Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 139-144.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tolerance to Low Phosphorus by Different Foxtail Millet Varieties

Qiu Shuang,Yan Shuangdui,Liu Lijun   

  1. College of Resources and Environment,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taigu 030801,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2016-12-31 Revised:2017-02-17 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Shuangdui Yan

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

200

Abstract:

In order to explore the tolerance to low phosphorus by foxtail millet, the experiment was conducted with 10 foxtail millet varieties two levels of phosphorus application [no phosphorus application (LP) and phosphorus application at P2O5 50kg/hm 2] to study the effects of low phosphorus stress on the growth, enzyme activity in rhizosphere soil, phosphorus uptake and its utilization efficiency. The results showed that, compared with the control treatment (CK), the root activity decreased by 50.36% to 73.14% and the root length increased by -11.43% to 28.57% for all the varieties except Longgu 26 which decreased the root length under the low phosphorus stress. The biomass decreased by 6.29% to 18.55% and the rhizosphere soil phosphates activity increased by 4.64% to 19.97%. The phosphorus uptake decreased by 30.78% to 37.14% and phosphorus utilization efficiency increased by 29.26% to 37.38%. The effect of phosphorus stress on root traits was greater than that on aboveground traits. The growth, phosphorus absorption and utilization among different foxtail millet varieties were significant different under low phosphorus stress. The tolerance to low-phosphorus was stronger for Jigu 13 and Jigu 11, whereas weaker for Longgu 26.

Key words: Phosphorus, Millet, Acid phosphorus activity in rhizosphere soil, Varieties

Table 1

Effects of phosphorus on root length of different foxtail millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(cm) LP(cm) 增长率Growth rate(%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 11.61c 16.26b 28.57a
济谷11 Jigu 11 10.85cd 14.22d 23.68b
陇谷3 Longgu 3 9.03e 10.77f 16.11c
金谷1 Jingu 1 10.31d 13.22e 21.99b
公谷66 Gonggu 66 8.83e 10.27g 13.99cd
白谷9 Baigu 9 7.57f 8.61h 12.01de
龙谷26 Longgu 26 6.96fg 6.25j -11.43f
晋谷33 Jingu 33 6.35g 6.96i 8.76e
长农35 Changnong 35 14.65a 17.29a 15.25cd
晋谷21 Jingu 21 13.01b 15.24c 14.63cd

Table 2

Effects of phosphorus on root activity of different foxtail millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK
[μg/(g·h)]		 LP
[μg/(g·h)]		 降低率(%)
Reduction rate
济谷13 Jigu 13 93.50a 60.87a 53.65d
济谷11 Jigu 11 89.40b 59.50a 50.36d
陇谷3 Longgu 3 88.42bc 51.08de 73.14a
金谷1 Jingu 1 84.17e 55.55b 51.51d
公谷66 Gonggu 66 89.17b 54.19bc 64.67bc
白谷9 Baigu 9 83.25e 50.92de 63.58c
龙谷26 Longgu 26 84.77de 49.94e 69.80ab
晋谷33 Jingu 33 88.87b 52.59cd 68.99ab
长农35 Changnong 35 84.09e 54.57b 54.12d
晋谷21 Jingu 21 86.37cd 56.08b 54.01d

Table 3

Effects of phosphorus on plant height of different foxtail millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(cm) LP(cm) 降低率Reduction rate (%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 100.67a 90.68a 9.88bc
济谷11 Jigu 11 85.80b 77.24b 9.96bc
陇谷3 Longgu 3 74.53c 67.70c 9.08bc
金谷1 Jingu 1 76.37c 66.95cd 12.30abc
公谷66 Gonggu 66 68.00e 62.26ef 8.36c
白谷9 Baigu 9 69.90de 61.54f 11.96abc
龙谷26 Longgu 26 38.83g 32.38h 16.64a
晋谷33 Jingu 33 59.27f 50.96g 13.93ab
长农35 Changnong 35 75.37c 68.76c 8.75bc
晋谷21 Jingu 21 72.97cd 64.70de 11.21bc

Table 4

Effects of phosphorus on biomass of different foxtail millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(g) LP(g) 降低率Reduction rate (%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 70.29a 65.87a 6.29c
济谷11 Jigu 11 59.30b 53.73b 9.39bc
陇谷3 Longgu 3 45.39c 40.44c 10.89bc
金谷1 Jingu 1 40.03de 34.86d 12.93ab
公谷66 Gonggu 66 39.42d 35.58d 9.74bc
白谷9 Baigu 9 47.73c 42.05c 11.90bc
龙谷26 Longgu 26 23.50f 19.14e 18.55a
晋谷33 Jingu 33 37.11e 32.90d 11.34bc
长农35 Changnong 35 47.95c 42.82c 10.70bc
晋谷21 Jingu 21 45.97c 40.37c 12.17bc

Table 5

Effects of low phosphorus on acid phosphorus activity in rhizosphere soil of different foxtail millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(mg/g) LP(mg/g) 增长率Growth rate (%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 0.47ab 0.56a 18.33a
济谷11 Jigu 11 0.45b 0.54a 19.97a
陇谷3 Longgu 3 0.45b 0.52ab 16.02ab
金谷1 Jingu 1 0.40cd 0.45d 12.59abcd
公谷66 Gonggu 66 0.47ab 0.53ab 12.19abcd
白谷9 Baigu 9 0.38de 0.40e 6.36cd
龙谷26 Longgu 26 0.37de 0.40e 6.42cd
晋谷33 Jingu 33 0.36e 0.39e 9.77bcd
长农35 Changnong 35 0.48a 0.50bc 4.64d
晋谷21 Jingu 21 0.41c 0.47cd 14.07abc

Table 6

Effects of low phosphorus on phosphorus absorption of different millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(mg) LP(mg) 降低率Reduction rate (%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 209.02a 142.58a 31.79b
济谷11 Jigu 11 154.47b 105.72b 31.56b
陇谷3 Longgu 3 108.53f 73.29e 32.47b
金谷1 Jingu 1 92.46g 61.86f 33.10b
公谷66 Gonggu 66 80.72h 55.87g 30.78b
白谷9 Baigu 9 145.72c 98.27c 32.57b
龙谷26 Longgu 26 41.21j 25.90i 37.14a
晋谷33 Jingu 33 68.73i 46.26h 32.70b
长农35 Changnong 35 126.86e 87.64d 30.92b
晋谷21 Jingu 21 139.91d 94.29c 32.61b

Table 7

Effects of low phosphorus on phosphorus utilization efficiency of different millet varieties"

品种名称Varieties CK(mg/mg) LP(mg/mg) 增长率Growth rate (%)
济谷13 Jigu 13 336.28f 461.97ef 37.38a
济谷11 Jigu 11 383.90e 508.27d 32.40a
陇谷3 Longgu 3 418.19d 551.87c 31.97a
金谷1 Jingu 1 432.96d 563.45c 30.14a
公谷66 Gonggu 66 488.37c 636.78b 30.39a
白谷9 Baigu 9 327.53f 427.89f 30.64a
龙谷26 Longgu 26 570.39a 739.07a 29.57a
晋谷33 Jingu 33 539.86b 711.21a 31.74a
长农35 Changnong 35 378.00e 488.59de 29.26a
晋谷21 Jingu 21 328.57f 428.18f 30.32a

Fig.1

Cluster analysis of 10 millet varieties"

[1] 杨文治, 余存祖 . 黄土高原区域治理与评价.北京: 科学出版社, 1992: 115.
[2] 赵华, 徐芳森, 石磊 , 等. 植物根系形态对低磷胁迫应答的研究进展. 植物学通报, 2006,23(4):409-417.
[3] 张淼, 赵书岗, 耿丽平 , 等. 缺磷对不同作物根系形态及体内养分浓度的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(3):577-585.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0307
[4] 李春检 . 高级植物营养学.北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2008: 169-170.
[5] 王树起, 韩晓增, 严君 , 等. 缺磷胁迫对大豆根系形态和氮磷吸收积累的影响. 土壤通报, 2010,41(3):644-650.
[6] 陈俊意, 蔡一林, 徐德 , 等. 不同玉米基因型的磷效率和相对生物性状的差异及其回归模型研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(6):1068-1073.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2007.0613
[7] 马建华, 王玉国, 孙毅 , 等. 低磷胁迫对不同品种高粱苗期形态及生理指标的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1083-1091.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0507
[8] 季萌萌, 许海港, 彭玲 , 等. 低磷胁迫下五种苹果砧木的磷吸收与利用特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(4):974-980.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0420
[9] 范曾丽, 王三根 . 缺磷胁迫对不同玉米幼苗生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(3):231-235.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.03.051
[10] 任永哲 . 低磷胁迫对不同基因型小麦品种苗期性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(18):40-44.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.18.008
[11] 李永夫 . 水稻适应低磷胁迫的营养生理机理研究. 杭州:浙江大学, 2006.
[12] 高俊风 . 植物生理学实验指导.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012: 59-61.
[13] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 268-270.
[14] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室. 土壤微生物研究法.北京: 科学出版社, 1985: 65-83.
[15] 赵兰坡, 姜岩 . 土壤磷酸酶活性测定方法的探讨. 土壤通报, 1986,17(3):138-141.
[16] 乔振江, 蔡昆争, 骆世明 . 低磷和干旱胁迫对大豆植株干物质积累及磷效率的影响. 生态学报, 2011,31(19):5578-5587.
[17] 樊明寿, 陈刚, 孙国荣 . 低磷胁迫下玉米根中磷的运转与再利用. 作物学报, 2006,32(6):946-948.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2006.06.028
[18] 冷华妮, 陈益泰, 段红平 , 等. 磷胁迫对不同种源枫香生长及氮、磷吸收利用率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2009,20(4):754-760.
[19] 彭正萍, 孙旭霞, 刘会玲 , 等. 缺磷对不同基因型玉米苗期生长及氮磷钾吸收的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 2009,32(6):8-12.
[20] 李君, 田霄鸿, 曹翠玲 . 低磷胁迫对熊猫豆生殖生长及某些生理特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2013,31(2):191-195.
[21] 徐静, 张锡州, 李廷轩 , 等. 野生大麦对土壤磷吸收及其酸性磷酸酶活性的基因型差异. 草业学报, 2015,24(1):88-98.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20150112
[22] 潘晓华, 刘水英, 李锋 , 等. 低磷胁迫对不同水稻品种幼苗生长和磷效率的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2002,24(3):297-300.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2002.03.001
[23] Chapin III F S . Adaptation of selected trees and grasses to low availability of phosphorus. Plant and Soil, 1983,72(2-3):283-287.
doi: 10.1007/BF02181967
[24] 郭玉春, 林文雄, 石秋梅 , 等. 低磷胁迫下不同磷效率水稻苗期根系的生理适应性研究. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(1):61-65.
[25] 曹黎明, 潘晓华 . 水稻耐低磷基因型种质的筛选与鉴定. 江西农业大学学报, 2000,22(2):162-168.
[26] 童学军, 李惠珍, 曾焕泰 , 等. 低磷胁迫下溶液培养大豆生长和磷素营养特性及其与土培下磷效率特性的关系. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001,7(3):298-304.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2001.0309
[27] Da Silva Á E, Gabelman W H . Screening maize inbred lines for tolerance to low-P stress condition. Plant and Soil, 1992,146(1-2):181-187.
doi: 10.1007/BF00012011
[28] 张丽梅, 贺立源, 李建生 , 等. 玉米自交系耐低磷材料苗期筛选研究. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(12):1955-1959.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.12.028
[1] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[2] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[3] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[4] Wenlian Bai,Yi Zheng,Jingxiu Xiao. Below-Ground Biotic Mechanisms of Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Improved by Cereal and Legume Intercropping-A Review [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 20-27.
[5] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37-41.
[6] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[7] Bo Zeng. Renovation of Main Cultivated Rice Varieties in China in the Past 30 Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 1-7.
[8] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[9] Bo Zeng,Shixian Sun,Jie Wang. Registration of Main Rice Varieties and Its Application in Recent 30 Years in China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 1-5.
[10] Ge Qu,Zhengguang Chen,Xue Wang. Identification of Rice Varieties Using NIR Spectroscopy and SIMCA, PLS-DA Methods [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 166-170.
[11] Maolin Yue,Weirong Xue,Ruidong Zhang,Zhongxiao Yue,RuiZhou Lü,Pengyan Guo. Effects of Different Row Spaces on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 93-96.
[12] Dongxue Sun,Aijun Zhang. Effects of Base Application of Zinc Fertilizer on Antioxidant Activity and Dry Matter Accumulation of Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 160-164.
[13] Chunhua Pang,Shifang Yang,Yongqing Zhang,Yanhong Hua,Xiao He,Yang Yang. Effects of Inoculating Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth of Quinoa under Different Phosphorus Levels [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 131-139.
[14] Ruifeng Guo,Yongfu Zhang,Yuemei Ren,Zhong Yang. Effects of Saline-Alkali Stress on Millet Germination and Shoots Growth and Saline-Alkali Tolerance Variety Screening [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 63-66.
[15] Ruda Yang,Hai Li,Fengxian Lin,Haiyan Liang. Grey Relational Analysis of Characters and Yield of Broom Millet and Discussion on Characteristics of Variety Selection [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 50-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .