Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 111-116.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.01.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Adaptability Analysis of Non-Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Hybrid Rapeseed Lines from Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River in Ili River Valley, Xinjiang

Long Weihua1,2(), Xian Zhihui2, Zhang Zheng3(), Alibieligen·Hazitai 3, Zulehumaer·Wusimanjiang 3, Pu Huiming2, Hu Maolong2   

  1. 1College of Rural Revitalization, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210036, Jiangsu, China
    2Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, China
    3Yili Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yining 835000, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2023-12-20 Revised:2024-03-23 Online:2025-02-15 Published:2025-02-12

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

95

Abstract:

One significant barrier to the rise in spring rape production is the competition from field weeds. To increase the weed control effect of spring rapeseed in Yili, Xinjiang, this study introduced nine non-transgenic herbicide-resistant hybrid rapeseed lines from the lower reaches of the Yangtze River in order to screen high-yield and resistant varieties suitable for planting in Yili Valley by planting adaptability experiments. The impact of applying herbicide-resistant lines on weed control in farmland was investigated. The results showed that the growth periods of the introduced resistant lines were similar to that of the CK (the locally recommended variety), with a latest delay of only two days compared to the CK. The branch height in the maturity stage of the introduced lines reached 64.0-90.4 cm, higher than the CK. The values of lines such as the number of pods, seed number per pod, and 1000-grain weight fluctuated up and down compared to the CK. The yield of DP2 reached 3368.70 kg/ha, significantly higher than that of CK, while the yield of DP4 remained the same as CK. The experiment of spraying herbicides during the seedling stage showed that the application of corresponding herbicides had an average control effect of 82.54% on broad-leaved weeds in the field, while spraying herbicides had no significant effect on the growth of introduced lines during the seedling stage. This study demonstrates that using “resistant rapeseed lines+spraying corresponding herbicides” is an effective strategy for controlling weeds in the spring rapeseed area of Ili, at the same time, high-yield resistant rapeseed line DP2 adapted to the climate of the Ili River Valley were selected.

Key words: Ili River Valley, Non-transgenic herbicide-resistant hybrid rapeseed, Weeds, Adaptability analysis, Herbicides, Yield

Table 1

Parental sources of nine hybrid combinations"

品系
Line		 杂交组合（母本×父本）
Hybrid (maternal×paternal)
DP1 D26×M75
DP2 D26×M110
DP3 D26×L356
DP4 D50×M75
DP5 D50×M110
DP6 D50×L356
DP7 D218×M75
DP8 D218×M110
DP9 D218×L356

Table 2

"

品种（系）
Variety
(line)		 播种期
Sowing
stage		 出苗期
Seedling
stage		 抽薹期
Bolting
stage		 初花期
Early flowering
stage		 终花期
Final flowering
stage		 成熟期
Maturity
stage		 收获期
Harvesting
stage		 生育期天数
Growth
days(d)
DP1 04-30 05-10 06-26 07-18 08-08 09-14 10-05 127.5
DP2 04-30 05-10 06-28 07-23 08-11 09-15 10-05 128.5
DP3 04-30 05-10 06-28 07-24 08-13 09-14 10-05 127.0
DP4 04-30 05-10 06-29 07-23 08-12 09-15 10-05 128.5
DP5 04-30 05-10 06-27 07-19 08-10 09-07 10-05 120.0
DP6 04-30 05-10 06-26 07-18 08-08 09-16 10-05 129.0
DP7 04-30 05-10 06-26 07-18 08-08 09-13 10-05 126.5
DP8 04-30 05-10 06-26 07-18 08-09 09-15 10-05 128.0
DP9 04-30 05-10 06-29 07-21 08-12 09-11 10-05 124.5
CK 04-30 05-10 06-23 07-16 08-07 09-14 10-05 127.5

Table 3

Weed control effectiveness and seedling indicators of the varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Variety
(line)		 阔叶杂草防效
Control effect of broad-
leaved weeds (%)		 苗高
Seedling height (cm)		 绿叶数
Number of green leaves		 地上部干重
Dry weight of aboveground (g)
未喷
No spraying		 喷施
Spraying		 未喷
No spraying		 喷施
Spraying		 未喷
No spraying		 喷施
Spraying
DP1 83.21 32.5a 31.2a 7.9a 7.5a 8.8a 8.7a
DP2 80.62 31.6a 33.2a 8.5a 8.6a 9.8a 9.9a
DP3 76.83 28.8a 29.6a 7.6a 7.5a 9.0a 8.6a
DP4 88.63 27.6a 26.8a 8.2a 8.3a 10.0a 10.6a
DP5 87.84 29.5a 28.8a 8.0a 8.1a 7.8a 7.9a
DP6 79.23 24.6a 25.2a 8.3a 8.2a 8.1a 8.0a
DP7 76.54 27.3a 28.4a 7.5a 7.3a 7.8a 7.3a
DP8 81.24 29.6a 30.4a 7.6a 7.4a 8.3a 8.5a
DP9 88.74 26.4a 27.1a 7.3a 7.5a 8.4a 8.6a
CK 89.36 26.4a 5.2b 8.0a 0.0b 8.8a 1.2b

Table 4

Analysis of the agronomic traits of tested varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Variety
(line)		 株高
Plant height
(cm)		 分枝高度
Branch
height (cm)		 一次分枝数
Primary
branches		 主轴长度
Length of terminal
raceme (cm)		 主轴果数
Pods of
terminal raceme		 一次角果数
Siliques of
1st branch		 角果长度
Pod length
(cm)		 每角粒数
Seed number
per pod		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
DP1 123.8d 64.0c 4.5a 52.0b 50.5c 107.5c 6.3b 21.1ab 3.4a
DP2 140.1b 71.9bc 4.5a 63.0a 66.5a 171.5a 6.1b 24.3a 3.1b
DP3 133.4c 77.0b 3.5b 52.6b 58.5b 93.5d 6.6b 19.9b 3.4a
DP4 139.0b 67.8c 3.8ab 63.2a 50.5c 90.5d 7.6a 25.2a 3.4a
DP5 147.0ab 79.1b 4.2a 59.2a 63.5ab 101.5c 6.6b 22.8ab 3.6a
DP6 147.0ab 77.6b 3.2b 59.4a 65.5a 146.5ab 6.6b 21.5ab 3.7a
DP7 135.2bc 81.6ab 4.1a 48.4c 55.5bc 104.5c 7.1ab 22.7ab 3.6a
DP8 153.1a 88.6a 4.8a 55.8ab 55.5bc 150.5ab 6.6b 25.0a 3.3ab
DP9 147.2ab 90.4a 3.7ab 31.6d 68.5a 133.5b 7.6a 20.1b 3.5a
CK 113.2e 46.5d 4.2a 54.5ab 40.5d 105.5c 7.6a 24.1a 3.3ab

Table 5

Analysis of yields of the tested varieties (lines)"

变异来源Source of variation 自由度Df 平方和SS 均方MS F值F-value F0.05 F0.01
区组Block 2 2.83 1.42 5.36 3.24 5.21
处理Treatment 19 265.50 13.97 52.87 1.87 2.43
年度Year 1 260.30 260.30 984.96 4.10 7.35
品种（系）Variety (line) 9 5.04 0.56 2.12 2.14 2.92
年度×品种（系）Year×variety (line) 9 0.16 0.02 0.07 2.14 2.92
误差Error 38 10.04 0.26
总变异Total variation 59 278.37

Table 6

Multiple comparisons of the average yield of the tested varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 平均单产
Average yield (kg/hm2)		 平均增产
Average yield increase (%)
DP2 3368.70 17.57aA
DP4 2989.95 10.21abAB
CK 2755.50 0.00bAB
DP7 2737.65 -1.85bAB
DP6 2659.35 -4.93bAB
DP9 2616.75 -8.27bAB
DP5 2664.15 -3.35bAB
DP3 2585.85 -8.32bAB
DP8 2515.50 -11.53bB
DP1 2414.85 -16.15bB
[1] 盛倩男, 余小红, 周雄, 等. 油菜与杂草生物量和养分竞争对氮磷钾肥用量的响应. 中国农业科学, 2023, 56(3):481-489.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.03.007
[2] 李俊凯, 朱建强, 程玲, 等. 油菜田杂草发生特点与田间土壤水分的关系研究. 华中农业大学学报, 2002, 21(30):217-220.
[3] 郭青云. 青海省春油菜田杂草发生危害与防除技术研究. 杂草科学, 2002(3):27-30.
[4] 陈天虹, 王福楷, 李万福, 等. 四川省油菜杂草防治现状与展望. 四川农业科技, 2022(3):43-46.
[5] 赵延存, 娄远来. 长江下游地区油菜田杂草发生规律和综合防治. 杂草科学, 2004(3):15-17.
[6] 管文杰, 张付贵, 闫贵欣, 等. 油菜抗除草剂机理与种质创制研究进展. 中国油料作物学报, 2021, 43(6):1159-1173.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2020354
[7] 臧丽丽, 许玲, 王铭, 等. 草除灵对甘蓝型油菜苗期生理生化及超微结构的影响. 核农学报, 2017, 31(3):597-606.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.03.0597
[8] 张宏军, 郭嗣斌, 朱文达, 等. 75%二氯吡啶酸对油菜田阔叶杂草的防除效果. 华中农业大学学报, 2009, 28(1):27-30.
[9] Guo Y, Cheng L, Long W H, et al. Synergistic mutations of two rapeseed AHAS genes confer high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides for weed control. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2020, 133(10):2811-2824.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03633-w pmid: 32556395
[10] 侯献飞, 赵卫芳, 安学春, 等. 油菜专用长效配方肥对新疆春油菜产量及肥料利用效率的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(4):652-659.
doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.04.007
[11] 陈雷. 新疆伊犁地区春油菜种质资源生态适应性研究及综合评价. 阿拉尔:塔里木大学, 2021.
[12] 陈雷, 万素梅. 新疆伊犁地区春油菜种质资源筛选及灰色综合评价. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(6):60-67.
[13] 魏有海, 郭青云, 冯俊涛. 免耕沟播春油菜田杂草发生规律及化学防除研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 38(2):184-190.
[14] 刘月, 明博, 李姚姚, 等. 基于根冠协调发展的东北春玉米高产种植密度分析. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3):795-807.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2023.23026
[15] 刘华招, 步金宝, 宋微, 等. 两种插秧密度下不同穗型水稻品种耐密性研究. 土壤与作物, 2014, 3(1):22-27.
[16] 朱金龙, 刘锦宇, 朱晓斌, 等. 大豆耐密植相关性状遗传调控机制研究进展. 大豆科学, 2023, 42(1):109-117.
[17] 蒯婕, 王积军, 左青松, 等. 长江流域直播油菜密植效应及其机理研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(24):4625-4632.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.24.004
[18] 张维, 浦惠明, 胡茂龙, 等. 磺酰脲类除草剂对抗性油菜田间杂草的防除效果及安全性评价. 中国油料作物学报, 2023, 45(2):334-340.
doi: 10.19802/j.issn.1007-9084.2022064
[19] Guo Y, Liu C L, Long W H, et al. Development and molecular analysis of a novel acetohydroxyacid synthase rapeseed mutant with high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. The Crop Journal, 2022, 10(1):56-66.
[1] Ren Yongfu, Li Jiayi, Chen Guopeng, Pu Tian, Chen Hong, Wang Xiaochun. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on the Yield and Efficiency of Maize in Strip Intercropping System [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 101-108.
[2] Tian Wenqiang, Wang Hongyi, Nie Lingfan, Sun Ganggang, Zhang Jun, Zhang Qiangbin, Yu Shan, Li Jiahao, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. The Effects of Sowing Date and Sowing Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Extremely Late-Sown Wheat Population [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 115-122.
[3] Ji Jinghong, Liu Shuangquan, Ma Xingzhu, Hao Xiaoyu, Zheng Yu, Zhao Yue, Wang Xiaojun, Kuang Enjun. Effects of Different Controlled-Release Urea on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Cold Region Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 149-154.
[4] Zhang Jili, He Jinghao, Wei Jianyu, Huang Chongjun, Wang Wei, Cai Yixia. Effects of Application Period of Microbial Inoculants on Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Diversity, Enzyme Activity and Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 162-171.
[5] Jin Dandan, Sui Shijiang, Chen Yue, Li Bo, Qu Hang, Gong Liang. Effects of Straw Returning with Nitrogen Application Reduction on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Liaohe Plain [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 172-179.
[6] Li Yunxia, Yang Jiashuo, Li Yangyang, Xiang Shipeng, Yu Jinlong, Li Bin, Zheng Weiwei, Liu Lu. Effects of Different Transplanting Periods on the Growth, Development and Yield Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Tobacco-Rice Rotation Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 222-227.
[7] Li Junzhi, Dou Shuang, Wang Xiaodong, Zhang Meng, Xiao Jibing. Effects of Different Intercropping Patterns on Sorghum Growth and Development [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 234-240.
[8] Zhao Lingling, Li Guifang, Cheng Chu, Zheng Mingjie, Hu Min, Zhu Jianfeng, Shen Ayi, Shen Aga, Wang Junzhen, Shao Meihong. Preliminary Report on Introduction Experiment of New Buckwheat Varieties in Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 86-92.
[9] Luo Jianke, Zhang Kehou, Wang Zeyu, Zhang Pingzhen, Nan Ming. Research on the Production Performance of 18 Oat Varieties (Lines) in the Irrigation Area along the Yellow River in Baiyin City [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 93-100.
[10] Chu Zhaokang, Wang Shiji, Bi Jianjian, Zhang Lin, Peng Chen, Chen Xiang, Wu Wenming. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield and Filling Characteristics of Summer Maize in the Central Yangtze-Huaihe Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 117-122.
[11] Zhang Kaikai, Zhao Deming, Ma Juhua, Bai Pengjun, Ma Peng, Chen Hui, Xu Wenjie, Huang Caixia, Liu Zhongyu. Effects of Furrow Straw Mulching on Soil Hydrothermal Characteristics and Yield of Potato under Dry Cultivation [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 139-146.
[12] Lü Shuli, Ding Fang, Zheng Dongfang. Response of Photosynthetic Characteristics, Yield and Quality of Sesame Capsule to Different Chemical Ripening Agents [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 155-161.
[13] Zhou Miaomiao, He Ruitong, Li Lan, Wang Hongxin, Peng Haoyuan, Zhang Yubo, Zhang Dan, Wang Jinbin, Luo Xinning, Qi Bingqin. Effects of Growth Regulators “EDAH” on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Formation of Maize under High Planting Density [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 162-169.
[14] Ma Peng, Wei Ximing, Ding Fangju, Zhang Kaikai, Wang Qiaoli, Xing Guyue, Chang Lei, Huang Caixia. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Regulation on Water Dynamics and Yield of Potato under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 170-178.
[15] Zhu Zijian, Chen Nana, Wu Yueying, Rang Zhongwen, Dai Linjian, Tian Minghui, Tian Feng, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate, Planting Density and Retained Leaf Number on Yield and Quality of Xiangyan 7 in Tobacco Region of Western Hunan [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 179-186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .