Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 78-83.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.014

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Planting Density on Yield Traits and Commercial Characters of Guiguozhe No.1

Li Song,He Yibo,Lu Manman,Liu Hongjian,Liu Junxian,Liu Limin,Yu Kunxing,Liu Xin   

  1. Sugarcane Research Institute,Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biotechnology and Genetic Improvement (Guangxi),Ministry of Agriculture/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement/Guangxi Collaborative Innovation Center of Sugarcane Industry,Nanning 530007,Guangxi,China
  • Received:2017-05-03 Revised:2017-07-07 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

155

Abstract:

In order to optimize planting density of new chewing cane Guiguozhe No.1 in Guangxi sugarcane region, and to provide the cultivation technique for its application, the experiment was conducted in 4 counties with 6 planting density including 39 000, 42 000, 45 000, 48 000, 51 000 and 54 000stalks/hm 2 in 2016. The results showed that planting density had little influence on plant height and field brix of Guiguozhe No.1. Stalk diameter and cane commodity rate decreased with increased planting density. Cane yield, cane commodity yield and economy income increased firstly and then decreased with increased planting density. The highest cane yield reached 149 077.1kg/hm 2with 48 000stalks/hm 2, The highest and the following cane commodity yield reached 144 325.3kg/hm 2 and 144 069.9kg/hm 2 with 48 000 and 45 000 stalks/hm 2, the highest economic income was up to 102 132.3yuan/hm 2 with 45 000stalks/hm 2. The incidence of pokkah boeng disease had no significant changes among planting densities, which changed in 0.25%-0.89%. In present study, the suitable planting density of Guiguozhe No.1 was 45 000stalks/hm 2, but the fertilization levels should be carefully considered for its local situation.

Key words: Chewing cane, Guiguozhe No.1, Planting density, Yield, Commercial character

Table 1

Effects of planting density on main agronomic traits and resistance"

试验点Location 处理Treatment 株高Plant height (cm) 茎径Stem diameter (cm) 田间蔗汁锤度Field brix (%) 梢腐病率Incidence of Pokkah Boeng (%)
博白Bobai A 275.3 4.07 17.58 0.67
B 274.5 3.99 18.10 0.52
C 277.2 3.87 18.12 0.31
D 279.1 3.75 17.96 0.48
E 280.8 3.68 18.01 0.56
F 278.8 3.61 18.17 0.42
玉州Yuzhou A 227.8 4.23 17.77 0.51
B 250.5 4.13 18.04 0.32
C 254.2 4.11 18.23 0.89
D 255.3 4.03 17.59 0.76
E 258.4 3.83 17.71 0.25
F 259.2 3.64 17.52 0.56
横县Hengxian A 273.8 4.11 18.09 0.35
B 254.7 4.08 18.33 0.58
C 256.8 3.96 17.97 0.87
D 272.6 3.78 18.06 0.50
E 256.3 3.54 17.58 0.41
F 262.5 3.43 17.94 0.76
宾阳Binyang A 230.3 4.17 18.39 0.65
B 232.8 4.02 17.84 0.78
C 237.7 3.96 17.47 0.65
D 241.8 3.89 18.05 0.62
E 248.5 3.81 17.76 0.33
F 230.8 3.67 17.92 0.71
平均Mean A 251.8 4.15±0.0231aA 17.96±0.0577abA 0.55
B 253.1 4.06±0.0231bB 18.08±0.0404aA 0.55
C 256.5 3.98±0.0173cB 17.95±0.0346abA 0.68
D 262.2 3.86±0.0231dC 17.92±0.0173abA 0.59
E 261.0 3.72±0.0231eD 17.77±0.1270bA 0.39
F 257.8 3.59±0.0115fE 17.89±0.1212abA 0.61

Table 2

Effects of planting density on cane yield and commercial cane yield of chewing cane"

试验点
Location		 处理
Treatment		 节间长度(cm)
Internode length		 蔗产量(kg/hm2)
Cane yield		 商品蔗产量(kg/hm2)
Commercial cane yield
博白Bobai A 11.01 132 813.6±3 757.3cB 131 485.5±2 960.6bB
B 10.98 145 529.2±3 696.9bAB 143 928.3±2 825.3aAB
C 11.08 155 778.6±3 777.4abA 153 441.9±2 834.8aA
D 11.16 155 824.8±4 138.4abA 151 305.9±3 144.8aA
E 11.23 160 599.1±3 987.1aA 150 802.6±2 873.2aA
F 11.15 162 639.5±4 507.2aA 148 327.3±3 254.2aA
玉州Yuzhou A 9.11 124 759.4±2 088.9eE 123 511.8±2 781.1dC
B 10.02 140 872.7±2 602.6dD 139 182.2±3 375.0bcABC
C 10.16 151 565.2±3 325.2bB 149 443.3±4 141.5abAB
D 10.21 156 202.1±3 697.5aA 151 672.2±4 466.0aA
E 10.32 151 515.5±3 149.2bB 142 576.1±3 786.6abcAB
F 10.36 145 467.5±2 771.5cC 133 539.2±3 315.3cdBC
横县Hengxian A 10.95 141 570.3b±2 370.3cB 140 013.0±3 152.6abA
B 10.19 139 814.9±2 018.1cB 138 556.6±2 799.9bA
C 10.27 142 227.3±3 120.3bB 140 805.0±3 902.1aA
D 10.88 146 441.2±3 551.0aA 141 169.4±4 238.2aA
E 10.25 128 561.3±3 414.3eC 119 690.6±3 869.8cB
F 10.48 130 663.1±2 791.2dC 119 556.7±3 244.2cB
宾阳Binyang A 9.21 122 576.2±2 760.0dD 120 737.5±2 958.1bAB
B 9.31 124 011.2±2 343.3cdCD 122 027.0±2 684.6bAB
C 9.48 135 295.3±2 499.6bABC 132 589.4±2 784.4aAB
D 9.67 137 840.4±3 024.1abAB 133 153.8±3 195.7aAB
E 9.94 144 416.3±2 688.1aA 134 884.8±2 832.6aA
F 9.23 131 745.9±1 977.7bcCD 119 493.6±2 150.9bB
平均Mean A 10.07 130 429.9±2 744.1eE 128 937.0±3 077.5bA
B 10.13 137 557.0±2 688.0dD 135 923.5±3 025.0abA
C 10.25 146 216.6±3 180.7bB 144 069.9±3 523.4aA
D 10.48 149 077.1±3 602.8aA 144 325.3±3 884.8aA
E 10.44 146 273.1±3 304.7bB 136 988.5±3 450.1abA
F 10.31 142 629.0±3 011.9cC 130 229.2±3 074.3bA

Table 3

Effects of planting density on main economic characters"

处理
Treatment		 蔗产量(kg/hm2)
Cane yield		 商品蔗产量(kg/hm2)
Commercial cane yield		 商品蔗率(%)
Commercial cane rate		 次品蔗产量(kg/hm2)
Defective cane yield		 次品蔗率(%)
Defective cane rate
A 130 429.9eE 128 937.0bA 98.86±0.43aA 1 492.9 1.14
B 137 557.0dD 135 923.5abA 98.81±0.47aA 1 633.5 1.18
C 146 216.6bB 144 069.9aA 98.53±0.39aA 2 146.7 1.47
D 149 077.1aA 144 325.3aA 96.81±0.91bA 4 751.8 3.19
E 146 273.1bB 136 988.5abA 93.65±0.27cB 9 284.6 6.35
F 142 629.0cC 130 229.2bA 91.31±0.59dB 12 399.8 8.69

Table 4

Effects of planting density on economic benefits of sugarcane"

处理
Treatment		 商品蔗Commercial cane 次品蔗Defective cane 种植成本(元/hm2)
Planting cost		 收获成本(元/hm2)
Harvesting cost		 利润(元/hm2)
Profit
价格(元/kg)
Price		 收入(元/hm2)
Income		 价格(元/kg)
Price		 收入(元/hm2)
Income
A 1.60 206 299.2 0.50 746.5 97 500 15 651.6 93 894.1±2 656.3bB
B 1.55 210 681.4 0.50 816.8 97 500 16 506.8 97 491.4±1 970.0bB
C 1.50 216 104.9 0.50 1 073.4 97 500 17 546.0 102 132.3±2 476.6aA
D 1.45 209 271.7 0.50 2 375.9 97 500 17 889.3 96 258.3±1 834.0bB
E 1.40 191 783.9 0.50 4 642.3 97 500 17 552.8 81 373.4±2 208.1cC
F 1.35 175 809.4 0.50 6 199.9 97 500 17 115.5 67 393.8±2 140.0dD
[1] 余坤兴, 谭芳, 李松 , 等. 广西果蔗生产现状与健康发展对策.广西蔗糖, 2007(4):14-17.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4732.2007.04.003
[2] 戴友铭, 李松, 余坤兴 , 等. 果蔗拔地拉种性恢复试验研究. 广西农业科学, 2008,39(1):26-29.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2008.01.006
[3] 李松, 游建华, 余坤兴 , 等. 黑皮果蔗茎尖脱毒不同代数种茎苗商品性能研究. 热带作物学报, 2010,31(2):176-180.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2010.02.003
[4] 李松, 唐红琴, 游建华 , 等. 黑皮果蔗拔地拉茎尖杯苗商品蔗的栽培技术. 浙江农业科学, 2010,1(6):1226-1228.
[5] 王文明, 李松, 杨柳 , 等. 果蔗拔地拉(Badila)健康种苗在黄山歙县的引种试验初报. 作物杂志, 2013(6):140-142.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2013.06.037
[6] 巫玉平 . 广西黑皮果蔗产销问题和发展对策.中国糖料, 2013(3):83-84.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2624.2013.03.033
[7] 李松, 刘红坚, 刘俊仙 , 等. 桂果蔗1号选育及其栽培技术要点. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(9):1561-1566.
doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2015.09.1561
[8] 刘欣, 刘丽敏, 刘红坚 , 等. 桂果蔗1号商品性质量分析.湖南农业科学, 2015(1):14-16.
doi: 10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2015.01.006
[9] 路春光, 郭满平 . 不同种植密度对大豆经济性状及产量的影响.现代农业科技, 2017(5):23-24.
[10] 黄鼎程, 王登伟, 柳延涛 , 等. 不同种植密度对甜玉米品种主要农艺性状及产量的影响研究. 新疆农垦科技, 2017,40(2):14-16.
[11] 李强, 李慧敏, 李丁 , 等. 播期和种植密度对冬小麦节水新品种衡S29产量及相关因素的影响.山东农业科学, 2017(3):37-41.
doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2017.03.007
[12] 王亮, 李艳, 王桥江 , 等. 膜下滴灌种植密度对花生主要农艺性状和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2017,56(1):21-25.
[13] 蔡桂青 . 施氮量和种植密度对水稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响及差异. 湖南农业大学, 2014.
[14] 谭芳, 王伦旺, 经艳 , 等. 施肥和种植密度对桂糖31号产量及主要经济性状的影响.南方农业学报, 2016(4):564-570.
doi: 10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.04.564
[15] 谭芳, 经艳, 王伦旺 , 等. 不同施肥量和种植密度对桂糖32号甘蔗蔗糖分和产量的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2016,32(5):1055-1059.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.016
[16] 裴铁雄, 陈永, 黄培强 , 等. 甘蔗新品种的不同种植密度试验研究.中国糖料, 2014(4):6-10.
[17] 吴建涛, 刘福业, 杨俊贤 , 等. 施肥量和种植密度对粤糖60号产量和蔗糖分的影响. 广东农业科学, 2014,41(20):19-23.
[18] 郭惠明, 林炎照, 林警周 , 等. 种植密度和施肥水平对龙黑果蔗产量的影响. 亚热带农业研究, 2013,9(1):15-18.
[19] 庞天, 张荣华, 王勇 . 旱地果蔗项目投资收益与风险评估及其防范. 中国糖料, 2015,37(3):44-46.
doi: 10.13570/j.cnki.scc.2015.03.017
[20] 王继华, 曹干, 张剑亮 , 等. 我国果蔗产业的现状与可持续发展.甘蔗糖业, 2013(5):56-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9695.2013.05.012
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .