44-48.
[5] 姜秀英, 吕军, 姚继攀 , 等. 2011-2015年辽宁省审定水稻品种米质分析. 中国稻米, 2017,23(5):63-64.
[6] 赵一洲, 倪善君, 张战 , 等. 辽宁省水稻品种品质性状及亲缘关系变化分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017,18(6):1039-1045.
[7] 韩勇, 邓媛, 沈枫 , 等. 辽宁省2002~2006年育成水稻品种品质情况分析. 粮食与饲料工业,2008(2):1-3.
[8] 粱康迳, 林文雄, 李亚娟 , 等. 水稻籽粒发育过程中可溶性糖含量的遗传及其与品质的关系. 分子植物育种, 2003,1(2):207-215.
[9] 程方民, 钟连进 . 不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15(3):187-191.
[10] 马群, 顾海永, 张庆 , 等. 不同生育期类型粳稻品种垩白性状对施氮水平的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010,16(6):1341-1350.
[11] 严光彬, 李彦利, 王万成 , 等. 不同熟期水稻品种的产量、品质及效应分析. 吉林农业科学, 2002,27(5):35-37.
[12] 矫江, 王伯伦 . 我国东北地区稻米垩白发生规律研究. 作物学报, 2003,29(2):311-314.
[13] 祁祖白, 李宝键, 杨文广 , 等. 水稻籽粒外观品质及脂肪的遗传研究. 遗传学报, 1983,10(6):452-458.
[14] 徐云碧, 申宗坦 . 籼稻米粒垩白的遗传. 浙江农业大学学报, 1989,15(1):8-13.
[15] 蔺万煌, 萧浪涛, 彭克勤 , 等. 稻米垩白的形成及其调控. 湖南农业大学学报, 2001,27(3):234-239.
[16] 王才林, 朱镇, 张亚东 , 等. 粳稻外观品质选择效果研究. 云南农业大学学报, 2006,21(增刊):47-52.
[1] An Zhu,Jie Gao,Jian Huang,Hao Wang,Yun Chen,Lijun Liu. Advances in Morphology and Physiology of Root and Their Relationships with Grain Quality in Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 1-8.
[2] Hongtao Shen,Fusheng Zhang,Dong Li,Jianhua Qiu,Xinghong Cai,Yubao Qin. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[3] Wei Zhou,Fuzhu Cui,Hongkai Duan,Guohua Hao,Hui Yang,Ruirui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Waxy Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 156-161.
[4] Xin Liu,Rong Zhu,Mei Yang,Zhangyong Liu. Screening of High-Yield Germplasms for Ratoon Rice and Analysis of High Yield Composition [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 28-33.
[5] Zhichang Yang,Tao Shen,Zhuo Luo,Zhi Peng,Yuqian Hu,Tao Zi,Tinghao Xiong,Haixing Song. Effects of Low Nitrogen Rate Combined with High Planting Density on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Machine-Transplanted Double Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 71-81.
[6] Zongjie Ya,Shuchang Lu,Kun Hou. Development Status, Problems and ApplicationProspects of Dry Direct Seeding Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 9-15.
[7] Zhao Zhun,Li Jian,Song Ruijiao,Guo Yan,Ling Jiangrui,Qi Juncang. Effects of Different Planting Densities on Biomass Yield and Silage Quality of Barley [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 110-116.
[8] Hu Yuqian,Zi Tao,Xiong Tinghao,Zhang Zhenhua,Song Haixing. Study on the Difference of Nutrient Absorption between Winter Rape Cultivars at Early Maturity and Conventional Maturity [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 117-123.
[9] Zhang Kaixuan,Ding Mengqi,Li Faliang,Tang Yu,Yang Keli,Yang Fuyu,Zhang Hanmin,Yuan Rengui,Hu Yongping,Zhou Meiliang. Selective Breeding of Fagopyrum cymosum (Trev.) Meisn Zhongjin No.1 for Medicine and Forage and the Study of the Economic Benefits [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 29-34.
[10] Tian Mengxiang,Gong Yanlong,Zhang Shilong,He Youxun,Lei Yue,Yu Benxun,Yu Li,Li Jiali,Zhang Dashuang,Ye Yongyin. Design and Verification of New Functional Marker of Chilling-Tolerance COLD1 Gene in Rice Seedling Stage [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 55-60.
[11] Chen Tingmu,Sun Zhiguang,Xing Yungao,Fang Zhaowei,Wang Baoxiang,Liu Yan,Xu Dayong. Study on the Method of Determining Digestible Protein Content and Screening of Rice Resources [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 61-66.
[12] Jing Peipei,Ren Hongru,Yang Hongjian,Dai Qigen. Effects of Saline Stress on Leaf Photosynthesis Characteristics and Grain Yield of Two Rice Cultivars (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 67-75.
[13] Ma Hui,Jiao Xiaoyu,Xu Xue,Li Juan,Ni Dahu,Xu Rongfang,Wang Yu,Wang Xiufeng. Advances in Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Cadmium Metabolism in Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 1-8.
[14] Bai Lanfang,Zhang Xiangqian,Wang Rui,Wang Ya'nan,Ye Xuesong,Wang Yufen,Li Juan,Zhang Dejian. Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Different Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 154-160.
[15] Cao Sheng,Wang Ying,Chen Huixian,Shang Xiaohong,Xie Xiangyu,Yan Huabing,Lu Liuying. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on the Quality of Edible Cassava [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 168-172.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[3] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[4] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167 -174 .
[5] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37 -41 .
[6] Weijiao Xiong,Yalun Wang,Shaochang Yao,Chunliu Pan,Dong Xiao,Aiqin Wang,Longfei He. Progress in Studying Mechanism of microRNA in Stress Response in Higher Plants[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 1 -8 .
[7] Liangmei Chen,Jiangxia Li,Zhaoyun Hu,Wenling Ye,Wenge Wu,Youhua Ma. Review on Application of Low Accumulation Crops on Remediation of Farmland Contaminated by Heavy Metals[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 16 -24 .
[8] Lu Zhao,Zhiwei Yang,Liqun Bu,Ling Tian,Mei Su,Lei Tian,Yinxia Zhang,Shuqin Yang,Peifu Li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evalution of Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Ningxia and Xinjiang Rice Germplasm[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 25 -34 .
[9] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines)[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77 -82 .
[10] Kai Zhu,Fei Zhang,Fulai Ke,Yanqiu Wang,Jianqiu Zou. Effects of Planting Density on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Hybrids Suitable for Mechenization[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 83 -87 .