Crops ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 206-212.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.02.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Water-Saving Irrigation Modes on Growth, Yield, and Water Utilization of Summer Maize

Wang Huaiping1(), Yang Mingda2,3,4(), Zhang Suyu2, Li Shuai2, Guan Xiaokang3, Wang Tongchao3()   

  1. 1Hebi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hebi 458030, Henan, China
    2Shangqiu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shangqiu 476000, Henan, China
    3Agronomy College of Henan Agricultural University / Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, China
    4National Agro-Ecological System Observation and Research Station of Shangqiu, Shangqiu 476000, Henan, China
  • Received:2023-03-27 Revised:2023-05-25 Online:2024-04-15 Published:2024-04-15

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

53

Abstract:

In order to better understand the potential of increasing yield of traditional and novel water-saving irrigation technologies, the effects of different irrigation modes on growth, yield and water utilization of summer maize were compared and analyzed under the same total irrigation amount. Under rain-proof shelter controlled precipitation conditions, four water-saving irrigation modes were set up, namely furrow irrigation (FI), surface drip irrigation (DI), subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) and moistube-irrigation (MI). The findings demonstrated that, in contrast to FI and DI treatments, SDI and MI treatments decreased the soil water content in the 0-40 cm soil layer and increased it in the 40-100 cm soil layer. Although the leaf area index and aboveground biomass of summer maize declined during the jointing stage, they increased throughout the silking and filling stages, and reduced the decline after silking, ultimately achieving higher aboveground biomass and yield. Compared with FI treatment, aboveground biomass and yield of SDI and MI treatments at maturity stage were significantly increased by 13.43% and 9.65%, and the yields were significant increased by 22.15% and 15.61%, respectively. The water use efficiency of SDI and MI treatments were significantly increased, compared with FI and DI treatments, due to the reduction of soil evaporation and soil water storage consumption, and resulting in lower evapotranspiration. In sum, compared with FI and DI treatments, SDI and MI treatments can reduce soil evaporation, improve soil water conditions in the middle and lower layers, delay the senescence of plant leaves after silking, facilitate post-silking photosynthetic production, and improve water use efficiency and yield of summer maize.

Key words: Summer maize, Water saving irrigation modes, Subsurface drip irrigation, Moistube-irrigation, Leaf area index, Yield, Water use efficiency

Fig.1

The meteorological datas of the experimental site in summer maize growing period"

Fig.2

Water contents of soil profile of summer maize under different water-saving irrigation modes"

Table 1

Leaf area indexes of summer maize under different water-saving irrigation modes"

处理
Treatment		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 吐丝期
Silking stage		 灌浆期
Filling stage
FI 1.86ab 5.24b 3.78c
DI 1.97a 6.25a 4.95ab
SDI 1.44b 6.92a 5.78a
MI 1.61ab 6.31a 5.22ab

Fig.3

Aboveground biomass of summer maize under different water-saving irrigation modes Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different treatments (P < 0.05) at the same stage."

Table 2

Yield and its components of summer maize under different water-saving irrigation modes"

处理
Treatment		 穗粒数
Kernel number
per ear		 百粒重
100-grain
weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)		 收获指数
Harvest
index (%)
FI 403.04b 23.39b 6401.24c 44.53b
DI 409.81b 24.75a 7005.10bc 45.85b
SDI 453.41a 24.47a 7819.20a 47.95a
MI 426.56ab 24.91a 7410.65ab 47.02a

Table 3

Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of summer maize under different water-saving modes"

处理
Treatment		 土壤贮水消耗量
Soil storage water
consumption (mm)		 蒸散量
Evapotranspiration
(mm)		 水分利用效率
Water use efficiency
[kg/(hm2·mm)]		 土面蒸发量Soil evaporation (mm/d)
拔节期―吐丝期
Jointing-silking stage		 吐丝期―成熟期
Silking-maturity
FI 55.79a 295.79a 21.64c 1.47a 0.96a
DI 46.65ab 286.65ab 24.44b 1.36a 0.68b
SDI 40.54b 280.54b 27.96a 0.50b 0.38c
MI 37.65b 277.65b 26.69a 0.54b 0.40c
[1] Wei K, Bao H X, Huang S M, et al. Effects of long-term fertilization on available P, P composition and phosphatase activities in soil from the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2017, 237:134-142.
doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.030
[2] 薛昌颖, 刘荣花, 马志红. 黄淮海地区夏玉米干旱等级划分. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(16):147-156.
[3] 杨明达, 关小康, 刘影, 等. 滴灌模式和水分调控对夏玉米干物质和氮素积累与分配及水分利用的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45(3):443-459.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83026
[4] Chen R, Cheng W H, Cui J, et al. Lateral spacing in drip-irrigated wheat: The effects on soil moisture, yield, and water use efficiency. Field Crops Research, 2015, 179:52-62.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.021
[5] 巨晓棠, 谷保静. 我国农田氮肥施用现状、问题及趋势. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):783-795.
[6] 李金鹏. 利用微灌优化水肥供给协同提高冬小麦产量和水氮利用的机理. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2019.
[7] 涂张焕, 丰文庆, 徐唐奇. 土壤板结原因分析及其对作物吸水性的影响研究. 陕西农业科学, 2020, 66(12):71-73.
[8] 孙景生, 康绍忠, 王景雷, 等. 沟灌夏玉米棵间土壤蒸发规律的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(11):20-24.
[9] 张彦群, 王建东, 龚时宏, 等基于液流计估测蒸腾分析覆膜滴灌玉米节水增产机理. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(21):89-97.
[10] 邱虎森, 张文正, 刘杰云, 等. 滴灌方式及生物质炭对温室青椒产量品质及土壤氮转化酶的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022 (9):67-74.
[11] 徐晨, 张丽华, 于江, 等. 不同滴灌模式下玉米光合响应特征、水分利用及生长发育. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(4):869-879.
[12] 唐志瀚, 王猛猛, 张鹏, 等. 温室番茄循环曝气地下滴灌土壤水分动态及耗水特性. 排灌机械工程学报, 2022, 40(5):504-510.
[13] 王亚竹, 王建平. 微润灌溉对玉米耗水特性及产量的影响研究. 节水灌溉, 2019(6):39-42.
[14] 张明智, 牛文全, 路振广, 等. 微润灌对作物产量及水分利用效率的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(11):1671-1683.
[15] 薛万来, 牛文全, 张子卓, 等. 微润灌溉对日光温室番茄生长及水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013, 31(6):61-66.
[16] 陈绍民, 张胜江, 曹伟. 不同灌溉方式对土壤水分及棉花光合特性的影响分析. 灌溉排水学报, 2016, 35(6):26-30.
[17] Yang M D, Leghari S, Guan X K, et al. Deficit subsurface drip irrigation improves water use efficiency and stabilizes yield by enhancing subsoil water extraction in winter wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11:508.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00508
[18] 杨明达, 关小康, 白田田, 等. 不同滴灌模式对土壤水分空间变异及夏玉米生长的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(1):1-7.
[19] 汪顺生, 费良军, 高传昌, 等. 不同灌溉方式下夏玉米棵间蒸发试验. 农业机械学报, 2012, 43(9):66-71.
[20] Jha S K, Ramatshaba T S, Wang G, et al. Response of growth, yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat to different irrigation methods and scheduling in North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 217:292-302.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.011
[21] 秦杏宇, 吕馥龄, 彭晶晶, 等. 滴灌与沟灌栽培杨树人工林土壤水分动态与生产力. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5):1535-1542.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202005.019
[22] Patel N, Rajput T B S. Dynamics and modeling of soil water under subsurface drip irrigated onion. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(12):1335-1349.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.06.002
[23] 唐士劼, 窦超银. 滴头流量对风沙土滴灌湿润锋运移影响的试验研究. 节水灌溉, 2018(11):56-60,72.
[24] 麦麦提尼亚孜·努尔, 李维, 吴燕锋, 等. 单点滴灌模式干旱区枣园土壤水分运移特征分析. 新疆农业大学学报, 2013, 36(1):81-86.
[25] Uzokwe P, 李新强, 高阳, 等. 不同灌水方式下基于水面蒸发量的夏玉米灌溉试验研究. 灌溉排水学报, 2013, 32(3):59-62.
[26] 何华, 康绍忠. 灌溉施肥深度对玉米同化物分配和水分利用效率的影响. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(4):454-458.
[27] 吴卫熊, 何令祖, 张廷强, 等. 滴灌和微润灌条件下桂西北山区典型土壤水分运移规律分析. 节水灌溉, 2016(9):18-25.
[28] 蔡耀辉, 吴普特, 张林, 等. 微孔陶瓷渗灌与地下滴灌土壤水分运移特性对比. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(4):242-249.
[29] 梁鹏, 申丽霞, 王银花, 等. 基于微润灌不同灌水方式对大棚辣椒生长的影响. 节水灌溉, 2018(12):5-7,11.
[1] Wang Han, Zheng Dechao, Tian Qinqin, Wu Xiaojing, Zhou Wenxin, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Harvest Time on Yield and Cadmium Accumulation and Distribution Characteristics of Early Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 105-112.
[2] Sun Tong, Yang Yushuang, Ma Ruiqi, Zhu Yingjie, Chang Xuhong, Dong Zhiqiang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of PASP-KT-NAA and Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on the Lodging Resistance, Yield, and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 113-121.
[3] Sun Yueying, Liu Jinghui, Mi Junzhen, Zhao Baoping, Li Yinghao, Zhu Shanshan. Study on the Growth-Promoting Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Compound Preparation on Oat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 122-128.
[4] Xu Zheli, Zhu Weiqi, Wang Litao, Shi Feng, Wei Zhiying, Wang Lina, Qiu Hongwei, Zhang Xiaoying, Li Huili. Effects of Irrigation and Foliar Nitrogen Application on Yield, Quality and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Late Sowing Wheat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 139-147.
[5] Xiao Min, Guo Lang, Cui Can, Cheng Zhouqi, Liu Yuwu, Zhuo Le, Wu Si, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Phosphate Fertilizer Management on Yield Components and Nutrient Uptake and Utilization in Mechanical Transplanting Double-Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 178-188.
[6] Xie Mengfan, Jia Haijiang, Qu Yuankai, Nong Shiying, Li Junlin, Wang Jie, Liu Liwei, Yan Huifeng. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate on Leaf Development and Yield of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Baise Tobacco Region [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 189-197.
[7] Zhang Lei, Dong Kongjun, He Jihong, Ren Ruiyu, Liu Tianpeng, Yang Tianyu. Study on the Difference of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Uptake of Different Genotypes of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 228-233.
[8] Hu Haochi, Wang Fugui, Zhu Kongyan, Hu Shuping, Wang Meng, Wang Zhigang, Sun Jiying, Yu Xiaofang, Bao Haizhu, Gao Julin. Effects of Straw Returning Years and Phosphorus Application on Root Growth and Yield of Maize [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 80-88.
[9] Qin Birong, You Saiya, Chen Shurong, Zhu Lianfeng, Kong Yali, Zhu Chunquan, Tian Wenhao, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu, Cao Xiaochuang, Liu Li. Effects of the Different Nitrogen Levels on Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and the Nitrogen Balance of Double-Cropping Rice in Paddy Field [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 89-96.
[10] Luo Xiaoying, Fang Yanfei, Hu Dongping, Tang Jianghua, Xu Wenxiu, Wang Huaigang. Effects of Sowing Methods and Sowing Rates on Soil Water Use and Yield of Dryland Wheat in Arid Region [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 97-104.
[11] Ji Ping, Liu Jinlong, Liu Hao, Kuang Jiali, Ye Shihe, Long Sha, Yang Hongtao, Peng Bo, Xu Chen, Liu Xiaolong. Effects of Heat Stress on Yield Components and Quality in Different Rice Varieties during Heading Stage [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 117-125.
[12] Zhou Zhenlei, Liu Jianming, Cao Dong, Liu Baolong, Wang Dongxia, Zhang Huaigang. Comparison of Grass Yield, Agronomic Traits and Forage Quality of Different Oat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 132-140.
[13] Xiong Xin, Deng Jun, Shang Liyan, Sheng Tian, Ye Jiayu, Liu Zichen, Huang Liying, Zhang Yunbo. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Interaction on Yield and Radiation Use Efficiency of Hybrid Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 166-173.
[14] Shao Meihong, Zhu Defeng, Cheng Siming, Cheng Chu, Xu Qunying, Hu Chaoshui. Study on Seedling Quality and Yield of Machine Transplanting Early Rice with the Seedling Raising of Overlayed-Tray Emergence [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 229-232.
[15] Xie Keran, Gao Ti, Cui Kehui. Research Progress of Potassium Fertilizer Controlling Rice Yield under High Temperature [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 8-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!