Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 33-36.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.03.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Study on the Influence Factors of Callus and Adventitious Bud Induction in Pea

Zhang Lijuan,Lu Jianying,Wang Chang,Min Gengmei,Yang Xiaoming   

  1. Crop Institute,Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Gansu 730070,Lanzhou,China
  • Received:2016-01-18 Revised:2016-04-02 Online:2016-06-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

134

Abstract:

The pea variety Longwan No.1 was used as experimental material to study the factors in callus and adventitious bud induction process, such as seed treatment,explants selection, optimal medium, adventitious bud and rooted inducing.The results showed that the optimal disinfection treatments for seed was 75% alcohol solution for 30 seconds, and then 0.1% HgCl2 for 10min. Hypocotyl as the explants, the optimal culture medium of callus was 0.2mg/L 2,4-D and 1.0mg/L TDZ with an induction rate of 91.11%. Only the addition of TDZ could induce adventitious bud,but the rooting rate was only 8.89%. We also analyzed the factors affecting the growth of root,which provided the basis for subsequent research.

Key words: Pea, Callus, Adventitious shoot

Table 1

Effects of different disinfection treatment on seed germination"

处理
Treatments		 75%乙醇消毒时间(s)
Disinfection time of 75% alcohol solution		 0.1%升汞消毒时间(min)
Disinfection time of0.1% HgCl2		 出苗率(%)
Emergence rate		 污染情况
Condition of contamination
C1 30 0 14.44±1.11g +++
C2 30 5 54.45±2.22e ++
C3 30 10 92.22±2.94a -
C4 30 15 93.33±1.93a -
C5 30 20 84.44±1.11b -
C6 30 30 51.11±1.11e -
C7 60 0 27.78±2.94f +++
C8 60 5 70.00±1.92d +
C9 60 10 90.00±1.92ab -
C10 60 15 87.78±1.11ab -
C11 60 20 76.67±1.93c -
C12 60 30 48.89±1.11e -

Table 2

Effects of different explants on callus induction"

外植体Explants 接种外植体数No.of explants(个) 产生愈伤组织外植体数No.of Callus induction(个) 愈伤组织诱导率Callus induction rate(%)
下胚轴Hypocotyl 90×3 224 82.97±1.34aA
子叶Cotyledon 90×3 64 23.70±0.74bB
胚根Radicel 90×3 17 6.30±1.34cC

Table 3

Effect of different hormones on callus induction of hypocotyl"

组合代号
Code of combination		 2,4-D浓度(mg/L)
2,4-D concentration		 6-BA浓度(mg/L)
6-BA concentration		 TDZ浓度(mg/L)
TDZ concentration		 愈伤组织诱导率(%)
Callus induction rate
Y1 0.2 0 0 0.00±0.00e
Y2 1.0 0 0 0.00±0.00e
Y3 0.2 0.2 0 57.78±2.94d
Y4 0.2 0.5 0 74.44±2.94c
Y5 0.2 0 0.5 83.33±1.93b
Y6 0.2 0 1.0 91.11±1.11a

Table 4

Effect of TDZ on adventitious shoot differentiation"

TDZ浓度(mg/L)
TDZ concentration		 接种愈伤组织块数
No.of callus		 形成不定芽的愈伤组织块数
No.of callus with shoots		 不定芽分化率(%)
Shoot differentiation rate		 不定芽增殖数(个)
No.of shoots per explant
0.5 30×3 75 83.33±3.85a 10.00±1.15c
1.0 30×3 81 90.00±1.92a 17.67±1.20c
2.0 30×3 82 91.11±2.94a 25.00±2.52b
4.0 30×3 82 91.11±1.11a 26.33±0.88a

Table 5

Effect of different hormones on root induction of adventitious shoot"

激素浓度(mg/L)
Hormone concentration		 生根率 Rooting rate(%)
NAA IBA IAA
0.5 0 0 0
1.0 0 0 0
2.0 0 8.89 0
4.0 0 0 0
[1] 贺晨帮, 宗绪晓 . 豌豆种质资源形态标记遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011,12(1):42-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9393.2009.05.006
[2] Das A, Kumar S, Nandeesha P , et al. An efficient in vitro regeneration system of fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) via.shoot organogenesis. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2014,23(2):184-189.
doi: 10.1007/s13562-013-0200-3
[3] Malmberg R L . Regeneration of whole plants from callus culture of diverse genetic lines of Pisum sativum L. Planta. 1979,146(2):243-244.
doi: 10.1007/BF00388239 pmid: 24318066
[4] Popiers D, Flandre F ,Sangwan-Norreel B S.Intensification de la regeneration du pois (Pisum sativum L.),par le thidiazuron,via la formation de structures caulinaires organogenes. Canadian Journal Botany, 1997,75(3):492-500.
doi: 10.1139/b97-053
[5] Tzitzikas E N, Bergervoet M, Raemakers K , et al. Regeneration of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)by a cyclic organogenic system. Plant Cell Reports, 2004,23(7):453-461.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-004-0865-0 pmid: 15372196
[6] Murthy B N S, Murch S, Saxena P K . Thidiazuron:A potent regulator of in vitro plant morphogenesis. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 1998,34(4):267-275.
doi: 10.1007/BF02822732
[7] 苏承刚, 吴学科, 郑占伟 , 等. 食荚型豌豆组织培养和植株再生研究. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,32(4):30-32.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2007.04.007
[8] Zhihui S, Tzitzikas M, Raemakers K , et al. Effect of TDZ on plant regeneration from mature seeds in pea (Pisum sativum). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Plant, 2009,45(6):776-782.
doi: 10.1007/s11627-009-9212-z
[9] Petra B, Beate M, Hans-Jörg J . Thidiazuron-induced high frequency of shoot induction and plant regeneration in protoplast derived pea callus. Plant Cell Reports, 1995,15(1):26-29.
doi: 10.1007/BF01690247
[1] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102-105.
[2] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28-31.
[3] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8-12.
[4] Jiangchun Song,Shuanzhu Li,Jianyu Wang,Xiuge Zhang,Xuefeng Zhu,Jianli Qiao,Zhen Xiang. Advances in Breeding of High Oil Peanut in China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 25-31.
[5] Wei Zhang,Liangqun Wang,Yong Liu,Yanfang Hao,Wei Yang,Hongyan Bai,Bo Wu. Optimization of the Factors Related to the Efficiency of Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 56-61.
[6] Shuanzhu Li,Jiangchun Song,Jianyu Wang,Xiuge Zhang,Jianli Qiao,Ning Liu. Advances in Genetics and Breeding of High Oleic Acid Peanut [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 6-13.
[7] Dongxian Ning,Yukun Zhao,Cuiping Yan,Xiuli Yang,Junhong Xiao,Liping Yang. Analysis and Evaluation of Different Models for Yield Stability of Peanut Cultivars in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 39-43.
[8] Jinyun Wang,Xianguo Cheng,Jibin Guo,Li Wang. Soil Nutrients Changes and Evaluation for Peach Cultivation under Greenhouse Conditions [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 96-103.
[9] Xiaoli Gao,Wenhua Liao,Shanshan Wang,Wencai Yang,Xianglin Dai,Yuhong Zhang. Relationships among Major Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Characters of Pea based on Correlation/Grey Relational Analysis [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 56-60.
[10] Jingdong Wang,Hongwen Ma,Yunfang Fan,Xiaojun Chen. The Study on Antibacterial Effects of Different Antibiotics and Concentrations in a Genetic Transformation System of Yandao8 [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 61-66.
[11] Zhurong Zheng,Ruixiang Zhang,Tingting Yang,Lichao Wen,Xuefeng Shen. Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Roots in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 142-145.
[12] Ling Li,Tao Yang,Xuxiao Zong. Effects of Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer in Pea [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 145-150.
[13] Yiming Liu,Zhao Ling,Yufen Han,Guimei Yang,Jingtao Wen. Effects of Selenium(Se) Fertilizer Concentration on Se Content of Red Peanut [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 105-106.
[14] Xiaoli Gao. Effects of Phosphorus on Pea Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 125-128.
[15] Zhongyong Cen,Jiang Su,Xichao Deng,Yanjun Xie. Study on Total Phenolic Content and Correlation between PPO Activity and Browning of Corydalis saxicola Bunting Callus [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 149-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .