Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 71-75.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.06.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Plant Spacing on Growth and Yield of Oil Sunflower under Mechanized Cultivation Conditions

Li Jiming1,Li Aiguo1,Jia Yingquan2,Song Congmin1,Liu Guihua1,Xu Guizhen3,Li Heping1   

  1. 1Dryland Farming Research Institute, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory for Crop Drought Resistance Research of Hebei Province, Hengshui 053000, Hebei, China
    2Hengshui Taocheng Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Hengshui 053000, Hebei, China
    3Institute of Grain and Oil Crops, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050035, Hebei, China
  • Received:2019-05-06 Revised:2019-09-27 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-11
  • Contact: Heping Li

Abstract:

In order to determine suitable plant spacing allocation for high yield and high efficiency mechanical production of oil sunflower in low plain area of Hebei Province. Two widely planted varieties, Xinkui 20 and SD567, were planted to develop under wide-narrow row (70cm+50cm), which was suitable for mechanized and simplified cultivation, with plant spaces of 24cm, 26cm, 28cm, 30cm, 32cm and 35cm, respectively. The results showed that the plant space of 30cm produced the highest dry matter accumulation, leaf area per plant and yield. Under the cultivation of wide-narrow row (70cm+50cm) and plant space of 30cm, the water, fertilizer and light can be maximized to utilize and the maximum yield can be obtained, which is suitable for the current production of oil sunflower in the low plain area of Hebei Province.

Key words: Plant spacing, Oil sunflower, Dry matter, Leaf area, Yield

Table 1

Experimental design"

处理Treatment 宽行Wide row (cm) 窄行Narrow row (cm) 株距Plant spacing (cm) 密度(株/hm2) Density (plants/hm2) 覆膜Film mulching
T1 70 50 24 69 479 覆膜
T2 70 50 26 64 134 覆膜
T3 70 50 28 59 554 覆膜
T4 70 50 30 55 583 覆膜
T5 70 50 32 52 109 覆膜
T6 70 50 35 47 642 覆膜

Table 2

Effects of different plant spacing on leaf area per plant at different growth stages cm2/株 cm2/plant"

品种Variety 处理Treatment 苗期Seedling stage 现蕾期Budding stage 开花期Flowering stage 灌浆期Grain filling stage 成熟期Mature stage
新葵20 T1 70.97bc 666.58de 2 413.14bc 2 506.70c 1 714.99cd
Xinkui 20 T2 72.66bc 706.80cd 2 536.38bc 2 716.42b 1 763.01cd
T3 77.06ab 744.25bc 2 575.60b 2 679.66b 1 814.13bc
T4 81.01a 827.46a 2 750.51a 2 957.65a 2 141.70a
T5 66.82cd 658.24de 2 358.62c 2 567.36bc 1 654.83cd
T6 64.10d 632.35e 2 140.91d 2 420.80c 1 602.66d
SD567 T1 78.87ab 684.91bc 2 286.37c 2 576.70cd 1 746.48c
T2 81.36a 714.64b 2 499.90bc 2 733.49b 1 988.57b
T3 73.39bc 718.53b 2 662.87b 2 632.60bc 1 684.22cd
T4 82.80a 820.81a 2 889.71a 3 053.82a 2 330.56a
T5 65.76e 644.49cf 2 292.70c 2 461.82d 1 518.73de
T6 63.68e 609.28cd 1 960.63d 2 245.48e 1 487.58e

Fig.1

Variation trend of leaf area index of Xinkui 20 under different plant spacing"

Fig.2

Variation trend of leaf area index of SD567 under different plant spacing"

Table 3

Effects of different plant spacing on dry matter accumulation per plant g/株 g/plant"

品种Variety 处理Treatment 苗期Seedling stage 现蕾期Budding stage 开花期Flowering stage 灌浆期Grain filling stage 成熟期Mature stage
新葵20 T1 46.30d 125.47e 470.67d 561.60e 593.77e
Xinkui 20 T2 49.07c 142.47d 497.33c 588.63c 611.87d
T3 54.63b 174.17b 524.57b 607.40b 649.70b
T4 58.87a 193.73a 546.43a 640.70a 699.57a
T5 55.20b 176.87b 519.57b 611.27b 655.90b
T6 53.47b 154.60c 515.10b 587.27c 634.83c
SD567 T1 43.27f 119.87d 411.70e 524.40f 582.97e
T2 46.60e 140.13c 425.60d 570.27e 619.23d
T3 51.53d 157.40b 477.33b 593.80d 676.73b
T4 65.53a 180.53a 511.40a 648.30a 739.97a
T5 62.23b 161.77b 476.60b 612.67bc 681.00b
T6 59.70c 157.43b 457.50c 599.70cd 652.43c

Table 4

Effects of different plant spacing on yield"

品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
盘径(cm)
Disk diameter
饱粒数(粒/盘)
Number of plump grain (grains/disk)
秕粒数(粒/盘)
Number of blighted grains (grains/disk)
百粒重(g)
100-grain weight
小区产量(kg)
Plot yield
新葵20 T1 16.7 876 115 4.12c 14.76d
Xinkui 20 T2 18.4 1 034 68 4.47ab 17.47b
T3 20.7 1 210 154 4.35b 18.47ab
T4 20.8 1 287 148 4.69a 19.56a
T5 24.6 1 263 129 4.76a 18.46ab
T6 23.1 1 196 169 4.81a 16.17c
SD567 T1 18.1 939 193 4.36c 16.74c
T2 17.9 1 113 113 4.29c 18.05bc
T3 20.3 1 320 87 4.65ab 21.54ab
T4 22.9 1 384 107 4.92a 22.27a
T5 26.5 1 308 136 4.97a 19.96b
T6 26.3 1 196 122 4.83a 16.23d
[1] 李积铭, 李锴雯, 李和平 , 等. 华北低平原区高产油葵新品种比较试验. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(7):46-47,69.
[2] 姚佳宾, 李和平, 吴鑫淼 , 等. 不同灌水下限对盆栽油葵生长、耗水及产量的影响. 中国农村水利水电,2018(5):1-5.
[3] 余娟娟, 谈建鑫, 王江丽 , 等. 种植密度与行距配置对复播油葵同化物运转和产量的影响. 新疆农业科学,2014(12):2162-2167.
[4] 于欢 . 不同种植密度对向日葵相关性状及产量的影响. 现代农业科技,2017(14):10-14.
[5] 杨吉顺, 高辉远, 刘鹏 , 等. 种植密度和行距配置对超高产夏玉米群体光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2010,36(7):1226-1233.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01226
[6] 李和平, 何晓庆, 李锴雯 , 等. 行株距配置对小麦生长与产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2016,44(6):47-49,61.
[7] 鲍瑞, 康建宏, 吴宏亮 , 等. 砂田油葵适宜密度研究. 农业科学研究, 2012,3(33):8-12,29.
[8] 林洪鑫, 潘晓华, 石庆华 , 等. 行株距配置对超高产早晚稻产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011,25(1):79-85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.01.012
[9] 王夫玉, 张洪程 . 行株距配置比对水稻群体特征的影响. 甘肃科学学报, 2001,13(2):38-42.
[10] 朱元刚, 高凤菊 . 不同株行距配置下夏播谷子产量及相关性状的多重分析. 核农学报, 2014,28(12):2290-2299.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2014.12.2290
[11] 王晶 . 不同种植密度对向日葵农艺性状及产量的影响. 农民致富之友,2019(1):89-90.
[1] Diao Shengpeng,Gao Riping,Gao Yu,Ren Yongfeng,Zhao Peiyi,Yuan Wei,Gao Xuefeng. Effects of Straw Returning on Soil Hydrothermal and Yield of Maize in Loess Plateau of Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 83-89.
[2] Fan Liqin,Li Lei,Wu Xia. Effects of Different Planting Patterns for Oil Sunflower on Saline-Alkali Soil Temperature, Moisture and Electrical Conductivity in Northern Yinchuan Irrigation District [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 127-133.
[3] Zhuang Kezhang,Wu Ronghua,Zhang Chunyan,Xu Lihua,Xu Xiangbo,Ding Yi,Wang Zhennan. Effects of Density on Yield and Nutritional Value of Different Types of Silage Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 140-144.
[4] Wang Yanqing,Li Yongjun,Li Chunhua,Lu Wenjie,Sun Daowang,Yin Guifang,Hong Bo,Wang Lihua. Correlation and Path Analysis of the Main Agronomic Traits and Yield per Plant of Quinoa [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 156-161.
[5] Yang Junxue,Zhang Shangpei,Luo Shiwu,Wang Yong,Zhang Xiaojuan,Wang Xiaojun,Cheng Bingwen. Effects of Different Exogenous Hormones on the Spike Formation and Yield of Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 150-155.
[6] Wang Lina,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. The Effects of Topdressing Boron Fertilizer on the Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 94-98.
[7] Li Hu,Chen Chuanhua,Liu Guanglin,Wu Zishuai,Huang Qiuyao,Luo Qunchang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate and Planting Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Guiyu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 99-103.
[8] Zhang Yanhua,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Zinc Topdressing Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 109-113.
[9] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120-124.
[10] Liang Xiaohong,Zhang Ruidong,Huang Minjia,Liu Jing,Cao Xiong. Interaction of Film Mulching and Nitrogen Application on Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 135-142.
[11] Chen Li,Zhang Luxin,Wu Feng,Li Zhen,Long Xingzhou,Yang Yurui,Yin Baozhong. Effects of Wheat-Maize Double Crops Rotational Tillage on Soil Characteristics and Crop Yield in Hebei Plain [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 143-150.
[12] Jiang Lina,Zhang Yawen,Zhu Yalin,Zhao Lingxiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation, Transport and Yield in Different Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 151-158.
[13] Dong Zhiqiang,Wang Mengmeng,Li Hongyi,Xue Xiaoping,Pan Zhihua,Hou Yingyu,Chen Chen,Li Nan,Li Manhua. Applicability Assessment of WOFOST Model of Growth and Yield of Summer Maize in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 159-165.
[14] Wang Jinsong,Dong Erwei,Jiao Xiaoyan,Wu Ailian,Bai Wenbin,Wang Lige,Guo Jun,Han Xiong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Sorghum Jinnuo 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 166-172.
[15] Zhao Zhun,Qi Juncang,Li Jian,Guo Yan,Ling Jiangrui,Li Huqing. Influence of Mowing Stages on Hay Yield and Fermentation Quality of Spring Barley [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 180-185.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong. Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 1 -8 .
[2] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104 -108 .
[3] Li Song,Zhang Shicheng,Dong Yunwu,Shi Delin,Shi Yundong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rice Varieties in Tengchong, Yunnan Based on SSR Markers[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 15 -21 .
[4] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1 -7 .
[5] Cao Tingjie,Zhang Yu’e,Hu Weiguo,Yang Jian,Zhao Hong,Wang Xicheng,Zhou Yanjie,Zhao Qunyou,Li Huiqun. Detection of Three Dwarfing Genes in the New Wheat Cultivars (Lines) Developed in South Huang-Huai Valley and Its Association with Agronomic Traits[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 14 -19 .
[6] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20 -26 .
[7] Wang Yongxing,Shan Feibiao,Yan Wenzhi,Du Ruixia,Yang Qinfang,Liu Chunhui,Bai Lihua. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Code Classification Based on DUS Testing in Sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 22 -27 .
[8] Shi Zhaokang,Zhao Zequn,Zhang Yuanhang,Xu Shiying,Wang Ning,Wang Weijie,Cheng Hao,Xing Guofang,Feng Wanjun. The Response and Cluster Analysis of Biomass Accumulation and Root Morphology of Maize Inbred Lines Seedlings to Two Nitrogen Application Levels[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 28 -36 .
[9] Zhang Zhongwei,Yang Hailong,Fu Jun,Xie Wenjin,Feng Guang. Genetic Analysis of the Kernel Length of Maize with Mixed Model of Major Gene Plus Polygene[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 37 -40 .
[10] Zhang Yongfang,Qian Xiaona,Wang Runmei,Shi Pengqing,Yang Rong. Identification of Drought Resistance of Different Soybean Materials and Screening of Drought Tolerant Varieties[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 41 -45 .