谷子杂交种产量与主要农艺性状的相关性及回归分析

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.06.011

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to clarify the main factors affecting millet hybrids yield, correlation and regression analysis of yield and main agronomic traits of four types foxtail millet hybrids including short panicle type, mid-to-short panicle type, mid-to-long panicle type and long panicle type were studied. The results showed that panicle length and yield were significant difference among four types of foxtail millet hybrids. Correlation analysis displayed that there was a significant positive correlation between the yield and milled millet percentage; and there were very significant positive correlations between panicle weight per plant and grain weight per plant, and the economic coefficient. There were significant positive correlations between effective tillers and panicle weight per plant, grain weight per plant and economic coefficient. There was a significant positive correlation between the panicle density and the grass weight per plant. There was a significant correlation between 1000-grain weight and panicle length. Regression analysis results showed that panicle diameter, milled millet percentage and 1000-grain weight were positively correlated with foxtail millet hybrids yield.

Key words: Millet hybrids, Yield, Agronomic traits, Correlation analysis, Regression analysis

Shi Guanyan, Wang Juanfei, Ma Huifang, Zhao Xiongwei. Correlation and Regression Analysis between Yield and Main Agronomic Traits in Foxtail Millet Hybrids[J].Crops, 2022, 38(6): 82-87.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 27

[1]	Zhang G, Liu X, Quan Z, et al. Genome sequence of foxtail millet (Setaria italica) provides insights into grass evolution and biofuel potential. Nature Biotechnology, 2012, 30(6):549-554. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2195 pmid: 22580950
[2]	刁现民. 育种创新造就谷子种业新发展. 中国种业, 2022(4):4-7.
[3]	李艳, 马庆州, 王彦辉, 等. 谷子种质资源重要性状的统计分析. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(5):88-91.
[4]	Diao X M, Jia G Q. Foxtail millet breeding in China//Doust A,Diao X M. Genetics and Genomics of Setaria. Springer International Publishing, 2017:93-113.
[5]	崔文生, 马洪锡, 张德勇. 谷子雄性不育系“蒜系28”的选育与利用. 中国农业科学, 1979(1):43-46.
[6]	王玉文, 李会霞, 田岗, 等. 谷子高异交结实雄性不育系的创制及应用. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(4):680-689.
[7]	陈茜午, 温蕊, 张永虎, 等. 谷子育种研究进展. 贵州农业科学, 2021, 49(5):10-16.
[8]	程汝宏, 刘正理. 我国谷子育种目标的演变与发展趋势. 河北农业科学, 2003(增1):95-98.
[9]	邱风仓, 冯小磊. 我国谷子杂优利用回顾、现状与发展方向. 中国种业, 2013(3):11-12.
[10]	周花, 戴丽君, 李永平, 等. 11个谷子新品种的主要农艺性状灰色关联度分析与综合评价. 甘肃农业科技, 2020(12):25-30.
[11]	赵杰, 杜伟建, 韩浩坤, 等. 杂交谷子株高与产量性状分析. 山西农业科学, 2013, 41(3):215-218.
[12]	贾小平, 李剑峰, 赵渊, 等. 谷子抽穗期与农艺性状的相关与回归分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3):634-645.
[13]	李志江, 马金丰, 李延东, 等. 东北春谷区近年来谷子育成品种的评价. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(23):4507-4518.
[14]	魏萌涵, 解慧芳, 邢璐, 等. 华北地区谷子产量与农艺性状的综合评价分析. 作物杂志, 2018(4):42-47.
[15]	张华, 王秀全, 何丹, 等. 西南地区玉米高产稳定性与主要农艺性状的回归及相关分析. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(10):1625-1628.
[16]	鲁清, 刘浩, 李海芬, 等. 花生不同株型主要农艺性状的相关分析及其对单株产量的影响. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6):1115-1121.
[17]	李金琴, 张智勇, 何智彪, 等. 矮秆蓖麻杂交种产量与主要农艺性状的相关及多元回归分析. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 25(1):40-43.
[18]	曹鹏鹏, 王士岭, 王富建. 大豆主要农艺性状与产量相关性分析. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(36):18-26.
[19]	贾冠清, 刁现民. 谷子[Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.]作为功能基因组研究模式植物的发展现状及趋势. 生命科学, 2017, 29(3):292-301.
[20]	孙宇燕, 李书田, 陈晓敏, 等. 春谷子农艺和品质性状的变异分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(2):62-69.
[21]	任月梅. 春播早熟区谷子主要农艺性状相关和通径分析. 内蒙古农业科技, 2004(1):13-22.
[22]	刘正理, 程汝宏, 张凤莲, 等. 不同密度条件下3种类型谷子品种产量及其构成要素变化特征研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2007, 15(5):135-138.
[23]	杨成元. 春谷产量与其相关性状的关联度分析. 杂粮作物, 2002, 22(5):259-261.
[24]	黄英杰, 张岩. 谷子品种产量及主要产量构成因素稳定性的分析. 作物杂志, 2002(5):43-44.
[25]	魏玮, 赵芳, 张晓磊, 等. 张杂谷谷子主要农艺性状与产量的灰色关联度分析. 农业科技通讯, 2019(9):182-188.
[26]	Siles M M, Russell W K, Tensperger B D, et al. Heterosis for grain yield and other agronomic traits in foxtail millet. Crop Science, 2004, 12(1):1960-1965.
[27]	Song G Y, Guo Z B, Liu Z W, et al. The phenotypic predisposition of the parent in F 1 hybrid is correlated with transcriptome preference of the positive general combining ability parent. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15:297. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-297

Related Articles 15

[1]	Zhou Hao, Qiu Xianjin, Xu Jianlong. Advance in Effects of Magnetized Water Irrigation on Crop Growth and Development [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 1-6.
[2]	Wen Rui, Chen Qianwu, Zhao Yajie, Jia Yiming, Lu Xudong, Zhang Jihong, Li Huanchun, Zhao Peiyi, Zhang Yonghu. Study on Water Temperature Effects and Water Use Efficiency of Paddy Field under Different Plastic Film Mulching Planting Patterns in Arid Area of Loess Plateau in Northwest China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 111-117.
[3]	Xiong Yousheng, Xiong Hanfeng, Guo Yanlong, Wang Haisheng, Liu Wei, Yan Yuxiang, Xie Yuanyuan, Zhou Jianxiong, Yang Lijun. Effects of Reducing Fertilizer Application Models on Wheat Yield and Nutrient Use Efficiencies in Rice-Wheat Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 118-123.
[4]	Yang Yan, Xu Ningsheng, Pan Zhechao, Li Yanshan, Yang Qiongfen, Zhang Lei. Effects of Paclobutrazol and Nitrogen on Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 139-144.
[5]	Qin Meng, Cui Shize, He Xiaodong, Zhai Lingxia, Tao Bo, Wang Zhaojun, Zhao Haicheng, Li Hongyu, Zheng Guiping, Liu Lihua. Effects of Straw Puffing Returning on Rice Yield, Quality and Soil Nutrients [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 159-166.
[6]	Ma Chunmei, Tian Yangqing, Zhao Qiang, Li Jiangyu, Wu Xueqin. Effects of Plant Growth Regulator Compound on Cotton Yield [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 181-185.
[7]	Qiao Jiangfang, Zhang Panpan, Shao Yunhui, Liu Jingbao, Li Chuan, Zhang Meiwei, Huang Lu. Effects of Different Planting Densities and Varieties on Dry Matter Production and Yield Components of Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 186-192.
[8]	Hui Chao, Yang Weijun, Deng Tianchi, Chen Yuxin, Song Shilong, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Biochar Dosage on Accumulation and Transport of Dry Matter and Nitrogen and Yield of Spring Wheat in Irrigated Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 201-207.
[9]	Wang Heshou. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Nutritional Quality of Vegetable Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 208-213.
[10]	Feng Yu, Xing Baolong. Research on the Growth Characteristics and Forage Quality of Different Cowpea Varieties in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 220-225.
[11]	Chong Haotian, Shang Cheng, Zhang Yunbo, Huang Liying. Effects of Dense Planting with Reduced Nitrogen Application on Spikelet Formation of Different Types of Rice Varieties [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 226-233.
[12]	Zhao Bin, Ji Changhao, Sun Hao, Zhu Bin, Wang Rui, Chen Xiaodong. Comprehensive Assessment of the Yield and Quality of Forage and Grain among Multi-Rowed Barley Lines [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 93-97.
[13]	Xu Chuangye, Zhang Jianjun, Zhou Gang, Zhang Kaipeng, Zhu Xiaohui, Wang Jiaxi, Dang Yi, Zhao Gang, Wang Lei, Li Shangzhong, Fan Tinglu. Screening and Evaluation of New Maize Varieties with Compact Planting, High Yield and Suitable for Mechanical Grain Harvest in Loess Plateau in Eastern Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 104-110.
[14]	Feng Changhui, Jiao Chunhai, Zhang Youchang, Bie Shu, Qin Hongde, Wang Qiongshan, Zhang Jiaohai, Wang Xiaogang, Xia Songbo, Lan Jiayang, Chen Quanqiu. Genetic Analysis for Yield and Fiber Quality Traits in Upland Cotton Based on Partial NCII Mating Design [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 13-21.
[15]	Jia Xiuping, Mao Xuhui, Liang Gensheng, Liu Runping, Liu Feng, Wang Xingzhen. Analysis of Physiological and Biochemical Mechanism and Growth and Development Characteristics of Saline and Alkali Resistance in Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 146-152.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

编号 Number	品种 Variety	杂交组合名称 Name of hybrid combination
1	汾杂18-4	汾92A/k33-15
2	汾杂18-6	汾92A/k164
3	汾杂18-3	汾92A/k37-9
4	汾杂18-2	汾92A/j29
5	汾杂16-11	汾21A6/k15-9
6	汾杂16-13	汾21A-6/安20
7	汾杂18-5	汾21A6/k33-15
8	汾杂16-3	汾21A6/k37-9
9	汾杂16-14	汾6A/k164
10	汾杂16-9	汾6A/j29
11	汾杂16-12	汾6A/k15-9
12	汾杂16-1	汾6A/k37-9
13	汾杂18-1	汾92A/K3-33

编号 Number	品种 Variety	穗长 Panicle length (cm)	穗粗 Panicle diameter (cm)	穗码密度 Panicle density	穗颈长 Neck length (cm)	有效分蘖数 Effective tillers	单株草重 Grass weight per plant (g)	单株穗重 Panicle weight per plant (g)	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant (g)	经济系数 Economic coefficient	出谷率 Milled millet percentage (%)	千粒重 1000- grain weight (g)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)
1	汾杂18-4	25.87	2.68	4.20	28.04	1.72	38.30	27.16	21.22	0.32	78.12	2.77	4969.95
2	汾杂18-6	28.11	3.11	4.08	27.52	1.81	35.24	34.08	26.46	0.38	77.65	2.65	4800.00
3	汾杂18-3	27.35	2.98	4.60	27.74	1.98	43.87	47.39	37.31	0.41	78.71	2.81	5827.50
4	汾杂18-2	26.85	3.04	4.57	24.71	1.94	35.90	40.10	31.99	0.42	79.73	2.86	5575.05
5	汾杂16-11	30.10	2.82	4.01	28.46	1.26	35.00	30.83	25.12	0.38	81.57	2.96	6345.00
6	汾杂16-13	31.53	2.81	4.15	29.12	1.25	38.76	29.84	22.91	0.33	76.67	3.18	5935.05
7	汾杂18-5	30.00	2.58	3.96	30.41	1.22	42.51	29.34	21.87	0.30	74.55	3.03	4767.45
8	汾杂16-3	27.54	2.79	4.89	36.62	1.57	33.11	28.60	22.93	0.37	80.09	3.03	6352.50
9	汾杂16-14	26.97	2.87	4.31	26.72	2.08	30.58	33.00	26.78	0.42	81.17	2.67	5425.05
10	汾杂16-9	24.47	2.69	4.49	26.98	2.11	35.62	38.37	31.05	0.42	80.88	2.86	5197.50
11	汾杂16-12	28.19	3.10	3.98	24.08	1.71	37.72	43.35	35.37	0.44	81.60	2.78	6349.95
12	汾杂16-1	25.24	3.08	4.56	25.68	1.89	30.80	30.53	22.93	0.38	74.51	2.85	5272.50
13	汾杂18-1	28.09	2.79	3.51	26.24	1.80	44.65	40.61	33.66	0.40	82.88	2.93	5824.95
平均值Average		27.72	2.87	4.25	27.87	1.72	37.08	34.86	27.66	0.38	79.09	2.88	5587.88
最大值Maximum		31.53	3.11	4.89	36.62	2.11	44.65	47.39	37.31	0.44	82.88	3.18	6352.50
最小值Minimum		24.47	2.58	3.51	24.08	1.22	30.58	27.16	21.22	0.30	74.51	2.65	4767.45
变异系数CV (%)		6.90	5.90	8.20	10.90	17.30	11.70	17.70	19.30	10.40	3.26	4.96	9.84

性状 Trait	穗长 Panicle length	穗粗 Panicle diameter	穗码密度 Panicle density	穗颈长 Neck length	有效分蘖数 Effective tillers	单株草重 Grass weight per plant	单株穗重 Panicle weight per plant	单株粒重 Grain weight per plant	经济系数 Economic coefficient	出谷率 Milled millet percentage	千粒重 1000- grain weight	产量 Yield
穗长Panicle length	1
穗粗Panicle diameter	-0.042	1
穗码密度Panicle density	0.569^*	0.041	1
穗颈长Neck length	0.254	-0.474	0.293	1
有效分蘖数Effective tillers	-0.436	0.436	-0.002	-0.369	1
单株草重 Grass weight per plant	0.415	-0.237	0.549^*	-0.038	-0.062	1
单株穗重 Panicle weight per plant	-0.042	0.485	-0.190	-0.496	0.583^*	0.469	1
单株粒重 Grain weight per plant	-0.075	0.447	-0.190	-0.499	0.559^*	0.433	0.989^**	1
经济系数 Economic coefficient	-0.359	0.580^*	0.131	-0.505	0.610^*	-0.220	0.721^**	0.775^**	1
出谷率 Milled millet percentage	-0.234	-0.056	0.007	-0.159	0.043	-0.072	0.293	0.432	0.616^*	1
千粒重1000-grain weight	0.605^*	-0.418	-0.117	0.511	-0.487	0.321	-0.229	-0.253	-0.487	-0.270	1
产量Yield	0.263	0.156	0.105	0.163	-0.242	-0.031	0.218	0.292	0.373	0.556^*	0.338	1

差异源 Source of variation	平方和 SS	自由度 df	均方 MS	F值 F-value	Fα F_0.05
组间Intersection	28.49907	3	9.499691	4.310835	2.874187
组内Intra-block	77.12873	35	2.203678
总计Total	105.62780	38

差异源 Source of variation	平方和 SS	自由度 df	均方 MS	F值 F-value	Fα F_0.05
组间Intersection	23 208.53	3	7736.178	15.33936	3.049125
组内Intra-block	11 095.37	22	504.335
总计Total	34 303.90	25

Correlation and Regression Analysis between Yield and Main Agronomic Traits in Foxtail Millet Hybrids

RichHTML

PDF (PC)