Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 104-108.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Uniconazole and Plant Density on Yield and Its Relavent Components of Foxtail Millet

Dai Xiaodong1,Zhu Cancan1,Qin Na1,Yang Yufeng1,Wang Yannan1,Yang Guohong1,Si Bing2,Liu Shihui2,Li Junxia1   

  1. 1 Cereal Crops Institute,Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhengzhou 450002,Henan,China
    2 Seed Administration Station of Henan Province,Zhengzhou 450046,Henan,China
  • Received:2017-02-17 Revised:2017-02-26 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Junxia Li

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

132

Abstract:

The effects of different uniconazole concentration (0mg/L, 30mg/L, 90mg/L, 120mg/L), plant density (52.5×10 4 plants/hm 2, 60×10 4 plants/hm 2, 67.5×10 4 plants/hm 2, 75×10 4 plants/hm 2, 82.5×10 4 plants/hm 2) and their interactions on foxtail millet yield components were studied using Yugu 17 as test material. The results showed that spraying uniconazole increased yield significantly and the 30mg/L treatment had the best result. The different plant density treatments also had significant effect on foxtail millet yield. Moreover, the high yield was available at the interaction of 60×10 4 plants/hm 2 (plant density) and 30mg/L (uniconazole concentration). With the increasing of plant density, single panicle weight and grain weight per panicle decreased. Uniconazole had positive effects on single panicle weight and grain weight per panicle and spraying uniconazole 30mg/L was the best treatment.

Key words: Foxtail millet, Uniconazole, Density, Yield

Table 1

Experimental design for two factors of plant density and uniconazole concentration"

试验因子
Experimental factor		 处理Treatment
A1B1 A1B2 A1B3 A1B4 A2B1 A2B2 A2B3 A2B4 A3B1 A3B2 A3B3 A3B4 A4B1 A4B2 A4B3 A4B4 A5B1 A5B2 A5B3 A5B4
种植密度(万株/hm2)
Plant density		 52.5
 52.5
 52.5
 52.5
 60.0
 60.0
 60.0
 60.0
 67.5
 67.5
 67.5
 67.5
 75.0
 75.0
 75.0
 75.0
 82.5
 82.5
 82.5
 82.5
烯效唑浓度(mg/L)
Uniconazole concentration		 0
 30
 60
 90
 0
 30
 60
 90
 0
 30
 60
 90
 0
 30
 60
 90
 0
 30
 60
 90

Table 2

Comparison of the difference significance of yield of different plant density and uniconazole concentrations"

种植密度Plant density (万株/hm2) 平均产量(kg/hm2)
Average yield		 差异显著性
The difference significance
52.5 60.0 67.5 75.0 82.5 0.05 0.01
烯效唑浓度(mg/L) 0 5 192.1 5 995.0 5 102.9 5 049.4 4 674.7 5 202.8 c C
Uniconazole concentration 30 5 852.9 6 186.4 5 719.5 5 269.3 5 119.2 5 629.5 a A
60 5 569.4 5 986.3 5 436.1 5 219.3 4 935.8 5 429.4 b B
90 5 352.7 5 869.6 5 302.7 5 085.9 4 752.4 5 272.6 c BC
平均产量(kg/hm2)
Average yield		 5 491.8
 6 009.3
 5 390.3
 5 156.0
 4 870.5
差异显著性
The difference significance		 0.05 b a b c d
0.01
 B A B C D

Table 3

Comparison of yield of the coupling effects of different plant density and uniconazole concentrations"

处理
Treatment		 平均产量
Average yield
(kg/hm2)		 差异显著性
The difference significance
0.05 0.01
A2B2 6 186.4 a A
A2B3 5 986.3 ab AB
A2B4 5 869.6 abc ABC
A1B2 5 852.9 abc ABC
A3B2 5 719.5 bcd ABCD
A2B1 5 602.8 cde BCDE
A1B3 5 569.5 cdef BCDEF
A3B3 5 436.1 defg CDEFG
A1B4 5 352.7 efg DEFGH
A3B4 5 302.7 efgh DEFGH
A4B2 5 269.3 efgh DEFGH
A4B3 5 219.3 fgh DEFGHI
A5B2 5 119.2 ghi EFGHI
处理
Treatment		 平均产量
Average yield
(kg/hm2)		 差异显著性
The difference significance
0.05 0.01
A4B4 5 085.9 ghij FGHI
A5B3 4 935.8 hij GHI
A1B1 4 852.4 ij HI
A3B1 4 769.1 ij IJ
A5B4 4 752.4 ij IJ
A4B1 4 719.0 j IJ
A5B1 4 368.9 k J

Table 4

Single panicle weight of different plant density and uniconazole concentrations"

种植密度Plant density (万株/hm2) 平均单穗重(g)
Average weight of
per panicle		 差异显著性
The difference significance
52.5 60.0 67.5 75.0 82.5 0.05 0.01
烯效唑浓度(mg/L) 0 12.86 12.48 9.82 8.97 7.79 10.38 b B
Uniconazole concentration 30 13.96 12.95 10.83 9.18 8.07 11.00 a A
60 13.45 12.75 10.35 9.08 7.93 10.71 ab AB
90 12.94 12.66 10.13 9.03 7.81 10.51 b B
平均单穗重(g)
Average weight of per panicle		 13.30
 12.71
 10.28
 9.07
 7.90
差异显著性
The difference significance		 0.05 a b c d e
0.01 A B C D E

Table 5

Grain weight per panicle of different plant density and uniconazole concentrations"

种植密度Plant density (万株/hm2) 平均单穗粒重(g)
Average grain weight
of per panicle		 差异显著性
The difference significance
52.5 60.0 67.5 75.0 82.5 0.05 0.01
烯效唑浓度(mg/L) 0 11.10 10.99 8.40 7.48 6.30 8.85 c C
Uniconazole concentration 30 12.39 11.46 9.41 7.81 6.89 9.59 a A
60 11.79 11.09 8.95 7.73 6.65 9.24 b B
90 11.33 10.87 8.73 7.53 6.40 8.97 c BC
平均单穗粒重(g)
Average grain weight of per panicle		 11.65
 11.10
 8.87
 7.64
 6.56
差异显著性
The difference significance		 0.05 a b c d e
0.01 A B C D E
[1] 陈卫军, 魏益民 . 国内外谷子的研究现状. 杂粮作物, 2000,20(3):27-29.
[2] 刁现民 . 中国谷子生产与产业发展方向//柴岩.中国小杂粮产业发展报告.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007: 32-43.
[3] 崔永伟 . 中西部地区小杂粮的生产优势与存在问题及对策研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2008,10(3):54-57.
[4] 刘春娟, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰 , 等. S3307和DTA-6对大豆叶片生理活性及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,22(3):626-633.
[5] 王浩, 姜妍, 李远明 , 等. 不同化控处理对大豆植株形态及产量的影响.作物杂志, 2014(3):63-66.
[6] 高建芹, 陈松, 彭琦 , 等. 苗期喷施烯效唑对油菜生长及产量和品质的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2016,32(2):305-312.
[7] 刘星贝, 吴东倩, 汪灿 , 等. 喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(24):4903-4915.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.24.005
[8] 王小春, 杨文钰, 陈刚 , 等. 喷施烯效唑对玉米叶片衰老特性和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2009,17(1):86-88.
[9] 李艳霞, 范建芝, 张敬敏 , 等. 烯效唑不同喷施时期对烟薯25生长及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(11):39-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2013.11.010
[10] 周永进, 吴文革, 许有尊 , 等. 烯效唑对不同落谷密度机插水稻秧苗素质及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2014,37(5):19-26.
doi: 10.7685/j.issn.1000-2030.2014.05.004
[11] 韩慧芳, 杨文钰, 李增嘉 , 等. 烯效唑对不同种植密度小麦后期氮素分配及籽粒蛋白质的影响. 作物学报, 2006,32(3):466-468.
[12] 王仁怀, 徐绍英 . 烯效唑对大麦的降矮抗倒效应及其机理研究. 浙江农业大学学报, 1996,22(6):579-584.
[13] 倪皖莉, 于欢欢, 江建华 , 等. 烯效唑对花生产量品质影响的研究. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(12):223-228.
[14] 钟瑞春, 唐秀梅, 蒋菁 , 等. 烯效唑对花生生长、光合作用及产量性状的影响.广东农业科学, 2015(11):65-70.
[15] 杨文钰, 项祖芬, 任万君 , 等. 烯效唑对水稻氮代谢及稻米蛋白质含量的影响.中国水稻科学,20015, 19(1):63-67.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2005.01.012
[16] 樊高琼, 杨文钰, 任万君 , 等. 烯效唑干拌种对小麦叶片衰老期间碳氮代谢的效应.麦类作物学报,20014, 24(4):88-91.
[17] 解备涛, 王庆美, 张海燕 , 等. 植物生长调节剂对甘薯产量和激素含量的影响. 华北农学报, 2016,31(1):155-161.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2016.01.025
[18] 刘星贝, 汪灿, 胡丹 , 等. 烯效唑干拌种对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(1):93-103.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00093
[19] 汪慧芳 . 烯效唑对玉米种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 玉米科学, 2000,8(s):51-52.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2000.z1.022
[20] 陈卫卫, 张秀丽, 张友民 . 烯效唑浸种对谷子幼苗生长和生理指标的影响.黑龙江农业科学, 2006(4):33-35.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2006.04.011
[21] 张永清, 裴红宾, 刘良全 , 等. 烯效唑浸种对谷子植株生长发育的效应. 作物学报, 2009,35(11):2127-2132.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02127
[22] 秦岭, 陈二影, 陈桂玲 , 等. 烯效唑对夏谷生长发育及籽粒产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2014,46(8):46-48,53.
[23] 刘传飞, 金乐红, 曾晓春 , 等. 烯效唑和多效唑在大豆叶片和土壤中的降解动态比较. 植物生理学通讯, 1998,34(5):350-352.
[24] 王熹, 俞美玉, 陶龙兴 , 等. 烯效唑延缓小麦成熟期间叶片衰老的效应. 华北农学报, 1995,10(4):71-75.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1995.04.013
[25] 马建萍, 古世禄, 独俊娥 , 等. 不同浓度烯效唑对谷子发育及生理特性的调控效应//西部大开发科教先行与可持续发展-中国科协2000年学术年会文集, 2000.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .