Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 46-50.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.01.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Grey Relation Analysis on Fagopyrum esculentum Moench Yield Related to Agronomic and Physi-Biochemical Traits

Liu Jie1,Sheng Jinhua1,Zhang Xiongjie2   

  1. 1 Agronomy College,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,Inner Mongolia,China
    2 Inner Mongolia Horizon Oasis Research Center of Characteristic Biological Resource,Hohhot 010018,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2015-10-12 Revised:2015-12-03 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2018-08-25
  • Contact: Jinhua Sheng

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

121

Abstract:

With 12 varieties of Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, their 7 agronomic traits and 6 physi-biochemical traits related with yield were analyzed by grey correlation analysis method to explore the relationship of these primary and secondary traits. The results showed that the correlation degree of agronomic traits and yield was: seed setting rate (0.8666), grain number per plant (0.8221), plant height (0.7720), stem diameter (0.7140), grain (0.7004), flowering (0.6975), dry weight (0.6243). The correlation degree of physi-biochemical traits and yield was: chlorophyll content (0.7171), malondialdehyde (MDA) content (0.7035), proline (Pro) content (0.6372), peroxidase (POD) activity (0.6369), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (0.6191) and catalase (CAT) activity (0.6028). The results showed that the high seed setting rate, more grain number per plant, more chlorophyll content and MDA content were beneficial for getting a high yield.

Key words: Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, Varieties, Yield, Agronomic traits, Physi-biochemical traits, Grey relation analysis

Table 1

The yield and agronomic traits parameters of F. esculentum Moench varieties"

品种Varieties 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)		 开花总数
Flowering
(朵)		 株高
Plant height（cm）		 茎粗
Stem diameter
（mm）		 干重
Dry weight
（g）		 千粒重1000-grain weight（g） 单株粒数
Grain number per plant		 结实率
Seed setting rate（％）
晋荞8号Jinqiao 8 1 337.25 1 948 114.7 10.8 25.54 34.36 207 10.63
绿荞1号Lüqiao 1 2 587.35 1 682 109.4 9.5 20.58 28.87 296 17.62
茶色黎麻道Chaselimadao 2 278.20 1 754 105.4 8.9 13.75 31.06 255 14.55
赤甜荞1号Chitianqiao 1 2 736.75 1 607 103.4 9.2 12.86 31.00 307 19.11
常陆秋Changluqiu 1 185.30 1 951 115.7 9.3 11.98 31.73 196 10.05
丰甜1号Fengtian 1 1 846.95 1 748 95.6 8.6 10.75 34.13 243 13.88
宁荞1号Ningqiao1 1 617.90 1 843 99.7 10.2 17.56 33.63 235 12.74
荞杂-2 Qiaoza-2 1 621.80 1 813 98.5 8.9 7.86 34.11 235 12.95
信农1号Xinnong 1 2 118.90 1 775 94.5 9.1 13.01 33.06 254 14.33
综甜2号Zongtian 2 2 461.35 1 731 115.8 8.8 12.86 35.37 262 15.12
定甜荞2号Dingtianqiao 2 2 558.85 1 774 135.4 9.4 15.07 31.69 283 15.99
通荞1号Tongqiao 1 2 513.40 1 736 128.2 13.2 38.12 29.50 274 15.81

Table 2

The physi-biochemical traits parameters of F. esculentum Moench varieties"

品种Varieties 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll
content		 SOD活性
SOD activity
（U/g FW）		 POD活性
POD activity
（U/mg FW）		 CAT活性
CAT activity
（U/mg FW）		 MDA含量
MDA content (μmol/g FW)		 Pro含量
Pro content
(μg/g)
晋荞8号Jinqiao 8 52.0 196.70 2.17 4.59 0.108 296.18
绿荞1号Lüqiao 1 51.2 154.87 6.23 6.78 0.096 118.16
茶色黎麻道Chaselimadao 48.2 162.75 2.89 7.10 0.097 277.93
赤甜荞1号Chitianqiao 1 54.7 84.38 2.70 3.86 0.103 42.64
常陆秋Changluqiu 59.5 245.79 2.26 0.46 0.112 156.07
丰甜1号Fengtian 1 60.7 96.58 9.63 3.59 0.071 131.64
宁荞1号Ningqiao 1 52.6 90.79 4.89 4.07 0.109 171.44
荞杂-2 Qiaoza-2 54.0 339.05 7.96 6.95 0.127 148.47
信农1号Xinnong 1 48.9 354.29 6.00 1.83 0.144 189.36
综甜2号Zongtian 2 39.4 434.70 1.78 0.47 0.118 74.67
定甜荞2号Dingtianqiao 2 44.3 356.51 4.40 1.57 0.105 214.42
通荞1号Tongqiao 1 49.4 276.35 3.63 5.11 0.081 97.84

Table 3

Agronomic traits and yield correlation coefficient of F. esculentum Moench varieties"

品种Varieties X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7
晋荞8号 Jinqiao 8 0.5455 0.5738 0.5326 0.3776 0.5644 0.7607 0.8536
绿荞1号 Lüqiao 1 0.6395 0.6821 0.6703 0.9765 0.6015 0.8672 0.9567
茶色黎麻道Chaselimadao 0.8256 0.7958 0.7519 0.6628 0.7940 0.8504 0.8589
赤甜荞1号Chitianqiao 1 0.5631 0.5876 0.5940 0.4952 0.5973 0.8288 0.9893
常陆秋Changluqiu 0.5069 0.5274 0.5797 0.7861 0.5691 0.7297 0.8110
丰甜1号Fengtian 1 0.8568 0.9654 0.9992 0.6866 0.7684 0.8922 0.8819
宁荞1号Ningqiao 1 0.6794 0.8085 0.6621 0.6638 0.6765 0.7888 0.8388
荞杂-2 Qiaoza-2 0.6959 0.8243 0.7958 0.6342 0.6657 0.7910 0.8225
信农1号Xinnong 1 0.9557 0.7702 0.8707 0.6905 0.9983 0.9612 0.9526
综甜2号Zongtian 2 0.7145 0.8034 0.6607 0.5643 0.8502 0.7758 0.7968
定甜荞2号Dingtianqiao 2 0.6935 1.0000 0.6732 0.6199 0.6780 0.8178 0.8129
通荞1号Tongqiao 1 0.6940 0.9249 0.7775 0.3337 0.6411 0.8014 0.8247

Table 4

Physi-biochemical traits and yield correlation coefficient of F. esculentum Moench varieties"

品种Varieties X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13
晋荞8号 Jinqiao 8 0.6503 0.7859 0.8179 0.5531 0.6471 0.3512
绿荞1号 Lüqiao 1 0.7406 0.5341 0.8690 0.5712 0.6687 0.5691
茶色黎麻道Chaselimadao 0.8275 0.6305 0.5934 0.4731 0.8017 0.5105
赤甜荞1号Chitianqiao 1 0.7373 0.4067 0.4769 0.6832 0.6645 0.3833
常陆秋Changluqiu 0.5315 0.5824 0.9285 0.5993 0.5817 0.6282
丰甜1号Fengtian 1 0.7049 0.5865 0.3472 0.9818 0.7659 0.9376
宁荞1号Ningqiao 1 0.7439 0.6365 0.7035 0.7216 0.7417 0.7064
荞杂-2 Qiaoza-2 0.7225 0.4964 0.4040 0.3924 0.6207 0.8418
信农1号Xinnong 1 0.9374 0.5742 0.7016 0.5498 0.6725 0.8246
综甜2号Zongtian 2 0.6191 0.4942 0.4534 0.3805 0.9299 0.4790
定甜荞2号Dingtianqiao 2 0.6496 0.7021 0.7260 0.4432 0.7457 0.8883
通荞1号Tongqiao 1 0.7411 1.0000 0.6219 0.8845 0.6020 0.5262

Table 5

The correlation degree and relational sequence of Agronomic traits and yield in F.esculentum Moench"

性状 Trait 关联度
Correlation degree		 关联序
Relational sequence
结实率 Seed setting rate 0.8666 1
单株粒数 Grain number per plant 0.8221 2
株高 Plant height 0.7720 3
茎粗 Stem diameter 0.7140 4
千粒重 1000-grain weight 0.7004 5
开花总数Flower number 0.6975 6
干重 Dry weight 0.6243 7

Table 6

The correlation degree and relational sequence of physi-biochemical traits and yield in F.esculentum Moench"

性状 Trait 关联度
Correlation
degree		 关联序
Relational sequence
叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content 0.7171 1
MDA含量MDA content 0.7035 2
Pro含量 Pro content 0.6372 3
POD活性 POD activity 0.6369 4
SOD活性 SOD activity 0.6191 5
CAT活性 CATactivity 0.6028 6
[1] 王淑敏 . 不同叶面肥对荞麦生长发育及产量和品质的影响. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
[2] 张春明, 张耀文, 赵雪英 , 等. 甜荞品系的产量相关因素分析. 山西农业科学, 2011,39(2):109-112.
[3] 汪灿, 王诗雪, 李曼 , 等. 播种量和施肥水平对春播甜荞光合特性及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(4):1021-1029.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0426
[4] 杨玉霞, 吴卫, 郑有良 , 等. 苦荞主要农艺性状与单株籽粒产量的相关和通径分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(16):6719-6721,6746.
[5] 汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉 , 等. 甜荞农艺性状与产量关系的多重分析. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(12):234-238.
[6] 宋慧, 冯佰利, 高小丽 , 等. 不同小豆品种(系)叶片衰老与活性氧代谢. 作物学报, 2010,36(2):347-353.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00347
[7] 吴青霞, 杨林, 邵慧 , 等. 药隔期低温胁迫对小麦生理及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2013,33(4):752-757.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2013.04.023
[8] 盛晋华, 张雄杰, 陕方 . 内蒙古自治区荞麦生产开发现状与对策. 作物杂志, 2009(3):1-4.
[9] Liu X Q, Shi G L, Zhang L Y . The use of grey sequence for the identification of key factors from life table data of insects. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1996,32:447-453.
[10] Li Y Y, Feng Z, Zhao L Y , et al. The grey analysis,kriging and selection index of flower yield in Rugosa Rose. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2007,6(12):1420-1425.
doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60003-6
[11] 鄢铮, 王正荣 . 灰色关联分析在淀粉型甘薯新品种评价上的应用.作物杂志, 2014(1):30-32.
[12] 侯小峰, 刘静, 王彩萍 , 等. 绿豆产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联分析.作物杂志, 2015(1):53-56.
[13] 邓聚龙 . 灰色系统基本方法.武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1987.
[14] 王士强, 胡银岗, 佘奎军 , 等. 小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(11):2452-2459.
[15] 陈稳良, 赵雪英, 李秀莲 , 等. 苦荞产量与主要性状的灰色关联度评价. 山西农业科学, 2009,37(10):23-25.
[16] 张雄, 柴岩, 封山海 , 等. 甜荞主要数量性状的灰色关联分析.陕西农业科学, 1997(6):3-4.
[17] 徐芦, 高金锋, 王鹏科 , 等. 灰色关联分析在苦荞区试产量性状上的应用. 种子, 2010,29(6):64-66.
[18] 孙擎, 杨再强, 高丽娜 , 等. 低温对早稻幼穗分化期叶片生理特性的影响及其与产量的关系. 中国生态农业学报, 2014,22(11):1326-1333.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wang Lei, Zhang Xiangping, Li Runxi, Niu Xiaoxia, . Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic#br# Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .