Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 147-151.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on the Effects of N P K Fertilizer in Foxtail Millet

Dai Xiaodong,Xu Xinzhi,Zhu Cancan,Yang Yufeng,Qin Na,Wang Yannan,Wang Chunyi,Yang Xiaoping,Yang Guohong,Li Junxia   

  1. Cereal Crops Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,Henan,China
  • Received:2016-06-08 Revised:2016-07-26 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Junxia Li

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

136

Abstract:

The “3414” fertilizer experiment for high fertilizer efficiency was designed to explore N, P and K fertilizer effects in foxtail millet production and to simulate the optimum fertilization parameter by the established models for scientific fertilization. The results showed that N, P and K fertilizer application can significantly increase panicle length, ear diameter, single panicle weight, grain weight per panicle and yield of foxtail millet. The effects of N, P and K fertilizer on economic traits were in order: N>P>K. According to the ternary quadratic fertilizer efficiency equation, the most suitable amount of fertilizer in Yugu 23 were N 165.33kg/hm 2, P2O5 115.93kg/hm 2, K2O 32.48kg/hm 2, respectively. According to the one-variable quadratic fertilizer efficiency equation, the recommended optimum amount of fertilizer in Yugu 23 were N 162.66kg/hm 2, P2O5 109.30kg/hm 2, K2O 32.68kg/hm 2, respectively. The application of N, P, K fertilizer of Yugu 23 should be emphasized with increasing amounts of N, P and supplemented with K.

Key words: Foxtail millet, N,P,K fertilizer, “3414”, Fertilizer effect mode

Table 1

Designs of the “3414” fertilizer experiment on foxtail millet"

处理
Treatments		 水平Level 肥料用量(kg/hm2)
Rate of fertilizers
N P K N P2O5 K2O
N0P0K0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N0P2K2 0 2 2 0 120 30
N1P2K2 1 2 2 75 120 30
N2P0K2 2 0 2 150 0 30
N2P1K2 2 1 2 150 60 30
N2P2K2 2 2 2 150 120 30
N2P3K2 2 3 2 150 180 30
N2P2K0 2 2 0 150 120 0
N2P2K1 2 2 1 150 120 15
N2P2K3 2 2 3 150 120 45
N3P2K2 3 2 2 225 120 30
N1P1K2 1 1 2 75 60 30
N1P2K1 1 2 1 75 120 15
N2P1K1 2 1 1 150 60 15

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on economic character and yield of foxtail millet"

处理
Treatments		 穗长(cm)
Panicle length		 穗粗(cm)
Ear diameter		 单穗重(g)
Single panicle weight		 穗粒重(g)
Grain weight per panicle		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
N0P0K0 19.70ab 1.93g 8.81g 7.33g 3 037.22g
N0P2K2 20.03ab 2.03f 12.74f 10.09f 4 392.54f
N1P2K2 21.00a 2.12abcdef 15.36abc 12.92abc 5 298.81abc
N2P0K2 20.70ab 2.06def 13.33ef 10.85ef 4 653.81ef
N2P1K2 21.12a 2.13abcde 15.39abc 13.54abc 5 437.61abc
N2P2K2 22.13a 2.20a 16.33a 13.99a 5 633.56a
N2P3K2 21.67a 2.13abcde 15.77ab 13.09ab 5 306.98ab
N2P2K0 20.55ab 2.04ef 13.49ef 10.79ef 4 596.66ef
N2P2K1 21.42b 2.15abcd 15.44abc 13.35abc 5 323.31abc
N2P2K3 21.55a 2.19ab 16.22a 13.71a 5 511.09a
N3P2K2 21.48a 2.17abc 15.98ab 13.85ab 5 592.74ab
N1P1K2 19.82ab 2.09cdef 14.65cd 11.52cd 5 053.88cd
N1P2K1 20.75ab 2.08cdef 13.92de 11.20de 4 800.77de
N2P1K1 20.88a 2.10bcdef 15.08bc 12.38bc 5 200.84bc

Table 3

Correlation coefficients between the economic characters and the fertilizers"

肥料Fertilizer 穗长Panicle length(cm) 穗粗Ear diameter(cm) 单穗重Single panicle weight(g) 穗粒重Grain weight per panicle(g)
N 0.745** 0.716** 0.717** 0.752**
P2O5 0.569* 0.550* 0.600* 0.556*
K2O 0.437 0.655* 0.637* 0.616*

Table 4

Recommended nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium application amounts for foxtail millet predicted by the ternary quadratic fertilizer efficiency equation kg/hm2"

最大施肥量Max fertilization rate 最高产量
Max yield		 最佳施肥量Optimum fertilization rate 最佳产量
Optimum yield
N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O
179.85 122.83 33.21 5 672.68 165.33 115.93 32.48 5 656.05

Table 5

The results simulated by one-factor fertilization models"

肥料
Fertilizer		 肥料效应方程
Fertilizer response equation		 F值
F value
氮肥N Y=4402.3375+14.71803N-0.04209N2 260.075*
磷肥P2O5 Y=4657.076+17.47218P-0.07711P2 1 266.871**
钾肥K2O Y=4595.844+62.81293K-0.94347K2 24 271.634**

Table 6

Recommended nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium application amounts for foxtail millet predicted by the one-variable quadratic fertilizer efficiency equation kg/hm2"

