氮肥运筹对湘南双季杂交稻产量与抗倒伏特性的影响

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.03.033

Abstract

Abstract:

To explore the effects of different nitrogen fertilizer management modes on yield and lodging resistance of double-cropping hybrid rice in southern Hunan, field experiments were conducted with early rice varieties Luliangyou 996 and Zhuliangyou 819 and late rice varieties H you 518 and Shengtaiyou 018 as materials for comparative study of the effects of three proportion of basal and tiller fertilizer, panicle fertilizer, and grain fertilizer (N1: 7:2:1, N2: 6:3:1, and N3: 5:4:1) on yield and lodging resistance of double-cropping rice in Hengyang county, Hunan province, in 2019-2020. The results showed that nitrogen management mode had a significant effects on the yield of double-cropping rice. The N2 treatment had the best coordination effects on the yield components and the yield was the highest. Under the condition of 50%-60% basal and tiller fertilizer ratio, all varieties had higher bending resistance and lower lodging index but individual varieties showed inter-annual differences. Compared with N1, N2 and N3 treatments had lower plant height, lower center of gravity, thicker stem wall, shorter internode, and higher internode fullness and there was no significant difference between N2 and N3 treatments. Correlation analysis showed that the key to improve lodging resistance was to reduce plant height, the height of the center of gravity, and fresh weight of single stem and to improve stem diameter and fullness of the 4th internode from the top. Comprehensively considering the lodging index and yield characters of different varieties, 6:3:1 treatment with ratio of basal and tiller fertilizer, panicle fertilizer, and grain fertilizer could better coordinate the yield characters and lodging resistance of rice to achieve the goal of high yield and lodging resistance.

Key words: Double-cropping rice, Southern Hunan, Nitrogen fertilizer management, Yield, Lodging resistance

Su Yuting, Yuan Shuai, Li Yongsong, Cui Can, Chen Pingping, Wang Xiaoyu, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Yield and Lodging Resistance Properties of Double-Cropping Hybrid Rice in Southern Hunan[J].Crops, 2022, 38(3): 225-232.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

References 27

[1]	杨世民, 谢力, 郑顺林, 等. 氮肥水平和栽插密度对杂交稻茎秆理化特性与抗倒伏性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(1):93-103.
[2]	肖立, 罗俊英, 陈泽. 施氮量和栽插密度对杂交稻金优527抗倒伏能力的影响. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2009, 15(9):153-155.
[3]	李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 等. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(7):1323-1334.
[4]	李娟, 黄平娜, 刘淑军, 等. 不同施肥模式对水稻生理特性、产量及其N肥农学利用率的影响. 核农学报, 2011, 25(1):169-173.
[5]	Hossain K A, Horiuchi T, Miyagawa S. Effects of powdered rice chaff application on Si and N absorption,lodging resistance and yield in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Production Science, 1999, 2(3):159-164. doi: 10.1626/pps.2.159
[6]	徐富贤, 蒋鹏, 周兴兵, 等. 多效唑对杂交中稻不同密肥群体产量和抗倒伏性的影响. 核农学报, 2020, 34(5):1088-1096.
[7]	吴晓然, 丁艳锋, 张巫军, 等. 超级杂交籼稻抗倒能力比较及其对氮素的响应. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48 (14):2705-2717.
[8]	张忠旭, 陈温福, 杨振玉, 等. 水稻抗倒伏能力与茎秆物理性状的关系及其对产量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 1999, 30(2):81-85.
[9]	田文涛, 邵平, 王燚, 等. 超级杂交稻茎秆形态结构及其与抗倒性的关系研究. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(2):67-71,81.
[10]	Pan J, Zhao J, Liu Y, et al. Optimized nitrogen management enhances lodging resistance of rice and its morpho-anatomical,mechanical,and molecular mechanisms. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9:20274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56620-7
[11]	胡江, 藤本宽, 郭龙彪, 等. 水稻抗倒力及相关抗倒伏性状的QTL分析. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(2):211-214.
[12]	Zhang W, Wu L, Wu X, et al. Lodging resistance of Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.):morphological and anatomical traits due to top-dressing nitrogen application rates. Rice, 2016, 9(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12284-016-0103-8
[13]	Zhang W, Wu L, Ding Y, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer application affects lodging resistance by altering secondary cell wall synthesis in japonica rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Plant Research, 2017, 130(5):859-871. doi: 10.1007/s10265-017-0943-3
[14]	何巧林, 张绍文, 李应洪, 等. 硅钾配施对水稻茎秆性状和抗倒伏能力的影响. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(1):66-73.
[15]	张丰转, 金正勋, 马国辉, 等. 灌浆成熟期粳稻抗倒伏性和茎鞘化学成分含量的动态变化. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(3):264-270.
[16]	邓接楼, 付国良, 晏燕花. 硅肥对水稻茎秆SiO₂含量与抗折力的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(5):2696-2698.
[17]	马国辉, 邓启云, 万宜珍, 等. 超级杂交稻抗倒生理与形态机能研究Ⅰ.培矮64S/E32与汕优63植株钾、硅和纤维素含量差异. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 26(5):329-331.
[18]	程慧煌, 易振波, 曾勇军, 等. 超级杂交稻抗倒伏能力及其对施肥量的响应. 核农学报, 2018, 32(8):1603-1610.
[19]	陈书强, 赵海新, 杜晓东, 等. 氮肥运筹对黑龙江省第三积温带水稻抗倒伏能力的影响. 华北农学报, 2015, 30(S1):390-394.
[20]	苏东行, 彭显龙, 罗盛国, 等. 氮肥管理对寒地水稻倒伏性能的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012(9):39-42.
[21]	陈平平, 张小平, 吴小京, 等. 氮肥运筹对陆两优996产量形成与氮利用效率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5):238-242
[22]	杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 等. 不同水稻品种(系)抗倒伏能力与茎秆形态性状的关系. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(2):231-235.
[23]	李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 等. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(11):2234-2243.
[24]	谷海东, 赵宏伟, 刘洋, 等. 插秧密度对寒地粳稻抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物杂志, 2014(2):101-106.
[25]	苗智英, 邵光成, 房凯, 等. 不同水炭处理对水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 排灌机械工程学报, 2021, 39(2):193-199.
[26]	穆麒麟, 游艾青, 王松, 等. 适宜机械化栽培的水稻品种筛选研究. 杂交水稻, 2021, 36(2):45-51.
[27]	陈健晓, 屠乃美, 易镇邪, 等. 硅肥对超级早稻茎叶形态与抗倒伏特性的影响. 作物研究, 2011, 31(3):209-212.

Related Articles 15

[1]	Xu Chuangye, Zhang Jianjun, Zhou Gang, Zhang Kaipeng, Zhu Xiaohui, Wang Jiaxi, Dang Yi, Zhao Gang, Wang Lei, Li Shangzhong, Fan Tinglu. Screening and Evaluation of New Maize Varieties with Compact Planting, High Yield and Suitable for Mechanical Grain Harvest in Loess Plateau in Eastern Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 104-110.
[2]	Feng Changhui, Jiao Chunhai, Zhang Youchang, Bie Shu, Qin Hongde, Wang Qiongshan, Zhang Jiaohai, Wang Xiaogang, Xia Songbo, Lan Jiayang, Chen Quanqiu. Genetic Analysis for Yield and Fiber Quality Traits in Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Mating Design [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 13-21.
[3]	Chang Haigang, Li Guang, Yuan Jianyu, Xie Mingjun, Qi Xiaoping. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Soil Nutrients and Yield of Spring Wheat in the Loess Hilly Region of Central Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 160-166.
[4]	Zhang Xi, Xie Jin, Huang Hao, Gao Renji, Lu Chao, Zhou Yilin, Liang Zengfa, Wang Wei. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Operation and Plant Spacing on Yield and Quality of Yunyan 116 in Pu’er Tobacco Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 188-194.
[5]	Shi Bixian, Tao Jianfei, Gao Yan, Xie Huihong, Abulimiti·Aierken , Cheng Pingshan, Maitituersun·Sadike , Sha Hong. Effects of Different Planting Densities on the Morphological Traits and Yields of Three Confectionery Sunflower Varieties [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 195-200.
[6]	Xu Min, Jin Lulu, Li Ruichun, Sun Liyuan, Wang Zisheng. Study on Cotton Chemical Topping in Liaohe Cotton Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 201-207.
[7]	Tao Yueyue, Sun Hua, Wang Haihou, Lu Changying, Shen Mingxing. Effects of Harvest Date and Drying Days on the Yield, Crude Protein Content and Moisture of Forage Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 215-220.
[8]	Zhang Chonghua, Duan Licheng, Wang Shangming, Zhang Qingxia, Wang Chengzi, Wu Fengyu, Yang Lin. Effects of Sowing Date on Late-Rice Yield and Utilization of Heat-Light Resources in Jiangxi Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 229-234.
[9]	Pan Junfeng, Liu Yanzhuo, Liang Kaiming, Huang Nongrong, Peng Bilin, Fu Youqiang, Hu Xiangyu, Zhong Xuhua, Li Meijuan, Hu Rui. Effects of Long- and Short-Term Reduction of Phosphorus Input on Yield and Phosphorus Utilization of Double Cropping Rice in South China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 241-248.
[10]	Li Rui, Dong Liqiang, Shang Wenqi, Yu Guangxing, Dai Guijin, Wang Zheng, Li Yuedong. Effects of Water Spraying Interval at Seedling Stage on Growth and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 249-254.
[11]	Chen Shiyong, Wang Rui, Chen Zhiqing, Zhang Haipeng, Wang Juanjuan, Shan Yuhua, Yang Yanju. Effects of Nano-Zinc and Ion-Zinc on Rice Yield Formation and Grain Zinc Content [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 107-114.
[12]	Tang Jianpeng, Chen Jingdu, Wen Kai, Zhang Mingwei, Xie Chenglin, Lu Peiling, Min Sigui, Wang Qiluan, Cheng Jiemin. Study on Material Production and Yield Characteristics of Japonica Rice with Good Eating Quality in Rice-Crayfish Farming System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 115-123.
[13]	Sun Qingsheng, Yuan Cheng, Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Inoculating Rhizobium on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Black Soybean [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 132-137.
[14]	Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua, Liu Yongqiang, Tang Dejing, Zhu Yongyong, Hu Xinyuan. Effects of Basal Zinc Fertilizer on Activities of Disease Resistance-Related Enzymes, Soil Borne Diseases and Yield of Potato under Long-Term Continuous Cropping [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 154-159.
[15]	Li Zujun, Jiang Xue, Yang Tonglian, Wu Chaoxin, Zhang Xichun, Jiang Xuehai, Long Wuhua, Zhang Yushan, Zhu Susong. Effects of Different Fertilizer Ratios on Yield and Taste Quality of Guizhouhe Goudang No.1 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 160-166.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle (×10⁴/hm²)	穗粒数 Grains per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate (%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm²)	实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm²)
陆两优996	N1	303.90a	85.76b	76.40b	28.20a	5.62b	5.45b
Luliangyou 996	N2	285.40b	105.92a	78.99a	27.73a	6.62a	6.25a
	N3	278.20b	104.08a	76.37b	28.43a	6.29a	6.02a
株两优819	N1	324.60a	100.51b	76.02b	24.78a	6.15b	5.89b
Zhuliangyou 819	N2	313.90b	112.68a	77.25ab	24.64a	6.73a	6.48a
	N3	302.30c	115.50a	78.10a	24.85a	6.78a	6.44a
H优518	N1	357.33a	104.90b	77.71b	25.87a	7.54b	7.22b
H you 518	N2	337.50b	115.81ab	78.53ab	25.81a	7.92a	7.61a
	N3	325.83b	111.50a	79.40a	25.94a	7.48b	7.26ab
盛泰优018	N1	376.49a	114.70b	73.87b	25.22a	8.05b	7.81b
Shengtaiyou 018	N2	350.17ab	128.65a	79.63a	25.28a	9.07a	8.75a
	N3	332.33b	129.95a	78.40a	24.67b	8.35b	8.11b

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle (×10⁴/hm²)	穗粒数 Grains per panicle	结实率 Seed setting rate (%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight (g)	理论产量 Theoretical yield (t/hm²)	实际产量 Actual yield (t/hm²)
陆两优996	N1	292.63a	79.98a	78.56a	26.67b	4.93b	4.73b
Luliangyou 996	N2	305.85a	80.37a	76.87a	28.52ab	5.46a	5.22a
	N3	298.13a	74.28b	77.62a	30.11a	5.20ab	5.03ab
株两优819	N1	294.25b	83.91a	80.12a	27.26a	5.44b	5.25b
Zhuliangyou 819	N2	354.25a	82.35a	77.28a	27.86a	6.21a	5.88a
	N3	316.64b	82.29a	79.02a	27.92a	5.80ab	5.47b
H优518	N1	307.64b	115.22a	68.14a	24.58a	5.93b	5.77b
H you 518	N2	336.88a	122.37a	70.74a	23.87a	6.92a	6.66a
	N3	322.94ab	120.62a	66.47a	24.93a	6.43ab	6.24ab
盛泰优018	N1	302.61b	113.32a	65.98b	29.11a	6.58a	6.34b
Shengtaiyou 018	N2	330.08a	110.33a	71.43a	28.68a	7.39a	7.11a
	N3	309.17b	112.05a	72.71a	28.14a	7.08a	6.78ab

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	倒3节间The 3rd internode from the top			倒4节间The 4th internode from the top
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	抗折力 Bending resistance (g)	弯曲力矩 Bending moment of force (cm·g)	倒伏指数 Lodging index [(cm·g)/g]	抗折力 Bending resistance (g)	弯曲力矩 Bending moment of force (cm·g)	倒伏指数 Lodging index [(cm·g)/g]
陆两优996 Luliangyou 996	N1	453.10b	1062.36a	234.49a	1059.59a	1275.27a	125.40a
	N2	531.91a	1102.60a	207.34b	1092.88a	1320.23a	120.37a
	N3	503.44a	1073.12a	212.94ab	1083.41a	1288.25a	121.77a
株两优819 Zhuliangyou 819	N1	629.83c	869.90a	138.66a	1072.39b	1008.97a	94.06a
	N2	838.92a	879.56a	105.02b	1262.24a	1016.26a	80.46b
	N3	741.45b	871.42a	117.55b	1112.60b	1006.42a	90.60ab
H优518 H you 518	N1	718.09b	787.69b	109.91a	899.85c	967.53b	107.54a
	N2	970.17a	945.95a	98.56ab	1235.00a	1084.78a	87.83b
	N3	934.07a	844.48b	90.77b	1070.96b	1007.15ab	94.23b
盛泰优018 Shengtaiyou 018	N1	923.60b	799.47a	86.58a	1187.66a	944.44a	79.57a
	N2	928.52b	695.95b	75.00ab	1038.45b	826.43b	78.92a
	N3	1059.64a	759.10ab	72.12b	1299.16a	889.30ab	68.67b

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	倒3节间The 3rd internode from the top			倒4节间The 4th internode from the top
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	抗折力 Bending resistance (g)	弯曲力矩 Bending moment of force (cm·g)	倒伏指数 Lodging index [(cm·g)/g]	抗折力 Bending resistance (g)	弯曲力矩 Bending moment of force (cm·g)	倒伏指数 Lodging index [(cm·g)/g]
陆两优996 Luliangyou 996	N1	834.10a	526.60b	63.13b	915.20a	609.57b	66.82b
	N2	899.27a	561.03a	62.60a	940.93a	684.22a	72.71b
	N3	860.89a	579.47a	67.25a	727.93b	678.41a	93.29a
株两优819 Zhuliangyou 819	N1	950.22a	539.39a	56.31a	945.61a	601.22a	63.65b
	N2	967.77a	459.94b	47.55b	949.44a	518.86b	54.68c
	N3	956.58a	534.42a	55.21a	707.05b	637.08a	89.34a
H优518 H you 518	N1	969.24a	856.10a	88.39a	1262.57b	1023.10a	81.05a
	N2	908.77a	801.69a	88.22a	1408.66a	914.94b	65.50b
	N3	906.58a	805.96a	89.03a	1411.05a	958.30ab	67.97b
盛泰优018 Shengtaiyou 018	N1	924.36b	620.81b	67.54b	1108.70b	738.76b	66.24b
	N2	1056.60a	704.07a	66.64b	1266.62a	826.98a	65.29b
	N3	726.29c	660.75b	90.86a	994.37c	754.78b	75.64a

品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height (cm)	重心高度 Gravity center height (cm)	单茎鲜重 Fresh weight per stem (g)	茎秆粗度 Stem diameter (mm)	茎壁厚度 Stem wall thickness (mm)	节间长度 Length of internode (cm)		节间充实度 Fullness of internode (mg/cm)
品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height (cm)	重心高度 Gravity center height (cm)	单茎鲜重 Fresh weight per stem (g)	茎秆粗度 Stem diameter (mm)	茎壁厚度 Stem wall thickness (mm)	倒3 The 3rd from the top	倒4 The 4th from the top	倒3 The 3rd from the top	倒4 The 4th from the top
陆两优996 Luliangyou 996	N1	103.87a	53.49a	13.86a	6.06a	0.97b	14.11a	6.94a	27.76a	28.34a
	N2	99.03b	53.13a	14.86a	6.17a	1.19a	13.68a	6.55a	27.80a	28.63a
	N3	99.87b	52.44a	13.89a	6.28a	1.13a	13.23a	6.23a	28.26a	28.64a
株两优819 Zhuliangyou 819	N1	103.50a	45.80a	12.09a	6.02a	1.07a	11.05a	4.11a	31.44b	32.11b
	N2	97.47b	45.10a	11.97a	5.94a	1.00a	8.82b	3.71a	37.48a	39.34a
	N3	97.30b	43.80b	12.16a	5.91a	1.05a	10.06ab	4.20a	35.71a	32.99a
H优518 H you 518	N1	107.43a	46.84a	11.33b	5.96a	1.03b	12.39a	6.54a	20.51a	21.71b
	N2	104.03b	43.13b	13.23a	6.20a	1.17a	11.87a	5.48b	20.89a	28.24a
	N3	105.17ab	43.11b	12.00ab	5.94a	1.14a	11.19a	5.75b	20.67a	22.14b
盛泰优018 Shengtaiyou 018	N1	98.90a	40.42a	11.20a	5.95a	1.03b	8.25a	4.72a	22.09b	21.59b
	N2	92.10b	39.71a	10.63a	5.82a	1.08a	7.89ab	4.45a	21.78b	23.05ab
	N3	95.33b	37.83b	11.62a	6.36a	1.09a	7.22b	4.48a	26.42a	25.21a

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Yield and Lodging Resistance Properties of Double-Cropping Hybrid Rice in Southern Hunan

RichHTML

PDF (PC)