Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 61-68.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.04.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of Grain and Forage Maize Varieties in High Latitude and Cold Area of Shanxi Province

Guo Qingrui,Wang Mengfei,Guo Fengqin,Yin Jianjun,Zhang Xiaojuan,Wang Li   

  1. High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Datong 037008, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2018-12-26 Revised:2019-04-02 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-08-06
  • Contact: Mengfei Wang

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

326

Abstract:

Comprehensive evaluation of 30 grain and forage maize varieties with large planting area in high latitude and cold region of Shanxi Province was conducted, which included silage fresh yield, quality, resistance. The results showed that fresh yield of 12 varieties was increased compared with the control Yongyu 3, and all reached a significant level (P<0.05) and 6 varieties reached at extremely significant level (P<0.01). The grain yield of 12 varieties was increased and all reached a significant level compared with Yongyu 3, and 2 varieties reached extremely significant level. Quality analysis results showed that the total digestible nutrient content of the 6 varieties were increased by 1.0% to 3.0% than Yongyu 3, including Yuqingzhu 23, Jindan 65, Xianyu 508, Wenyu 3, Dafeng 26 and Jinlingqingzhu 10. According to the correlative analysis of different indexes, it is suggested that the best harvest time is 30.0% to 35.0% of dry matter content and 40.00% to 50.00% of grain milk line in the whole maize plant.

Key words: Shanxi, High latitude and cold area, Grain and forage maize, Variety, Comprehensive evaluation

Table 1

Results of fresh yield of silage maize varieties in harvest period"

品种编号Variety number 品种Variety 鲜产量Fresh yield (kg/hm2) ±CK (%) 位次Rank
V1 豫青贮23 90 712.0aA +21.5 1
V2 潞玉10号 86 623.5abAB +16.0 2
V3 文玉3号 82 947.0abcABC +11.1 3
V4 屯玉168 81 394.5abcdABCD +9.0 4
V5 金岭青贮10号 80 975.5bcdeABCD +8.5 5
V6 强盛青贮119 78 480.0bcdefABCDE +5.1 6
V7 大丰26号 78 035.5bcdefABCDE +4.5 7
V8 禾玉9566 77 470.5bcdefBCDE +3.8 8
V9 潞玉6号 77 245.5bcdefBCDE +3.5 9
V10 大丰1409 77 159.5bcdefBCDE +3.4 10
V11 大丰28号 76 832.0bcdefgBCDE +2.9 11
V12 锦润911 76 470.0bcdefghBCDE +2.4 12
V13 (CK) 永玉3号（CK） 74 654.0cdefghiBCDEF - 13
V14 晋单65号 73 972.5cdefghiBCDEFG -0.9 14
V15 太玉511 73 917.5cdefghiBCDEFG -1.0 15
V16 先玉1441 72 480.0defghijCDEFGH -2.9 16
V17 强盛10号 72 451.5defghijCDEFGH -3.0 17
V18 大丰27号 70 987.5defghijkCDEFGH -4.9 18
V19 强盛103 70 771.5efghijkCDEFGH -5.2 19
V20 伊单76 68 560.5fghijklDEFGHI -8.2 20
品种编号Variety number 品种Variety 鲜产量Fresh yield (kg/hm2) ±CK (%) 位次Rank
V21 太育1405 68 416.0fghijklDEFGHI -8.4 21
V22 瑞丰168 66 511.5ghijklmEFGHI -10.9 22
V23 伊单131 66 184.5hijklmEFGHI -11.3 23
V24 先玉508 65 987.5ijklmEFGHI -11.6 24
V25 承玉309 65 761.5ijklmEFGHI -11.9 25
V26 迪卡159 62 571.5jklmFGHI -16.2 26
V27 强盛青贮30 61 333.0klmFGHI -17.8 27
V28 先玉698 60 926.5klmGHI -18.4 28
V29 锦玉28 59 736.0lmHI -20.0 29
V30 奥利18 57 126.5mI -23.5 30

Table 2

The results of main agronomic traits of 30 silage maize varieties in field"

品种编号
Variety number		 品种
Variety		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 穗位高(cm)
Spike height		 持绿性
Stay-green value		 乳线百分比(%)
Milk line percentage		 干物质含量(%)
Dry matter content
V1 豫青贮23 384 180 5/17 33.33 27.0
V2 潞玉10号 315 141 6/16 40.00 31.6
V3 文玉3号 345 148 2/17 43.33 33.2
V4 屯玉168 343 153 4/15 33.33 32.6
V5 金岭青贮10号 337 145 6/17 45.33 31.8
V6 强盛青贮119 328 140 2/17 40.00 35.1
V7 大丰26号 341 130 4/17 50.00 33.8
V8 禾玉9566 370 166 3/16 33.33 35.1
V9 潞玉6号 330 141 4/15 32.33 33.8
V10 大丰1409 371 157 5/16 54.44 37.4
V11 大丰28号 309 123 3/16 56.67 37.0
V12 锦润911 335 144 3/16 50.00 34.3
V13 (CK) 永玉3号（CK） 351 142 6/17 44.33 38.9
V14 晋单65号 371 160 6/15 60.00 37.7
V15 太玉511 322 142 7/17 36.11 31.9
V16 先玉1441 327 118 5/15 50.00 39.3
V17 强盛10号 359 140 6/15 66.67 40.3
V18 大丰27号 336 145 6/16 50.00 37.6
V19 强盛103 324 120 5/16 64.45 38.0
V20 伊单76 314 132 4/16 55.57 36.2
V21 太育1405 350 145 7/16 62.23 41.5
V22 瑞丰168 347 123 5/16 75.56 44.3
V23 伊单131 364 143 6/16 66.67 42.5
V24 先玉508 352 139 4/15 50.67 42.5
V25 承玉309 337 110 5/16 57.78 44.2
V26 迪卡159 313 117 4/15 64.45 41.1
V27 强盛青贮30 346 130 6/15 75.56 44.7
V28 先玉698 341 140 7/15 73.33 45.0
V29 锦玉28 353 138 6/15 70.00 45.3
V30 奥利18 343 137 7/15 71.11 44.7

Table 3

Correlation analysis between fresh yield and main agronomic trait in silage maize varieties"

项目Item 株高
Plant
height		 株数
Number
of plants		 绿叶数/总叶片数
Green/Total leaves		 乳线百分比
Milk line percentage		 干物质含量
Dry matter
content		 总可消化养分
Total digestible nutrients		 鲜产量
Fresh
yield
株高Plant height -1
株数Number of plants -0.436* -1
绿叶数/总叶片数Green/Total leaves -0.290 -0.452* -1
乳线百分比Milk line percentage -0.039 -0.084 -0.040 -1
干物质含量Dry matter content -0.227 -0.073 -0.138 -0.651* -1
总可消化养分Total digestible nutrients -0.272 -0.456 -0.474 -0.438 -0.629* -1
鲜产量Fresh yield -0.070 -0.340 -0.025 -0.618** -0.841** -0.299 1

Table 4

Quality analysis of silage maize varieties"

品种编号
Variety
number		 品种Variety 粗蛋白(%)
Crude protein		 淀粉
(%)
Starch		 中性洗涤
纤维(%)
Neutral detergent		 酸性洗涤
纤维(%)
Acid detergent		 木质素(%)
Lignin		 干物质(%)
Dry
matter		 每吨干物质可生产的牛奶
Producable milk per ton of dry matter (kg)		 总可消化养分(%)
Total digestible
nutrient
V13 (CK) 永玉3号(CK) 9.98 26.61 44.48 27.96 4.46 30.4 1.612 67
V1 豫青贮23 10.55 18.84 53.44 31.33 4.19 27.0 1.374 63
V5 金岭青贮10号 8.61 29.21 46.73 26.02 3.86 30.1 1.608 68
V12 锦润911 9.20 26.61 45.82 26.87 4.25 34.1 1.605 67
V9 潞玉6号 7.83 25.95 47.71 29.23 4.64 34.7 1.611 67
V7 大丰26号 7.72 28.69 46.57 26.88 3.78 35.1 1.596 69
V2 潞玉10号 7.88 20.52 53.18 32.26 5.02 33.4 1.461 64
V14 晋单65号 6.85 34.91 42.18 21.89 3.50 40.5 1.639 70
V6 强盛青贮119 8.61 33.70 40.62 22.31 3.43 32.8 1.698 70
V3 文玉3号 8.31 30.24 45.33 25.47 3.35 33.5 1.615 69
V24 先玉508 6.89 39.55 42.16 21.54 3.25 41.5 1.690 69

Table 5

Quality correlation analysis of silage maize varieties"

成分
Component		 粗蛋白
Crude
protein		 乳线百分比
Milk line
percentage		 淀粉
Starch		 中性洗
涤纤维
Neutral
detergent		 酸性洗
涤纤维
Acid
detergent		 木质素
Lignin		 干物质
Dry
matter		 每吨干物质可
生产的牛奶
Producable milk
per ton of dry matter		 总可消化养分
Total digestible
nutrient
粗蛋白Crude protein -1
乳线百分比Milk line percentage -0.531 -1
淀粉 Starch -0.644* -0.664* -1
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent -0.397 -0.470 -0.905** -1
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent -0.516 -0.616* -0.966** -0.931** -1
木质素Lignin -0.355 -0.463 -0.816** -0.715* -0.874** -1
干物质Dry matter -0.886** -0.872** -0.749** -0.557 -0.647* -0.437 1
每吨干物质可生产的牛奶
Producable milk per ton of dry matter		 -0.516 -0.412 -0.881** -0.942** -0.846** -0.593 0.587 1
总可消化养分Total digestible nutrient -0.576 -0.443 -0.890** -0.918** -0.901** -0.769** 0.594 0.917** 1

Table 6

Variability of fresh yield, agronomic trait and quality of silage maize varieties"

项目Item 株高
Plant
height		 穗位高
Spike
height		 粗蛋白
Crude protein		 淀粉
Starch		 中性洗涤纤维
Neutral detergent		 酸性洗涤纤维
Acid detergent		 木质素
Lignin		 总可消化养分
Total digestible nutrient		 干物质
Dry
matter		 鲜产量
Fresh
weight
标准差
Standard deviation		 19.0900 15.1000 1.2120 6.0547 4.4908 3.6954 0.5062 2.2104 6.0880 9 163.8750
变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation		 5.58 10.81 15.06 20.01 9.99 14.42 12.81 3.26 16.06 12.63
权重Weight (%) 4.63 8.96 12.48 16.59 8.28 11.95 10.62 2.70 13.29 10.47
位次Rank 9 7 3 1 8 4 5 10 2 6

Table 7

Resistance of silage maize varieties"

品种编号
Variety number		 品种
Variety		 弱株率(%)
Weak plant rate		 倒伏率(%)
Lodging rate		 倒折率(%)
Folding rate		 大斑病(级)
Big leaf spot		 茎腐病(%)
Stem rot		 丝黑穗病(%)
Head smut		 持绿性
Stay-green value
V13 (CK) 永玉3号（CK） 3.5 0 9.3 0 2.3 3.5 6/17
V1 豫青贮23 0 50.0 0 0 0 0 5/17
V5 金岭青贮10号 3.8 0 0 0 0 12.5 6/17
V12 锦润911 0 0 0 0 0 0 3/16
V9 潞玉6号 5.2 0 1.3 0 0 2.6 4/15
V7 大丰26号 2.6 0 0 0 0 2.6 4/17
V2 潞玉10号 0 0 0 0 0 0 6/16
V14 晋单65号 6.3 0 2.5 0 3.8 0 6/15
V6 强盛青贮119 3.7 0 0 0 8.5 0 2/17
V3 文玉3号 0 0 4.1 0 4.1 0 2/17
V24 先玉508 0 0 2.6 0 16.9 2.6 4/15

Table 8

Comparison of grain yield in silage maize varieties"

品种编号Variety number 品种Variety 子粒产量Grain yield (kg/hm2) ±CK (%) 位次Rank
V28 先玉698 10 588.5aA +21.3 1
V24 先玉508 10 536.0abA +20.7 2
V11 大丰28号 10 155.0abAB +16.3 3
V3 文玉3号 10 149.0abAB +16.3 4
V5 金岭青贮10号 10 071.0abAB +15.4 5
V7 大丰26号 10 009.5abAB +14.7 6
V14 晋单65号 9 727.5bcABC +11.4 7
V29 锦玉28 9 349.5cdBCD +7.1 8
V26 迪卡159 9 226.5defBCDE +5.7 9
V12 锦润911 9 133.5defgBCDE +4.6 10
V27 强盛青贮30 9 124.5defgBCDE +4.5 11
V18 大丰27号 9 123.0defgBCDE +4.5 12
V20 伊单76 9 085.5defgBCDEF +4.1 13
V19 强盛103 9 046.5defgBCDEFG +3.6 14
V13 (CK) 永玉3号（CK） 8 728.5efghCDEHGH - 15
V10 大丰1409 8 706.0efghCDEFGH -0.3 16
V16 先玉1441 8 401.5fghiDEFGH -3.7 17
V1 豫青贮23 8 386.5fghiDEFGH -3.9 18
V9 潞玉6号 8 374.5fghiDEFGH -4.0 19
V4 屯玉168 8 368.5ghiDEFGH -4.1 20
V2 潞玉10号 8 364.0ghiDEFGH -4.2 21
V15 太玉511 8 340.0ghiDEFGH -4.5 22
V23 伊单131 8 332.5ghiDEFGH -4.5 23
V22 瑞丰168 8 301.0ghiDEFGH -4.9 24
V25 承玉309 8 290.5ghiDEFGH -5.0 25
V17 强盛10号 8 140.5hiEFGH -6.7 26
V21 太育1405 7 951.5hiFGH -8.9 27
V30 奥利18 7 906.5hiGH -9.4 28
V6 强盛青贮119 7 717.5iH -11.6 29
V8 禾玉9566 7 638.0iH -12.5 30

Table 9

Results of fresh yield, grain yield and quality of silage maize varieties"

品种编号
Variety
number		 品种
Variety		 淀粉
(%)
Starch		 粗蛋白(%)
Crude
protein		 酸性洗涤
纤维(%)
Acid detergent		 中性洗涤
纤维(%)
Neutral detergent		 持绿性
Stay-green
value		 鲜产量
(kg/hm2)
Fresh yield		 鲜产量位次
Rank of
fresh yield		 子粒产量
Grain
yield		 子粒产量位次
Rank of
grain yield
V1 豫青贮23 18.84 10.55 53.44 31.33 5/17 90 712.0 1 8 386.5 18
V3 文玉3号 30.24 8.31 25.47 45.33 2/17 82 947.0 3 10 149.0 4
V5 金岭青贮10号 29.21 8.61 26.02 46.73 6/17 80 975.5 5 10 071.0 5
V7 大丰26号 28.69 7.72 26.88 46.57 4/17 78 035.5 7 10 009.5 6
V24 先玉508 39.55 6.89 21.54 42.16 4/15 65 987.5 24 10 536.0 2
V14 晋单65号 34.91 6.85 21.89 42.18 6/15 73 972.5 14 9 727.5 7
[1] 郭庆瑞, 郭凤琴, 殷建军 , 等. 农业供给侧结构性改革下玉米产业的发展思路. 安徽农学通报, 2018,24(2):40-41,112.
[2] 马明德, 米文宝 . 北方农牧交错带农业经济增长驱动因素的动态分析——以宁夏回族自治区盐池县为例. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015,36(6):120-127.
[3] 张合成 . 农业农村现代化实现六大突破. 中国经济报告, 2017(12):18-19.
[4] 于康震 . 粮改饲是推进农业供给侧结构性改革的重要举措. 农村工作通讯, 2017(9):5-8.
[5] 苏秀艳 . 以玉米调减为主的农业结构调整方略及措施. 农业与技术, 2018,38(20):26.
[6] 杨建萍 . 机械化种植青贮玉米的效益分析. 农村牧区机械化, 2009(4):41-42.
[7] 陈凤芝 . 高纬寒地青贮玉米生产现状及发展对策. 农业科技通讯, 2007(10):7-9.
[8] 杨志跃 . 山西玉米种植区划研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(3):223-227.
[9] 郑向阳, 栗建枝, 王国平 , 等. 山西省玉米不同生态区特点和特征特性分析. 中国种业, 2014(8):26-28.
[10] 史丽娟, 白文斌, 李光 , 等. 不同耕作模式对山西旱塬区高粱产量和水分利用效率的影响. 农学学报, 2018,8(12):1-5.
[11] 赵鑫, 苏晓菲, 张宝林 . 晋西北风沙源区玉米种植模式研究. 山西农业科学, 2018,46(10):1637-1639,1642.
[12] 兰宏亮, 王海波 . 施氮量对不同密度夏播青贮玉米产量和品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(2):73-75.
[13] 盘道兴, 杨云, 韦继雯 , 等. 青贮饲料资源开发利用的研究现状. 粮食与饲料工业, 2018(11):52-57.
[14] 史枢卿 . 青贮玉米品种的选择(上). 中国乳业, 2017(4):48-54.
[15] 李永强 . 青贮饲料的加工调制技术. 广东饲料, 2018,27(8):25-28.
[16] 全国畜牧种站, 中华人民共和国质量监督检验检疫总局. GB/T 25882-2010 青贮玉米品质分级. 北京, 2011.
[17] 田龙, 韩媛芬, 丁维汉 . 陕西省玉米品种农艺性状与产量相关性研究. 陕西农业科学, 2017,63(6):1-4.
[18] 李洪, 王瑞军, 王彧超 , 等. 玉米杂交组合主要农艺性状与产量的多重分析. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(22):31-36.
[19] 杨锦越, 宋碧, 罗英舰 , 等. 基于主成分分析及聚类分析对不同春玉米品种耐密性评价. 中国种业, 2018(8):51-55.
[20] 李胜开, 肖玲, 张倩云 , 等. 2015 ~2016年中国青贮玉米品质分析. 中国奶牛, 2017(11):49-55.
[21] 周明 . 西方动物营养与饲料研究的历史、现状与展望. 古今农业, 2002(1):25-34.
[22] 林炎丽, 云颖, 郭琳娜 , 等. 饲用玉米青贮工艺研究现状. 草学, 2018(S1):50-54.
[23] 谢文青 . 青贮玉米的制作及其饲喂肉牛时的注意事项. 现代畜牧科技, 2018(12):44.
[24] 刘颖慧, 郭明, 贾树利 , 等. 影响青贮玉米品质因素研究进展. 作物杂志, 2018(2):6-10.
[25] 李胜开, 肖玲, 张倩云 , 等. 2015 ~2016年中国青贮玉米品质分析. 中国奶牛, 2017(11):49-55.
[26] 王锐 . 全株青贮玉米制作的关键技术. 中国乳业, 2016(8):35-40.
[1] Wang Jian,Yao Dandan,Hao Ruxue,Yu Qingsong,Han Jinling,Zhou Yinfu,Wang Wenpo. Grain Filling Characteristics of Nine Main Spring Corn Varieties in Eastern Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 120-124.
[2] Wang Nan,Li Mu,Lu Ming,Gao Tingting,Zheng Shubo,Zhang Zhijun,Liu Wenguo. Application Analysis of Pioneer USA Maize Varieties in China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 24-29.
[3] Jin Yulong,Bai Ting,Zhu Mingxia,Liu Xiaojiao,Wang Shanshan,Zhang Zhiwei,Hu Yun,Zhang Yuhong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality of Nine Tibetan Barley Landlaces by Factor Analysis [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 55-60.
[4] Wang Yu,Ma Hui,Xu Xue,Qin Ruiying,Yang Jianbo,Wang Xiufeng. Screening and Application of Functional Insertion-Deletion Markers (InDel) in Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 84-93.
[5] Fu Yang,Minna Zheng,Jiahui Kang,Xiuzhi Liang,Chao Jiang,Yinfan Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Feeding Value of 9 Oat Varieties in Northern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 94-98.
[6] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[7] Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Xun Dong. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Different Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 146-151.
[8] Shuangqin Tang,Ziming Wu,Xueming Tan,Yongjun Zeng,Qinghua Shi,Xiaohua Pan,Yanhua Zeng. Identification of Cold Tolerance of Direct Seeded Early Rice Varieties at Bud Stage [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 159-167.
[9] Zhao Xin,Chen Shaofeng,Wang Hui,Liu Sancai,Yang Xiushi,Zhang Baolin. Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[10] Su Guihua,Li Chunlei,Su Yichen. Evaluation of 22 Main Popularized Varieties by Variety Regional Trails in Jilin Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 63-70.
[11] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
[12] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8-12.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[15] Ge Qu,Zhengguang Chen,Xue Wang. Identification of Rice Varieties Using NIR Spectroscopy and SIMCA, PLS-DA Methods [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 166-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[2] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[3] Ying Chai,Yongqing Xu,Yao Fu,Xiuyu Li,Fumeng He,Yingqi Han,Zhe Feng,Fenglan Li. Characteristics of Cell Wall Degradation Enzyme Produced by Main Pathogenic Fusarium spp. in Potato Dry Rot[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 154 -160 .
[4] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84 -88 .
[5] Zhengui Yuan,Pingping Chen,Lili Guo,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Varietal Difference in Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Panicle of Rice Affected by Soil Cd Content[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 107 -112 .
[6] Liangmei Chen,Jiangxia Li,Zhaoyun Hu,Wenling Ye,Wenge Wu,Youhua Ma. Review on Application of Low Accumulation Crops on Remediation of Farmland Contaminated by Heavy Metals[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 16 -24 .
[7] Lu Zhao,Zhiwei Yang,Liqun Bu,Ling Tian,Mei Su,Lei Tian,Yinxia Zhang,Shuqin Yang,Peifu Li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evalution of Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Ningxia and Xinjiang Rice Germplasm[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 25 -34 .
[8] Shanshan Lu,Chenglai Wu,Yan Li,Chunqing Zhang. The Molecular Basis of Holding the Feature and Genetic Purity for Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 41 -48 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 1998, 14(S): 37 -44 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(1): 93 -94 .