最大施肥量Max fertilization rate 最高产量
Max yield		 最佳施肥量Optimum fertilization rate 最佳产量
Optimum yield
N P2O5 K2O N P2O5 K2O
174.84 ● ● 5 688.99 162.66 ● ● 5 682.74
● 113.29 ● 5 646.82 ● 109.30 ● 5 645.59
● ● 33.29 5 641.06 ● ● 32.68 5 640.96
[1] Lu H Y, Zhang J P, Liu K , et al. Earliest domestication of common millet (Panicum miliaceum) in East Asia extended to 10,000 years ago. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America, 2009,106(18):7367-7372.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900158106
[2] 刁现民 . 中国谷子生产与产业发展方向//柴岩.中国小杂粮产业发展报告.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007: 32-43.
[3] 崔永伟 . 中西部地区小杂粮的生产优势与存在问题及对策研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2008,10(3):54-57.
[4] 李生秀 . 植物营养与肥料学科的现状与展望. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999,5(3):193-205.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.1999.03.001
[5] White J G, Welch R M, Norvell W A . Soil zinc map of the USA using geostatistics and geographic information systems. Soil Science, 1997,62(4):291-298.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100010027x
[6] 赵其国 . 现代土壤学与农业持续发展. 土壤学报, 1996,33(1):1-12.
[7] 张福锁, 马文奇 . 肥料投入水平与养分资源高效利用的关系. 土壤与环境, 2000,9(2):154-157.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2000.02.019
[8] 王圣瑞, 陈新平, 高祥照 , 等. “3414”肥料试验模型拟合的探讨. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(4):409-413.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2002.0406
[9] 刘淑军, 黄晶, 梁海军 , 等. 玉米“3414”肥料试验的产量及产值效益分析. 湖南农业科学, 2012(17):51-53,57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2012.17.016
[10] 周景飞, 张晓明 . 水稻“3414”配方施肥法肥料效应研究. 湖北农业科学, 2015,54(16):3872-3874.
[11] 张美俊, 乔治军, 杨武德 , 等. 糜子氮、磷、钾肥的效应及优化研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(2):347-353.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0210
[12] 卫双玲, 李春明, 高桐梅 , 等. 芝麻氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(3):644-649.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0314
[13] 何盛莲, 吴政卿, 雷振生 , 等. 小麦新品种郑麦9962施肥效果及推荐用量研究. 河南农业科学, 2014,43(1):33-35.
[14] 谢立华, 余常兵, 胡小加 , 等. 高密度直播油菜氮磷钾肥推荐用量及影响因素. 中国油料作物学报, 2013,35(1):64-68.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.01.011
[15] 闫虎斌, 赵雪英, 张春明 , 等. 晋北地区绿豆“3414”肥效试验. 山西农业科学, 2015,43(7):857-860.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2015.07.23
[16] 钟秋瓒, 陈荣华, 方先兰 , 等. 红壤旱地花生“3414”肥料试验施肥效应研究. 花生学报, 2013,42(3):16-22.
[17] 孙景玲, 魏丹, 马星竹 , 等. 黑龙江省黑土区大豆测土配方施肥指标体系的建立. 大豆科学, 2013,32(4):512-516.
[18] 代小冬, 常世豪, 杨育峰 , 等. 不同氮肥组合和施肥方式对谷子生长和产量的影响. 河南农业科学, 2014,43(11):13-16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2014.11.004
[19] 罗世武, 杨军学, 张尚沛 , 等. 宁南干旱半干旱区不同施磷量对谷子产量及水分利用效率的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2014,42(30):10506-10507.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.30.026
[20] 宋淑贤, 田伯红, 王建广 , 等. 不同施钾量对谷子生长及产量的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2015(6):6-8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2015.06.002
[21] 赵斌, 张瑞芳, 李向文 , 等. 不同施肥处理对新成片麻岩土壤谷子生长及土层硝态氮的影响. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(24):142-147.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.24.027
[22] 王艳玲, 奚广生 .氮肥对谷子产量的影响研究.安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(34): 15070, 15091.
[23] 王文忠, 双树林 . 山西省褐土施用钾肥对谷子养分吸收及产量形成的影响. 土壤通报, 1999,30(2):82-84.
[24] 温丽琴, 孙治军 . 施用磷肥对旱坡地谷子的产量影响. 土壤肥料, 1998(2):46.
[25] 刘正理, 程汝宏, 张凤莲 , 等. 不同密度条件下3 种类型谷子品种产量及其构成要素变化特征研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2007,15(5):135-138.
[26] 于亚军, 李军, 贾志宽 , 等. 不同水肥条件对宁南旱地谷子产量、WUE及光合特性的影响. 水土保持研究, 2006,13(2):87-90.
[27] 杨艳君, 郭平毅, 曹玉凤 , 等. 施肥水平和种植密度对张杂谷5号产量及其构成要素的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(12):2278-2285.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.02278
[28] 代小冬, 杨育峰, 陈煜 , 等. 施肥对谷子农艺性状、产量及抗倒伏能力的影响. 河南农业科学, 2014,43(10):47-52.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2014.10.012
[29] 韩芳, 韩浩坤, 王海龙 , 等. 施肥对旱薄地谷子农艺性状及产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2015,43(6):718-722.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2015.06.24
[30] 袁宏安, 刘佳佳, 郭玮 , 等. 施肥对不同谷子品种农艺性状及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2015,47(9):90-93.
doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2015.09.021
[31] 刘建平, 李龙江 . 冀西北春谷子“3414”肥效试验研究. 河北农业科学, 2013,17(6):1-5.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2013.06.001
[1] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[2] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[3] Gouliang Song,Xiaolei Feng,Guangyu Fan,Gaolei Shi,Shuangdong Li,Feng Wang,Xiaoming Wang,Zhihai Zhao. Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 44-50.
[4] Xiaodong Dai,Cancan Zhu,Na Qin,Yufeng Yang,Yannan Wang,Guohong Yang,Bing Si,Shihui Liu,Junxia Li. Effects of Uniconazole and Plant Density on Yield and Its Relavent Components of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 104-108.
[5] Lijuan Zhao,Jinfeng Ma,Yandong Li,Xiangyu Li,Zhijiang Li,Hongmei Yuan,Wendong Guo. Mutagenic Effects of 60Co-γ-Ray Radiation on Dry Seeds of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 38-43.
[6] Tingting Mu,Huiling Du,Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Qi Guo,Gang Tian,Huixia Li,Zhang Liu. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Yield Components and Selenium Content in Grain of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 73-78.
[7] Zhihua Li,Xiaolan Jing,Huixia Li,Gang Tian,Xin Liu,Tingting Mu. Safety and Weed Control Efficiency of Foxtail Millet Seedling Stage Herbicides [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 150-154.
[8] Ling Li,Tao Yang,Xuxiao Zong. Effects of Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer in Pea [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 145-150.
[9] Xiaodong Dai,Xinzhi Xu,Cancan Zhu,Yufeng Yang,Chunyi Wang,Xiaoping Yang,Guohong Yang,Junxia Li. Seeding Stage Response to Different Water Availability and Drought Resistance Evaluation of Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 140-143.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .