Crops ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 71-79.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Concentrations of Exogenous Amino Acids on Growth and Related Physiological Indicators of Rice Seedlings

Liu Fanchao1,2(), Fang Shumei1,2, Wang Qingyan1,2, Wang Hanxin1, Niu Juanjuan1,2, Liang Xilong1,2()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
    2Heilongjiang Plant Growth Regulator Engineering Technology Research Center, Daqing 163319, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2023-03-24 Revised:2023-04-13 Online:2024-04-15 Published:2024-04-15

RichHTML

11

PDF (PC)

67

Abstract:

With the test material of Kenjing 8, the effects of different exogenous amino acids (L-leucine, L-aspartic acid, L-glutamic acid, L-arginine) on rice seedlings growth and related physiological indicators were studied through greenhouse experiment. The results showed that, the addition of exogenous leucine (4 g/L), aspartic acid (1.00 g/L) and glutamic acid (0.9 g/L) could increase the accumulation of dry matter content, chlorophyll content, osmotic substance content, increase antioxidant enzyme activities and reduce malondialdehyde content, further promote root growth of seedlings, and improve the quality of seedlings. Specifically, the plant height of seedlings increased by 55.14%, 57.25% and 37.90%, respectively, the stem base width increased by 10.53%, 12.78% and 42.85%, respectively, the total dry matter mass increased by 66.91%, 42.75% and 38.66%, respectively, and the total chlorophyll content increased by 64.41%, 20.85% and 1.84%, respectively. The exogenous arginine mixed soil treatment showed that the root growth and underground dry matter accumulation of seedlings were significantly inhibited in the concentration range of seedlings. This study showed that exogenous leucine, aspartic acid and glutamic acid had significant regulatory effects. In particular, 4 g/L exogenous leucine had an outstanding effect, which could be used as a technical means to control seedling growth in production of cultivating high-quality rice seedlings.

Key words: Amino acid, Rice, Seedling quality, Agronomic traits, Resistance

Table 1

Experimental design scheme"

组别
Group		 处理
Treatment		 浓度
Concentration (g/L)
亮氨酸Leucine L1 1
L2 2
L3 4
L4 8
天门冬氨酸Aspartic acid T1 0.25
T2 0.50
T3 1.00
T4 5.00
谷氨酸Glutamic acid G1 0.9
G2 1.8
G3 3.6
G4 7.2
精氨酸Arginine J1 0.85
J2 1.70
J3 3.40
J4 10.20
对照Control CK 0.00

Table 2

Effects of different amino acid treatments on agronomic traits of rice seedlings"

组别
Group		 处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant
height
(cm)		 茎基宽
Stem base
width
(mm)		 叶面积
Leaf
area
(cm2)		 地上部
干物质量
Above ground
dry weight
(mg)		 地下部
干物质量
Underground
dry weight
(mg)		 根系总长度
Total root
length
(cm)		 总根表面积
Total root
surface area
(cm2)		 总根体积
Total root
volume
(cm3)		 充实度
Fullness
(mg/cm)		 生长函数
Growth
function
(mg/d)		 根冠比
Root-
shoot
ratio
亮氨酸
Leucine
 CK 13.80±0.95b 1.33±0.06a 0.85±0.07b 6.09±0.14b 7.36±1.09b 80.98±3.69cd 7.07±0.31b 0.05±0.002b 0.44±0.03cd 0.75±0.07c 1.21±0.15a
L1 15.69±0.67b 1.39±0.08a 1.89±0.39a 7.35±0.48b 8.35±0.15b 88.07±2.41c 7.87±0.65b 0.05±0.008b 0.47±0.01c 0.82±0.04c 1.32±0.07a
L2 16.22±1.57b 1.39±0.17a 1.53±0.19a 9.32±1.39a 9.37±0.80b 142.26±9.59a 12.15±1.40a 0.08±0.015a 0.57±0.03a 0.98±0.12b 1.02±0.05ab
L3 21.41±0.96a 1.47±0.16a 1.70±0.25a 10.65±0.47a 11.88±0.72a 125.78±10.01b 11.07±1.33a 0.08±0.012a 0.50±0.01b 1.01±0.05b 1.12±0.02a
L4 21.11±3.30a 1.48±0.17a 1.65±0.20a 9.92±1.04a 7.51±0.45b 70.97±6.11d 6.99±0.37b 0.05±0.005b 0.47±0.02bc 1.21±0.09a 0.76±0.09b
天门冬
氨酸
Aspartic
acid		 CK 13.80±0.95c 1.33±0.06a 0.85±0.07c 6.09±0.14c 7.36±1.09ab 80.98±3.69b 7.07±0.31bc 0.05±0.002bc 0.44±0.03b 0.75±0.06b 1.21±0.15a
T1 18.77±2.34b 1.38±0.09a 1.75±0.10b 6.80±0.28c 5.88±0.34b 76.87±4.33b 6.55±0.20c 0.04±0.001c 0.36±0.03c 0.71±0.04b 0.86±0.02b
T2 15.37±1.36c 1.37±0.16a 2.07±0.31ab 6.87±0.29c 8.51±0.98a 86.47±7.48b 7.44±0.70b 0.05±0.003b 0.38±0.02c 0.80±0.07b 1.24±0.13a
T3 21.70±0.54a 1.50±0.11a 2.47±0.43a 9.83±0.64a 9.37±0.92a 107.23±8.89a 9.54±0.42a 0.07±0.004a 0.45±0.02b 1.01±0.08a 0.95±0.04ab
T4 14.65±1.64c 1.39±0.16a 1.67±0.30b 8.25±1.16b 6.96±0.66ab 60.03±5.95c 5.71±0.70d 0.04±0.006c 0.54±0.05a 0.85±0.10b 0.84±0.04b
谷氨酸
Glutamic
acid
 CK 13.80±0.95d 1.33±0.06b 0.85±0.07c 6.09±0.14c 7.36±1.09b 80.98±3.69b 7.07±0.31b 0.05±0.002a 0.44±0.03b 0.75±0.07c 1.21±0.15a
G1 19.03±0.92c 1.90±0.17a 1.73±0.15b 8.87±0.44b 9.78±1.07a 97.94±7.40a 7.73±0.20b 0.05±0.001a 0.47±0.01b 0.86±0.05bc 1.10±0.03a
G2 21.42±0.83b 1.66±0.04a 2.74±0.32a 9.11±0.53a 6.57±0.46b 53.93±2.99c 5.01±0.50c 0.04±0.006b 0.46±0.01b 0.91±0.07b 0.72±0.03b
G3 24.11±0.92a 1.87±0.10a 2.65±0.56a 9.38±0.78a 6.45±0.66b 58.42±2.81c 5.50±0.61c 0.04±0.008ab 0.39±0.02c 0.87±0.06bc 0.69±0.03b
G4 19.24±1.46c 1.79±0.18a 2.45±0.27a 10.96±0.79a 6.24±0.39b 46.15±3.39d 5.89±2.25a 0.04±0.005ab 0.56±0.03a 1.15±0.10a 0.57±0.05c
精氨酸
Arginine
 CK 13.80±0.95b 1.33±0.06cd 0.85±0.07c 6.09±0.14c 7.36±1.09a 80.98±3.69a 7.07±0.31a 0.05±0.002a 0.44±0.03c 0.75±0.07c 1.21±0.15a
J1 15.08±0.58b 1.61±0.03b 2.11±0.34b 7.54±0.44b 6.32±0.41ab 61.04±3.27b 5.69±0.45b 0.04±0.002a 0.50±0.04b 0.77±0.04bc 0.84±0.01b
J2 22.74±0.16a 1.82±0.04a 2.79±0.29a 11.97±0.69a 5.89±0.49bc 49.43±4.92c 4.81±0.28c 0.04±0.003a 0.53±0.03b 0.99±0.07a 0.49±0.02c
J3 20.32±2.73a 1.39±0.13c 3.22±0.13a 10.84±1.00a 4.89±0.53c 44.92±4.24c 4.41±0.61c 0.03±0.006a 0.53±0.03b 0.87±0.08b 0.45±0.04c
J4 10.78±1.15c 1.18±0.12d 1.04±0.32c 6.72±0.80bc 2.95±0.23d 21.01±2.60d 2.72±0.34d 0.01±0.001a 0.62±0.03a 0.54±0.05d 0.44±0.05c

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on root vigor of rice seedlings Different lowercase letters indicates the significant difference among different treatments (P < 0.05), the same below."

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on chlorophyll contents in rice seedlings"

组别
Group		 处理
Treatment		 叶绿素a含量
Chlorophyll a content (mg/g)		 叶绿素b含量
Chlorophyll b content (mg/g)		 叶绿素总含量
Total chlorophyll content (mg/g)		 叶绿素a/b
Chlorophyll a/b
亮氨酸Leucine CK 1.30±0.02c 0.32±0.01c 1.63±0.03c 4.00±0.06a
L1 1.14±0.02c 0.32±0.01c 1.46±0.01c 3.55±0.16b
L2 1.79±0.01b 0.53±0.01b 2.32±0.01b 3.38±0.09bc
L3 2.04±0.41b 0.63±0.17b 2.68±0.59b 3.27±0.26c
L4 2.41±0.01a 0.86±0.01a 3.27±0.01a 2.79±0.02d
天门冬氨酸Aspartic acid CK 1.30±0.02b 0.32±0.01c 1.63±0.03b 4.00±0.06a
T1 1.14±0.11c 0.31±0.01c 1.46±0.13c 3.65±0.21b
T2 1.33±0.06b 0.37±0.03b 1.69±0.09b 3.63±0.11b
T3 1.54±0.06a 0.42±0.02a 1.97±0.08a 3.66±0.05b
T4 1.16±0.02c 0.32±0.01c 1.48±0.03c 3.69±1.10b
谷氨酸Glutamic acid CK 1.30±0.02bc 0.32±0.01c 1.63±0.03c 4.00±0.06a
G1 1.37±0.11bc 0.29±0.03c 1.66±0.14c 4.02±0.11a
G2 1.49±0.12b 0.41±0.05c 1.89±0.17b 3.66±0.17ab
G3 1.51±0.30b 0.56±0.14b 2.07±0.17b 2.91±1.11b
G4 2.20±0.03a 0.70±0.01a 2.90±0.03a 3.15±0.05ab
精氨酸Arginine CK 1.30±0.02d 0.32±0.01c 1.63±0.03d 4.00±0.06a
J1 0.70±0.04e 0.19±0.03d 0.89±0.07e 3.79±0.37ab
J2 2.10±0.01a 0.62±0.01a 2.72±0.01a 3.41±0.03b
J3 1.80±0.06c 0.52±0.02b 2.32±0.07c 3.48±0.08ab
J4 1.97±0.10b 0.59±0.04a 2.56±0.14b 3.32±0.08b

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on carbon metabolite of rice seedlings"

Fig.3

Effects of different treatments on protective enzyme activities of rice seedlings"

Fig.4

Effects of different treatments on osmoregulation substances contents of rice seedlings"

[1] 申春芳. 水稻栽培技术对稻米品质的影响. 世界热带农业信息, 2022(5):84-86.
[2] 李瑶, 郑殿峰, 冯乃杰, 等. 调环酸钙对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗生长及抗性生理的影响. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(10):1897-1906.
[3] 华东理工大学有机化学教研组. 有机化学:第二版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013.
[4] 王振华. 氨基酸能促进插条生根. 中国花卉盆景, 1988(1):13.
[5] 邹朝晖, 张志元, 邓钢桥, 等. 喷施外源氨基酸对水稻干重及含氮量的影响. 核农学报, 2016, 30(7):1435-1439.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.07.1435
[6] 陈鹏, 霍天满, 夏金林, 等. 丙氨酸浸种对水稻发芽及幼苗生长和养分元素含量的影响. 安徽科技学院学报, 2022, 36(4):25-30.
[7] 姚雄, 万军, 蓝平, 等. 氮肥与多效唑配合对稻麦两熟区机插水稻秧苗生长的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6):1364-1371.
[8] Huang M, Han S, Ao J, et al. Primary-tiller panicle number is critical to achieving high grain yields in machine-transplanted hybrid rice. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10(1):2811-2817.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59751-4 pmid: 32071392
[9] 李晓蕾, 钱永德, 黄成亮, 等. 苗期氮素用量对水稻秧苗素质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2014(3):47-50.
[10] 陈雪, 夏冰, 张思佳. 聚天门冬氨酸浸种对水稻秧苗抗逆性的影响. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(4):49-52.
[11] 左莹. 外源添加谷氨酸提高水稻抗旱性机制. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2022.
[12] 邹朝晖, 张志元, 邓钢桥, 等. 喷施外源氨基酸对水稻干重及含氮量的影响. 核农学报, 2016, 30(7):1435-1439.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2016.07.1435
[13] 梁志雄, 彭智平, 涂玉婷, 等. 氨基酸配合硼喷施对油麦菜硼营养及生长、品质的影响. 核农学报, 2020, 34(11):2587-2594.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.11.2587
[14] 齐德强, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 不同复配壮秧剂对水稻机插秧根系形态及抗性生理的影响. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(5):974-981.
[15] 安之冬. 水稻育秧基质配施化肥与生长调节剂对秧苗素质及产量的影响. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021.
[16] 王晶英, 敖红, 张杰, 等. 植物生理生化实验技术与原理. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社, 2003.
[17] 胡秉芬, 黄华梨, 季元祖, 等. 分光光度法测定叶绿素含量的提取液的适宜浓度. 草业科学, 2018, 35(8):1965-1974.
[18] 张志良. 植物生理学实验指导: 第5版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016.
[19] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
[20] Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 227:248-254.
[21] 安之冬, 管浩, 朱远芃, 等. 育秧基质配施腐植酸对水稻秧苗素质及产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(6):173-181.
[22] 宋胜. 聚合氨基酸、SOD模拟物及其复合物对大豆生长发育及产量品质的调控效应. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2008.
[23] 牛耀芳, 宗晓波, 都韶婷, 等. 大气CO2浓度升高对植物根系形态的影响及其调控机理. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17 (1):240-246.
[24] 王艳丽, 刘国顺, 丁松爽, 等. 磷用量对烤烟根系及其与地上部关系的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(5):1440-1446.
[25] 王艳哲, 刘秀位, 孙宏勇, 等. 水氮调控对冬小麦根冠比和水分利用效率的影响研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(3):282-289.
[26] 苑婧娴. 氨基酸对小麦幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013.
[27] 褚润, 陈年来. UV-B辐射增强对芦苇光合生理及叶绿体超微结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11):3515-3520.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201711.006
[28] ALquezar B, Rodrigo M J, Zacarias L. Regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis during fruit maturation in the red-fieshed orange mutant Cara. Phytochemistry, 2008, 69(10):1997-2007.
doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2008.04.020
[29] 潘圣刚, 闻祥成, 田华, 等. 播种密度和壮秧剂对水稻秧苗生理特性的影响. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(3):32-36.
[30] 张鹏宇, 张晓蕊, 贺如, 等. 氨基酸肥喷施次数和时期对大豆生理和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2022, 41(5):569-579.
[31] 朱广龙, 宋成钰, 于林林, 等. 外源生长调节物质对甜高粱种子萌发过程中盐分胁迫的缓解效应及其生理机制. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11):139-150.
[32] 李成江, 谢小林, 周莲, 等. 羽毛酶解氨基酸肥对小麦根系形态及抗性酶活的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022, 305(9):127-132.
[1] Wang Han, Zheng Dechao, Tian Qinqin, Wu Xiaojing, Zhou Wenxin, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Harvest Time on Yield and Cadmium Accumulation and Distribution Characteristics of Early Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 105-112.
[2] Sun Tong, Yang Yushuang, Ma Ruiqi, Zhu Yingjie, Chang Xuhong, Dong Zhiqiang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of PASP-KT-NAA and Ethylene-Chlormequat-Potassium on the Lodging Resistance, Yield, and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 113-121.
[3] Xiao Min, Guo Lang, Cui Can, Cheng Zhouqi, Liu Yuwu, Zhuo Le, Wu Si, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Phosphate Fertilizer Management on Yield Components and Nutrient Uptake and Utilization in Mechanical Transplanting Double-Cropping Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 178-188.
[4] Zhang Zhixiao, Shen Yingchao, Fan Baojie, Wang Yan, Liu Changyou, Wang Shen, Cao Zhimin, Su Qiuzhu, Shi Huiying, Tian Jing. Germplasm Creation and New Variety Breeding for Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 249-254.
[5] Qin Birong, You Saiya, Chen Shurong, Zhu Lianfeng, Kong Yali, Zhu Chunquan, Tian Wenhao, Zhang Junhua, Jin Qianyu, Cao Xiaochuang, Liu Li. Effects of the Different Nitrogen Levels on Yield, Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency and the Nitrogen Balance of Double-Cropping Rice in Paddy Field [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 89-96.
[6] Ji Ping, Liu Jinlong, Liu Hao, Kuang Jiali, Ye Shihe, Long Sha, Yang Hongtao, Peng Bo, Xu Chen, Liu Xiaolong. Effects of Heat Stress on Yield Components and Quality in Different Rice Varieties during Heading Stage [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 117-125.
[7] Lü Zengshuai, Dong Hongye, Wang Peng, Duan Wei, Liu Shengli, Liu Yantao. Progress in Mechanism of Herbicide Resistance and Breeding of Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 16-22.
[8] Xiong Xin, Deng Jun, Shang Liyan, Sheng Tian, Ye Jiayu, Liu Zichen, Huang Liying, Zhang Yunbo. Effects of Nitrogen and Potassium Fertilizer Interaction on Yield and Radiation Use Efficiency of Hybrid Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 166-173.
[9] Wang Xiaolei, Zhang Yunhe, Mu Jinmeng, Gao Dapeng, Geng Yanqiu, Cao Yiwen, Lu Fen, Guan Zhengwen, Shao Xiwen, Guo Liying. Effects of Soda and Saline-Alkali Stress on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 193-203.
[10] Zhang Lu, Li Dengming, Zhai Xiaoyu, Wu Junying, Gao Shihua, Zhao Yufei. Differences in Agronomic and Quality Traits of Oat at Cutting Time and Their Relationships with Regeneration Performance [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 220-228.
[11] Shao Meihong, Zhu Defeng, Cheng Siming, Cheng Chu, Xu Qunying, Hu Chaoshui. Study on Seedling Quality and Yield of Machine Transplanting Early Rice with the Seedling Raising of Overlayed-Tray Emergence [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 229-232.
[12] Liu Dan, Wang Jiayu, Feng Zhangli, Feng Bo, Chen Wenfu. Analysis on Genetic Diversity and Population Structure for Japonica Rice Varieties in Liaoning Province [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 40-47.
[13] Sun Yuantao, Long Wenjing, Li Yuan, Liu Tianpeng, Zhao Ganlin, Ding Guoxiang, Ni Xianlin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 45 Glutinous Sorghum Germplasms Based on Major Agronomic Traits and SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 57-64.
[14] Xie Keran, Gao Ti, Cui Kehui. Research Progress of Potassium Fertilizer Controlling Rice Yield under High Temperature [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 8-15.
[15] Xie Hao, Xue Zhangyi, Shu Chenchen, Zhang Weiyang, Zhang Hao, Liu Lijun, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang, Gu Junfei. Analysis of Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Base Fertilizer of Rice under Different Crop Management Practices by Using 15N Labeling [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 90-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!