Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 181-185.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.06.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Plant Growth Regulator Compound on Cotton Yield

Ma Chunmei(), Tian Yangqing, Zhao Qiang(), Li Jiangyu, Wu Xueqin   

  1. College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University/Engineering Research Centre of Cotton, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830052, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2021-06-08 Revised:2021-11-11 Online:2022-12-15 Published:2022-12-21
  • Contact: Zhao Qiang E-mail:1287408495@qq.com;qiangzhao99@163.com

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

266

Abstract:

Taking Yanmian 67 as experimental material, the effects of different plant growth regulators on boll formation and yield of cotton were investigated. The results showed that different plant growth regulators compound could effectively adjust the plant height and the number of fruit branches, increase the number of fruit nodes and bolls, increase the volume and weight of bolls, significantly increase the number of before summer bolls and summer bolls, and increase the lint yield. The combination of sodium nitrate-phenol and fresh amine had the best effect. Each compound treatment had little effect on cotton fiber quality.

Key words: Plant growth regulator compound, Cotton, Yield, Fiber quality

Table 1

Effects of plant growth regulators compound on boll volume cm3"

处理
Treatment		 施药后天数Days after application
10d 17d 24d 31d 38d
T1 13.07±0.17c 15.87±0.29bc 18.17±0.39c 20.73±0.54b 23.13±0.25bc
T2 13.97±0.29b 16.60±0.29b 20.07b±0.48b 23.07±0.25a 24.23±0.38b
T3 15.17±0.40a 19.93±0.63a 22.00±0.57a 24.07±0.40a 26.03±0.78a
CK1 13.77±0.29b 16.00±0.45b 18.00±0.54c 20.57±0.54b 22.07±0.82cd
CK2 12.80±0.14c 15.00±0.22c 17.10±0.24c 19.77±0.65b 21.40±0.71d

Table 2

Effects of plant growth regulators compound on boll weight g"

处理
Treatment		 施药后天数Days after application
10d 17d 24d 31d 38d
T1 2.99±0.03a 3.07±0.08c 3.57±0.13b 4.38±0.14b 6.08±0.29a
T2 2.97±0.12a 3.59±0.07ab 3.73±0.12b 4.29±0.12b 5.91±0.35a
T3 2.97±0.13a 3.75±0.08a 4.50±0.08a 5.43±0.26a 6.14±0.11a
CK1 2.98±0.10a 3.71±0.19a 3.91±0.18b 4.75±0.50b 5.95±0.09a
CK2 3.03±0.02a 3.41±0.26b 3.74±0.26b 4.73±0.20b 5.75±0.21a

Table 3

Adjusting effects of different topping methods on boll time distribution"

处理
Treatment		 总铃数
Total number
of bolls		 伏前桃Before summer boll 伏桃Summer boll 秋桃Autumn boll
铃数
Number of bolls		 比例
Ratio (%)		 铃数
Number of bolls		 比例
Ratio (%)		 铃数
Number of bolls		 比例
Ratio (%)
T1 5.64±0.13b 1.21±0.03ab 21.51 3.08±0.23b 54.54 1.35±0.24a 23.95
T2 5.45±0.11bc 1.16±0.08bc 21.24 2.94±0.06b 53.95 1.36±0.17a 24.81
T3 6.15±0.10a 1.28±0.01a 20.79 3.42±0.03a 55.57 1.46±0.12a 23.63
CK1 5.44±0.20bc 1.08±0.03c 18.77 3.13±0.13b 54.52 1.24±0.10a 22.78
CK2 5.32±0.11c 1.14±0.10bc 21.05 3.02±0.05b 55.57 1.16±0.11a 21.21

Table 4

The spatial effects of plant growth regulator compound and boll regulation in cotton"

处理
Treatment		 果节量Fruit nodes 棉铃数Number of bolls
下部
Underpart		 中部
Middle part		 上部
Top part		 总量
Total		 下部
Underpart		 中部
Middle part		 上部
Top part		 总量
Total
T1 7.65±0.26ab 7.70±0.22ab 5.50±0.30a 20.85±0.38a 3.55±0.17a 3.65±0.30a 2.05±0.09a 9.25±0.26ab
T2 7.45±0.22ab 7.15±0.82b 5.55±0.26a 20.15±0.79a 3.50±0.30a 2.95±0.30b 2.35±0.30a 8.80±0.32b
T3 7.10±0.52b 8.15±0.36a 5.70±0.54a 20.95±1.28a 3.60±0.37a 3.55±0.48a 2.60±0.37a 9.75±0.64a
CK1 7.70±0.30a 7.65±0.26ab 4.55±0.38b 19.90±0.54a 3.65±0.09a 2.85±0.17b 2.10±0.46a 8.60±0.51b
CK2 7.10±0.10b 7.45±0.17ab 5.20±0.32a 19.75±0.36a 3.50±0.30a 3.00±0.14b 2.05±0.17a 8.55±0.26b

Table 5

Effects of plant growth regulator combinations on cotton yield and its components"

处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 果枝数
Number of branches		 单株成铃数
Bolls per plant		 单铃重
Boll weight (g)		 籽棉产量
Lint yield (kg/hm2)
T1 71.98±3.71a 10.33±0.16a 5.99±0.21a 5.43±0.19a 6154.27±79.26ab
T2 71.43±1.27a 10.18±0.54a 5.78±0.14ab 5.40±0.10a 6068.60±308.41ab
T3 73.10±2.47a 10.30±0.19a 6.14±0.13a 5.53±0.13a 6637.47±213.13a
CK1 70.88±2.37a 10.28±0.27a 5.48±0.15b 5.47±0.06a 6025.94±169.45ab
CK2 71.89±3.27a 10.15±0.11a 5.37±0.26b 5.36±0.17a 5709.69±498.64b

Table 6

Effects of plant growth regulator compound on cotton fiber quality"

处理
Treatment		 长度
Length (mm)		 整齐度
Uniformity (%)		 强度
Strength (CN/tex)		 伸长率
Elongation (%)		 短纤维率
Short fiber content (%)		 成熟度
Maturity		 马克隆值
Micronaire value
T1 25.99±0.34a 82.40±0.38a 26.05±0.32ab 13.13±0.11a 9.30±0.20a 0.84±0.00a 5.24±0.05a
T2 25.91±0.27a 81.83±0.38a 26.16±0.59a 13.15±0.20a 10.14 ±0.29a 0.84±0.00a 5.25±0.05a
T3 25.69±0.28a 81.20±0.31a 26.00±0.14ab 12.50±0.25b 10.29±0.24a 0.84±0.00a 5.31±0.05a
CK1 25.68±0.27a 81.33±0.46a 25.19±0.38b 12.84±0.25ab 10.33±1.06a 0.84±0.00a 5.34±0.08a
CK2 25.80±0.21a 81.73±0.63a 26.30±0.27a 12.97±0.28ab 10.37±0.33a 0.84±0.01a 5.37±0.04a
[1] 卢政茂, 崔东亮, 马宏娟, 等. 植物生长调节剂与除草剂混用对水稻的安全性及对除草效果的影响. 农药, 2017, 56(5):388-390.
[2] 王兰英, 唐莉, 敬华英, 等. 胺鲜脂对麦冬块根膨大的促进效应. 中国中药杂志, 2005(17):1378-1379.
[3] 彭波, 鞠东. 复硝酚钠对马铃薯生长发育的影响. 当代生态农业, 2009(增1):112-113.
[4] 段强, 王冲, 孙艳, 等. 1.8%复硝酚钠水剂对棉花生长的调节作用. 农药研究与应用, 2011, 15(2):26-28.
[5] 于彩莲, 刘波, 燕红, 等. 复硝酚钠及其组分对大豆种子萌发的影响. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(3):440-443.
[6] 黄毅, 刘杰, 李衍素, 等. 萘乙酸钠根施对日光温室春茬黄瓜生长、产量及品质的影响. 中国蔬菜, 2017(1):36-40.
[7] 郭允娜, 李衍素, 贺超兴, 等. 亚适宜温光下萘乙酸钠对番茄幼苗生长与生理特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10):3053-3058.
[8] 胡兆平, 李伟, 陈建秋, 等. 复硝酚钠、DA-6和α-萘乙酸钠对茄子产量和品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(25):168-172.
[9] 曹莹, 张贺楠, 孟军, 等. 木醋液与萘乙酸钠复合作用对花生光合特性及产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1):185-191,210.
[10] 郭世保, 徐雪松, 王朝阳, 等. 调环酸钙对小麦群体性状和产量的调控作用. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(7):1706-1709.
[11] 汪洪洋, 徐宗进, 张立智, 等. 5%调环酸钙泡腾片在水稻生产上应用效果分析. 中国农村小康科技, 2010(4):20-21,69.
[12] 阿力木江·克来木, 赵强, 娄善伟, 等. 调环酸钙对棉花农艺性状及产量形成的调控效应. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10):39-46.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0259
[13] 黄文婷, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 烯效唑和胺鲜酯对大豆叶片光合特性与碳代谢的调控效应. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(2):243-251.
[14] 孙晓慧, 李成亮, 陈剑秋, 等. 不同胺鲜酯(DA-6)浓度及施用方式对菠菜生长的影响. 北方园艺, 2017(13):122-128.
[15] 付慧杰, 薛国娟, 廖宝鹏, 等. 棉花苗蕾期喷施生长调节剂促早熟效应研究. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(6):561-568.
[16] 刘孟君, 程乾生. 缩节安对棉铃发育的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 1990, 18(2):88-92.
[17] 曹新川, 胡守林, 韩秀锋, 等. 海岛棉棉铃阶段性发育与产量品质的关系. 作物学报, 2020, 46(2):300-306.
[18] 刘保军, 吴琼, 李慧, 等. 复硝酚钠与胺鲜酯对棉花化肥吸收率的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):754-761.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2020.04.022
[19] 李永山, 董哲生, 张建诚, 等. 山西省棉区棉花促早熟集成避霜技术研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(1):85-87.
[20] 李秉华, 李香菊, 王贵启, 等. 芸苔素内酯和复硝酚钠对夏播棉产量和品质的调节作用比较. 河北农业科学, 2003, 7(2):12-15.
[21] 邓忠, 白丹, 翟国亮, 等. 不同植物生长调节剂对新疆棉花干物质积累、产量和品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3):122-127.
[22] 吴雪琴, 崔延楠, 赵强. 化学打顶后使用外源物质对棉花脱叶催熟及产量品质的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(12):151-160.
[1] Zhou Hao, Qiu Xianjin, Xu Jianlong. Advance in Effects of Magnetized Water Irrigation on Crop Growth and Development [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 1-6.
[2] Wen Rui, Chen Qianwu, Zhao Yajie, Jia Yiming, Lu Xudong, Zhang Jihong, Li Huanchun, Zhao Peiyi, Zhang Yonghu. Study on Water Temperature Effects and Water Use Efficiency of Paddy Field under Different Plastic Film Mulching Planting Patterns in Arid Area of Loess Plateau in Northwest China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 111-117.
[3] Xiong Yousheng, Xiong Hanfeng, Guo Yanlong, Wang Haisheng, Liu Wei, Yan Yuxiang, Xie Yuanyuan, Zhou Jianxiong, Yang Lijun. Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application Models on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiencies in Rice-Wheat Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 118-123.
[4] Yang Yan, Xu Ningsheng, Pan Zhechao, Li Yanshan, Yang Qiongfen, Zhang Lei. Effects of Paclobutrazol and Nitrogen on Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 139-144.
[5] Qin Meng, Cui Shize, He Xiaodong, Zhai Lingxia, Tao Bo, Wang Zhaojun, Zhao Haicheng, Li Hongyu, Zheng Guiping, Liu Lihua. Effects of Straw Puffing Returning on Rice Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 159-166.
[6] Qiao Jiangfang, Zhang Panpan, Shao Yunhui, Liu Jingbao, Li Chuan, Zhang Meiwei, Huang Lu. Effects of Different Planting Densities and Varieties on Dry Matter Production and Yield Components of Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 186-192.
[7] Hui Chao, Yang Weijun, Deng Tianchi, Chen Yuxin, Song Shilong, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Biochar Dosage on Accumulation and Transport of Dry Matter and Nitrogen and Yield of Spring Wheat in Irrigated Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 201-207.
[8] Wang Heshou. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Nutritional Quality of Vegetable Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 208-213.
[9] Feng Yu, Xing Baolong. Research on the Growth Characteristics and Forage Quality of Different Cowpea Varieties in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 220-225.
[10] Chong Haotian, Shang Cheng, Zhang Yunbo, Huang Liying. Effects of Dense Planting with Reduced Nitrogen Application on Spikelet Formation of Different Types of Rice Varieties [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 226-233.
[11] Shi Guanyan, Wang Juanfei, Ma Huifang, Zhao Xiongwei. Correlation and Regression Analysis between Yield and Main Agronomic Traits in Foxtail Millet Hybrids [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 82-87.
[12] Zhao Bin, Ji Changhao, Sun Hao, Zhu Bin, Wang Rui, Chen Xiaodong. Comprehensive Assessment of the Yield and Quality of Forage and Grain among Multi-Rowed Barley Lines [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 93-97.
[13] Xu Chuangye, Zhang Jianjun, Zhou Gang, Zhang Kaipeng, Zhu Xiaohui, Wang Jiaxi, Dang Yi, Zhao Gang, Wang Lei, Li Shangzhong, Fan Tinglu. Screening and Evaluation of New Maize Varieties with Compact Planting, High Yield and Suitable for Mechanical Grain Harvest in Loess Plateau in Eastern Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 104-110.
[14] Feng Changhui, Jiao Chunhai, Zhang Youchang, Bie Shu, Qin Hongde, Wang Qiongshan, Zhang Jiaohai, Wang Xiaogang, Xia Songbo, Lan Jiayang, Chen Quanqiu. Genetic Analysis for Yield and Fiber Quality Traits in Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Mating Design [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 13-21.
[15] Chang Haigang, Li Guang, Yuan Jianyu, Xie Mingjun, Qi Xiaoping. Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Soil Nutrients and Yield of Spring Wheat in the Loess Hilly Region of Central Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 160-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!