Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 93-99.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.05.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Altitude on Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Characteristics, and Antioxidant Properties on Solanum tuberosum L.

Ye Hongda1, 2,Sha Bencai1,Wang Wenxiang1,Liu Jia1,Ye Yiran1,Hai Meirong1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,Yunnan,China
    2College of Resources and Environment,Yunnan Agricultural University,Kunming 650201,Yunnan,China
  • Received:2017-05-01 Revised:2017-08-01 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Meirong Hai

Abstract:

Altitude is one of the main ecological factors limiting photosynthetic physiological characteristics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), and it has a great significance to study the effects of different altitudes on the physiological characteristics of potato leaves. Photosynthetic characteristics of potato at different altitudes depends on various altitudes. In this study, there were three potato species cultivars, Yingjiangxiaoyangyu, Jianchuanhong and Laojiayangyu that were cultivated under the normal nitrogen level, which were experimented in three areas of Jiaoxi (890m), Zhuanlong (1 998m) and Tanshan (2 988m) to analyze the effects of altitude gradient on photosynthetic characteristics and fluorescence characteristics of potato landraces. The results showed that the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of the high-altitude cultivars from the low altitude to the high altitude area were changed relatively larger than those of other potato varieties. As far as Laojiayangyu was considered to be the most adaptable variety for the environmental stress caused by the altitude, it could be seen that the three potato varieties had different photoprotective mechanisms in response to elevated altitudes.

Key words: Altitude gradient, Potato local species, Photosynthetic characteristics, Fluorescence characteristics

Fig.1

The changes of chlorophyll content of leaves of potato varieties at different altitudes Different small letters mean significance difference at P<0.05 level among different varieties of the same altitude, respectively; "**" mean significant difference at P<0.01 level of different altitudes in the same variety, respectively"

Table 1

Effects of altitude on photosynthetic indexes of potato local varieties"

地点
Site
参数
Variable
盈江小洋芋
Yingjiang-xiaoyangyu
剑川红
Jianchuanhong
老家洋芋
Laojia-yangyu
皎西村 Pn[μmol/(m2·s)] 11.14a 9.58a 5.15b
Jiaoxi Gs[μmol/(m2·s)] 0.11aA 0.07bB 0.05bB
Ci (μmol/mol) 206.46a 139.57b 205.56a
Tr[mmol/(m2·s)] 6.26aA 2.30bB 2.82bB
转龙镇 Pn[μmol/(m2·s)] 11.85b 16.86a 15.74a
Zhuanlong Gs[μmol/(m2·s)] 0.05b 0.09ab 0.11a
Ci (μmol/mol) -8.29bB 66.94aAB 94.50aA
Tr[mmol/(m2·s)] 2.18b 2.64ab 3.18a
炭山村 Pn[μmol/(m2·s)] 15.74bB 15.87bB 20.63aA
Tanshan Gs[μmol/(m2·s)] 0.35b 0.30b 1.59a
Ci (μmol/mol) 276.92bB 263.32bB 319.43aA
Tr[mmol/(m2·s)] 2.02bB 1.87cC 2.52aA

Table 2

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of potato at different altitudes"

地点Site 参数Index 老家洋芋Laojiayangyu 剑川红Jianchuanhogn 盈江小洋芋Yingjiangxiaoyangyu F
皎西村Jiaoxi Fv/Fm 0.804±0.013b 0.813±0.012a 0.808±0.011a 2.439*
ΦPSⅡ 0.511±0.008c 0.586±0.004a 0.560±0.017b 9.992**
ETR [μmol·e/(m2·s)] 32.223±3.445b 19.790±0.346c 34.100±1.960ab 28.570***
qP 0.567±0.031a 0.501±0.010b 0.530±0.017ab 15.540***
NPQ 0.442±0.010b 0.472±0.000a 0.422±0.011b 22.390***
转龙镇Zhuanlong Fv/Fm 0.829±0.015a 0.831±0.010a 0.832±0.005a 0.166
ΦPSⅡ 0.365±0.054a 0.323±0.085a 0.351±0.025a 0.664
ETR [μmol·e/(m2·s)] 47.920±5.041ab 54.723±6.300ab 35.567±11.550b 4.650**
qP 0.621±0.074ab 0.619±0.020ab 0.560±0.050b 1.846**
NPQ 0.188±0.013a 0.212±0.029a 0.241±0.016a 0.773
炭山村Tanshan Fv/Fm 0.831±0.011a 0.834±0.011a 0.834±0.004a 0.266
ΦPSⅡ 0.341±0.042b 0.365±0.026ab 0.359±0.060b 2.869**
ETR [μmol·e/(m2·s)] 33.563±9.351a 31.253±7.003a 52.257±24.640a 1.300
qP 0.622±0.054b 0.702±0.020a 0.651±0.035ab 3.462
NPQ 0.224±0.044a 0.210±0.028a 0.213±0.034a 0.770

Fig.2

Effects of altitude on ETR of potato varieties"

Table 3

The Influence of altitude on ETR of leaves in nitrogen levels"

品种Variety 皎西村
Jiaoxi
转龙镇
Zhuanlong
炭山村
Tanshan
老家洋芋Laojiayangyu 20.09±0.36 32.65±4.27 30.13±14.49
剑川红Jianchuanhong 31.27±0.60 37.27±9.35 20.09±0.36
盈江小洋芋
Yingjiangxiaoyangyu
18.03±0.11 25.21±8.08 7.14±2.62

Table 4

The Influence for NPQ, qN, and qP of leaves of different potato landraces at different altitudes"

品种
Variety
皎西村Jiaoxi 转龙镇Zhuanlong 炭山村Tanshan
NPQ qN qP NPQ qN qP NPQ qN qP
老家洋芋
Laojiayangyu
0.44±0.01a
0.70±0.00a
0.56±0.03a
0.18±0.01a
0.43±0.00a
0.62±0.07a
0.22±0.04a
0.49±0.05a
0.62±0.05a
剑川红
Jianchuanhong
0.47±0.00a
0.72±0.01a
0.50±0.01c
0.21±0.03a
0.47±0.04a
0.61±0.02b
0.21±0.02a
0.50±0.04a
0.70±0.02a
盈江小洋芋
Yingjiangxiaoyangyu
0.42±0.01a
0.67±0.01b
0.53±0.02b
0.24±0.02a
0.50±0.04a
0.56±0.05b
0.21±0.04a
0.48±0.05a
0.65±0.03a
[1] 刘钟, 薛英利, 杨圆满 , 等. 人工遮阴条件下3个马铃薯品种耐阴性研究. 云南农业大学学报, 2015,30(4):566-574.
doi: 10.16211/j.issn.1004-390X(n).2015.04.013
[2] 杨帅, 闵凡祥, 高云飞 , 等. 新世纪中国马铃薯产业发展现状及存在问题. 中国马铃薯, 2014,28(5):311-316.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2014.05.012
[3] 王学英, 师生波, 吴兵 . 西宁和海北麻花艽净光合速率和叶绿素荧光参数的日变化比较. 西北植物学报, 2005,25(12):2514-2518.
[4] 温国胜, 田海涛, 张明如 , 等. 叶绿素荧光分析技术在林木培育中的应用. 应用生态学报, 2006,17(10):1973-1977.
[5] 张勇, 程怡, 王清明 , 等. 遮荫对月季光合特性及生长发育的影响. 西北植物学报, 2014,34(1):162-168.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.01.0162
[6] 何涛, 吴学明, 张改娜 , 等. 不同海拔火绒草叶绿体超微结构的比较. 云南植物研究, 2005,27(6):639-643.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0845.2005.06.006
[7] 龚荣高, 丁建林, 张光伦 . 不同海拔高度对青脆李生理辐射光谱、光合特性及果实品质的影响. 四川农业大学学报, 2010,28(4):454-458.
[8] Arnon D I . Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplast//Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1949,24(1):126-138.
[9] Bazza F A, Carlson R W . Photosynthetic acclimation to variability in the light environment of early and late successional plants. Oecologia, 1982,54:313-316.
doi: 10.1007/BF00379999
[10] 林小虎, 秘树青, 郭振清 , 等. 同海拔天女木兰叶抗氧化酶活性与光合色素含量. 经济林研究, 2011,9(2):60-64.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2011.02.010
[11] 刘瑞显, 王友华, 陈兵林 , 等. 花铃期干旱胁迫下氮素水平对棉花光合作用与叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 作物学报, 2008,34(4):675-683.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.00675
[12] Muller P, Li X P, Niyogi K K . Non-photochemical quenching:a response to excess light energy. Plant Physiology, 2001,125:1558-1566.
doi: 10.1104/pp.125.4.1558
[13] 韩玙, 刘石山, 梁艳丽 . 不同光照强度下花魔芋(Amorphophallus konjac)与谢君魔芋(Amorphophallus xiei)光合特性及光保护机制研究. 植物研究, 2013,33(6):676-683.
[14] Ogren E, Sundin U . Photosynthetic responses to variable light:a comparison of species from contrasting habitats. Oecologia, 1996,106:18-27.
doi: 10.1007/BF00334403 pmid: 28307153
[15] 杨智超, 李彩霞, 高海宁 , 等. 海拔对民乐紫皮大蒜植株光合特性及鳞茎品质的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2014,49(2):106-111.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2014.02.020
[16] Morecroft M D, Woodward F I . Experimental investigations on the environmental determination of δ 13C at different altitudes . Journal of Experimental Botany, 1990,41(10):1303-1308.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/41.10.1303
[17] 金高明 . 黄土高原不同海拔高度的富士苹果光合特性及生理效应的比较研究. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2015.
[18] 罗旭 . 不同海拔对金冠苹果光合特性和果实品质的影响. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2013.
[19] Genty B, Briantais J M, Rchreibe B N . Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1989,900:87-92.
[20] 陈贻竹, 李晓萍, 夏丽 , 等. 叶绿素荧光技术在植物环境胁迫研究中的应用. 热带亚热带植物学报, 1995,3(4):79-86.
[21] 林世青, 许春辉 . 叶绿素荧光动力学在植物抗性生理学生态学和农业现代化中的应用. 植物学通报, 1992,9(1):1-16.
[22] van Kooten O, Snel J F . The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology. Photosynthesis Research, 1990,25(3):147-150.
doi: 10.1007/BF00033156 pmid: 24420345
[23] Maxwell K, Johnson G N . Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. Journal of Experiment Botany, 2000,51(345):659-668.
doi: 10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659 pmid: 10938857
[1] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[2] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[3] Jiao Zhang,Qi Wu,Yufei Zhou,Yitao Wang,Ruidong Zhang,Ruidong Huang. Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 148-154.
[4] Fang Chen,Yupeng Liu,Xiaoping Gu,Jiamin Hu,Fei Yu,Bo Zhang. Effects of Low Temperature on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 155-161.
[5] Shuguang Wang,Yugang Shi,Huawei Shi,Yaping Cao,Daizhen Sun. Research on Relationship between Photosynthetic Characteristics and Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 23-29.
[6] Xiaoping Gu,Fei Yu,Ping Liang,Fang Chen. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 66-72.
[7] Kaiyu Li,Zhanxiang Sun,Ning Yang,Jiaming Zheng,Zhichuang Zhu,Jibing Xiao,Liangshan Feng,Chuang Lu. Effects of Topdressing Different Forms of Nitrogen on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Maize with Drip Irrigation under Plastic Film [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 93-97.
[8] Yang Sun,Yi Wang,Yao Meng,Haichao Fan,Danyang Qu,Jing Li,Shi Wei,Wanrong Gu. Effects of Exogenous ALA on Growth and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize Seedlings under Low Temperature Stress [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 87-93.
[9] Yanping Chen,Lingjie Kong,Wenming Zhao,Ruixiang Liu,Meijing Zhang,Fei Zheng,Qingchang Meng,Jianhua Yuan. Effects of Planting Density on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Maize [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 68-72.
[10] Liqiang Dong,Jing Ye,Shu Wang,Baoyan Jia,Yuancai Huang,Yan Wang. Effects of Sowing Rate on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Drill-Seeded Japonica Rice in North Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 86-92.
[11] Lingbo Zhou,Can Wang,Guobin Zhang,Yan Xu,Junxia Bai,Lanying Wu,Hai Luo,Mingbo Shao. Effects of Potassium Sulphate Compound Fertilizer and Planting Density on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Agronomic Traits and Yield in Coix lacryma-jobi L. [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 93-97.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .