Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 78-83.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.03.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Tillage Methods and Straw Returning on Soil Nutrients and Wheat Yield and Quality

Zhou Zhengping(), Tian Baogeng, Chen Wanhua, Wang Ziyang, Yuan Wei, Liu Shiping()   

  1. Yangzhou University/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology/Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou 225009, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2020-07-23 Revised:2020-08-09 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-22
  • Contact: Liu Shiping E-mail:zpingzhou@foxmail.com;spliu@yzu.edu.cn

Abstract:

To explore the combinations of tillage and straw returning for high-yielding, high-quality, and efficient production of rice and wheat, a continuous positioning field experiment was carried out in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, a typical rice-wheat double cropping area since 2001. Six treatments were set i.e., no-tillage and straw returning in rice and wheat (NTS); no-tillage, and straw reduce returning in wheat (RNT); no-tillage and straw-reduce returning in rice (RCT); conventional tillage and straw returning in rice and wheat (CTS); minimum tillage and straw reduce returning in rice and wheat (MTS), and conventional tillage and no straw returning in rice and wheat as a control (CT). The changes of contents of soil organic matter and total nitrogen in 2009-2018 were analyzed and their effects on the grain yield and quality of wheat were investigated. The results showed that continuous straw returning significantly increased the soil nutrient content of topsoil. The soil organic matter and total nitrogen contents under the MTS treatment increased by 29.64% and 19.76%, respectively than the control and MTS treatment had a significant effect on the nutrient accumulation in soil. However, continuous no-tillage was not conducive to increasing wheat yield. The wheat yields of the RNT and RCT treatments were higher than that of the NTS treatment with increases of 16.33% and 10.34%, respectively. RNT tended to improve the processing quality and noodle quality of wheat. In conclusion, the combination of no-tillage and straw returning in the wheat season could increase the yield and quality of medium and weak gluten wheat and could be used as the preferred combination for achieving high-yielding, high-quality and efficient production of wheat in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River.

Key words: Tillage method, Straw returning, Soil nutrients, Wheat, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Treatments of experiment"

处理Treatment 秸秆还田量
Amount of straw
returning to the field
稻麦双季免耕与秸秆还田No-tillage and straw returning in rice and wheat double season (NTS) 稻麦双季各4500kg/hm2
麦季免耕与秸秆减量还田No-tillage and straw-reduce returning in wheat and convention tillage in rice (RNT) 麦季3000kg/hm2
稻季免耕与秸秆减量还田Conventional tillage in wheat, no-tillage and straw-reduce returningin rice (RCT) 稻季3000kg/hm2
稻麦双季翻耕与秸秆还田Conventional tillage and straw returning in rice and wheat double season (CTS) 稻麦双季各4500kg/hm2
稻麦双季少耕与秸秆减量还田Minimum tillage and straw-reduce returning in rice and wheat double season (MTS) 稻麦双季各3000kg/hm2
稻麦双季翻耕无秸秆还田Conventional tillage and no straw returning in rice and wheat double season (CT) 稻麦双季均不还田

Table 2

Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on soil organic matter content g/kg"

处理
Treatment
年份Year 平均值
Mean
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
NTS 17.87b 17.53b 18.60b 18.00b 19.23ab 20.87a 20.15ab 19.58bc 18.38c 22.99a 19.32ab
RNT 17.26b 16.62bc 18.27b 16.29c 17.83b 18.96b 18.57bc 20.87ab 20.21b 23.25a 18.81b
RCT 15.72c 15.90c 17.32bc 15.75cd 17.25b 19.62ab 18.62bc 20.51ab 19.70bc 20.58ab 18.10b
CTS 20.89a 22.38a 20.93a 20.62a 19.30ab 20.27a 21.61a 21.17a 22.09a 21.13ab 21.04a
MTS 20.12a 22.61a 20.34ab 20.11ab 20.30a 20.55a 21.21a 20.92ab 22.17a 21.76a 21.11a
CT 13.50d 15.60c 16.57c 14.35d 15.52c 15.98c 17.76c 18.35c 16.64d 18.54b 16.28c

Table 3

Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on soil total nitrogen content g/kg"

处理
Treatment
年份Year 平均值
Mean
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
NTS 1.25a 1.01b 1.03ab 1.04a 1.14a 0.99a 1.10b 0.95b 1.03b 0.79a 1.02ab
RNT 1.04b 0.99b 1.06ab 0.89b 1.08ab 0.99a 1.13b 1.03ab 1.14ab 0.86a 1.00ab
RCT 0.87c 0.98b 1.03b 0.87b 1.07ab 0.90ab 1.10b 0.96b 1.05b 0.86a 0.95ab
CTS 1.19ab 1.06ab 1.22a 1.07a 1.14a 0.98a 1.23a 1.02ab 1.16ab 0.88a 1.08a
MTS 1.20ab 1.14a 1.10ab 1.11a 1.15a 0.93ab 1.21a 1.10a 1.24a 0.85a 1.10a
CT 0.90c 0.83c 0.96b 0.86b 0.94b 0.86b 1.11b 0.91b 0.98b 0.86a 0.91b

Table 4

Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on wheat yield and its components"

处理
Treatment
穗数
Ear number (×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grain number per ear
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical yield (kg/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield (kg/hm2)
NTS 403.58c 41.58a 45.83a 7681.62b 6435.32b
RNT 415.58bc 41.20a 45.20ab 7740.28ab 7177.86ab
RCT 476.91a 40.07a 43.47b 8306.21ab 7486.49a
CTS 465.80a 38.13a 43.58b 7729.87ab 6942.57ab
MTS 432.91b 42.57a 43.47b 8008.12ab 6618.66ab
CT 482.69a 40.67a 43.58b 8549.98a 7431.48a

Table 5

Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on grain quality of wheat"

处理
Treatment
容重
Test weight
(g/L)
硬度
Hardness
(%)
出粉率
Flour yield
rate (%)
湿面筋含量
Wet gluten
content (%)
沉淀值Sedimentation
value (mL)
蛋白质含量
Protein content
(%)
淀粉含量
Starch content
(%)
NTS 740.00ab 61.62b 62.97b 24.57ab 33.90b 11.84b 64.11a
RNT 738.20ab 64.68ab 65.94ab 27.42a 39.58a 12.72ab 63.60ab
RCT 743.80ab 70.88a 70.73a 22.44c 34.32b 12.24b 64.06a
CTS 741.65ab 70.77a 68.44ab 26.43ab 40.04a 14.21a 62.67b
MTS 730.40b 70.75a 68.02ab 23.67abc 33.78b 12.35b 63.91a
CT 744.70a 67.52ab 68.61ab 23.19bc 34.00b 12.45b 63.79ab

Table 6

Effects of different tillage methods and straw returning on the RVA parameters of wheat"

处理
Treatment
峰值黏度
Peak viscosity (cP)
低谷黏度
Though viscosity (cP)
稀懈值
Break down (cP)
最终黏度
Final viscosity (cP)
峰值时间(分)
Peaktime (min)
NTS 2259.33b 1548.67c 710.67a 2795.83b 6.27b
RNT 2524.00a 1833.17a 690.83a 3005.00a 6.35ab
RCT 2317.83ab 1596.33bc 721.50a 2809.67ab 6.50a
CTS 2360.00ab 1712.33b 647.67a 2910.67ab 6.40ab
MTS 2391.17ab 1680.50b 710.67a 2890.83ab 6.36ab
CT 2317.67ab 1590.17bc 727.50a 2834.17b 6.30b
[1] Yuan L, Zhang Z, Cao X , et al. Responses of rice production,milled rice quality and soil properties to various nitrogen inputs and rice straw incorporation under continuous plastic film mulching cultivation. Field Crops Research, 2014,155:164-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.009
[2] 刘春晓 . 稻麦两熟制秸秆沟埋还田作用特点研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010.
[3] Lenka N K, Lal R . Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer management in a no-till system. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013,126:78-89.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2012.08.011
[4] 陈素英, 张喜英, 裴冬 , 等. 秸秆覆盖对夏玉米田棵间蒸发和土壤温度的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2004(4):32-36.
[5] 严洁, 邓良基, 黄剑 . 保护性耕作对土壤理化性质和作物产量的影响. 中国农机化, 2005(2):31-34.
[6] 刘丽, 白秀广, 姜志德 . 国内保护性耕作研究知识图谱分析——基于CNKI的数据. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(4):76-81.
[7] Lindstrom J E, Barry R P, Braddock J F . Microbial community analysis:a kinetic approach to constructing potential C source utilization patterns. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1998,30(2):231-239.
doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00113-2
[8] Kenarova A, Radeva G, Traykov I , et al. Community level physiological profiles of bacterial communities inhabiting uranium mining impacted sites. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014,100:226-232.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.012 pmid: 24315773
[9] 衣明圣, 李玉杰, 李玉伦 , 等. 不同耕作模式对土壤肥力和小麦产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2018,50(7):72-77.
[10] 陈源泉, 隋鹏, 高旺盛 , 等. 中国主要农业区保护性耕作模式技术特征量化分析. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(18):1-7.
[11] 赵华桐, 周舫, 颜红 , 等. 耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦/夏玉米籽粒糖类积累和产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2014,46(1):32-36.
[12] 顾克军, 张传辉, 顾东祥 , 等. 短期不同秸秆还田与耕作方式对土壤养分与稻麦周年产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2017,30(6):1408-1413.
[13] Fuertes-Mendizábal T, González-Murua C, González-Moro M B , et al. Late nitrogen fertilization affects nitrogen remobilization in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2012,175(1):115-124.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.201000299
[14] 邓妍, 李青, 孙敏 , 等. 休闲期施肥覆盖对旱地小麦产量、品质的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,31(1):9-12.
[15] Bai Z, Li H, Yang X , et al. The critical soil P levels for crop yield,soil fertility and environmental safety in different soil types. Plant and Soil, 2013,372(1/2):27-37.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1696-y
[16] 张春霞, 郝明德, 谢佰承 . 长期秸秆还田对黄土旱塬区土壤肥力的影响. 甘肃农业科技, 2010(2):18-20.
[17] 颜丽, 宋杨, 贺靖 , 等. 玉米秸秆还田时间和还田方式对土壤肥力和作物产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2004(2):143-148.
[18] 李琳, 李素娟, 张海林 , 等. 保护性耕作下土壤碳库管理指数的研究. 水土保持学报, 2006(3):106-109.
[19] 刘世平, 陈文林, 聂新涛 , 等. 麦稻两熟地区不同埋深对还田秸秆腐解进程的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007(6):1049-1053.
[20] 李新举, 张志国, 李贻学 . 土壤深度对还田秸秆腐解速度的影响. 土壤学报, 2001(1):135-138.
[21] 朱自玺, 赵国强, 邓天宏 , 等. 秸秆覆盖麦田水分动态及水分利用效率研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2000,8(1):34-37.
[22] 贾树龙, 孟春香, 任图生 , 等. 耕作及残茬管理对作物产量及土壤性状的影响. 河北农业科学, 2004(4):37-42.
[23] 蔡太义, 黄会娟, 黄耀威 , 等. 不同量秸秆覆盖还田对土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响. 自然资源学报, 2012,27(6):964-974.
[24] 高亚军, 李生秀 . 旱地秸秆覆盖条件下作物减产的原因及作用机制分析. 农业工程学报, 2005(7):15-19.
[25] 孙隆祥, 崔福柱, 薛建福 , 等. 不同麦秆还田量对夏高粱农艺性状及产量的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,37(7):493-498.
[26] Rozbicki J, Ceglińska A, Gozdowski D , et al. Influence of the cultivar,environment and management on the grain yield and bread-making quality in winter wheat. Journal of Cereal Science, 2015,61:126-132.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2014.11.001
[27] Grahmann K, Verhulst N, Peña R J , et al. Durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) quality and yield as affected by tillage-straw management and nitrogen fertilization practice under furrow- irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research, 2014,164:166-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.002
[28] 张礼军, 张耀辉, 鲁清林 , 等. 耕作方式和氮肥水平对旱地冬小麦籽粒品质的影响. 核农学报, 2017,31(8):1567-1575.
[29] 刘建军, 何中虎, 杨金 , 等. 小麦品种淀粉特性变异及其与面条品质关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2003(1):7-12.
[30] 张勇, 何中虎 . 我国春播小麦淀粉糊化特性研究. 中国农业科学, 2002(5):471-475.
[31] 刘建军, 何中虎, 赵振东 , 等. 小麦品质性状与干白面条品质参数关系的研究. 作物学报, 2002,28(6):738-742.
[32] 刘世平, 陈后庆, 陈文林 , 等. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田对小麦产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2007,27(5):859-863.
[1] Weng Wenfeng, Wu Xiaofang, Zhang Kaixuan, Tang Yu, Jiang Yan, Ruan Jingjun, Zhou Meiliang. The Overexpression of FtbZIP5 Improves Accumulation of Flavonoid in the Hairy Roots of Tartary Buckwheat and Its Salt Tolerance [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 1-9.
[2] Pan Gaofeng, Wang Benfu, Chen Bo, Fang Zhenbing, Zhao Shasha, Tian Yonghong. Effects of Seeding Date on Yield, Growth Period and Utilization of Temperature and Sunshine of Different Types of Japonica Rice in North Central of Hubei Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 105-111.
[3] Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Wang Can, Zhang Guobing, Zhou Lengbo, Peng Qiu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum Cultivar "Hongyingzi" [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 118-122.
[4] Tong Tianyi, Cai Jianxuan, Zhang Jisheng, Li Lin, Ma Lin, He Roujing, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Fertilizer Types on Yield, Quality and Aroma of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 152-158.
[5] Zhang Jiawen, Lu Shaohao, Zhao Mingqin, Zhong Qiu, Wang Jun, Yi Kai, Xiang Huan. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Quality of Cigar Leaves in Sichuan [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 159-165.
[6] Wang Qingbin, Nie Zhentian, Lu Jiechun, Peng Chun’e, Zhang Min, Meng Hui, Liu Zhiguo, Geng Quanzheng. Effects of Paecilomyces variotii Extract on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 166-171.
[7] Wu Ke, Xie Huimin, Liu Wenqi, Mo Bingmao, Wei Guoliang, Lu Xian, Li Zhuanglin, Deng Senxia, Wei Shanqing, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on Rice Grain Yield and Yield Components in Double Cropping Rice Area of Southern China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 178-183.
[8] Wang Zhihua, Zhang Lingyun, Wei Lixing. Comparison Test of Different Triticale Varieties in Winter Fallow Saline Farmland [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 191-195.
[9] Du Xiaoyu, Li Nannan, Zou Shaokui, Wang Lina, Lü Yongjun, Zhang Qian, Li Shuncheng, Yang Guangyu, Han Yulin. Comprehensive Analysis of Main Traits of Newly Bred Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Southern Huang-Huai Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 38-45.
[10] Wang Guojiao, Song Peng, Yang Zhenzhong, Zhang Wenzhong. Effects of Straw Returning on Photosynthetic Matter Production Characteristics, Quality of Rice and Soil Nutrients [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 67-72.
[11] Xue Jingfang, Cai Yongsheng, Chen Shuqiang. Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation Cultivation Model on Rice Quality and Starch RVA Profiles [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 86-92.
[12] Liu Tianhao, Zhang Yifei, Wang Huaipeng, Yang Kejun, Zhang Jinsong, Sun Yishan, Xiao Shanshan, Xu Rongqiong, Du Jiarui, Li Jiayu, Peng Cheng, Wang Baosheng. Regulating Effects of Foliar Spraying Silicon Fertilizer on Dry Matter Accumulation and Translocation, Grain Yield and Quality of Maize in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 112-117.
[13] Liu Xuetong, Zheng Chunlian, Cao Wei, Dang Hongkai, Cao Caiyun, Li Xiaoshuang, Li Kejiang, Ma Junyong. Effects of Long-Term Located Fertilization on Soil Organic Matter, Nitrogen Forms and Crop Yields [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 130-135.
[14] Liang Qian, Wu Qingshan, Ge Junzhu, Wu Xidong, Yang Yong’an, Hou Haipeng, Zhang Yao, Ma Zhiqi. Effects of Sowing Date on Rain-Fed Summer Maize Yield Formation and Resource Utilization in North China Plain [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 136-143.
[15] Zhao Baoping, Liu Jinghui, Ren Changzhong. Research Progress of Physiological Mechanism of Yield Formation in Oats [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 1-7.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!