Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 121-126.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.03.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Pre-Production Patterns on Soybean Yield and Soil Moisture in Semiarid Region

Liu Caixia,Li Ming,Du Tianqing,Cui Fuzhu,Xue Jianfu,Chen Mengni,Qi Jianying   

  1. College of Agronomy,Shanxi Agricultural University,Taigu 030801,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2017-03-30 Revised:2017-04-19 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Tianqing Du

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

31

Abstract:

Soil moisture is an important factor limiting rainfed agricultural production. In this study, the temporal and spatial distribution of soil moisture in the soybean field after 6 different cropping patterns was analyzed by the method of contours, compared with water use efficiency and yield so as to provide a theoretical basis for screening water saving and high efficiency cultivation model in the semiarid region. The results obtained were as follows: it is similar that dynamics in spatial and temporal change of soil moisture in soybean planting season under different planting patterns, the soil water storage decreased first and then increased; soil moisture dynamic changes showed some differences with the passage of time and soil depth changes. Among them, millet→ cabbage→ potato→ soybean pattern contour line intensive, water consumption rate was quick, corn→ cabbage→ potato→ soybean planting pattern contour line was the most loose, the edge of the value of large, the soil pondage change was small. There were significant differences in water consumption of soybean growth period among different rotation cropping patterns, and there were significant differences in yield and water use efficiency by soybean under different cropping patterns. The yield of corn→ potato→ cabbage→ soybean were significantly higher than that of other planting patterns, reached 3 767.39kg/hm 2, water use efficiency of 12.83kg/(hm 2?mm). Therefore, as a well planting combination in this region, the treatment corn→ potato→ cabbage→ soybean is better than other planting patterns.

Key words: Dry farming, Crop rotation, Water use efficiency, Yield, Regression contours

Fig.1

Distribution of precipitation in test areas in 2014"

Table 1

The sequence of different planting patterns to grow crops"

种植模式Planting pattern 2011年 2012年 2013年 2014年
MCPS 谷子 甘蓝 马铃薯 大豆
CCPS 玉米 甘蓝 马铃薯 大豆
MSSS 谷子 大豆 大豆 大豆
CSSS 玉米 大豆 大豆 大豆
MPCS 谷子 马铃薯 甘蓝 大豆
CPCS 玉米 马铃薯 甘蓝 大豆

Table 2

Different crop planting patterns and field management"

作物
Crop		 播种方式
Seeding
method		 播种时间
Sowing time		 种植密度
(万株/hm2)
Planting density		 田间管理
Field management
玉米Maize 点播 5月5日 5.64 间苗、定苗、
中耕松土、
除草、防止
病虫害
谷子Millet 条播 5月5日 37.50
马铃薯Potato 穴播 5月5日 5.25
甘蓝Cabbage
 撒播
 4月10日育苗
5月20日定植		 6.00
大豆Soybean 条播 5月5日 30.00

Fig.2

The dynamic changes of soil pondage in soybean growth period of different planting patterns"

Fig.3

The influence of different planting patterns on soybean yieldDifferent lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments (P<0.05), the same below"

Fig.4

The influence of different planting patterns on water consumption in soybean growth period"

Fig.5

The influence of different planting patterns on water use efficiency in soybean growth period"

[1] 左燕霞, 张乃瑾, 张建峰 . 干旱山区雨水资源利用研究综述. 水资源研究, 2016,5(1):65-70.
[2] 雷波 . 我国北方旱作区旱作节水农业综合效益评价研究. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2005.
[3] 温晓南, 马成林 . 半干旱地区农业可持续发展的制约因素与对策.经济纵横, 2008(5):67-69.
[4] 靖华, 亢秀丽, 马爱平 , 等. 山西旱作节水农业现状及其发展战略. 农学学报, 2011,1(2):66-69.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7774.2011.02.015
[5] 张耗, 杨建昌 . 三种主要粮食作物的节水灌溉技术及其对产量和水分利用率的影响.作物杂志, 2016(5):67-74.
[6] 李玉敏, 王金霞 . 水资源短缺状况及其对农业生产影响的实证研究. 水利经济, 2013,31(5):49-52.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-9511.2013.05.012
[7] 王毅 . 干旱胁迫对作物影响研究概况.现代农业, 2015(4):28-29.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0708.2015.04.022
[8] 韩晓增, 乔云发, 张秋英 , 等. 不同土壤水分条件对大豆产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2003,22(4):269-272.
[9] 郭晓霞, 刘景辉, 田露 , 等. 免耕轮作对内蒙古地区农田贮水特性和作物产量的影响. 作物学报, 2012,38(8):1504-1512.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2012.01504
[10] 杨晓琳 . 华北平原不同轮作模式节水减排效果评价. 北京:中国农业大学, 2015.
[11] 周乃健, 王志亚, 郝久青 . 回归等值线图在土壤水分时空变化动态分析中的应用. 农业工程学报, 1997,13(1):112-115.
[12] 程冬兵, 张平仓, 赵健 , 等. 基于回归等值线法的不同下垫面红壤水分时空变化规律研究. 灌溉排水学报, 2009,28(2):90-94.
[13] 郝科栋, 郝建平, 杜天庆 , 等. 回归等值线图在分析旱地蔬菜全生育期土壤水分动态变化规律中的应用. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,34(6):488-493.
[14] 匡恩俊, 宿庆瑞, 迟凤琴 , 等. 玉米和毛苕子间种轮作对土壤水分及硬度的影响.黑龙江农业科学, 2013(3):21-23.
[15] 张益望, 刘文兆, 王俊 , 等. 轮作及不同施肥措施对春玉米生长、产量及水分利用的影响. 水土保持通报, 2010,30(2):124-128.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2013.05.013
[16] 卜玉山, 苗果园, 周乃健 , 等. 秸秆与地膜覆盖玉米农田土壤水分时空动态变化——兼评回归等值线法的应用. 土壤学报, 2004,41(5):795-802.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2004.05.020
[17] 侯慧芝, 吕军峰, 郭天文 , 等. 旱地全膜覆土穴播对春小麦耗水、产量和土壤水分平衡的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(22):4392-4404.
[18] 侯慧芝, 高世铭, 张绪成 , 等. 西北黄土高原半干旱区全膜微垄沟穴播对冬小麦耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(24):4701-4713.
[19] 毛桂莲, 虎德钰, 许兴 , 等. 干旱风沙区苜蓿后茬不同轮作方式对水分利用效率和产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2015,29(3):219-224.
doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2015.03.040
[20] 许华, 蒋梦娇, 魏宇昆 , 等. 连作对植物的危害及形成原因. 湖北农业科学, 2012,51(5):870-872.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2012.05.002
[21] 王建林, 于贵瑞, 房全孝 , 等. 作物水分利用效率的制约因素与调节.作物杂志, 2007(2):9-11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2007.02.003
[22] 郭清毅, 黄高宝 . 保护性耕作对旱地麦-豆双序列轮作农田土壤水分及利用效率的影响. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(3):165-169.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2005.03.040
[23] Cui H H, Wang J L, Ma B Z , et al. Effect of crop rotation and irrigation on wheat yield and water-use efficiency.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009,17(3):479-483.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2009.00479
[24] 张喜英 . 提高农田水分利用效率的调控机制. 中国生态农业学报, 2013,21(1):80-87.
[25] Lenssen A W, Johnson G D, Carlson G R . Cropping sequence and tillage system influences annual crop production and water use in semiarid Montana,USA. Field Crops Research, 2007,100(1):32-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.004
[26] 张昊, 郝春雷, 孟繁盛 , 等. 膜下滴灌条件下不同灌水量对玉米产量及土壤水分的影响.作物杂志, 2016(1):105-109.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[12] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[15] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .