Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 168-173.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.03.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction on Grain Protein of High Quality Rice and Its Rationality Evaluation

Wang Baojun1(), Cheng Wangda1, Shen Yaqiang1, Qin Yebo2, Su Yao3, Chen Gui4, Lu Chenni4, Zhang Hongmei1()   

  1. 1Institute of Eco-Environmental Sciences, Jiaxing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiaxing 314016, Zhejiang, China
    2Zhejiang Agricultural Technology Extension Center, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China
    3Institute of Environment, Resources, Soil and Fertilizer, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, China
    4Institute of Biotechnology Research, Jiaxing Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiaxing 314016, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2021-04-07 Revised:2021-05-17 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-06-20
  • Contact: Zhang Hongmei E-mail:wbj19901012@163.com;xiuyingyifei10@sina.com

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

139

Abstract:

As an important agricultural production resource to ensure stable rice yield and quality, nitrogen fertilizer plays an important role in ensuring food security in China. However, excessive nitrogen fertilizer input is bound to cause a certain impact on the ecological environment security. To determine the reasonable nitrogen application rate for high-quality rice production in northern Zhejiang, a field experiment was carried out and the random block design was adopted. Four nitrogen application levels were set: contrast (no fertilization, N0), conventional nitrogen application (270kg/ha pure nitrogen, N), nitrogen fertilizer reduction of 15% (229.5kg/ha pure nitrogen, N-15%), and nitrogen fertilizer reduction of 30% (189kg/ha pure nitrogen, N-30%), to investigate the effects of nitrogen reduction on grain protein and evaluate the rationality of nitrogen application in northern Zhejiang. The results showed that the contents of protein and its components, rice yield under nitrogen reduction were no significant difference with N-15% and N-30% treatments. N-15% and N-30% treatments could increase nitrogen use efficiency by 1.97%, 8.11% and decrease nitrogen surplus by 20.56%, 23.89% (P < 0.05), respectively. The comprehensive evaluation score of nitrogen reduction measures for high-quality rice in northern Zhejiang by analytic hierarchy process was N-15% (0.86) > N-30% (0.67) > N (0.65) > N0 (0.17). In conclusion, 15% reduction of nitrogen fertilizer (229.5kg/ha) was the most suitable nitrogen application rate for high-quality rice production in northern Zhejiang.

Key words: High-quality rice, Protein, Nitrogen surplus, Nitrogen use efficiency, Analytic hierarchy process

Table 1

The fertilization designs of different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 施肥方式
Fertilization
method		 施肥量
Fertilization rate (kg/hm2)		 施肥日期
Fertilization
date
N P2O5 K2O
N0 基肥 0 45 135 2019-06-21
追肥 0 0 0 2019-07-02
追肥 0 0 0 2019-08-08
N 基肥 108 45 135 2019-06-21
追肥 81 0 0 2019-07-02
追肥 81 0 0 2019-08-08
N-15% 基肥 91.80 45 135 2019-06-21
追肥 68.85 0 0 2019-07-02
追肥 68.85 0 0 2019-08-08
N-30% 基肥 75.6 45 135 2019-06-21
追肥 56.7 0 0 2019-07-02
追肥 56.7 0 0 2019-08-08

Table 2

The weight of comprehensive evaluation indexes for reducing nitrogen fertilizer of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang"

目标层
Target
layer		 准则层
Standard
layer		 权重
Weight		 指标层
Index
layer		 综合权重
Comprehensive
weight
氮肥减量
合理性
Reducing
nitrogen
fertilizer		 作物 0.833 产量（+） 0.6944
蛋白质（+） 0.1386
环境 0.167 NUE（+） 0.0835
Nsur（-） 0.0835

Fig.1

Effects of nitrogen reduction on grain protein content of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between treatments, the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of nitrogen reduction on contents of grain protein components of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang"

Table 3

Effects of nitrogen reduction on the proportion of grain protein content of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang %"

处理
Treatment		 清蛋白
Albumin		 球蛋白
Globulin		 醇溶蛋白
Alcohol soluble protein		 谷蛋白
Glutelin
N0 6.38±0.57a 16.91±0.74a 6.56±1.27a 52.58±0.59a
N 6.15±1.07a 18.86±3.43a 5.59±0.50a 58.94±1.08a
N-15% 6.13±0.57a 17.72±2.32a 4.47±0.82a 58.71±4.10a
N-30% 6.33±0.18a 16.83±0.29a 4.95±1.40a 56.53±6.14a

Fig.3

Effects of nitrogen reduction on yield and aboveground dry matter weight of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang"

Fig.4

Effects of nitrogen reduction on Nsur and NUE of high quality rice in northern Zhejiang"

Fig.5

Comprehensive score of rationality of nitrogen reduction for high quality rice in northern Zhejiang"

[1] Yu C Q, Huang X, Chen H, et al. Managing nitrogen to restore water quality in China. Nature, 2019, 567(7749):516-520.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1001-1
[2] 巨晓棠, 张翀. 论合理施氮的原则和指标. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1):1-14.
[3] 许仁良, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 等. 施氮量对水稻不同品种类型稻米品质的影响. 扬州大学学报, 2005, 26(1):66-68.
[4] 兰宇辰, 郭晓红, 李猛, 等. 施氮量与移栽密度互作对垦粳7号稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1):136-145.
[5] 岳红亮, 赵庆勇, 赵春芳, 等. 江苏省半糯粳稻食味品质特征及其与感官评价的关系. 中国粮油学报, 2020, 35(6):7-14,22.
[6] 吴家青, 熊若愚, 解嘉鑫, 等. 稻米食味品质形成及其响应氮素调控作用的研究进展. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(2):28-37.
[7] 巨晓棠, 谷保静. 氮素管理的指标. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(2):281-296.
[8] Zhang C, Ju X T, Powlson D S, et al. Nitrogen surplus benchmarks for controlling N pollution in the main cropping systems of China. Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 53(12):1-28.
doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06630
[9] 刘宏元, 张爱平, 杨世琦, 等. 山东省冬小麦―夏玉米轮作体系土壤氮素盈余指标体系的构建与评价——以德州市为例. 农业环境科学学报, 2019, 38(6):1321-1329.
[10] 黄晶, 刘立生, 马常宝, 等. 近30年中国稻区氮素平衡及氮肥偏生产力的时空变化. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6):987-998.
[11] 陆若辉, 虞轶俊, 吴春燕, 等. 浙江省主要作物的化肥施用现状与减施潜力估算. 浙江农业科学, 2020, 61(4):757-760,775.
[12] 杨静, 罗秋香, 钱春荣, 等. 氮素对稻米蛋白质组分含量及蒸煮食味品质的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2006, 37(2):145-150.
[13] 王江飞, 周柯锦, 汪小泉, 等. 杭嘉湖地区大气氮、磷沉降特征研究. 中国环境科学, 2015, 35(9):2754-2763.
[14] 张欢, 李恒鹏, 李新艳, 等. 太湖流域典型农业区氮平衡时间变化特征及驱动因素. 土壤通报, 2014, 45(5):1119-1129.
[15] 董燕红, 钟定胜, 卢小丽. 主成分与层次分析法在区域可持续发展能力评价中的应用对比. 安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(1):359-365.
[16] 路凯, 赵庆勇, 周丽慧, 等. 稻米蛋白质含量与食味品质的关系及其影响因素研究进展. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36(5):1305-1311.
[17] 唐健, 唐闯, 郭保卫, 等. 氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):117-130.
[18] 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 等. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6):541-552.
[19] 郭晓红, 姜红芳, 王鹤璎, 等. 氮肥运筹对寒地水稻籽粒植酸、蛋白质和矿质元素的影响. 核农学报, 2020, 34(7):1534-1542.
[20] 史登林, 王小利, 刘安凯, 等. 黄壤稻田土壤微生物量碳氮及水稻品质对生物炭配施氮肥的响应. 环境科学, 2021, 42(1):443-449.
[21] 兰艳, 黄曌, 胡明明, 等. 施氮量对低谷蛋白水稻籽粒品质及蛋白质组分的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2):182-190.
[22] 张桂莲, 杨定照, 张顺堂, 等. 不同成熟度对水稻种子萌发及其生理特性的影响. 植物生理学报, 2012, 48(3):272-276.
[23] 梁成刚, 陈利平, 汪燕, 等. 高温对水稻灌浆期籽粒氮代谢关键酶活性及蛋白质含量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(4):398-402.
[24] 贾琰, 沈阳, 邹德堂, 等. 孕穗期冷水灌溉对寒地粳稻籽粒灌浆及其氮素积累的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(3):259-272.
[25] 仇景涛, 吴壮, 蒋天昊, 等. 不同生育时期氮肥减施对水稻群体生产特征的影响及减肥策略初步分析. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 41(3):52-58,65.
[26] 刘红江, 郭智, 郑建初, 等. 太湖地区氮肥减量对水稻产量和氮素流失的影响. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(3):713-718.
[27] 吴萌, 李委涛, 刘佳, 等. 红壤水稻土上双季稻氮素减施增效方法比较. 土壤, 2017, 49(4):685-691.
[28] 薛金元, 许芳芳, 王娟娟, 等. 减氮增密对水稻产量、氮素吸收及土壤剖面养分分布的影响. 河南农业科学, 2021, 50(6):82-90.
[29] 宁运旺, 张辉, 王磊, 等. 基肥结合抽穗期追肥稳定稻麦产量并提高氮肥利用率及经济效益. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(8):1407-1419.
[30] 熊鹰. 湖南省生态安全综合评价研究. 长沙:湖南大学, 2008.
[31] 何锦, 马雪梅, 庞雅婕, 等. 三江平原典型农垦区水土质量综合评价体系研究. 地质调查与研究, 2020, 43(3):271-278.
[32] 李治兵, 沈涛, 肖怡然, 等. 西北地区农业生态和经济系统协调发展研究. 中国农业资源与区划, 2020, 41(12):237-244.
[33] 董娟, 唐琳, 郭春燕, 等. 基于熵权—模糊层次分析法的矿区复垦土壤培肥技术研究. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(9):2109-2118.
[1] Tao Yueyue, Sun Hua, Wang Haihou, Lu Changying, Shen Mingxing. Effects of Harvest Date and Drying Days on the Yield, Crude Protein Content and Moisture of Forage Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 215-220.
[2] Li Ning, Liu Tongtong, Yang Jinwen, Shi Yugang, Wang Shuguang, Sun Daizhen. Analysis of Physiological Differences of Wheat Varieties with Different Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 87-96.
[3] Zhang Haipeng, Chen Zhiqing, Wang Rui, Lu Hao, Cui Peiyuan, Yang Yanju, Zhang Hongcheng. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Nano-Magnesium on Rice Yield, Grain Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 255-261.
[4] Li Feng, Gao Tongmei, Su Xiaoyu, Wei Libin, Wang Dongyong, Tian Yuan, Li Tongke, Yang Zihao, Wei Shuangling. Effects of Nitrogen Rate and Planting Density on Photosynthetic Rate, Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sesame [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 215-221.
[5] Lu Dandan, Ye Miao, Zhang Zujian. Research Progress on Rice Protein and Its Components and Their Effects on Rice Quality [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 28-34.
[6] Li Xu, Fu Lidong, Wang Yu, Sui Xin, Ren Hai, Lü Xiaohong, Ma Chang, Du Meng, Mao Ting. Effects of Genetic Interaction between DEP1 and NRT1.1B on Nitrogen Use in Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 22-27.
[7] Gao Tiantian, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Chang Xuhong, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Different Spring Wheat Varieties to Nitrogen Treatment [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 67-71.
[8] Deng Chaochao, Wang Lei, Xu Ye, Zhou Qi, Su Cuicui, Cai Xiaobin, Miao Pinggui, Zhao Haipeng, Zhang Yan, Wang Yucai, Zhang Xiangping. Effects of Nitrogen and Sowing Rate on Yield and Quality of Fresh Leaves in Barley [2011(07)814] [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 108-113.
[9] Liu Wei, Zhou Jianxiong, Xie Yuanyuan, Zhang Xu, Xiong Yousheng, Xu Xiangyu, Yuan Jiafu, Xiong Hanfeng. Effects of One-Time Basal Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Fresh Ear Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Summer-Sown Fresh Sweet Corn [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 134-139.
[10] Cao Liru, Wang Guorui, Zhang Xin, Wei Liangming, Wei Xin, Zhang Qianjin, Deng Yazhou, Wang Zhenhua, Lu Xiaomin. Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of HSP90 Gene Family in Maize [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 28-34.
[11] Wang Ruqing, Hua Wei, Liu Jun. Preparations and Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic Protein Complexes in Different Crops [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 35-42.
[12] Song Kunfeng, Hao Fengsheng, Yao Xin, Wang Jing, Liu Weiqun. Cloning and Functional Analysis of Tobacco Nt14-3-3-like C Gene [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 6-13.
[13] Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Wang Can, Zhang Guobing, Zhou Lengbo, Peng Qiu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum Cultivar "Hongyingzi" [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 118-122.
[14] Wang Yujiao, Cao Qi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Shi Shubing. Effects of Chemical Regulation on Wheat Yield and Quality under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 96-100.
[15] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!