Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 172-175.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.02.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Sunshine Durations on Main Agronomic Traits of Roselle

Zhao Yanhong,Hou Wenhuan,Liao Xiaofang,Tang Xingfu,Li Chuying()   

  1. Cash Crops Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2019-08-16 Revised:2019-11-25 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-13
  • Contact: Chuying Li E-mail:lcy6689@126.com

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

430

Abstract:

The varieties MG1501-1 and MG1502-2 of roselle were used as test materials. The main agronomic traits of roselle were investigated based on 8.0, 9.5 and 11.0h duration of sunshine and using natural light as control (CK). The results showed that the plants were sturdy with dark-green leaves and good growth under CK. After 11.0h sunshine treatment the plants were study, with dark-green leaves and normal buds which were evenly colored. The majority of the plants grew with slender stems, light green leaves, abnormal buds with red & green stripes which were unevenly colored after 8h sunshine treatment. The growth was followed by CK > 11.0h > 9.5h > 8.0h sunshine duration. The starting time of the budding, first-flowering and flowering reversal were followed by 11.0, 9.5, 8.0h sunshine duration. The plant height was followed by CK > 8.0h > 9.5h > 11.0h sunshine duration and it was not significant among all the treatments. The number of branches, fruits were the maximum, and the yield of fresh fruits, fresh sepals and dry sepals were the maximum with 11.0h sunshine duration, which reached at significant levels compared with other treatments. Based on the comprehensive indexes, the main yield traits of 11.0h sunshine duration were better than those of 8.0, 9.5h and CK treatments. The 11.0h sunshine duration could induce the roselle which were under the long-day environment flowering successfully. The technology of short-day can make roselle in off-season cultivation, then it can improve the multiple planting index and economic benefits.

Key words: Roselle, Short sunshine, Agronomic traits, Florescence

Fig.1

The abnormal buds (a) and the normal buds (b)"

Table 1

Effects of different sunshine duration on the phenotypic traits of roselle"

日照时长
Sunshine duration (h)		 MG1501-1 MG1502-2
8.0 叶片淡绿,植株细小,植株徒长,茎细长,变态花蕾多且着色不均匀,花蕾呈现红绿条纹相间且基部为橘红色,长势弱 叶片淡绿,植株徒长,茎细长,变态花蕾多且着色不均匀,花蕾基部为橘红色,长势弱
9.5 叶片绿色,植株中等,变态花蕾和正常花蕾数量中等,长势中等 叶片绿色,植株中等,变态花蕾和正常花蕾数量中等,长势中等
11.0 叶片浓绿,植株粗壮,正常花蕾多且着色均匀,长势好 叶片浓绿,植株粗壮,正常花蕾多且着色均匀,长势好
CK（自然光） 叶片浓绿,植株粗壮,无花蕾 叶片浓绿,植株粗壮,极少花蕾

Table 2

Effects of different sunshine durations on the florescence of roselle 月-日 Month-day"

日照时长
Sunshine duration (h)		 MG1501-1 MG1502-2
现蕾期
Squaring		 始花期
First-flowering		 成花逆转出现期
Flowering reversal		 现蕾期
Squaring		 始花期
First-flowering		 成花逆转出现期
Flowering reversal
8.0 5-04 5-26 6-05 5-02 5-24 6-02
9.5 5-02 5-22 5-31 5-01 5-21 5-30
11.0 4-30 5-21 5-30 4-28 5-20 5-29
CK（自然光） - - - 5-04 5-28 -

Table 3

Effects of different sunshine durations on the main agronomic traits of roselle"

品系
Line		 日照时长
Sunshine
duration (h)		 株高
Plant
height (cm)		 分枝数
Branches
number		 单株果数
Fruit number
per plant		 鲜果重
Fruit fresh
weight (g)		 萼片鲜重
Sepals fresh
weight (g)		 萼片干重
Sepals dry
weight (g)
MG1501-1 8.0 113.37a 11.70b 6.13b 24.20b 12.93b 1.20b
9.5 111.14a 10.97b 6.29b 27.39b 14.85b 1.45b
11.0 106.90a 17.73a 21.10a 83.20a 49.73a 4.70a
CK（自然光） 120.00a 20.00a 0.00b 0.00b 0.00b 0.00b
MG1502-2 8.0 121.97a 11.67b 24.37b 136.83c 71.21b 8.76b
9.5 119.57a 14.50ab 30.81ab 211.94b 113.14b 13.45b
11.0 110.47a 13.57ab 39.51a 301.10a 160.06a 19.70a
CK（自然光） 126.50a 17.00a 4.00c 30.67d 16.42c 2.09c
[1] 李时珍 . 本草纲目. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 1957: 36.
[2] 李泽鸿, 邓林, 刘树英 , 等. 玫瑰茄中营养元素的分析研究. 中国野生植物资源, 2008,27(1):61-62.
[3] 中国医学科学院药用植物开发研究所. 中国药用植物栽培学. 北京:农业出版社, 1991.
[4] 国家药典委员会. 中国药典. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2005: 356.
[5] 杨中义, 王晨, 李艳锋 , 等. 不同年份30d短日照处理对地被菊开花的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,37(6):419-424.
[6] 万友名, 马宏, 赵振刚 , 等. 不同光周期下馥郁滇丁香‘香妃’的成花反应以及花芽分化进程的解剖学研究. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(9):1659-1666.
[7] 贾小平, 全建章, 王永芳 , 等. 不同光周期环境对谷子农艺性状的影响. 作物学报, 2019,45(7):1119-1127.
[8] 董伟欣, 谢颍, 张月辰 , 等. 3不同生育时期短日照诱导对小豆形态、叶片生理及产量的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 2014,37(3):1-6.
[9] 董伟欣, 尹宝, 张彦 , 等. 短日照诱导对小豆花芽分化的影响. 河南农业大学学报, 2017,51(2):149-155.
[10] 白素兰, 谢中稳, 刘永胜 , 等. 植物的成花逆转. 植物生理学通讯, 2000,36(3):252-257.
[11] 赵耀, 吕晋慧, 陈阳 , 等. 3种短日照依赖型地被菊光周期调控研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,33(1):22-26.
[1] Wang Heying,Guo Xiaohong,Zhang Qinming,Ma Yan,Li Meng,Jiang Hongfang,Hu Yue,Lan Yuchen,Xu Lingqi,Guo Hongtao,Lü Yandong. Effects of Sowing in Line under Water on Agronomic Characters and Yield Components of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 81-88.
[2] Cao Tingjie,Zhang Yu’e,Hu Weiguo,Yang Jian,Zhao Hong,Wang Xicheng,Zhou Yanjie,Zhao Qunyou,Li Huiqun. Detection of Three Dwarfing Genes in the New Wheat Cultivars (Lines) Developed in South Huang-Huai Valley and Its Association with Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 14-19.
[3] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20-26.
[4] Li Hu,Chen Chuanhua,Liu Guanglin,Wu Zishuai,Huang Qiuyao,Luo Qunchang. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Rate and Planting Density on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Guiyu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 99-103.
[5] Liu Xingye,Xing Baolong,Wu Ruixiang,Wang Guimei,Liu Fei. Main Agronomic Traits Variation and Its Effects on Yield Composition of Mung Bean in Northern Shanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 69-75.
[6] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Variation Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Waxy Sorghum Varieties (Lines) in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 17-23.
[7] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29-36.
[8] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[9] Xiaoming Wang,Dacheng Li,Zhengda Liao,Yuanchu Gan,Huixiu Chen,Xide Su,Zenglin Wei. Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 50-55.
[10] Ruiyu Ren,Jihong He,Kongjun Dong,Lei Zhang,Tianpeng Liu,Tianyu Yang. Analysis on Suitable Sowing Date of Four Main Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet in Huining, Gansu [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 152-158.
[11] Wang Lei,Zhang Xiangping,Li Runxi,Niu Xiaoxia,Yang Shimei,Yan Zongshan,Zhang Ziqiang. Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[12] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[13] Maolin Yue,Weirong Xue,Ruidong Zhang,Zhongxiao Yue,RuiZhou Lü,Pengyan Guo. Effects of Different Row Spaces on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 93-96.
[14] Ruixin Zhang,Tianbao Ren,Zhe Zhao,Gang Wen,Mingqin Zhao. Effects of Transplanting Date on Quality and Main Economic Characters of Cigar in Five Fingers Group [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 148-153.
[15] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1 -7 .
[2] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20 -26 .
[3] Sun Yue,Liu Bin,Fu Manqi,Wang Jing,Wang Xiaohui,Chen Fu. Spatio-Temporal Dynamic Changes of Linseed Production in China from 1985 to 2015[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 8 -13 .
[4] Zhu An,Gao Jie,Huang Jian,Wang Hao,Chen Yun,Liu Lijun. Advances in Morphology and Physiology of Root and Their Relationships with Grain Quality in Rice[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 1 -8 .
[5] Zhang Xin,Cao Liru,Wei Liangming,Zhang Qianjin,Zhou Ke,Wang Zhenhua,Lu Xiaomin. Expression Analysis and Interaction Prediction of Maize Glucose Transporter Gene ZmGLUT-1[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 22 -28 .
[6] Pan Lei,Xu Jie,Yang Shuai,Chen Yunsong,Chen Lianhong,Ma Wenguang. Pollen Viability, Morphology and Physiological Indexes of Three Tobacco Varieties at Different Storage Temperatures[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 112 -118 .
[7] Yan Hua,Yan Zhongwen,Lei Jie. Climate Change Characteristics of Xinyuan during 1981-2018 and Its Impact on Spring Maize[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 140 -146 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 200 -204 .
[9] Ma Hui,Jiao Xiaoyu,Xu Xue,Li Juan,Ni Dahu,Xu Rongfang,Wang Yu,Wang Xiufeng. Advances in Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms of Cadmium Metabolism in Rice[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 1 -8 .
[10] Wang Meichun,Lian Rongfang,Xiao Gui,Mo Jinping,Cao Ning. Review and Industrial Development Countermeasures of Lentils in China[J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 13 -16 .