Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 148-154.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum

Zhang Jiao2,Wu Qi2,Zhou Yufei1,2,Wang Yitao3,Zhang Ruidong2,4,Huang Ruidong2   

  1. 1 Key Laboratory of Sorghum Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement of Shanxi Province, Jinzhong 030600, Shanxi, China
    2 College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, Liaoning, China
    3 Agro-environmental Protection and Supervision Center, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, China
    4 Institute of Economic Crops, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2017-11-27 Revised:2018-05-20 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

153

Abstract:

Sorghum hybrids Jiza 305 and Jiza 127 were used as experimental materials to study the effects of drought and rewatering at seedling and filling stages on photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter production of sorghum. The results showed that the photosynthesis of two sorghum cultivars was inhibited under drought stress at the seedling and filling stages. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (Tr), maximum photochemistry (Fv/Fm), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), electron transfer rate (ETR) and SPAD all decreased in different degrees, and the declined extent of above-mentioned parameters of Jiza 305 was lower than those of Jiza 127. However, under drought conditions, the initial fluorescence (Fo) of Jiza 127 increased higher than that of Jiza 305. After rewatering, the photosynthetic parameters of Jiza 305 were restored and no significant difference was observed between Jiza 305 and the control, the recovery of other parameters after rewatering in Jiza 127 was limited, except for Pn and Ci at the seedling stage and Gs at the filling stage, the other photosynthetic indexex were significant difference compaired with control. After two periods of drought and rewatering, the dry matter weight, grain yield, biomass yield and harvest index of sorghum organs decreased. The yield of Jiza 127 declined in a larger extent than that of Jiza 305. Jiza 127 showed a lower drought resistance index.

Key words: Drought stress, Sorghum, Photosynthetic characteristics, Dry matter production

Fig.1

Effects of drought and rewatering on Pn of sorghum"

Fig.2

Effects of drought and rewatering on Gs of sorghum"

Fig.3

Effects of drought and rewatering on Ci of sorghum"

Fig.4

Effects of drought and rewatering on Tr of sorghum"

Fig.5

Effects of drought and rewatering on SPAD value of sorghum"

Fig.6

Effects of drought and rewatering on Fo of sorghum"

Fig.7

Effects of drought and rewatering on Fv/Fm of sorghum"

Fig.8

Effects of drought and rewatering on qP of sorghum"

Fig.9

Effects of drought and rewatering on ETR of sorghum"

Table 1

Effects of drought and rewatering at seedling and filling stages on dry matter accumulation of sorghum"

生育时期
Growth stage		 品种
Cultivar		 处理
Treatment		 叶(g)
Leaf		 茎(g)
Stem		 鞘(g)
Sheath		 穗(g)
Panicle		 根(g)
Root		 根冠比
Root/Shoot
苗期Seedling stage 吉杂127 Jiza 127 DS 16.9b 10.4b 9.0c 18.6c 0.51ab
CK 20.2a 17.8a 12.1b 27.0ab 0.48b
吉杂305 Jiza 305 DS 20.1ab 13.0b 11.4b 25.1b 0.54a
CK 23.0a 19.0a 18.2a 29.0a 0.45b
吉杂127 Jiza 127 RW 21.2b 12.9b 13.8a 21.9b 0.47a
CK 23.6a 17.2ab 14.8a 24.8ab 0.46a
吉杂305 Jiza 305 RW 24.7a 17.8ab 13.5a 28.1a 0.48a
CK 25.3a 22.3a 16.6a 29.1a 0.43a
灌浆期Filling stage 吉杂127 Jiza 127 DS 19.4c 28.4c 12.5c 56.5d 27.4d 0.22b
CK 26.2ab 41.4ab 16.4b 75.9b 40.7b 0.23ab
吉杂305 Jiza 305 DS 24.1bc 33.7bc 16.7b 67.3c 38.2c 0.24a
CK 28.5a 43.3a 20.5a 89.6a 44.4a 0.22b
吉杂127 Jiza 127 RW 21.7c 33.3c 13.8c 69.0c 34.1c 0.23a
CK 28.6ab 42.9a 17.8ab 81.0bc 40.6b 0.22a
吉杂305 Jiza 305 RW 25.9b 37.1b 17.0bc 90.8ab 41.0b 0.22a
CK 30.5a 43.6a 20.7a 101.7a 50.3a 0.24a

Table 2

Sorghum yield and relevant factor under drought and rewatering at seedling and filling stages"

品种
Cultivar		 单株子粒产量(g)
Grain yield per plant		 单株生物产量(g)
Biological yield per plant		 收获指数
Harvest index		 抗旱指数
Drought resistance index
吉杂127 Jiza 127 处理Treatment 47.75c 129.35b 0.38 0.54
CK 74.42ab 179.45a 0.40
吉杂305 Jiza 305 处理Treatment 66.56b 169.55a 0.39 0.97
CK 82.02a 193.57a 0.41
[1] 王延宇, 王鑫, 赵淑梅 , 等. 玉米各生育期土壤水分与产量关系的研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 1998,16(1):100-105.
[2] 白向历, 孙世贤, 杨国航 , 等. 不同生育时期水分胁迫对玉米产量及生长发育的影响. 玉米科学, 2009,17(2):60-63.
[3] 马旭凤, 于涛汪, 李宏 , 等. 苗期水分亏缺对玉米根系发育及解剖结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(7):1731-1736.
[4] 李博, 田晓莉, 王刚卫 , 等. 苗期水分胁迫对玉米根系生长杂种优势的影响. 作物学报, 2008,34(4):662-668.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00662
[5] 郑盛华, 严昌荣 . 水分胁迫对玉米苗期生理和形态特性的影响. 生态学报, 2006,26(4):1138-1143.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2006.04.022
[6] 吕金印, 山仑, 高俊凤 , 等. 干旱对小麦灌浆期旗叶光合等生理特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2003,21(2):77-81.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2003.02.018
[7] 黄瑞冬, 孙璐, 肖木辑 , 等. 持绿型高粱B35灌浆期对干旱的生理生化响应. 作物学报, 2009,35(3):560-565.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00560
[8] Acevedo E, Hsiao T C, Henderson D W . Immediate and subsequent grow the responses of maize leaves to changes in water status. Plant Physiology, 1971,48:631-636.
doi: 10.1104/pp.48.5.631 pmid: 16657850
[9] Belsky A J, Carson W P, Jensen C L , et al. Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring?. Evolutionary Ecology, 1993,7(1):109-121.
[10] 马守臣, 徐炳成, 李凤民 , 等. 土壤水分对返青期断根冬小麦补偿效应的影响. 应用生态学报, 2006(10):1849-1853.
doi: 10.1360/yc-006-1280
[11] 王志强, 梁威威, 范雯雯 , 等. 不同土壤肥力下冬小麦春季干旱的复水补偿效应. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(8):1628-1636.
[12] 陈晓远, 罗远培 . 开花期复水对受旱冬小麦的补偿效应研究. 作物学报, 2001,27(4):512-516.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2001.04.018
[13] He J D, Wen R L, Tian S Y , et al. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and yield of different maize varieties at tasseling stage. Agricultural Basic Science and Technology, 2017,18(7):1145-1151,1157.
[14] 刘吉利, 赵长星, 吴娜 , 等. 苗期干旱及复水对花生光合特性及水分利用率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(3):469-476.
doi: 10.3864/j.ssn.0578-1752.2011.03.005
[15] 张翠翠, 邓西平, 陈炜 . 灌浆期干旱及复水对冬小麦旗叶蔗糖积累和产量构成的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2011,39(6):68-74,81.
[16] 山仑, 徐炳成 . 论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(7):2342-2348.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2009.07.011
[17] 周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳 , 等. 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA、CTK含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014(4):655-663.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.04.005
[18] 王艺陶, 周宇飞, 李丰先 , 等. 干旱胁迫对高粱叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2013,44(4):398-403.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2013.04.003
[19] Bhargava S, Paranjpe S . Genotypic variation in the photosynthetic competence of Sorghum bicolor seedlings subjected to polyethylene glycol-mediated drought stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2004,161(1):125-129.
[20] Sharma A D, Kumar S, Singh P . Expression analysis of a stress-modulated transcript in drought tolerant and susceptible cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006,163(5):570-576.
[21] Pasini L, Bergonti M, Fracasso A , et al. Microarray analysis of differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs in young leaves of sorghum under dry-down conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014,171(7):537-548.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.12.014
[22] Makino A . Photosynthesis,grain yield,and nitrogen utilization in rice and wheat. Plant Physiology, 2011,155(1):125-129.
doi: 10.1104/pp.110.165076 pmid: 20959423
[23] 王德权, 周宇飞, 陆璋镳 , 等. 水分胁迫下持绿型高粱根系形态及其活力研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012(2):73-76.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7601.2012.02.013
[24] 姜东, 谢祝捷, 曹卫星 , 等. 花后干旱和渍水对冬小麦光合特性和物质运转的影响. 作物学报, 2004,30(2):175-182.
[25] 胡继超, 姜东, 曹卫星 , 等. 短期干旱对水稻叶水势、光合作用及干物质分配的影响. 应用生态学报, 2004(1):63-67.
[26] 谷艳芳, 丁圣彦, 高志英 , 等. 干旱胁迫下冬小麦光合产物分配格局及其与产量的关系. 生态学报, 2010(5):1167-1173.
[27] 卢峰, 张飞, 段有厚 . 干旱胁迫对高粱苗期物质生产及生理特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2015(2):149-153.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.02.029
[28] 许大全 . 光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题. 植物生理学通讯, 1997,33(4):241-244.
[29] 张仁和, 郑友军, 马国胜 , 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响. 生态学报, 2011(5):1303-1311.
[30] 杨泽粟, 张强, 郝小翠 . 自然条件下半干旱雨养春小麦生育后期旗叶光合的气孔和非气孔限制. 中国生态农业学报, 2015(2):174-182.
doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.140874
[31] Kaiser W M . Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiologia Plantarum, 1987,71(1):142-149.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb04631.x
[32] 史正军, 樊小林 . 干旱胁迫对不同基因型水稻光合特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2003(3):123-126.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2003.03.026
[33] 张兴华, 高杰, 杜伟莉 , 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米品种苗期叶片光合特性的影响. 作物学报, 2015,41(1):154-159.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2015.00154
[34] 吴奇 . 干旱胁迫及氮素对高粱根系形态、生理特性及产量形成的影响. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学, 2017.
[35] 关义新, 戴俊英, 徐世昌 , 等. 玉米花期干旱及复水对植株补偿生长及产量的影响. 作物学报, 1997,23(6):740-745.
[1] Zhang Yizhong, Zhou Fuping, Zhang Xiaojuan, . Identification and Cluster Analysis of Photosynthetic#br# Characters and WUE in Sorghum Germplasm [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 45-53.
[2] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[3] Zhang Jianhua, Guo Ruifeng, Cao Changlin, Fan Na, . Study on Effect and Safety of Controlling Weed#br# in Sorghum Field by Several Stem and#br# Leaf Treatment Herbicide [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 162-166.
[4] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[5] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[6] Fang Chen,Yupeng Liu,Xiaoping Gu,Jiamin Hu,Fei Yu,Bo Zhang. Effects of Low Temperature on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 155-161.
[7] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[8] Jianghui Cui,Fuzhu Cui,Jianfu Xue,Jianping Hao,Tianqing Du,Longxiang Sun. Effects of Fertilizer Reduction on Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregates Based on Wheat-Sorghum System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 126-132.
[9] Yanfang Hao,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Wei Zhang,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Establishment of Sorghum Cell Suspensions with Young Leaves [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 35-40.
[10] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56-61.
[11] Kai Zhu,Fei Zhang,Fulai Ke,Yanqiu Wang,Jianqiu Zou. Effects of Planting Density on Yield and Physiological Characteristics of Sorghum Hybrids Suitable for Mechenization [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 83-87.
[12] Shuguang Wang,Yugang Shi,Huawei Shi,Yaping Cao,Daizhen Sun. Research on Relationship between Photosynthetic Characteristics and Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 23-29.
[13] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Can Wang,Guobing Zhang,Qiu Peng. Effects of Differrent Nitrogen Level on Material Production and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Glutinous Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 126-130.
[14] Hongda Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Jia Liu,Yiran Ye,Meirong Hai. Effects of Altitude on Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Characteristics, and Antioxidant Properties on Solanum tuberosum L. [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 93-99.
[15] Cong Wang,Guangdong Yang,Zunyan Hu,Linqi Chen,Siqi Ren. Influence of Planting Densities on Canopy Structure and Light Radiation of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 119-123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .