Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 132-137.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.03.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Bulk Density on Nitrogen Absorption and Yield of Soybean on Black Soil

Zhang Xiting1,Cao Liwei2,Lü Shucai1,Chen Guoxing1,Wang Yongji1,Yu Shuhan1,Gong Zhenping1   

  1. 1 College of Agronomy,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang,China
    2 Heilongjiang Management Station of Forest Tree Seedlings,Harbin 150090,Heilongjiang,China
  • Received:2017-01-15 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Zhenping Gong

Abstract:

Soil bulk density is one of the important soil physical properties, and is also important basis for soil cultivation, which influenced crop growth and yield formation directly. In this work, Jiyu 79 and Heinong 44 were used as test materials, adopted frame culture method with four soil bulk density treatments (1.00g/cm 3, 1.15g/cm 3, 1.30g/cm 3and 1.45g/cm 3) were used to study the effect of soil bulk density on nitrogen content, nitrogen accumulation and yields of soybean in R1 stage, R5 stage and R8 stage. The results showed that, the nitrogen content, dry matter weight, nitrogen accumulation and yields of soybean increased and then decreased with the increase of soil bulk density. Under the treatment of 1.00g/cm 3 and 1.45g/cm 3 bulk density was not good for increasing nitrogen content, dry matter weight, nitrogen accumulation and yields of soybean, however, the inhibitory effect under 1.45g/cm 3 bulk density treatment was the largest. During the three sampling periods, the dry matter weight and nitrogen accumulation of soybean were the largest, as well as the soybean yields were the highest under 1.30g/cm 3 bulk density treatment.

Key words: Soybean, Soil bulk density, Nitrogen absorb, Yield

Table 1

Effects of the bulk density on the nitrogen content of soybean organ %"

品种Cultivar 时期Stage 处理Treatment 叶片Blade 茎Stem 叶柄Petiole 根Root 荚Pod
吉育79 Jiyu 79 R1 D1.00 3.73±0.02b 2.73±0.03ab 1.84±0.04b 1.79±0.03b -
D1.15 5.08±0.04a 2.84±0.04a 1.74±0.03c 1.92±0.05a -
D1.30 5.10±0.07a 2.60±0.06b 2.12±0.03a 1.80±0.05b -
D1.45 3.41±0.06c 2.08±0.06c 1.73±0.05c 1.76±0.06c -
R5 D1.00 3.85±0.05c 2.78±0.08a 2.91±0.03b 2.82±0.10ab 3.82±0.08b
D1.15 4.31±0.05b 2.81±0.07a 3.25±0.05a 2.98±0.06a 3.99±0.04b
D1.30 4.60±0.07a 2.82±0.06a 2.96±0.03b 2.97±0.04a 4.26±0.04a
D1.45 3.63±0.06d 2.41±0.13b 2.00±0.05c 2.62±0.06c 3.03±0.04c
R8 D1.00 1.80±0.07b 1.63±0.06a 1.32±0.08bc 1.51±0.08bc 4.60±0.07b
D1.15 2.07±0.11a 1.68±0.04a 1.48±0.06ab 1.81±0.08a 4.75±0.06a
D1.30 2.13±0.09a 1.57±0.10a 1.66±0.07a 1.67±0.06ab 4.73±0.06a
D1.45 1.55±0.06b 1.00±0.08b 1.20±0.05c 1.37±0.06c 4.32±0.04c
黑农44 Heinong 44 R1 D1.00 3.93±0.05b 2.74±0.06b 2.05±0.05b 2.27±0.08a -
D1.15 4.13±0.05ab 2.96±0.09b 2.47±0.06a 2.26±0.05a -
D1.30 4.28±0.08a 3.20±0.06a 2.18±0.06b 2.41±0.05a -
D1.45 3.30±0.08c 1.82±0.08c 2.01±0.06b 1.52±0.05b -
R5 D1.00 4.03±0.11b 1.98±0.05a 2.77±0.04a 2.08±0.05b 3.73±0.07a
D1.15 4.17±0.13ab 2.07±0.05a 2.80±0.09a 2.51±0.09a 3.95±0.07a
D1.30 4.39±0.09a 1.94±0.05a 2.63±0.07a 2.64±0.08a 3.83±0.07a
D1.45 3.45±0.07c 1.42±0.04b 2.11±0.06b 1.96±0.04b 3.23±0.08b
R8 D1.00 1.86±0.04b 1.29±0.05b 1.34±0.04b 1.45±0.05a 4.05±0.03a
D1.15 2.01±0.03a 1.48±0.04a 1.52±0.02a 1.52±0.05a 4.21±0.04a
D1.30 1.98±0.05a 1.46±0.11a 1.61±0.02a 1.57±0.05a 4.16±0.02a
D1.45 1.52±0.05c 0.90±0.05c 1.26±0.03b 1.18±0.08b 3.73±0.07b

"

品种Cultivar 时期Stage 处理Treatment 叶片Blade 茎Stem 叶柄Petiole 根Root 荚Pod 全株Whole plant
吉育79 Jiyu 79 R1 D1.00 5.45±0.10b 2.57±0.02c 1.56±0.05b 2.85±0.05b - 12.43±0.20b
D1.15 6.88±0.12a 3.18±0.04b 2.40±0.10a 3.47±0.06a - 15.94±0.30a
D1.30 6.96±0.15a 3.63±0.10a 2.42±0.09a 2.82±0.07b - 15.83±0.32a
D1.45 2.62±0.08c 1.12±0.02d 0.57±0.03c 1.52±0.05c - 5.82±0.12c
R5 D1.00 20.92±0.44b 18.61±0.34a 11.30±0.15b 7.54±0.15b 5.08±0.09b 63.45±0.98b
D1.15 22.05±0.41b 18.83±0.60a 12.17±0.27ab 8.36±0.16a 7.85±0.13a 68.93±1.57ab
D1.30 25.04±0.76a 20.38±0.85a 12.70±0.25a 8.15±0.05a 8.09±0.09a 74.36±1.64a
D1.45 5.49±0.36c 3.47±0.23b 2.08±0.13c 3.45±0.14c 1.80±0.04c 16.39±0.80c
R8 D1.00 21.23±0.69a 22.03±0.18c 12.72±0.34a 7.77±0.19b 81.60±1.43b 145.35±0.78c
D1.15 21.96±0.23a 25.22±1.19b 12.03±0.05a 8.55±0.14ab 96.28±2.25a 168.04±0.49b
D1.30 22.32±0.61a 31.22±0.37a 12.93±0.42a 8.77±0.25a 106.30±1.06a 181.54±1.16a
D1.45 7.50±0.59b 4.49±0.29d 3.53±0.43b 2.77±0.14c 24.60±0.86c 42.89±1.66d
黑农44 Heinong 44 R1 D1.00 5.73±0.13b 2.98±0.22a 1.72±0.04b 2.63±0.11b - 13.07±0.44b
D1.15 5.90±0.15b 3.25±0.06a 1.89±0.09ab 2.97±0.12a - 14.01±0.19ab
D1.30 6.40±0.14a 3.45±0.14a 2.06±0.03a 2.84±0.06ab - 14.74±0.15a
D1.45 2.64±0.07c 1.15±0.04b 0.57±0.03c 1.58±0.04c - 5.95±0.16c
R5 D1.00 24.11±0.28a 21.33±0.36b 11.45±0.44a 11.17±0.34a 12.70±0.31c 80.80±1.58b
D1.15 25.98±0.85a 22.69±0.18ab 11.67±0.48a 11.43±0.18a 14.61±0.35b 86.39±1.83ab
D1.30 26.18±0.72a 24.11±0.64a 11.88±0.16a 10.07±0.18a 16.19±0.47a 89.14±1.36a
D1.45 7.75±0.23b 5.01±0.25c 2.31±0.07b 5.30±0.19b 6.62±0.22d 26.99±0.48c
R8 D1.00 17.54±0.27b 21.37±0.49b 9.43±0.10b 8.65±0.26b 78.04±1.04b 135.03±1.34b
D1.15 20.56±0.39a 21.93±0.60b 10.95±0.34a 9.25±0.33ab 81.78±0.68b 144.46±2.27b
D1.30 21.36±0.52a 30.34±0.76a 11.87±0.42a 10.49±0.42a 90.97±3.16a 165.03±4.35a
D1.45 6.66±0.33c 4.97±0.38c 1.63±0.06c 3.28±0.13c 24.04±0.34c 40.57±0.96c

"

品种Cultivar 时期
Stage
处理
Treatment
叶片Blade 茎Stem 叶柄Petiole 根Root 荚Pod 全株
Whole plant
吉育79 Jiyu 79 R1 D1.00 203.4±3.90b 70.1±0.57b 28.7±1.01c 51.0±0.95b - 353.2±5.83b
D1.15 349.7±6.18a 90.3±1.02a 41.8±1.79b 66.6±1.06a - 548.4±9.64a
D1.30 355.0±7.87a 94.4±2.53a 51.3±1.81a 50.8±1.22b - 551.5±11.3a
D1.45 89.4±2.63c 23.3±0.44c 9.8±0.48d 22.2±0.80c - 144.7±3.23c
R5 D1.00 805.6±17.07c 517.3±9.32b 328.8±4.36b 212.7±4.22b 193.9±3.59c 2 058.3±31.41c
D1.15 950.2±17.74b 529.2±16.89ab 395.5±8.83a 249.1±4.65a 313.4±5.07b 2 437.4±45.84b
D1.30 1 151.8±34.87a 574.7±23.88a 375.9±7.41a 242.1±1.49a 344.8±4.01a 2 689.3±58.67a
D1.45 199.4±13.03d 64.5±5.44c 41.7±2.64c 92.8±3.63c 54.5±1.22d 453.0±21.99d
R8 D1.00 382.1±12.36b 359.0±2.95c 167.9±4.49b 117.3±2.88b 37 56.7±24.94b 4 783.1±29.83c
D1.15 454.6±4.80a 423.6±19.92b 178.0±0.78b 154.8±2.52a 4 813.9±132.94a 6 024.9±100.98b
D1.30 475.4±12.92a 490.2±5.78a 214.6±6.92a 146.6±4.19a 4 987.0±24.49a 6 313.8±17.66a
D1.45 116.3±9.11c 44.9±2.85d 42.3±5.18c 37.9±1.98c 1 062.0±8.36c 1 303.4±28.26d
黑农44 Heinong 44 R1 D1.00 225.3±5.24c 81.7±5.93c 35.3±0.85b 59.8±2.48b - 402.0±13.06c
D1.15 243.8±2.08b 96.1±1.91b 46.8±2.12a 67.1±0.62a - 453.7±5.60b
D1.30 273.9±1.78a 110.3±1.34a 44.8±0.65a 68.4±1.51a - 497.5±4.12a
D1.45 87.2±2.40d 21.0±0.72d 11.5±0.59c 24.0±0.63c - 143.8±3.86d
R5 D1.00 971.8±11.26b 422.3±7.17b 318.2±12.25a 232.4±7.16b 473.7±11.42c 2 418.3±45.40b
D1.15 1 083.4±35.63a 469.8±3.65a 326.8±13.50a 286.8±4.57a 577.2±13.68b 2 744.0±65.22a
D1.30 1 149.3±31.75a 467.8±12.52a 312.5±1.66a 284.4±4.73a 620.0±6.58a 2 834.0±43.50a
D1.45 267.4±7.91c 71.1±2.15c 48.7±1.61b 103.9±3.78c 213.7±6.95d 704.9±14.81c
R8 D1.00 326.3±4.98b 275.7±6.26c 126.4±1.34c 125.4±3.77c 3 158.8±21.97c 4 012.5±36.23c
D1.15 413.2±7.77a 324.6±8.93b 166.4±5.23b 140.6±5.07b 3 442.0±34.44b 4 486.7±61.97b
D1.30 422.9±10.32a 442.9±3.82a 191.1±6.80a 164.8±6.63a 3 785.1±159.60a 5 006.7±180.56a
D1.45 101.3±5.05c 44.8±3.43d 20.5±0.80d 38.7±1.57d 895.8±10.91d 1 101.0±18.31d

Table 4

The yield components of soybean under different bulk density"

品种Cultivar 处理
Treatment
株高(cm)
Plant height
节数(节)
Node number
粒数(粒)
Kernel number
百粒重(g)
100-seed weight
产量(g/株)
Seed weight
吉育79 Jiyu 79 D1.00 70.6±0.70b 14.2±0.44b 189.2±0.93b 18.3±0.06ab 34.6±0.28c
D1.15 81.8±1.27a 15.3±0.33ab 214.7±4.91ab 19.7±0.52a 42.3±0.14b
D1.30 84.2±2.23a 16.3±0.44a 228.0±12.50a 19.8±0.86a 45.0±0.76a
D1.45 46.6±0.73c 12.3±0.33c 62.2±0.60c 16.4±0.29b 10.2±0.08d
黑农44 Heinong 44 D1.00 76.6±1.67b 15.2±0.17b 160.0±4.78b 20.7±0.35a 33.1±0.46b
D1.15 78.0±1.67b 14.8±0.16b 169.3±3.38b 20.7±0.23a 35.1±0.44b
D1.30 89.1±0.46a 16.2±0.20a 188.0±4.19a 20.9±0.18a 39.2±0.65a
D1.45 43.6±1.93c 12.3±0.33c 52.5±1.76c 19.2±0.40b 10.1±0.51c
[1] Logsdon S D, Karlen D L . Bulk density as a soil quality indicator during conversion to no-tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,78(2):143-149.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2004.02.003
[2] Garcia F, Cruse R M, Blackmer A M . Compaction and nitrogen placement effect on root growth,water depletion,and nitrogen uptake. Soil Science Society American Journal, 1988,52:792-798.
doi: 10.2136/sssaj1988.03615995005200030035x
[3] 李潮海, 梅沛沛, 王群 , 等. 下层土壤容重对玉米植株养分吸收和分配的影响. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(7):1371-1378.
[4] 郑存德, 程岩 . 容重对玉米植株养分吸收的影响. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(4):1541-1545.
[5] 王群, 张学林, 李全忠 , 等. 紧实胁迫对不同土壤类型玉米养分吸收、分配及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(21):4356-4366.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.21.004
[6] 贺明荣, 王振林 . 土壤紧实度变化对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响. 西北植物学报, 2002,4(23):649-654.
[7] Hallmark W B. 土壤容重和钾素对大豆根系和营养状况的影响. 耕作与栽培, 1983,1(15):58-61.
[8] 张兴义, 隋跃兴, 孟凯 . 农田黑土机械压实及其对作物产量的影响. 农机化研究, 2004,24(4):64-67.
[9] Mari G R, Ji C Y, Zhou J . Effects of soil compaction on soil physical properties and nitrogen,phosphorus,potassium uptake in wheat plants. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008,24(1):74-79.
[10] 郑存德, 依艳丽, 张大庚 , 等. 土壤容重对高产玉米根系生长的影响及调控研究. 华北农学报, 2012,27(3):142-149.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2012.03.028
[11] 李汝莘, 林成厚, 高焕文 , 等. 小四轮拖拉机土壤压实的研究. 农业机械学报, 2002,33(1):126-129.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1298.2002.01.037
[12] 迟仁立, 左淑珍, 夏平 , 等. 不同程度压实对土壤理化性状及作物生育产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2001,17(6):39-43.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2001.06.010
[13] 雷金银, 吴发启, 王健 , 等. 保护性耕作对土壤物理特性及玉米产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2008,24(10):40-45.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2008.10.009
[14] 肖亦农, 谢甫绨, 肖万欣 . 不同肥密处理对超高产大豆氮素吸收和产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2011,30(5):769-776.
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2011.05.0769
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114-120.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .