检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2021, 第4期: 172–177 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.04.026

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

灌浆期不同阶段干旱对高粱籽粒淀粉积累的影响

张瑞栋1,2(), 高铭悦2, 岳忠孝1, 周宇飞2, 曹雄1()   

  1. 1山西农业大学经济作物研究所,032200,山西汾阳
    2沈阳农业大学农学院,110866,辽宁沈阳
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-08 修回日期:2020-11-15 出版日期:2021-08-15 发布日期:2021-08-13
  • 通讯作者: 曹雄
  • 作者简介:张瑞栋,主要从事高粱栽培育种研究,E-mail：342185880@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家谷子高粱产业技术体系高粱汾阳试验站(CARS-06-13.5-B10);国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-06-13.5-A7);吕梁市重点研发计划(2019NYZDYF19);财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系

Effects of Drought at Different Stages of Grain Filling Period on Starch Accumulation of Sorghum Grains

Zhang Ruidong1,2(), Gao Mingyue2, Yue Zhongxiao1, Zhou Yufei2, Cao xiong1()   

  1. 1Institute of Industrial Crops, Shanxi Agricultural University, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, China
    2College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2020-09-08 Revised:2020-11-15 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-13
  • Contact: Cao xiong

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

254

摘要：

为了研究灌浆期干旱对高粱籽粒淀粉积累的影响,以高淀粉高粱品种铁杂17（TZ17）和低淀粉品种辽杂11（LZ11）为试验材料,在灌浆的早期、中期、后期进行干旱胁迫,通过测定2个高粱品种的总淀粉、直链淀粉、支链淀粉含量及产量指标,研究灌浆期干旱胁迫对高粱籽粒淀粉积累及产量形成的影响。结果表明,2个高粱品种的总淀粉、直链淀粉、支链淀粉含量及产量均受干旱影响呈减少的变化趋势。灌浆期不同阶段干旱胁迫对淀粉积累的影响程度主要表现为灌浆早期>灌浆中期>灌浆后期;高淀粉品种（TZ17）比低淀粉品种（LZ11）更易受到干旱胁迫的影响;干旱胁迫下淀粉指标的变异系数依次为直链淀粉>支链淀粉/直链淀粉>总淀粉>支链淀粉,表明直链淀粉比支链淀粉更易受干旱胁迫的影响;灌浆期干旱胁迫影响籽粒淀粉的积累,降低了千粒重,最终影响高粱的籽粒产量。

关键词: 高粱, 灌浆期, 干旱, 淀粉

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of drought stress during filling period on starch accumulation in sorghum. Two sorghum varieties, Tieza17 (high starch content) and Liaoza11 (low starch content) were planted in pots as the experiment materials. The two varieties were suffered from drought stress at initial stage, middle stage and late stage of grain filling period, respectively. The starch content, amylose content, amylopectin content and grain yield of the two sorghum varieties were investigated. The results showed that the contents of starch, amylose and amylopectin and grain yield were decreased by drought occurred at filling period. The effects of drought stress on starch accumulation at different stages of grain filling period were mainly at the initial filling stage > the middle filling stage > the late filling stage. Tieza17 was more sensitive than Liaoza11 to the drought stress. The variable coefficients of starch indexes under drought stress was as follows: amylose > amylopetin to amylase ratio > total starch > amyloptin, indicating that amylose was more susceptible to drought stress than amylopectin. Generally, drought stress during filling period significantly influenced the starch accumulation, resulting in decrease of the 1000-seed weight, ultimately caused a decline of grain yield in sorghum.

Key words: Sorghum, Filling period, Drought, Starch

表1

灌浆期干旱对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 总淀粉
Starch (%)		 直链淀粉
Amylose (%)		 支链淀粉
Amylopectin (%)		 支链淀粉/直链淀粉
Amylopectin/Amylose
TZ17 DS0 25.64±0.62a 5.35±0.12a 20.29±0.52a 3.79±0.06d
DS1 22.76±0.83c 4.17±0.07c 18.59±0.84b 4.46±0.22bc
DS2 24.57±0.24b 4.54±0.13b 20.03±0.27a 4.41±0.16bc
DS3 24.74±0.24b 4.66±0.04b 20.08±0.21a 4.31±0.09c
变异系数Variation coefficient (%) 4.86 9.69 4.22 7.18
LZ11 DS0 17.19±0.18d 3.15±0.13d 14.04±0.31c 4.47±0.29bc
DS1 16.17±0.08e 2.62±0.17f 13.55±0.23c 5.19±0.41a
DS2 16.43±0.08e 2.81±0.09ef 13.62±0.04c 4.85±0.15ab
DS3 16.72±0.06de 2.89±0.11e 13.83±0.16c 4.79±0.24ab
变异系数Variation coefficient (%) 2.44 7.92 1.96 7.56

图1

高粱籽粒总淀粉积累量的动态比较

图2

高粱籽粒直链淀粉积累量的比较

图3

高粱籽粒支链淀粉积累量的比较

表2

灌浆期干旱对高粱籽粒产量及构成因素的影响

处理
Treatment		 单株产量
Yield per
plant (g)		 千粒重
1000-seed
weight (g)		 穗粒数
Seeds per
panicle
TZ17DS0 (CK) 124.17±14.08a 36.95±1.26a 3380.19±363.61a
TZ17DS1 79.78±11.58ef 25.51±2.53e 3261.79±670.37a
TZ17DS2 99.67±3.73cd 28.81±2.16cd 3565.16±294.52a
TZ17DS3 110.54±5.67bc 32.60±1.73b 3428.49±237.17a
LZ11DS0 (CK) 111.99±10.61b 31.22±3.17bc 3641.13±556.84a
LZ11DS1 78.01±5.66f 21.86±3.40f 3861.37±735.78a
LZ11DS2 89.72±4.03de 25.35±3.41e 3625.54±486.40a
LZ11DS3 100.74±3.82bcd 28.36±2.83d 3659.07±270.82a
[1] Hubbard J E, Hall H H, Earle E R. Composition of the component parts of the sorghum kernel. Cereal Chemistry, 1946,23:504-511.
[2] 王黎明, 张育松, 马景生, 等. 高粱高淀粉基础材料的筛选及利用. 黑龙江农业科学, 2002,2(2):28-29.
[3] Ding G X, Zhao G L, Chen G M, et al. Invention and utilization of glutinous sorghum male sterile line 45A with high starch and high combining ability. Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015,16(3):486-492.
[4] 高欣, 肖木辑, 周宇飞, 等. 种植密度对高粱子粒淀粉积累的影响. 作物杂志, 2009(6):35-38.
[5] 曹昌林, 董良利, 宋旭东, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2011(1):56-58.
[6] 黄瑞冬, 于泳, 肖木辑, 等. 施磷、钾肥对高粱子粒淀粉积累规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2009(2):29-32.
[7] 李咏, 李召锋, 赵云, 等. 小麦籽粒发育及淀粉晶体特性对花后高温胁迫的响应. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(1):77-86.
[8] 赵晶晶, 姚珊, 李昱, 等. 花后干旱对春小麦籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉形成关键酶活性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015,33(3):104-110.
[9] Yi B, Zhou Y F, Gao M Y, et al. Effect of drought stress during flowering stage on starch accumulation and starch synthesis enzymes in sorghum grains. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014,13(11):2399-2406.
[10] 岳鹏莉, 王晨阳, 卢红芳, 等. 灌浆期高温干旱胁迫对小麦籽粒淀粉积累的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36(11):1489-1496.
[11] 张智猛, 戴良香, 胡昌浩, 等. 玉米灌浆期水分差异供应对籽粒淀粉积累及其酶活性的影响. 植物生态学报, 2005,29(4):636-643.
[12] 依兵. 高粱子粒淀粉积累与合成相关酶活性研究. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2014.
[13] 李诚, 张润琪, 付凯勇, 等. 花后干旱对小麦胚乳淀粉粒发育和理化特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(9):1284-1290.
[14] Correia M J, Osório M L, Osório J, et al. Influence of transient shade periods on the effects of drought on photosynthesis,carbohydrate accumulation and lipid peroxidation in sunflower leaves. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2006,58(1/2/3):75-84.
[15] Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell and Environment, 2008,31(1):11.
[16] Li C, Li C Y, Zhang R Q, et al. Effects of drought on the morphological and physicochemical characteristics of starch granules in different elite wheat varieties. Journal of Cereal Science, 2015,66:66-73.
[17] Yu X, Li B, Wang L, et al. Effect of drought stress on the development of endosperm starch granules and the composition and physicochemical properties of starches from soft and hard wheat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2015,96(8):2746-2754.
[18] 许振柱, 于振文, 张永丽. 土壤水分对小麦籽粒淀粉合成和积累特性的影响. 作物学报, 2003,29(4):595-600.
[19] 苗建利, 王晨阳, 郭天财, 等. 高温与干旱互作对两种筋力小麦品种籽粒淀粉及其组分含量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2008,28(2):254-259.
[20] Zhao X C, Batey I L, Sharp P J, et al. A single genetic locus associated with starch granule properties and noodle quality in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 1998,27(1):7-13.
[21] Singh S, Singh G, Singh P, et al. Effect of water stress at different stages of grain development on the characteristics of starch and protein of different wheat varieties. Food Chemistry, 2008,108(1):130-139.
[1] 高杰, 封广才, 李晓荣, 李青风, 汪灿, 张国兵, 周棱波, 彭秋. 施氮量对酒用糯高粱品种红缨子产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (4): 118–122
[2] 宋瑞娇, 冯彩军, 齐军仓. 富氢水对干旱胁迫下大麦种子萌发及幼苗生物量分配的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (4): 206–211
[3] 陶志强, 闫鹏, 张学鹏. 不同年代玉米品种灌浆期的光合特征对高温适应性的初步研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (4): 73–79
[4] 贾瑞玲, 赵小琴, 南铭, 陈富, 刘彦明, 魏立平, 刘军秀, 马宁. 64份苦荞种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性分析与综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (3): 19–27
[5] 曲祥春, 王鼐, 石贵山, 于淼, 李海青, 高悦, 徐宁, 陈冰嬬. 同异分析法在粒用高粱杂交种评价中的应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (3): 46–50
[6] 曹晓燕, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 董二伟, 焦晓燕. 施氮量对高粱产量、品质及氮利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (2): 108–115
[7] 申洁, 王玉国, 郭平毅, 原向阳. 腐植酸对干旱胁迫下谷子幼苗叶片抗坏血酸-谷胱甘肽循环的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (2): 173–177
[8] 邢愿, 贺中华. 基于水分亏缺指数的贵州省水稻干旱特征分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (2): 191–199
[9] 韩多红, 王恩军, 张勇, 王红霞, 王艳, 王富. 干旱胁迫下外源亚精胺、甜菜碱对菘蓝种子萌发和幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (1): 118–123
[10] 邓婉月, 冷秋彦, 杨在君, 余燕, 吴一超. 干旱胁迫对盆栽“川丹参1号”生理指标及主要活性成分含量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (1): 74–81
[11] 杨娟, 姜阳明, 周芳, 张军, 罗海登, 田山君. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性玉米品种苗期形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (1): 82–89
[12] 周元成, 陈爱萍, 曹永立, 王镇, 赵玉坤, 侯东红, 解丽丽. 大麦籽粒灌浆期β-淀粉酶积累动态与气象因子关系研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (6): 123–127
[13] 王瑞, 平俊爱, 张福耀, 詹鹏杰, 楚建强. 高粱育种资源耐瘠性鉴定及评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (6): 30–37
[14] 高杰, 封广才, 李晓荣, 李青风, 彭秋. 贵州不同地区高粱种质资源表型多样性与聚类分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (6): 54–60
[15] 罗兴录, 黄小凤, 吴美艳, 刘珊迁, 赵博伟. 5个木薯品种生理特性与主要农艺性状的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (5): 182–187
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!