Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 179-186.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.04.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dry Matter Accumulation and Productivity Potential Evaluation of Main Forage Oat Varieties in China

Zhao Shifeng(), Cao Lixia(), Shi Bihong, Liu Wenting, Zhao Xuefeng, Liu Junxin, Zhang Lixia, Li Jiahao   

  1. Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
  • Received:2021-03-18 Revised:2021-10-25 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-08-22
  • Contact: Cao Lixia E-mail:zsf1886@163.com;hhclx@126.com

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

278

Abstract:

To explore the suitable oat cultivars and cutting times for planting in northern Hebei province, 20 oat varieties with different types of bark and bare oat from 2017 to 2019 were selected as the research objects. The influence of climate on the development process of oat, the grass yield and grain yield in different years and cutting periods were compared. The results showed that the effect of air temperature on the growth period of oat is more obvious, showing a negative correlation, especially on the late maturing varieties. Rainfall had a positive correlation with the biological yield of oat. Drought at seedling stage is quite unfavorable to forage production. The most suitable forage varieties in Bashang of northern Hebei were GL381, Bayou 18, Yuanza 1, Dingyan 2, Bayou 3 and Caoyou 1, and only Dingyan 2 was the best choice for cutting before flowering. After flowering, Yuanza 1, GL381 and Bayou 18 were the first choice for cutting, followed by Bayou 3 and Dingyan 2. Eight early maturing varieties (Qingyin 2 and Baiyan 2, etc) could be selected in the second cropping area and when the growing season is limited. The varieties of Yuanza 1 and GL381 had higher biological yields of 10 920.0 and 10 819.5kg/ha, respectively. Grain yields of the top nine varieties were 4269.0-5185.5kg/ha, of which the yields of naked oats of GL381 and Yuanza 1 were 4765.5 and 4269.0kg/ha, respectively. GL381, Mengyan 1, Yuanza 1 and Haywire had high yield of both biological and grain.

Key words: Oat, Variety, Forage grass, Mowing period, Yield

Fig.1

Temperature in Zhangbei county from 2017 to 2019"

Fig.2

Rainfall in Zhangbei county from 2017 to 2019"

Table 1

Growth period of test varieties"

生育期指标
Growth period		 品种
Variety		 出苗-抽穗
Emergence-
heading (d)		 抽穗-成熟
Heading-
maturity (d)		 实际生育天数
Actual growth
period (d)		 数量
Number
早熟Precocious 80d以下 青引2号 45 33 78 1
中早熟Medium early maturity
80~90d
白燕2号、白燕7号、白燕18号、白燕
19号、甜燕麦、KONA、魁北克		 46
34
80
7
中熟Medium riping
90~100d
坝燕6号、蒙燕一号、甜燕二号、Haywire、
陇燕3号、草莜一号		 48
36
84
6
中晚熟Medium late ripening 100~110d 张燕四号、定燕2号、坝莜三号 50 38 88 3
晚熟Late-maturing 110d以上 坝莜18号、GL381、远杂一号 54 42 96 3

Fig.3

Annual dry matter amount of oat at different cutting stages"

Table 2

Difference of dry matter accumulation among varieties at different cutting stages kg/hm2"

品种
Variety		 干物质量Dry matter amount
孕穗期Booting 抽穗期Heading 开花期Blooming 乳熟期Milking 成熟期Mature
坝莜3号Bayou 3 3225.0±1362.0* 4950.0±1816.5* 5925.0±2073.0 8160.0±1522.5* 10 315.0±1677.0*
坝莜18号Bayou 18 3120.0±1395.0* 4725.0±1674.0* 6170.0±2398.5* 8415.0±1966.5* 11 085.0±1552.5*
坝燕6号Bayan 6 3090.0±1356.0* 4230.0±1987.5 5775.0±2494.5 6645.0±2334.0 9315.0±993.0
白燕2号Baiyan 2 2535.0±1416.0 3570.0±1372.5 4530.0±2584.5 6165.0±2568.0 8430.0±1623.0
白燕7号Baiyan 7 2880.0±1407.0 4095.0±1609.5 5205.0±2602.5 6615.0±2571.0 9105.0±2697.0
白燕18号Baiyan 18 2565.0±1225.5 3510.0±1468.5 4290.0±2392.5 5355.0±2521.5 7365.0±1554.0
白燕19号Baiyan 19 2340.0±586.5 3075.0±1042.5 3780.0±1783.5 5940.0±2578.5 7845.0±1125.0
远杂1号Yuanza 1 3000.0±1309.5* 4785.0±2092.5* 6090.0±2698.5* 9030.0±3093.0* 10 800.0±1635.0*
张燕4号Zhangyan 4 3045.0±1603.5* 4035.0±1537.5 5580.0±2412.0 6180.0±2218.5 9465.0±2434.5
GL381 3060.0±1285.5* 5535.0±2112.0* 6525.0±2493.0* 8430.0±2073.0* 11 220.0±2016.0*
陇燕3号Longyan 3 2535.0±1255.5 4290.0±1920.0 5565.0±2271.0 6285.0±1558.5 9765.0±1939.5*
定燕2号Dingyan 2 4485.0±499.5* 5205.0±2050.5* 6555.0±2310.0* 6780.0±2253.0 10 365.0±1591.5*
魁北克Kuibeike 2850.0±1546.5 4080.0±1728.0 4935.0±1956.0 6510.0±2722.5 9585.0±1600.5
青引2号Qingyin 2 2115.0±561.0 3135.0±874.5 3855.0±1785.0 5850.0±2848.5 6120.0±2121.0
甜燕麦Tianyinmai 2970.0±1417.5 4290.0±1848.5 5190.0±2170.5 6660.0±2494.5 8850.0±925.5
草莜1号Caoyou 1 2865.0±1593.0 4680.0±12 188.5* 6705.0±2752.5* 7515.0±1500.0* 9855.0±1417.5*
蒙燕1号Mengyan 1 3000.0±1473.0* 4455.0±1936.5 5550.0±2440.5 6390.0±2514.0 10 275.0±2287.5*
甜燕2号Tianyan 2 3300.0±1503.0* 4515.0±1854.0* 5475.0±2272.5 6690.0±2454.0 9870.0±2161.5*
KONA 3090.0±1710.0* 4410.0±1824.0 5175.0±2521.5 6360.0±2554.5 10 185.0±1567.5
Haywire 3210.0±1498.5* 4425.0±2004.0 5655.0±2262.0 6750.0±2254.5 10 185.0±1966.5*
平均Mean 2970.0±1208.0 4305.0±1593.0 5430.0±2100.0 6840.0±2170.5 9424.5±1944.0

Table 3

Screening of high-yielding varieties in different phenological periods"

生育期
Growth
period		 生物产量
Biological yield
(kg/hm2)		 数量
Number		 高产品种排序
Ranking of high-yielding variety		 最高产量Maximum yield
品种
Variety		 生物产量
Biological yield (kg/hm2)
孕穗期
Booting		 ≥3000
11
定燕2号>甜燕2号>Haywire>坝莜3号>坝莜18号>坝
燕6号>KONA>远杂1号>张燕4号>GL381>蒙燕1号		 定燕2号
4485.0±499.5
抽穗期
Heading		 ≥4500
7
GL381>定燕2号>坝莜3号>远杂1号>坝莜18号>草
莜1号>甜燕2号		 GL381
5535.0±2112.0
开花期
Blooming		 ≥6000
5
草莜1号>定燕2号>GL381>坝莜18号>远杂1号
草莜1号
6705.0±2752.5
乳熟期
Milk-ripening		 ≥7500
5
远杂1号>GL381>坝莜18号>坝莜3号>草莜1号
远杂1号
9030.0±3093.0
成熟期
Mature		 ≥9750
9
GL381>坝莜18号>远杂1号>定燕2号>坝莜3号>蒙燕1号>Haywire>甜燕2号>陇燕3号 GL381
11 220.0±2016.0

Table 4

Main economic characters and yield of tested varieties (yield group)"

编号
No.		 品种
Variety		 类型
Type		 株高
Plant
height
(cm)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 生物产量
Biological
yield
(kg/hm2)		 生物产量排名
Ranking of
biological
yield		 籽粒产量
Seed yield
(kg/hm2)		 籽粒产量排名
Ranking of grain yield		 苗数
Seedling
number
(×104/hm2)		 穗数
Panicle
number
(×104/hm2)
总
Total		 皮
Bark		 裸
Bare
1 坝莜3号 裸 118.7 22.6 10 236.0aAB 5 3847.5 14 4 394.5 441.0
2 坝莜18号 裸 117.2 26.0 10 249.5aAB 4 3940.5 13 3 394.5 436.5
3 坝燕6号 皮 104.1 35.0 8832.0cCD 14 4116.0 11 9 405.0 442.5
4 白燕2号 裸 107.9 23.4 8673.0cCD 17 3808.5 15 5 333.0 535.5
5 白燕7号 皮 99.1 34.0 9516.0bcBC 12 4627.5 5 4 400.5 577.5
6 白燕18号 裸 91.8 20.0 7245.0dD 19 3186.0 18 6 376.5 513.0
7 白燕19号 皮 81.4 31.3 7395.0dD 18 3598.5 16 11 375.0 819.0
8 远杂1号 裸 125.2 25.6 10 920.0aA 1 4269.0 9 2 328.5 444.0
9 张燕4号 皮 103.3 36.8 9663.0bcBC 10 4887.0 3 3 369.0 439.5
10 GL381 裸 119.6 28.1 10 819.5aA 2 4765.5 4 1 349.5 424.5
11 陇燕3号 皮 112.7 30.7 9663.0bcBC 11 4332.0 6 5 390.0 459.0
12 定燕2号 皮 123.6 27.7 10 207.5aAB 6 4110.0 12 10 361.5 351.0
13 魁北克 皮 101.5 36.1 9351.0bcBC 13 4960.5 2 2 393.0 435.0
14 青引2号 皮 91.6 28.5 6243.0eD 20 2365.5 20 13 363.0 456.0
15 甜燕麦 皮 111.0 34.1 8730.0cCD 15 3466.5 17 12 306.0 477.0
16 草莜1号 裸 112.0 24.3 9756.0bB 9 3163.5 19 7 363.0 375.0
17 蒙燕1号 皮 94.1 33.9 10 057.5bAB 8 4329.0 7 6 379.5 493.5
18 甜燕2号 皮 106.8 35.7 10 360.5aAB 3 5185.5 1 1 378.0 508.5
19 KONA 皮 85.6 26.2 8676.0cCD 16 4273.5 8 7 393.0 639.0
20 Haywire 皮 107.8 36.1 10 135.5abAB 7 4234.5 10 8 385.5 478.5
平均Mean 105.7 29.8 9336.0 4074.0 372.0 487.5
标准差
Standard deviation		 12.4 5.2 1234.5 687.0 25.5 102.0
变异系数CV (%) 11.7 17.5 13.2 16.9 7.0 20.8

Fig.4

Correlation analysis of main economic characters of forage oat varieties “*”and“**”indicate significant and extremely significant correlation, respectively"

Table 5

Comparison of differences in seed yield of oat"

产量排序
Yield order		 品种
Variety		 籽粒产量
Seed yield (kg/hm2)
1 甜燕2号 5185.5aA
2 魁北克 4960.5abAB
3 张燕4号 4887.0abAB
4 白燕7号 4627.5bcB
5 陇燕3号 4332.0cB
6 蒙燕1号 4329.0cB
7 KONA 4273.5cB
8 Haywire 4234.5cB
9 坝燕6号 4116.0cB
10 定燕2号 4110.0cB
11 白燕19号 3598.5dC
12 甜燕麦 3466.5dC
13 青引2号 2365.5eD
平均Mean 4191.0

Table 6

Comparison of yield differences of naked oat seeds"

产量排序
Yield order		 品种
Variety		 籽粒产量
Seed yield (kg/hm2)
1 GL381 4765.5aA
2 远杂1号 4269.0abAB
3 坝莜18号 3940.5abAB
4 坝莜3号 3847.5bAB
5 白燕2号 3808.5bAB
6 白燕18号 3186.0cC
7 草莜1号 3163.5cC
平均Mean 3855.0
[1] 任长忠, 胡跃高. 《中国燕麦学》. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2013.
[2] 侯龙鱼, 朱泽义, 杨杰, 等. 我国饲草用燕麦现状、问题和潜力. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 45(3):248-253.
[3] 刚永和, 张海博, 杜江. 燕麦在青海高寒地区草牧业可持续发展中的地位和作用. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2019, 49(6):53-56.
[4] 张桂芳, 斯那七皮, 唐世文. 云南省迪庆州燕麦饲草产业发展现状及对策思考. 中国农业信息, 2017(22):23-25.
[5] 尼玛扎西, 禹代林, 边巴, 等. 燕麦在西藏畜牧业生产中的地位与作用. 西藏农业科技, 2008(3):36-39.
[6] 游永亮, 杨志敏, 李广有, 等. 河北坝上(张家口)地区饲用燕麦生产利用情况调研报告. 草业与畜牧, 2015(5):39-43.
[7] 赵世锋. 田长叶. 陈淑萍. 等. 草用燕麦品种适宜刈割期的确定. 华北农学报, 2005(12):132-134.
[8] 赵世锋, 曹丽霞, 石碧红, 等. 国内主要莜麦品种在冀北坝上的适应性评价. 农学学报, 2016, 6(1):7-14.
[9] 刘彦明, 南铭, 边芳, 等. 11个饲草燕麦品种在甘肃中部干旱半干旱地区的种植表现. 甘肃农业科技, 2018(9):56-60.
[10] 周青平, 颜红波, 梁国玲, 等. 不同燕麦品种饲草和籽粒生产性能分析. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10):120-130.
[11] 丰明, 李韬, 王英杰, 等. 5种燕麦饲草品种在沈阳地区的评价与筛选. 辽宁农业科学, 2017(5):11-15.
[12] 唐凤德, 翟苗苗. 几种饲草型燕麦在辽西地区的生长及经济性状特征. 辽宁大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 41(3):263-266.
[13] 张杰, 闫志坚, 尹强, 等. 22种燕麦饲草品种在达拉特旗地区的评价与筛选. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(6):134-140.
[14] 李天亮, 周海涛, 杨晓虹, 等. 饲草专用燕麦品种“冀草燕1号”选育及栽培技术. 辽宁农业科学, 2020(3):88-89.
[15] 朱秋云. 饲草燕麦在辽宁地区的机械化栽培技术. 农业科技通讯, 2015(6):230-231.
[16] 韩志林, 周青平, 颜红波. 青海省燕麦良种繁育基地建设及种子生产. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2006(6):32-34.
[17] 南铭, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽. 20份饲草型燕麦品种的抗倒伏性研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(5):62-68.
[18] 史京京, 薛盈文, 郭伟, 等. 引进燕麦种质资源饲草产量与饲用营养价值评价. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(9):1063-1071.
[19] 梁国玲, 秦燕, 魏小星, 等. 青藏高原高寒区I-D燕麦品系饲草生产性能及品质评价. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4):917-927.
[20] 姜慧新, 柏杉杉, 吴波, 等. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1):140-149.
[21] 李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4):882-888.
[22] 徐欣然, 范昱, 刘思源, 等. 燕麦饲草多组分营养差异分析. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(1):43-49.
[23] 王茜, 李志坚, 李晶, 等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12):149-158.
[24] 刘建宁, 石永红, 吴欣明, 等. 晋北地区饲草燕麦生长动态及最佳收割期研究. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(17):107-111.
[25] 杨云贵, 程天亮, 杨雪娇, 等. 3个燕麦品种不同收获期对青贮饲草营养价值的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4):683-688.
[1] Chen Shiyong, Wang Rui, Chen Zhiqing, Zhang Haipeng, Wang Juanjuan, Shan Yuhua, Yang Yanju. Effects of Nano-Zinc and Ion-Zinc on Rice Yield Formation and Grain Zinc Content [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 107-114.
[2] Tang Jianpeng, Chen Jingdu, Wen Kai, Zhang Mingwei, Xie Chenglin, Lu Peiling, Min Sigui, Wang Qiluan, Cheng Jiemin. Study on Material Production and Yield Characteristics of Japonica Rice with Good Eating Quality in Rice-Crayfish Farming System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 115-123.
[3] Sun Qingsheng, Yuan Cheng, Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Inoculating Rhizobium on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Black Soybean [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 132-137.
[4] Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua, Liu Yongqiang, Tang Dejing, Zhu Yongyong, Hu Xinyuan. Effects of Basal Zinc Fertilizer on Activities of Disease Resistance-Related Enzymes, Soil Borne Diseases and Yield of Potato under Long-Term Continuous Cropping [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 154-159.
[5] Li Zujun, Jiang Xue, Yang Tonglian, Wu Chaoxin, Zhang Xichun, Jiang Xuehai, Long Wuhua, Zhang Yushan, Zhu Susong. Effects of Different Fertilizer Ratios on Yield and Taste Quality of Guizhouhe Goudang No.1 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 160-166.
[6] Ma Ke, Feng Lei, Zhao Xiatong, Zhang Liguang, Yuan Xiangyang, Dong Shuqi, Guo Pingyi, Song Xi’e. Effects of Sowing Distance and Sowing Amount on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Zhangzagu 10 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 172-178.
[7] Yu Guoyi, Kong Lingcong, Zhang Liang, Wei Zhi, Wang Yongjiu, Wang Zhi, Du Xiangbei. Effects of Different New Type Fertilizers on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics, Canopy Structure and Yield [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 193-198.
[8] Zhou Jihong, Wang Junying, Meng Fanyu, Tong Guoxiang, Mei Li, Liu Guoming, Wang Yan, Luo Jun, Xie Chunyuan. Effects of Tillage Methods on Sowing Quality, Yield and Benefit of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 199-204.
[9] Zhou Wuxian, Li Mengge, Tan Xuhui, Wang Youyuan, Wang Hua, Jiang Xiaogang, Duan Yuanyuan, Zhang Meide. Effects of Sowing Density on Growth, Nutritional Quality and Soil Enzyme Activity of Pinellia ternata in Different Seasons [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 205-213.
[10] Qiao Yujia, Wei Ling, Xiao Junhong, Liu Bo, Yang Haifeng, Duan Xueyan. Analysis on the Yield Differences of Huanghuaihai Summer Soybeans in Different Years and Locations [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 221-226.
[11] Liang Weiqin, Jia Li, Guo Liming, Li Yinglan, Hu Yafeng, Chen Xiaohua, Ma Xufeng, Li Jing. Effects of Irrigation and Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen Transport of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 242-248.
[12] Zheng Minna, Liang Xiuzhi, Kang Jiahui, Li Yinfan, Wang Hui, Han Zhishun, Chen Yanni. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Nitrogen Photosynthetic Utilization Efficiency of Fed Oats [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 249-254.
[13] Zhang Haipeng, Chen Zhiqing, Wang Rui, Lu Hao, Cui Peiyuan, Yang Yanju, Zhang Hongcheng. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Nano-Magnesium on Rice Yield, Grain Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 255-261.
[14] Wang Jiabao, Ji Huaiyuan, Mei Jiafa, Tao Zhiguo, Shu Zhifeng, Jiang Sanqiao. The Breeding of New Maize Variety Quankeyu 900 and Its Cultivation, Seed Production Techniques [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 267-270.
[15] Wang Xiaochun, Zhu Dexin, Yang Tianhui, Wang Chuan, Yang Weidi, Gao Ting, Liang Xiaojun. Correlation Analysis of Main Agronomic Characteristics of Different Alfalfa Varieties and Comparison of Hay Yield in Yellow River Irrigation Area of Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 32-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!