Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 23-29.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Relationship between Photosynthetic Characteristics and Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat

Wang Shuguang1,Shi Yugang1,Shi Huawei1,Cao Yaping2,Sun Daizhen1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taigu 030801,Shanxi,China
    2Wheat Research Institute,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Linfen 041000,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2017-07-25 Revised:2017-10-27 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Daizhen Sun

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

135

Abstract:

Twenty-six spring wheat strains were used to test stomatal conductance (Gs), photosynthetic rate (Pn) and transpiration rate (Tr) of flag leaves at 10 and 20d after flowering (at the early and middle filling stage) under the rainfed and irrigated conditions, respectively. The genetic and phenotypic correlations between these main photosynthetic traits and drought resistance index were analyzed, and heritability and correlative heritability of these traits were also analyzed. The purpose of the experiment was to provide the basis for selection of photosynthetic traits in spring wheat drought breeding. The results showed that a lot of some photosynthetic traits in spring wheat were significantly related to drought resistance. Under irrigation, heritabilities of Tr and Gs at early grain filling were larger; correlative heritabilities between the Gs at early grain filling and drought resistance index was also larger. Under rainfed, there were larger correlative heritability between Pn and Tr at middle filling stage, Gs at early and middle filling stages and drought resistance index. On basis of the conjoint analysis results of genetic correlation coefficient, heritability and correlative heritability, Tr and Pn at the middle filling stage and Gs at early and middle filling stages under rainfed condition should be focused on in spring wheat drought breeding practice.

Key words: Spring wheat, Photosynthetic characteristics, Drought resistance, Hereditary correlation, Heritability

Table 1

Mean values of main photosynthetic traits"

品系Strain Pn(10) [μmol/(m2·s)] Pn(20) [μmol/(m2·s)] Tr(10) [mmol/(m2·s)] Tr(20) [mmol/(m2·s)] Gs(10) [mmol/(m2·s)] Gs(20) [mmol/(m2·s)]
雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation		 雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation		 雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation		 雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation		 雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation		 雨养
Rainfed		 灌溉
Irrigation
9606 0.65 0.77 0.25 0.31 4.98 5.34 2.79 3.31 69.60 80.50 165.07 175.67
9609 0.67 0.71 0.42 0.36 4.50 5.47 1.82 3.79 82.83 89.40 156.17 183.66
9611 0.72 0.74 0.25 0.31 4.53 6.13 2.81 3.86 78.43 91.20 160.87 187.63
9624 0.74 0.85 0.31 0.36 6.13 6.63 3.79 5.57 87.37 100.77 168.33 182.62
9627 0.75 0.83 0.36 0.45 5.58 6.45 3.43 4.84 91.03 104.63 167.26 195.66
9631 0.62 0.87 0.32 0.42 5.26 7.49 3.27 4.39 93.77 105.97 178.87 194.05
9636 0.63 0.83 0.22 0.37 4.35 7.01 2.11 4.64 60.03 98.10 142.63 180.60
9643 0.62 0.75 0.26 0.48 5.36 6.86 3.28 4.00 79.70 95.37 171.10 188.26
9646 0.70 0.74 0.17 0.28 4.58 5.67 2.90 3.45 62.83 82.07 140.10 175.80
9648 0.58 0.65 0.18 0.35 5.30 6.02 2.85 3.55 67.23 74.70 151.36 168.87
9654 0.66 0.69 0.29 0.41 5.56 6.27 1.82 4.07 65.00 83.83 150.72 171.96
9655 0.62 0.65 0.31 0.38 5.56 6.04 2.89 4.00 60.10 82.47 145.10 176.83
9656 0.65 0.50 0.36 0.25 5.64 5.98 3.06 3.37 51.99 79.96 156.73 163.13
9659 0.71 0.72 0.17 0.51 4.22 6.18 2.45 3.76 72.17 90.70 132.14 177.62
9663 0.58 0.76 0.25 0.63 5.43 7.31 3.41 4.49 62.17 96.17 172.73 186.43
9668 0.66 0.63 0.20 0.33 5.45 4.81 2.69 2.82 65.50 57.84 150.33 154.00
9681 0.76 0.90 0.29 0.46 6.93 6.51 3.71 4.07 84.80 104.40 186.57 205.93
9691 0.69 0.72 0.34 0.41 6.10 6.39 3.12 3.79 65.83 82.80 155.46 172.17
9697 0.56 0.67 0.13 0.26 5.55 5.54 2.44 3.37 49.87 79.00 151.01 151.13
9698 0.57 0.69 0.19 0.25 6.12 4.76 2.23 3.19 60.67 74.70 121.90 152.97
9701 0.42 0.72 0.15 0.25 5.60 5.86 2.60 2.13 47.03 76.50 137.23 170.97
9725 0.58 0.72 0.38 0.44 5.62 6.03 3.18 4.22 87.60 69.10 157.77 171.33
9728 0.48 0.76 0.35 0.24 6.21 6.30 3.66 3.18 53.30 83.80 151.87 172.97
9740 0.75 0.80 0.39 0.35 6.52 6.80 3.99 3.88 94.83 91.17 173.90 203.40
9741 0.43 0.67 0.17 0.42 6.09 4.60 3.72 4.33 70.80 80.27 109.96 136.77
9746 0.61 0.52 0.15 0.46 6.18 5.21 3.86 3.43 87.00 108.50 184.40 204.07

Table 2

Pot yield comparison of spring wheat strains under the two water conditions g"

品系Strain 灌溉Irrigation 雨养Rainfed t值 t value 品系Strain 灌溉Irrigation 雨养Rainfed t值 t value
9606 973.90 866.38 3.94* 9659 576.17 390.02 6.69**
9609 701.33 604.32 4.17* 9663 980.20 815.36 5.77**
9611 801.53 713.93 1.09 9668 655.87 571.61 2.35
9624 1 333.40 1 163.40 4.44** 9681 1 070.23 972.87 1.04
9627 1 225.46 1 064.98 2.99* 9691 776.46 696.11 3.35*
9631 1 019.33 973.04 1.14 9697 457.53 376.46 4.47**
9636 471.03 384.82 1.86 9698 619.31 583.16 0.95
9643 983.46 724.51 9.81** 9701 641.30 524.55 7.18**
9646 530.47 431.52 2.66 9725 864.76 843.34 0.49
9648 657.83 606.71 2.73 9728 893.16 862.02 0.64
9654 503.27 381.74 4.76** 9740 1 175.90 1 155.66 0.61
9655 738.97 606.47 9.56** 9741 652.73 561.32 5.02**
9656 829.10 816.51 0.17 9746 1 063.40 891.68 6.16**

Table 3

Drought resistance coefficient, comprehensive drought resistance coefficient and drought resistance index of main photosynthetic traits in spring wheat strains"

品系
Strain		 抗旱系数Drought resistance coefficient (%) 综合抗旱系数
Comprehensive drought resistance coefficient		 抗旱指数
Drought resistance index
Pn(10) Pn(20) Tr(10) Tr(20) Gs(10) Gs(20)
9606 85.21 79.85 91.34 83.41 92.46 85.64 86.31 106.90
9609 93.33 97.35 80.41 51.58 86.86 90.41 83.32 76.24
9611 67.53 78.58 72.69 73.28 84.73 85.61 77.07 78.13
9624 97.62 86.85 92.43 66.61 90.27 87.77 86.93 146.73
9627 88.45 82.32 85.76 71.41 84.15 88.64 83.46 128.15
9631 85.31 77.65 68.97 75.43 91.96 87.44 81.13 103.94
9636 62.42 58.63 60.05 44.38 77.98 60.61 60.68 36.30
9643 97.66 54.47 76.53 80.43 91.26 82.71 80.51 100.34
9646 79.07 62.36 81.37 83.63 78.69 74.56 76.61 51.41
9648 100.42 52.23 87.04 80.32 87.75 89.83 82.93 68.95
9654 83.54 71.74 88.65 45.32 86.03 76.73 75.34 47.69
9655 79.42 85.32 93.16 75.39 81.26 72.13 81.11 74.33
9656 97.89 99.02 93.54 91.08 95.36 66.58 90.58 104.26
9659 82.65 34.64 67.88 64.49 73.37 80.12 67.19 48.47
9663 76.57 46.63 73.38 76.03 88.72 65.48 71.14 87.74
9668 96.52 62.62 97.91 94.18 96.36 111.02 93.12 80.86
9681 75.45 62.48 96.87 91.68 89.54 80.36 82.73 113.50
9691 92.64 81.36 94.19 81.77 91.23 77.35 86.42 84.89
9697 74.43 49.92 99.39 73.61 97.92 65.48 76.79 44.07
9698 71.42 75.29 98.65 69.32 77.46 80.21 78.73 65.56
9701 44.36 61.38 96.68 120.45 79.62 63.43 77.65 62.39
9725 67.68 85.21 95.47 74.34 91.12 97.87 85.29 97.95
9728 55.35 97.81 98.45 116.23 85.78 64.43 86.35 105.13
9740 97.54 96.39 94.42 104.76 84.66 98.86 96.11 147.27
9741 72.31 40.47 81.62 109.19 87.42 81.84 78.81 69.18
9746 98.76 35.36 99.81 96.54 91.21 79.85 83.59 128.22

Table 4

The relative efficiency of main photosynthetic traits on drought resistance in spring wheat strains"

性状
Trait		 环境
Environment		 表型相关系数(rp)
Phenotypic correlation
coefficient		 遗传相关系数(rg)
Genetic correlation
coefficient		 遗传力(H2,%)
Heritability		 相关遗传力(Hxy)
Correlation
heritability		 相对选择效率
Relative efficiency
Pn(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.3007* 0.2787 34.42 5.87 0.19
灌溉Irrigation 0.1149 0.1155 40.29 6.35 0.08
Pn(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.5485** 0.5592** 25.28 5.03 0.32
灌溉Irrigation 0.1534 0.1588 33.62 5.79 0.10
Tr(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.5879** 0.6004** 36.71 6.06 0.41
灌溉Irrigation 0.3232* 0.3400* 54.62 7.39 0.29
Tr(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.7981** 0.7747** 28.19 5.31 0.47
灌溉Irrigated 0.3489* 0.3369* 47.36 6.88 0.26
Gs(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.7127** 0.7155** 32.36 5.69 0.46
灌溉Irrigation 0.4960** 0.4922** 51.55 7.18 0.40
Gs(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.7219** 0.7219** 25.49 5.05 0.41
灌溉Irrigation 0.5326** 0.5062** 37.13 6.09 0.35

Table 5

Correlative heritability and genetic variation contribution rate between main photosynthetic traits and drought resistance in spring wheat strains"

性状
Trait		 环境
Environment		 相关遗传力
Correlative
heritability		 相关遗传变异贡献率
Correlative genetic variation
contribution rate
Pn(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.2193 0.6897
灌溉Irrigation 0.1280 0.6459
Pn(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.4168 0.7174
灌溉Irrigation 0.1537 0.7582
Tr(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.3928 0.7734
灌溉Irrigation 0.2156 0.8147
Tr(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.4798 0.6258
灌溉Irrigation 0.2478 0.7219
Gs(10) 雨养Rainfed 0.4912 0.6983
灌溉Irrigation 0.4329 0.7812
Gs(20) 雨养Rainfed 0.4537 0.6276
灌溉Irrigation 0.3458 0.6467
[1] 薛昌颖, 霍治国, 李世奎 , 等. 灌溉降低华北冬小麦干旱减产的风险评估研究. 自然灾害学报, 2003,12(3):131-136.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2003.03.021
[2] 代九江, 王永涛 . 农业减灾指南.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1994.
[3] 陈玉民 . 华北地区冬小麦需水量图与灌溉需水量评价研究.水利学报, 1987(11):10-20.
[4] 张甲元, 周苏玫, 尹钧 , 等. 适期晚播对弱春性小麦籽粒灌浆期光合性能的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2011,31(3):535-539.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2011.03.027
[5] 曹树青, 赵永强, 温家立 , 等. 高产小麦旗叶光合作用及与籽粒灌浆进程关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2000,33(6):19-25.
[6] 白向历, 齐华, 何萍 , 等. 水分胁迫对灌浆期燕麦叶片光合特性的影响. 杂粮作物, 2006,26(1):25-27.
[7] 王晨阳, 付雪丽, 郭天财 , 等. 花后干旱胁迫对两种筋力型小麦品种旗叶光合特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006,26(6):115-119.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.06.272
[8] 隋娜, 李萌, 田纪春 , 等. 超高产小麦品种(系)生育后期光合特性的研究. 作物学报, 2005,31(6):808-814.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.06.023
[9] 聂朝娟, 邓西平, 陈炜 . 花后水分亏缺对冬小麦光合特性及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(4):665-669.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.04.015
[10] 赵红梅, 郭程瑾, 段巍巍 , 等. 小麦品种抗旱性评价指标研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2007,8(1):76-81.
[11] 王川, 谢惠民, 王娜 . 小麦品种可溶性糖和保护性酶与抗旱性关系研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011,29(5):94-98.
[12] 施伟, 昌小平, 景蕊莲 . 不同水分条件下小麦生理性状与产量的灰色关联度分析. 麦类作物学报, 2012,32(4):653-659.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2012.04.010
[13] 杜志红, 张福耀, 平俊爱 , 等. 玉米品种主要农艺性状与抗旱性的相关分析. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(18):57-63.
[14] 赵志立, 许钢垣, 李生海 . 遗传育种学.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995.
[15] 高宝云, 张军 . 陕西麦区小麦品种萌发期抗旱性分析. 江西农业学报, 2017,29(3):33-37.
doi: 10.19386/j.cnki.jxnyxb.2017.03.07
[16] 史华伟, 孙黛珍, 王曙光 , 等. 冬播春性小麦产量相关性状与抗旱性的关系研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2017,22(3):12-22.
doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2017.03.03
[17] 兰巨生 . 作物抗旱性综合评价. 中国农学通报, 1994,10(5):34-35.
[18] 兰巨生 . 作物抗旱性综合评价方法的研究. 西北农业学报, 1998,7(3):85-87.
[19] 马育华 . 植物育种的数量遗传学基础.南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1982.
[20] 张文英, 柳斌辉, 彭海城 , 等. 冬小麦抗旱性状遗传力分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2009,27(3):44-47.
[21] Falconer D S, Mackay T F C .Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.Fourth Ed. Longman, 1996.
doi: 10.1002/9781118313718.ch4
[22] Fischer K S, Edmeades G O, Johnson E C . Selection for the improvement of maize yield under moisture deficits. Field Crops Research, 1989,22:227-243.
doi: 10.1016/0378-4290(89)90094-4
[23] 戴君惕, 杨德, 尹世强 , 等. 相关遗传力及其在育种上的应用. 遗传学报, 1983,10(5):375-383.
[1] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
[2] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[3] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[4] Jiao Zhang,Qi Wu,Yufei Zhou,Yitao Wang,Ruidong Zhang,Ruidong Huang. Effects of Drought and Rewatering at Seedling and Filling Stages on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Dry Matter Production of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 148-154.
[5] Fang Chen,Yupeng Liu,Xiaoping Gu,Jiamin Hu,Fei Yu,Bo Zhang. Effects of Low Temperature on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 155-161.
[6] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[7] Yingjie Zhu,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yu Wang,Bing Lü,Ruiqi Ma,Ying Liu,Yujiao Wang,Guangcai Zhao,Zhiqiang Tao. Effects of Black Soil and Alluvial Soil on Nutritional Quality of Different Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 84-90.
[8] Hongda Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Jia Liu,Yiran Ye,Meirong Hai. Effects of Altitude on Photosynthetic and Fluorescence Characteristics, and Antioxidant Properties on Solanum tuberosum L. [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 93-99.
[9] Xiaoping Gu,Fei Yu,Ping Liang,Fang Chen. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 66-72.
[10] Guolong Li,Yaqing Sun,Shiqin Shao,Yongfeng Zhang. Response of Antioxidant System to Drought Stress in Sugar Beet Leaves at Seedling Stage [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 73-79.
[11] Wenwen Ji,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang,Daizhen Sun. Identification of Drought Resistance of Adzuki Bean Germplasm Resources from Different Places in Budding Stage [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 54-59.
[12] Chaowu Zeng,Xiaodong Liang,Jianjiang Li. Genetic Diversity Analysis on Main Characters of Spring Wheat Germplasms in Central Asia [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 67-71.
[13] Bingsheng Lu,Hongmin Gao,Yongxiang Yao,Xiangli Bai,Zengqi Chen. Combining Ability and Genetic Parameters of Ear Characters of Ten Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 23-28.
[14] Kaiyu Li,Zhanxiang Sun,Ning Yang,Jiaming Zheng,Zhichuang Zhu,Jibing Xiao,Liangshan Feng,Chuang Lu. Effects of Topdressing Different Forms of Nitrogen on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Maize with Drip Irrigation under Plastic Film [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 93-97.
[15] Chang Xu,Jinghui Liu,Yanming Yang,Xue Bai,Bin Ma,Xinglong Zhang,Mengyuan Sun,Mengyu Zhang. Effects of Bacterial Manure and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer Combination on Drought Resistance Physiological Indexes and Yield of Potato under Plastic-Mulching [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 94-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .