检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2023, 第6期: 1–10 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.06.001

• 专题综述 •    下一篇

玉米叶片气孔表型鉴定及研究进展

金玉1,2,3,4(), 郭新宇1,2,3, 张颖1,2,3, 李大壮1,2,3,4, 王璟璐1,2,3()   

  1. 1数字植物北京市重点实验室，100097，北京
    2北京市农林科学院信息技术研究中心，100097，北京
    3国家农业信息化工程技术研究中心，100097，北京
    4华中农业大学，430070，湖北武汉
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-08 修回日期:2023-10-12 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2023-12-15
  • 通讯作者: 王璟璐，主要从事作物表型组学及生物信息学研究，E-mail：wangjl@nercita.org.cn
  • 作者简介:金玉，研究方向为作物表型组学，E-mail：1456368616@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市农林科学院作物表型协同创新中心项目(KJCX201917);国家自然科学基金(31801254)

Stomatal Phenotypic Identification and Research Progress in Maize Leaves

Jin Yu1,2,3,4(), Guo Xinyu1,2,3, Zhang Ying1,2,3, Li Dazhuang1,2,3,4, Wang Jinglu1,2,3()   

  1. 1Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Plant, Beijing 100097, China
    2Research Center of Information Technology,Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
    3National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
    4Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2022-07-08 Revised:2023-10-12 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-15

RichHTML

27

PDF (PC)

325

摘要：

叶片气孔是植物与外界联系的直接通道。气孔在玉米植株生长过程中碳、水循环调控中起着重要作用，影响着植株蒸腾和光合作用的强度。本文概述了玉米叶片气孔形态结构与主要功能特点，梳理了气孔表型破坏性与非破坏性获取方法，沿时间脉络整理了气孔表型人工―半自动化―自动化解析方法，归纳了玉米叶片气孔表型特征分析研究进展及影响气孔形态建成的相关基因研究现状，展望了叶片气孔研究可能面临的挑战与机遇，为基于气孔表型的玉米品种筛选鉴定及遗传改良提供参考。

关键词: 玉米, 叶片, 气孔, 表型, 研究进展

Abstract:

The leaf stomatas are the direct channel between plants and the outer enviroment, which play an important role in regulating the carbon and water cycles during the growth of maize plants and influence the intensity of transpiration and photosynthesis. This paper first outlined the morphological structure and main functional characteristics of maize leaf stomata. After classifying destructive and non-destructive stomatal phenotype acquisition techniques, manual, semi-automated, and automated stomatal phenotype analysis techniques were applied. The research progress of stomatal phenotype characterization in maize leaves and the status of genes affecting stomatal morphogenesis were summarized. This paper also presented the possible challenges and opportunities for stomatal research. It provides a reference for the selection, identification and genetic improvement of maize varieties based on stomatal phenotypes.

Key words: Maize, Leaves, Stomata, Phenotype, Research progress

图1

叶片气孔形态示意图 (a) 玉米叶片气孔；(b) 双子叶植物和大多数单子叶植物的气孔

表1

叶片气孔表型提取

发展阶段
Stage of
development		 参考文献
Reference		 表型解析方法
Phenotypic parsing
method		 作物
Crop		 主要表型特征
Main phenotypic characteristics		 特点
Characteristic
人工
Manpower
 [37,45-46]

 显微镜测微尺、计数室、Veeder-Root、样带法等
 菊花（Chrysanthemum morifolium）、大麦（Hordeum vulgare）、小叶杨（Populus simonii） 气孔数目、气孔密度、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔开度
 5min/视野，较为准确，耗时长
半自动化
Semi-
automatization		 [12]

 SMileView

 樟树（Cinnamomum camphora）

 气孔总数、张开气孔数、闭合气孔数，开放气孔比率、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔开度 （1）适应不同图像需求；
（2）有效降低计算复杂度；（3）2min/张，极大降低了人力投入

[53]
 Mv-1图像分析板和JAVA图像分析软件 蚕豆（Vicia faba）
 气孔孔径
[54]


 Motic Images Advance


 东栎（Quercus liaotungensis）、虎榛子（Ostryopsis davidiana）、酸枣（Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa）和狼牙刺（Sophora viciifolia） 气孔密度、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔面积

[55,59]

 Auto Desk Inventor Professional 2011、Auto CAD 2010和Arc GIS10.0 冬小麦（Triticum aestivum）

 气孔密度、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔面积、气孔周长、气孔形状指数和气孔分布格局
[56]

 Image J

 费菜（Phedimus aizoon）、刺槐（Robinia pseudoacacia）等40种
 气孔密度、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔面积、气孔开度、气孔张开比
[57]
 Scope Image 9.0
 桉树（Eucalyptus robusta）
 气孔长度、气孔宽度、孔径长度、气孔面积
[58]

 UTHSCSA ImageTool

 茄子（Solanum pennelli）

 气孔密度、气孔（长度、宽度、面积）、孔隙（长度、宽度、面积）、气孔深度
自动化
Automation
 [60] 级联分类器 桉树（Eucalyptus robusta） 气孔密度、气孔分布 （1）自动化识别，平均精度可达98%以上；（2）图像数据批量、高通量处理；（3）5~10s/张，高生产率和高可重复性，节省人力投入

[61] 最大稳定外部区域法 葡萄（Vitis vinifera） 气孔孔径
[62]

 DeepStomata: 基于定向梯度的气孔检测直方图和基于卷积神经网络 白花鸭跖草（Commelina benghalensis）
 气孔孔径

[63] 基于SSD算法的目标检测模型 大豆（Glycine max） 气孔密度
[64]
 深度卷积神经网络和修复算法的混合方法 水稻（Oryza sativa）
 气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔面积、气孔宽长比
[65]
 Gabor滤波算法下的卷积神经网络和灰度共生矩阵 姜黄（Curcuma longa）和姜
（Curcuma zanthorrhiza）		 气孔识别
[66-67]

 FPN目标检测和卷积神经网络Mask R-CNN
 裸子、蕨类、禾本科植物等12个数据集
 气孔识别、6个气孔孔隙（数目、长轴、短轴、面积、离心率、开度）性状
[39] SBOS：目标跟踪和语义分割 小麦（Triticum aestivum） 气孔开口面积
[68]
 转换学习和支持向量机
 藜麦（Chenopodium quinoa）
 气孔数量、气孔孔径、气孔面积、气孔状态（张开、闭合）
[40]
 基于FPN算法的目标检测模型和改进后的CV模型 玉米（Zea mays）
 4个气孔数量和6个气孔孔隙表型指标
[69] YOLO深度学习模型 玉米（Zea mays） 气孔密度
[70]

 Leaf Net: 分层策略下的深度卷积网络、区域合并方法、迁移学习 拟南芥（Arabidopsis thaliana）

 气孔复合体数量、尺寸、形状及表皮细胞数量、尺寸、形状等28项表型指标

图2

叶片气孔器表型性状解析发展历程

表2

叶片气孔主要表型指标

项目Item 指标Index 结构Structure 表型指标Phenotypic indicator 参考文献Reference
直接指标
Direct indicator

 气孔复合体


 由保卫细胞、副卫细胞、孔隙构成

 气孔总数、张开气孔数、闭合气孔数、气孔密度、气孔指数、张开气孔占比、气孔长度、气孔宽度、气孔周长、气孔面积、气孔偏心率、气孔长宽比、气孔圆度、气孔形状指数、气孔导度、空间分布模式、气孔深度 [40-41,55,72]


孔隙
 两个保卫细胞之间的小孔
 孔隙长度、孔隙宽度、孔隙面积、孔隙周长、孔隙开度、孔隙偏心率、孔隙面积指数 [40,73]
间接指标
Indirect indicator		 表皮细胞
 植物最外层细胞，与气孔相邻，排列紧密 表皮细胞个数、表皮细胞密度、表皮细胞面积、表皮细胞总面积 [70,73]

表3

调控玉米叶片气孔表型的功能基因

基因名称Gene name 基因位点Gene loci 基因功能Gene function 气孔表型Stomatal phenotype 参考文献Reference
ZmMUTE GRMZM2G417164 保卫细胞形成与副卫母细胞极化 气孔数目、气孔形状 [90-91]
ZmPAN1 Zm00001d031437 副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [84]
ZmROP2 Zm00001d053899 副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [85]
ZmROP9 Zm00001d015036 副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [85]
ZmPAN2 Zm00001d007862 副卫母细胞极化和副卫细胞形成 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [86-87]
ZmBRK1 GRMZM5G842058 副卫母细胞极化和表皮细胞形成 气孔形状 [88]
ZmBRK3 GRMZM5G88636 副卫母细胞极化和表皮细胞形成 气孔形状 [88]
ZmNOD GRMZM2G027821 保卫细胞分化 气孔数目、气孔形状 [82]
ZmSHR1 GRMZM2G132794 保卫细胞形成 气孔数目 [83]
ZmMLKS2 Zm00001d052955 副卫细胞分化 气孔尺寸、气孔数目、气孔形状 [89]
ZmSPL10 Zm00001d015451 保卫细胞形成与副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [92]
ZmSPL14 Zm00001d036692 保卫细胞形成与副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状、气孔尺寸 [92]
ZmSPL26 Zm00001d053756 保卫细胞形成与副卫母细胞极化 气孔形状 [92]
ZmB73 Zm00001d042263 保卫细胞形成与副卫母细胞极化 气孔数目 [93]
[1] USDA (2020) Foreign Agricultural Service. (2022-07-01)[2023-11- 09]. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/grain-world-markets-and-trade.
[2] Liu H, Wang X, Warburton M L, et al. Genomic, transcriptomic, and phenomic variation reveals the complex adaptation of modern maize breeding. Molecular Plant, 2015, 8:871-884.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.01.016 pmid: 25620769
[3] 李少昆, 赵久然, 董树亭, 等. 中国玉米栽培研究进展与展望. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):1941-1959.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.11.001
[4] Qu X, Peterson K M, Torii K U. Stomatal development in time: the past and the future. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 2017, 45:1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2017.02.001
[5] Hepworth C, Caine R S, Harrison E L, et al. Stomatal development: focusing on the grasses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2018, 41:1-7.
doi: S1369-5266(17)30099-7 pmid: 28826033
[6] Richardson F, Brodribb T J, Jordan G J. Amphistomatic leaf surfaces independently regulate gas exchangein response to variations in evaporative demand. Tree Physiology, 2017, 37:869- 878.
doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx073 pmid: 28898992
[7] Nunes T D G, Zhang D, Raissig M T. Form, development and function of grass stomata. The Plant Journal, 2020, 101:780-799.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14552 pmid: 31571301
[8] Rudall P J, Hilton J, Bateman R M. Several developmental and morphogenetic factors govern the evolution of stomatal patterning in land plants. The New Phytologist, 2013, 200:598-614.
doi: 10.1111/nph.2013.200.issue-3
[9] Bertolino L T, Caine R S, Gray J E. Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:225.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00225 pmid: 30894867
[10] Zhao C J, Zhang Y, Du J J, et al. Crop phenomics: current status and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:714.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00714 pmid: 31214228
[11] 任昱, 魏春光, 郭小宇. 6种荒漠植物叶片气孔性状比较分析. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(2):21-26.
[12] Cao J B, Song Y T, Wu H, et al. Ultrastructural studies on the natural leaf senescence of cinnamomum camphora. Scanning, 2013, 35(5):336-343.
doi: 10.1002/sca.21065 pmid: 23292543
[13] Van Cotthem W. The classification of morphological and ontogenetic types of stomata. Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 1973, 3(22):25.
[14] Franks P J, Farquhar G D. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiology, 2007, 143(1):78-87.
doi: 10.1104/pp.106.089367 pmid: 17114276
[15] Runions A, Tsiantis M, Prusinkiewicz P. A common developmental program can produce diverse leaf shapes. New Phytologist, 2017, 216(2):401-418.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14449 pmid: 28248421
[16] Conklin P A, Strable J, Li S, et al. On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(2):706-724.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15371 pmid: 30106472
[17] 许周伟, 闻丹妮, 欧阳由男, 等. 气孔调节剂对水稻秧苗素质的影响. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(1):24-27.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2018.01.006
[18] 于显枫, 张绪成, 方彦杰, 等. 高大气CO2浓度下遮阴对小麦叶片气孔特性及光合特性的影响. 甘肃农业科技, 2017, 3(6):31-36.
[19] Buckley T N. How do stomata respond to water status?. New Phytologist, 2019, 224(1):21-36.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15899 pmid: 31069803
[20] Chen Z H, Chen G, Dai F, et al. Molecular evolution of grass stomata. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22(2):124-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.005
[21] Liu Y B, Han L Z, Qin L J. Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene TPS1 improves drought tolerance in Zea mays L. by increasing the expression of SDD1 and reducing stomatal density. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 2015, 120(2):779-789.
doi: 10.1007/s11240-014-0647-5
[22] Zhao W S, Sun Y L, Kjelgren R. Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(1):1-9.
doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1746-y
[23] Xiang Y, Sun X J, Bian X L. The transcription factor ZmNAC49 reduces stomatal density and improves drought tolerance in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2021, 72(4):1399-1410.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa507 pmid: 33130877
[24] Mallmann J, Heckmann D, Bräutigam A, et al. The role of photorespiration during the evolution of C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria. eLife, 2014, 3(3):e02478.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.02478
[25] Liu T D, Zhang X W, Xu Y. Influence of red light on the expression of genes on stomatal formation in maize seedlings. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 2020, 100(3):296-303.
doi: 10.1139/cjps-2019-0140
[26] Han X S, Qin Y, Yu F. A Megabase-scale deletion is associated with phenotypic variation of multiple traits in maize. Genetics, 2019, 211(1):305-316.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301567 pmid: 30389804
[27] Jacob C, Melotto M. Human pathogen colonization of lettuce dependent upon plant genotype and defense response activation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:1769.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01769 pmid: 32082340
[28] Carter R, Woolfenden H, Baillie A. Stomatal opening involves polar, not radial, stiffening of guard cells. Current Biology, 2017, 27(19):2974-2983.
doi: S0960-9822(17)31015-1 pmid: 28943087
[29] 吴冰洁. 叶片生长过程中气孔发育状态对光合作用气孔限制和叶温调节的影响. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
[30] Aliche E B, Prusova-Bourke A, Ruiz-Sanchez M, et al. Morphological and physiological responses of the potato stem transport tissues to dehydration stress. Planta, 2020, 251:45.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03336-7 pmid: 31915930
[31] Nikinmaa E, Hölttä T, Hari P, et al. Assimilate transport in phloem sets conditions for leaf gas exchange. Plant Cell Environment, 2012, 36(3):655-669.
doi: 10.1111/pce.2013.36.issue-3
[32] Tegeder M, Daubresse M C. Source and sink mechanisms of nitrogen transport and use, mechthild tegeder. New Phytologist, 2018, 217(1):35-53.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14876 pmid: 29120059
[33] Gitz D C, Baker J T. Methods for creating stomatal impressions directly onto archivable slides. Agronomy Journal, 2009, 101(1):232-236.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0143N
[34] Eckerson S H. The number and size of the stomata. Botanical Gazette, 1908, 46(3):221-224.
doi: 10.1086/329698
[35] Weyers J D B, Travis A J. Selection and preparation of leaf epidermis for experiments on stomatal physiology. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1981, 32(4):837-850.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/32.4.837
[36] 孙慧群, 周升恩, 吴怀胜, 等. 甲醛胁迫下蚕豆保卫细胞中过氧化氢的积累及其对气孔导度和开度的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(7):1239-1246.
[37] Long F L, Clements F E. The method of collodion films for stomata. American Journal of Botany, 1934, 21(1):7-17.
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1934.21.issue-1
[38] Song W, Li J, Li K, et al. An automatic method for stomatal pore detection and measurement in microscope images of plant leaf based on a convolutional neural network model. Forests, 2020, 11(9):954.
doi: 10.3390/f11090954
[39] Sun Z Z, Song Y L, Li Q, et al. An integrated method for tracking and monitoring stomata dynamics from microscope videos. Plant Phenomics, 2021(2021):9835961.
[40] Liang X Y, Xu X C, Wang Z W, et al. StomataScorer:a portable and high-throughput leaf stomata trait scorer combined with deep learning and an improved CV model. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2022, 20(3):577-591.
doi: 10.1111/pbi.v20.3
[41] Haus M J, Kelsch R D, Jacobs T W. Application of optical topometry to analysis of the plant epidermis. Plant Physiology, 2015, 169(2):946-959.
doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00613 pmid: 26290539
[42] Haus M J, Li M, Chitwood D H, et al. Long-distance and trans- generational stomata patterning by CO2 across Arabidopsis organs. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:1714.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01714
[43] He Y, Zhou K Y, Wu Z M, et al. Highly efficient nanoscale analysis of plant stomata and cell surface using polyaddition silicone rubber. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:1569.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01569 pmid: 31921235
[44] 王爱民, 沈兰荪. 图像分割研究综述. 测控技术, 2000(5):1-6,16.
[45] 刘奉觉. 介绍一种测定植物气孔状况的方法. 林业科技通讯, 1982(2):6.
[46] Kubinova L. Recent stereological methods for measuring leaf anatomical characteristics-estimation of the number and size of stomata and mesophyll-cells. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1994, 45(1):119-127.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/45.1.119
[47] 罗希平, 田捷, 诸葛婴, 等. 图像分割方法综述. 模式识别与人工智能, 1999, 12(3):300-312.
[48] Zahn C T. Graph-theoretical methods for detecting and describing gestalt clusters. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1971, 20(1):68-86.
[49] Urquhart R. Graph theoretical clustering based on limited neighborhood sets. Pattern Recognition, 1982, 15(3):173-187.
doi: 10.1016/0031-3203(82)90069-3
[50] Wu Z, Leahy R. An optimal graph theoretic approach to data clustering:theory and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1993, 15(11):1101-1113.
doi: 10.1109/34.244673
[51] 王梅, 李玉鑑, 全笑梅. 图像分割的图论方法综述. 计算机应用与软件, 2014, 31(9):1-12,44.
[52] Cao J B, Song Y T, Wu H, et al. Ultrastructural studies on the natural leaf senescence of cinnamomum camphora. Scanning, 2013, 35(5):336-343.
doi: 10.1002/sca.21065 pmid: 23292543
[53] Lawrence D T, Eran R. Relative humidity is a key factor in the acclimation of the stomatal response to CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54:2141-2147.
pmid: 12867546
[54] 郑淑霞, 上官周平. 近一世纪黄土高原区植物气孔密度变化规律. 生态学报, 2004, 24(11):2457-2464.
[55] 刘娜, 郭丽丽, 路明, 等. 秸秆还田下灌水及施肥对冬小麦气孔特征的影响. 节水灌溉, 2019(8):14-23.
[56] 杨克彤, 常海龙, 陈国鹏, 等. 兰州市主要绿化植物气孔性状特征. 植物生态学报, 2021, 45(2):187-196.
[57] Sumathi M, Bachpai V K W, Deeparaj B, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for stomatal traits in interspecific hybrids of Eucalyptus. Journal of Genetics, 2018, 97(1):323-329.
pmid: 29666352
[58] Fanourakis D, Giday H, Milla R, et al. Pore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance between leaf sides. Annals of Botany, 2015, 115(4):555-565.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu247 pmid: 25538116
[59] 郑云普, 徐明, 王建书, 等. 玉米叶片气孔特征及气体交换过程对气候变暖的响应. 作物学报, 2015, 41(4):601-612.
[60] Vialet-Chabrand S, Brendel O. Automatic measurement of stomatal density from microphotographs. Trees, 2014, 28:1859- 1865.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-014-1063-5
[61] Liu S, Tang J, Petrie P, et al. A fast method to measure stomatal aperture by MSER on smart mobile phone. Applied Industrial Optics:Spectroscopy,Imaging and Metrology, 2016.
[62] Toda Y, Toh S, Bourdais G, et al. DeepStomata: facial recognition technology for automated stomata aperture measurement. bioRxiv, 2018, 9:365098.
[63] Sakoda K, Watanabe T, Sukemura S, et al. Genetic diversity in stomatal density among soybeans elucidated using high- throughput technique based on an algorithm for object detection. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):215-220.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36818-x
[64] Bhugra S, Mishra D, Anupama A, et al. Automatic quantification of stomata for high-throughput plant phenotyping. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2018:3904- 3910.
[65] Andayani U, Sumantri I B, Pahala A, et al. The implementation of deep learning using convolutional neural network to classify based on stomata microscopic image of curcuma herbal plants. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 851:012035.
[66] Jayakody H, Petrie P, Boer H D, et al. A generalised approach for high-throughput instance segmentation of stomata in microscope images. Plant Methods, 2020, 17(1):27.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00727-4
[67] 李君禹. 基于Mask R-CNN的植物叶片气孔分割方法研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021.
[68] Razzaq A, Shahid S, Akram M, et al. Stomatal state identification and classification in quinoa microscopic imprints through deep learning. Complexity, 2021, 22:1-9.
[69] Zhang F, Ren F T, Li J P, et al. Automatic stomata recognition and measurement based on improved YOLO deep learning model and entropy rate superpixel algorithm. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 68:101521.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101521
[70] Li S P, Li L, Fan W, et al. LeafNet:a tool for segmenting and quantifying stomata and pavement cells. The Plant Cell, 2022, 34(4):1171-1188.
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac021
[71] Yang W, Feng H, Zhang X, et al. Crop phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping:past decades,current challenges,and future perspectives. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13(2):187-214.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.008
[72] Lawson T, Blatt M R. Stomatal size, speed, and responsiveness impact on photosynthesis and water use efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164(4):1556-1570.
doi: 10.1104/pp.114.237107 pmid: 24578506
[73] Xie J, Fernandes S B, Mayfield-Jones D, et al. Optical topometry and machine learning to rapidly phenotype stomatal patterning traits for maize QTL mapping. Plant Physiology, 2021, 187(3):1462-1480.
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab299 pmid: 34618057
[74] 王秀玲, 赵明, 王启现, 等. 玉米不同基因型气孔特征和叶温差的研究. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(1):71-74.
[75] 王秀玲, 赵明, 王启现, 等. 玉米杂交种及亲本自交系气孔特征. 作物学报, 2004, 30(3):293-296.
[76] 冯宏昭, 吉春容, 李世清, 等. 不同株型夏玉米冠层叶表观自由空间变化规律研究. 西北农业学报, 2008(3):129-134.
[77] 吉春容, 李世清, 冯宏昭, 等. 不同株型夏玉米冠层叶片气孔特性的差异. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(5):57-63.
[78] 张浩, 郑云普, 叶嘉, 等. 外源钙离子对盐胁迫玉米气孔特征、光合作用和生物量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):923-930.
[79] 张晓媛. 大气CO2浓度升高对玉米叶片特征及产量的影响. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[80] 闫润杰, 李菲, 张茜茜, 等. 秸秆还田下不同水肥对玉米气孔形态特征及其分布格局的影响. 节水灌溉, 2021(10):71-77.
[81] Xu Y. Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2016, 129(4):653-673.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2691-5 pmid: 26932121
[82] Rosa M, Abraham-Juárez M J, Lewis M J, et al. The maize mid- complementing activity homolog cell number regulator13/narrow odd dwarf coordinates organ growth and tissue patterning. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(3),474-490.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00878
[83] Schuler M L, Sedelnikova O V, Walker B J, et al. SHORTROOT- mediated increase in stomatal density has no impact on photosynthetic efficiency. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176(1):757- 772.
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01005 pmid: 29127261
[84] Cartwright H N, Humphries J A, Smith L G. PAN1: a receptor- like protein that promotes polarization of an asymmetric cell division in maize. Science, 2009, 323(5914),649-651.
doi: 10.1126/science.1161686 pmid: 19179535
[85] Humphries J A, Vejlupkova Z, Luo A, et al. ROP GTPases act with the receptor-like protein PAN1 to polarize asymmetric cell division in maize. The Plant Cell, 2011, 23(6):2273-2284.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.085597 pmid: 21653193
[86] Zhang X, Facette M, Humphries J A, et al. Identification of PAN2 by quantitative proteomics as a leucine-rich repeat- receptor-like kinase acting upstream of PAN1 to polarize cell division in maize. The Plant Cell, 2012, 24(11):4577-4589.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.104125
[87] Sutimantanapi D, Pater D, Smith L G. Divergent roles for maize PAN1 and PAN2 receptor-like proteins in cytokinesis and cell morphogenesis. Plant Physiology, 2014, 164(4):1905-1917.
doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232660 pmid: 24578508
[88] Facette M R, Park Y, Sutimantanapi D, et al. The SCAR/WAVE complex polarizes PAN receptors and promotes division asymmetry in maize. Nature Plants, 2015, 1:14024.
doi: 10.1038/nplants.2014.24 pmid: 27246760
[89] Gumber H K, McKenna J F, Tolmie A F, et al. MLKS2 is an ARM domain and F-actin-associated KASH protein that functions in stomatal complex development and meiotic chromosome segregation. Nucleus, 2019, 10(1):144-166.
doi: 10.1080/19491034.2019.1629795 pmid: 31221013
[90] Liu T, Ohashi-Ito K, Bergmann D C. Orthologs of Arabidopsis thaliana stomatal bHLH genes and regulation of stomatal development in grasses. Development, 2009, 136(13):2265-2276.
doi: 10.1242/dev.032938
[91] Wang H, Guo S, Qiao X, et al. BZU2/ZmMUTE controls symmetrical division of guard mother cell and specifies neighbor cell fate in maize. PLoS Genetics, 2019, 15(8):e1008377.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008377
[92] Kong D, Pan X, Jing Y F, et al. ZmSPL10/14/ 26 are required for epidermal hair cell fate specification on maize leaf. New Phytologist, 2021, 230(4):1533-1549.
doi: 10.1111/nph.v230.4
[93] 郭思义, 乔鑫, 宋纯鹏, 等. Zm00001d042263基因在调控玉米气孔发育中的应用:中国,202111353930.1. 2021-11-11.
[94] Zhao C J, Zhang Y, Du J J, et al. Crop phenomics: Current status and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:714-729.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00714 pmid: 31214228
[95] Harrison E L, Arce Cubas L, Gray J E, et al. The influence of stomatal morphology and distribution on photosynthetic gas exchange. The Plant Journal, 2020, 101(4):768-779.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.14560 pmid: 31583771
[96] Doheny-Adams T, Hunt L, Franks P J, et al. Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2012, 367(1588):547-555.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0272 pmid: 22232766
[97] Hughes J, Hepworth C, Dutton C, et al. Reducing stomatal density in barley improves drought tolerance without impacting on yield. Plant Physiology, 2017, 174(2):776-787.
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01844 pmid: 28461401
[98] Caine R S, Yin X, Sloan J, et al. Rice with reduced stomatal density conserves water and has improved drought tolerance under future climate conditions. New Phytologist, 2019, 221(1):371-384.
doi: 10.1111/nph.15344 pmid: 30043395
[99] Dunn J, Hunt L, Afsharinafar M, et al. Reduced stomatal density in bread wheat leads to increased water-use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2019, 70(18):4737-4747.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz248 pmid: 31172183
[100] Tanaka Y, Sugano S S, Shimada T, et al. Enhancement of leaf photosynthetic capacity through increased stomatal density in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist, 2013, 198(3):757-764.
doi: 10.1111/nph.12186 pmid: 23432385
[101] Franks P J, Doheny-Adams T W, Britton-Harper Z J, et al. Increasing water-use efficiency directly through genetic manipulation of stomatal density. New Phytologist, 2015, 207 (1):188-195.
doi: 10.1111/nph.13347 pmid: 25754246
[1] 吴琦, 明博, 高尚, 杨宏业, 张川, 初振东, 李少昆. 东北冷凉区玉米籽粒脱水模型构建策略研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 108–113
[2] 梁忠宇, 薛军, 张国强, 明博, 沈东萍, 方梁, 周林立, 张玉芹, 杨恒山, 王克如, 李少昆. 水肥一体化施磷量对玉米抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (6): 190–194
[3] 曹庆军, 李刚, 杨浩, 娄玉勇, 杨粉团, 孔凡丽, 李辛琲, 赵新凯, 姜晓莉. 不同耕作方式对春玉米种床质量的影响及其与幼苗群体建成和产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 249–254
[4] 于乐, 李林, 黄红娟, 黄兆峰, 朱文达, 魏守辉. 湖北省玉米田杂草种类组成及群落特征[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 272–279
[5] 杨宗莹, 肖贵, 张红伟. 利用玉米F1群体进行玉米全株鲜重的全基因组预测分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 43–48
[6] 曲海涛, 李忠南, 王越人, 马艺文, 相洋, 邬生辉, 谭倬, 王纯, 魏强, 罗瑶, 李光发. 玉米百粒重遗传育种效应研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 66–70
[7] 杨密, 王美娟, 许海涛. 不同生态区玉米自交系苞叶动态发育差异性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (5): 81–90
[8] 袁刘正, 王会强, 王秋岭, 朱世蝶, 赵月强, 袁曼曼, 王会涛, 张运栋, 柳家友, 袁永强. 遮阴条件下玉米自交系配合力与遗传效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 104–109
[9] 郑飞, 陈静, 崔亚坤, 孔令杰, 孟庆长, 李杰, 刘瑞响, 张美景, 赵文明, 陈艳萍. 淮北不同生态区丰产稳产宜机收玉米新品种筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 110–117
[10] 王丽萍, 白岚方, 王天昊, 王宵璇, 白云鹤, 王玉芬. 不同施氮水平对青贮玉米植株氮素积累和转运的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 165–173
[11] 李雨新, 卢敏, 赵久然, 王荣焕, 徐田军, 吕天放, 蔡万涛, 张勇, 薛洪贺, 刘月娥. 京津唐夏玉米区生产现状调研分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 174–181
[12] 刘松涛, 田再民, 刘子刚, 高志佳, 张静, 贺东刚, 黄智鸿, 兰鑫. 基于转录组测序揭示玉米抗倒伏相关基因和代谢通路[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 31–37
[13] 谢文锦, 李方明, 李宁, 杨海龙, 付俊, 张中伟, 高旭东, 丰光. 基于GGE双标图的北方地区鲜食糯玉米产量和品质性状及试点鉴别力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (4): 85–90
[14] 温胜慧, 杨俊伟, 王洋, 李公建, 翁建峰, 段灿星, 贾鑫, 王建军. 玉米抗真菌病害基因挖掘与分子育种利用研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (3): 1–11
[15] 常青, 李立军, 渠佳慧, 张艳丽, 韩冬雨, 赵鑫瑶. 土默川平原麦后复种饲用玉米‖油菜模式的增产优势及氮素利用效率[J]. 作物杂志, 2023, (3): 167–174
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!