Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 173-178.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.02.027

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Intermembrane Spraying Pre-Germination Herbicide on the Safety of Millet and Weed Control

Shaoguang Liu,Xiatong Zhao,Xi’e Song,Xiangyang Yuan,Shuqi Dong,Meijun Guo,Pingyi Guo   

  1. College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2018-11-23 Revised:2018-12-18 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-04-12
  • Contact: Xi’e Song

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

380

Abstract:

The objective of this study was to identify the selection of herbicides and dosage which was safe to millet growth and gain a better weed control. Zhangzagu 10 was selected as the test material, aiming at weed damage between travelling in the millet fields by plastic mulching and hole seeding. Based on the results of previous experiments, acetochlor and metolachlor had been selected. 4 doses such as 2.25, 4.50, 6.75, 9.00 liter per hm 2 for acetochlor and 3.00, 6.00, 9.00, 12.00 liter per hm 2 for metolachlor were used before seedling. The safety of millet in emergence rate, morphological index and yield, the control effects of herbicides in plant number and fresh weight were compared. Results showed that the treatment of 2.25L/hm 2 of acetochlor and 3.00L/hm 2, 6.00L/hm 2of metolachlor were safe to the millet under which the emergence rate, plant height, and leaf area had no significant difference from control, but had significant effect on yield of millet. The treatment of 4.50-9.00L/hm 2 of acetochlor and 9.00-12.00L/hm 2 of metolachlor had a great effect on grass weeds and broadleaf weeds, the highest being above 99% and 90%, respectively. However, under the higher dose the treatment significantly inhibited the emergence rate, plant height, leaf areas and the yield of millet. The recommended dose of acetochlor and metolachlor were 2.25L/hm 2 and 6.00L/hm 2 , respectively in millet fields with plastic mulch and hole seeding which could effectively control weeds but safety for millet.

Key words: Millet, Herbicide, Intermembrane spraying, Acetochlor, Metolachlor, Security, Control effect

Table 1

Herbicide and dosage"

除草剂类型
Herbicide type		 除草剂
Herbicide		 剂量Dosage (L/hm2)
T1 T2 T3 T4
酰胺类Amides 乙草胺Acetochlor 2.25 4.50 6.75 9.00
异丙甲草胺Metolachlor 3.00 6.00 9.00 12.00

Fig.1

Effects of herbicide on emergence rate of millet Different letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level"

Table 2

Effects of herbicide on plant height and leaf area of millet"

除草剂
Herbicide		 处理
Ttreatment		 出苗后25d 25 days after emergence 出苗后40d 40 days after emergence
株高Plant height (cm) 叶面积Leaf area (cm2) 株高Plant height (cm) 叶面积Leaf area (cm2)
乙草胺Acetochlor CK 32.50±2.35a 24.16±1.43ab 91.77±3.23a 80.90±3.66a
T1 33.32±1.52a 25.74±3.61a 92.58±3.59a 83.16±3.86a
T2 30.84±1.72b 22.82±3.51bc 89.57±4.14a 73.40±7.38b
T3 28.87±0.85c 20.53±1.47c 84.68±4.51b 67.90±8.58bc
T4 28.17±1.67c 20.22±2.52c 85.16±3.56b 63.37±5.62c
异丙甲草胺Metolachlor CK 32.50±2.35a 24.16±1.44b 91.77±3.23a 80.90±3.66a
T1 32.62±1.66a 28.33±3.22a 92.13±2.01a 81.87±6.69a
T2 32.70±1.84a 27.44±5.58a 92.84±1.54a 81.11±3.05a
T3 29.97±1.61b 23.02±2.61b 87.72±4.20b 73.21±7.36b
T4 28.59±2.31b 22.99±1.97b 86.49±3.10b 69.80±6.10b

Table 3

Field weed control after seedling emergence 25d"

除草剂
Herbicide		 处理
Treatment		 杂草株防效Weed plant control effect 杂草鲜重防效Weed fresh weight control effect
禾本科杂草
Gramineous weeds		 阔叶杂草
Broadleaf weeds		 禾本科杂草
Gramineous weeds		 阔叶杂草
Broadleaf weeds
株数
Plant
number
 株防效
Plant control
effect
株数
Plant
number
 株防效
Plant control
effect		 鲜重
Fresh
weight		 鲜重防效
Fresh weight
control effect		 鲜重
Fresh
weight		 鲜重防效
Fresh weight
control effect
乙草胺Acetochlor T1 40.00 74.38b 15.33 67.14c 29.62 78.09c 25.81 57.09c
T2 20.67 89.77ab 11.33 76.18bc 21.13 84.00bc 20.55 66.01c
T3 5.67 97.19a 7.67 85.00ab 7.37 95.36ab 13.82 77.28b
T4 1.00 99.13a 5.33 89.67a 0.41 99.67a 8.10 86.74a
CK 210.67 - 59.33 - 152.97 - 60.71 -
异丙甲草胺Metolachlor T1 47.33 69.93b 17.67 63.14c 44.06 66.28b 33.94 43.40c
T2 24.33 86.48ab 13.00 69.86bc 25.16 82.72ab 25.58 57.93bc
T3 16.67 90.71a 7.33 83.33ab 19.30 86.97ab 16.39 72.98ab
T4 10.67 95.02a 4.00 90.86a 9.62 95.00a 6.78 89.23a
CK 210.67 - 59.33 - 152.97 - 60.71 -

Table 4

Field weed control after seedling emergence 40d"

除草剂
Herbicide		 处理
Treatment		 杂草株防效Weed plant control effect 杂草鲜重防效Weed fresh weight control effect
禾本科杂草
Gramineous weeds		 阔叶杂草
Broadleaf weeds		 禾本科杂草
Gramineous weeds		 阔叶杂草
Broadleaf weeds
株数
Plant
number		 株防效
Plant control
effect
株数
Plant number		 株防效
Plant control
effect		 鲜重
Fresh
weight		 鲜重防效
Fresh weight
control effect		 鲜重
Fresh
weight		 鲜重防效
Fresh weight
control effect
乙草胺Acetochlor T1 9.67 78.35b 4.00 74.03b 614.25 71.41c 301.56 58.56d
T2 5.00 88.59ab 4.00 73.75b 195.00 89.40b 230.45 68.31c
T3 2.33 93.72a 1.67 89.03a 20.47 98.46a 165.00 77.36b
T4 1.67 95.77a 1.67 89.03a 27.03 98.01a 73.39 89.79a
CK 43.77 - 5.33 - 703.00 - 770.63 -
异丙甲草胺Metolachlor T1 8.00 80.70b 3.67 58.61c 166.90 73.00b 227.14 68.04b
T2 4.67 88.58ab 2.67 65.14bc 100.85 82.62b 234.61 67.49b
T3 2.33 94.01a 4.67 69.45b 15.00 97.56a 87.53 88.09a
T4 2.00 95.05a 5.33 82.64a 15.71 96.81a 72.90 89.66a
CK 43.77 - 5.33 - 703.00 - 770.63 -

Table 5

Effects of herbicide on grain yield"

除草剂
Herbicide		 处理
Treatment		 重复Ⅰ产量(kg/hm2)
Repeat Ⅰyield		 重复Ⅱ产量(kg/hm2)
Repeat Ⅱ yield		 重复Ⅲ产量(kg/hm2)
Repeat Ⅲ yield		 平均产量(kg/hm2)
Average yield		 增产率(%)
Yield increase rate
乙草胺Acetochlor CK 8 940.37 8 834.78 8 578.37 8 784.51b -
T1 9 726.29 9 665.67 9 764.23 9 718.73a 10.63
T2 8 621.82 8 636.03 8 861.41 8 706.42b -0.09
T3 7 385.28 6 253.66 5 400.26 6 346.40c -27.75
T4 4 893.58 5 533.28 5 082.76 5 169.87d -41.15
异丙甲草胺Metolachlor CK 8 940.37 8 834.78 8 578.37 8 784.51ab -
T1 9 120.50 9 724.89 10 790.87 9 878.75a 12.46
T2 8 415.17 9 497.13 9 221.02 9 044.44ab 2.96
T3 7 460.09 8 854.03 7 887.13 8 067.08b -8.17
T4 5 741.46 6 499.56 6 981.20 6 407.41c -27.06
[1] 李燕敏, 祁显涛, 刘昌林 , 等. 除草剂抗性农作物育种研究进展. 作物杂志, 2017(2):1-6.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.001
[2] 张朝贤, 倪汉文, 魏守辉 , 等. 杂草抗药性研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(4):1274-1289.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.04.019
[3] 叶萱 . 除草剂抗性现状. 世界农药, 2017,39(3):1-6.
[4] 李志华, 景小兰, 李会霞 , 等. 谷子苗期除草剂的安全性及杂草防效研究. 作物杂志, 2017(1):150-154.
[5] 赵治海, 朱学海, 王天宇 , 等. 谷子抗除草剂杂交种“张杂谷3号”的选育与应用. 首届全国谷子产业大会文集, 2009.
[6] 高爱保, 郭平毅 . 除草剂稀禾啶对不同品种谷子的毒害. 杂草学报, 2017,35(1):57-61.
doi: 10.19588/j.issn.1003-935X.2017.01.011
[7] 王正贵, 于倩倩, 周立云 , 等. 几种除草剂对小麦籽粒产量及生理特性的影响. 核农学报, 2011,25(4):791-795.
[8] Breaux E J . Identification of the initial metabolites of acetochlor in corn and soybean seedlings. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1986,34(5):884-888.
doi: 10.1021/jf00071a030
[9] Capel P D, Ma L, Schroyer B R , et al. Analysis and detection of the new corn herbicide acetochlor in river water and rain. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995,29(6):1702-1705.
doi: 10.1021/es00006a039 pmid: 22276898
[10] 朱诗禹, 崔娟, 徐伟 , 等. 精异丙甲草胺苗前封闭处理对大豆苗期生长及其生理生化指标的影响. 植物保护学报, 2016,43(4):677-682.
doi: 10.13802/j.cnki.zwbhxb.2016.04.022
[11] 王艳秋, 张飞, 邹剑秋 , 等. 不同除草剂处理下高粱出苗及光合物质生产. 西北农业学报, 2013,22(10):108-115.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2013.10.019
[12] 张晓芳, 任学祥, 刘君良 , 等. 96%异丙甲草胺乳油防治棉田杂草田间药效试验评价. 农药研究与应用, 2017(1):28-30.
[13] 高越, 张润祥, 王振 , 等. 异丙甲草胺乳油对花生田杂草的防除效果. 山西农业科学, 2011,39(7):712-714.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2011.07.24
[14] 吾尔古丽•艾麦提, 艾米拉古丽•艾麦提 . 乙草胺对小麦出苗及幼苗生长的安全性评价. 新疆农业科技, 2017(5):59.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2006.02.013
[15] 郑和辉, 叶常明 . 乙草胺和丁草胺在土壤中的移动性. 环境科学, 2017(5):117-121.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0250-3301.2001.05.028
[16] 常玉君, 曾宪波 . 紫花苜蓿对氟乐灵除草剂的抗性试验. 草业科学, 2017(3):37-38.
[17] 钟妍婷, 原向阳, 刘哲 , 等. 油菜素内酯处理对谷子农艺性状和生理特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):124-128.
[18] 丁超, 张建华, 白文斌 , 等. 高粱田常用除草剂对高粱生理生化及产量品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(5):149-155.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.05.025
[19] 杜小娟, 梁婷婷, 慕小倩 . 8种常用除草剂对黄芩种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 西北农业学报, 2012,21(4):202-206.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2012.4.040
[20] 范润珍, 钱传范, 卢向阳 . 莠去津对水稻的药害及NA解毒技术研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2017(S4):111-115.
[21] José F C B, Basch G, de Carvalho M . Effect of reduced doses of a post-emergence graminicide mixture to control Lolium rigidum G. in winter wheat under direct drilling in Mediterranean environment. Crop Protection, 2005,24(10):880-887.
doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.01.020
[22] Zhang J, Weaver S E, Hamill A S . Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled rates. Weed Technology, 2000,14(1):106-115.
doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2000)014[0106:RAROUH]2.0.CO;2
[23] 胡建刚, Chen Y P, 叶惠光 . 乙草胺防除花生田杂草的药效. 河北农业科学, 2008,12(9):45-46.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2008.09.020
[24] 何永福, 陆得清, 叶照春 , 等. 50%乙草胺对旱地杂草辣子草防除效果研究. 植物保护, 2007,33(4):132-134.
[25] 赵怀斌, 赵长山, 郁延坤 . 不同除草剂施用量和施用时间对水稻产量及株高的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):163-167.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.029
[1] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[2] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[3] Yanwei Du,Jinfeng Zhao,Gaohong Wang,Yanfang Li,Genyou Zhao,Xiaoguang Yan. Study of Lodging Resistance of Spring-Sowing Foxtail Millet in Maturity Stages [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 141-145.
[4] Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Xun Dong. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Different Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 146-151.
[5] Ruiyu Ren,Jihong He,Kongjun Dong,Lei Zhang,Tianpeng Liu,Tianyu Yang. Analysis on Suitable Sowing Date of Four Main Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet in Huining, Gansu [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 152-158.
[6] Li Chunhong,Lu Xianglong,Zhang Peitong,Su Yanjing,Wang Yiming,Guo Wenqi,Yin Jianmei,Han Xiaoyong,Wang Li,Huo Enjie. Screening Herbicides to Control Weeds for Sweet Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 158-161.
[7] Meiri· Aheihati,Wumaierxiati· Tahan,Tahan· Ailinbieke,Wang Yuxiang. Phenotypic Diversity of Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Germplasm Resources in Xinjiang and Its Surrounding Areas [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 48-52.
[8] Zhang Xiangyu,Li Hai,Liang Haiyan,Zhang Zhi,Song Xiaoqiang,Zheng Minna. Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[9] Wang Xiaolin,Ji Xiaoling,Zhang Panpan,Zhang Xiong,Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[10] Zhang Jianhua,Guo Ruifeng,Cao Changlin,Fan Na,Jiang Baiyang,Li Guang,Shi Lijuan,Peng Zhidong,Bai Wenbin. Study on Effect and Safety of Controlling Weed in Sorghum Field by Several Stem and Leaf Treatment Herbicide [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 162-166.
[11] Zhao Cunhu,Kong Qingquan,Chen Wenjin,He Xiaoyong,Tian Xiaoyan. Screening of Postemergence Herbicides in the Broad Bean Field [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 167-172.
[12] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37-41.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Jianguang Liu,Guiyuan Zhao,Junli Zhao,Zhao Geng,Yongqiang Wang,Hanshuang Zhang. Progress in the Structure, Expression and Function of Plant Carboxylesterases [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 32-36.
[15] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[3] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[4] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37 -41 .
[5] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42 -47 .
[6] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8 -12 .
[7] Haibin Luo, Shengli Jiang, Chengmei Huang, Huiqing Cao, Zhinian Deng, Kaichao Wu, Lin Xu, Zhen Lu, Yuanwen Wei. Cloning and Expression of ScHAK10 Gene in Sugarcane[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 53 -61 .
[8] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69 -78 .
[9] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines)[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77 -82 .
[10] Kai Zhu,Fei Zhang,Fulai Ke,Yanqiu Wang,Jianqiu Zou. Effects of Planting Density on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Hybrids Suitable for Mechenization[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 83 -87 .