Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 51-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.01.010

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on the Combining Ability of Quality Traits in Forage Sorghum

Duan Bing,Liu Qingshan,Liang Du,Yan Fengxia,Guo Qi   

  1. Sorghum Institute,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Jinzhong 030600,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2015-12-21 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2018-08-25
  • Contact: Qingshan Liu

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

148

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the characteristics of sorghum parents scientifically and accurately, further to improve breeding efficiency of sorghum quality through making use of them, 6 sterile lines and 6 restorer lines were chosen, 36 hybrid combinations were matched by incomplete diallel crosses method in this study. The quality characteristics about protein, fat, total starch, tannic were analyzed by combining ability. The results showed that, sterile line Dongbei 1-26A and restorer line HD31 presented higher general combining ability. Their hybrids showed excellently in protein, fat, total starch and tannic, and the content were 11.70%, 3.48%, 73.40%, 0.75%, respectively. In addition, the narrow-sense heritability of protein, fat and total starch were higher than 50%, so the content of these traits can be improved by selected the elite parental lines. Nevertheless the specific combining ability of tannic was higher, so it should be focused on specific combining ability.

Key words: Forage sorghum, Quality traits, Combining ability

Table 1

Hybrid combination of grain protein,fat,total starch,tannin content %"

组合 Combination 蛋白质
Protein		 脂肪
Fat		 总淀粉
Total starch		 单宁
Tannin
东北1-26A×黑恢1
Dongbei 1-26A×Heihui 1		 11.033 3.853 73.533 1.463
东北1-26A×HD31
Dongbei 1-26A×HD31		 11.700 3.477 73.400 0.750
东北1-26A×HM65红
Dongbei 1-26A×HM65hong		 11.267 3.280 73.100 1.043
东北1-26A×1383-2
Dongbei 1-26A×1383-2		 12.133 4.267 71.967 1.087
东北1-26A×晋五
Dongbei 1-26A×Jinwu		 11.767 4.247 72.367 1.153
东北1-26A×三尺三
Dongbei 1-26A×Sanchisan		 12.000 4.110 72.300 1.410
T239·2087A×黑恢1
T239·2087A×Heihui 1		 11.400 3.803 73.533 0.433
T239·2087A×HD31 11.600 4.147 72.467 1.170
T239·2087A×HM65红
T239·2087A×HM65hong		 11.233 4.000 73.433 0.947
T239·2087A×1383-2 12.433 4.590 71.133 1.357
T239·2087A×晋五
T239·2087A×Jinwu		 11.800 4.450 72.167 1.170
T239·2087A×三尺三
T239·2087A×Sanchisan		 11.133 4.020 73.533 1.177
XJ2A×黑恢1
XJ2A×Heihui 1		 11.267 3.677 73.233 1.167
XJ2A×HD31 12.033 3.950 71.933 1.180
XJ2A×HM65红
XJ2A×HM65 hong		 11.500 4.060 72.433 1.347
XJ2A×1383-2 11.767 4.610 71.900 1.403
XJ2A×晋五
XJ2A×Jinwu		 12.067 4.823 71.567 1.453
XJ2A×三尺三
XJ2A×Sanchisan		 11.667 4.383 72.033 1.213
组合 Combination 蛋白质
Protein		 脂肪
Fat		 总淀粉
Total starch		 单宁
Tannin
XWA×黑恢1
XWA×Heihui 1		 10.800 3.740 73.267 1.053
XWA×HD31 11.767 3.947 71.800 1.163
XWA×HM65红
XWA×HM65 hong		 11.100 3.953 73.367 1.107
XWA×1383-2 11.567 4.417 72.133 1.200
XWA×晋五
XWA×Jinwu		 11.833 4.573 71.267 1.277
XWA×三尺三
XWA×Sanchisan		 11.633 4.153 72.133 1.180
72A×黑恢1
72A×Heihui1		 10.967 3.890 73.700 1.297
72A×HD31 11.667 3.993 72.567 1.287
72A×HM65红
72A×HM65 hong		 11.200 3.807 73.467 1.137
72A×1383-2 11.400 3.427 71.467 1.113
72A×晋五
72A×Jinwu		 11.533 4.020 72.733 1.023
72A×三尺三
72A×Sanchisan		 11.167 3.870 73.533 1.170
01A×黑恢1
01A×Heihui 1		 10.733 3.513 74.833 0.997
01A×HD31 11.567 3.917 73.800 1.467
01A×HM65红
01A×HM65 hong		 11.133 3.520 72.500 1.080
01A×1383-2 11.667 4.227 73.000 1.473
01A×晋五
01A×Jinwu		 11.233 4.127 73.500 1.320
01A×三尺三
01A×Sanchisan		 11.467 4.120 72.967 1.243

Table 2

Variance analysis of combining ability of hybrid combination"

变异来源 Source ofvariation 区组Block 组合（F1）Combination 不育系（P1）Male sterile line 恢复系（P2）Restorer line P1×P2
自由度 Freedom 2 35 5 5 25
蛋白质含量 Protein centent 0.264 11.300** 3.394* 10.737** 4.135**
脂肪含量 Fat centent 0.369 42.957** 3.301* 7.136** 19.478**
总淀粉含量 Total starch centent 0.770 15.535** 3.847* 7.245** 6.758**
单宁含量 Tannin centent 0.316 23.572** 1.160 0.912 23.333**

Table 3

Analysis of general combining ability of parents with different quality traits"

亲本Parent 蛋白质含量
Protein centent		 脂肪含量
Fat centent		 总淀粉含量
Total starch centent		 单宁含量
Tannin centent
效应值 Effect value 东北1-26A Dongbei 1-26A 1.247 -3.836 0.074 -2.517
T239·2087A 0.813 3.518 -0.018 -11.738
XJ2A 1.827 5.560 -0.744 9.574
XWA -0.491 2.580 -0.545 -1.482
72A -1.601 -4.774 0.257 -0.823
01A -1.794 -3.049 0.975 6.987
黑恢1 Heihui 1 -4.112 -6.967 1.319 -9.527
HD31 1.875 -3.022 -0.087 -0.964
HM65红 HM65 hong -2.326 -6.374 0.448 -5.999
1383-2 2.792 5.698 -1.087 7.739
晋五 Jinwu 1.730 8.609 -0.629 4.399
三尺三 Sanchisan 0.040 2.056 0.036 4.352
平均值 Average value 东北1-26A Dongbei 1-26A 11.650 3.872 72.778 1.151
T239·2087A 11.600 4.168 72.711 1.042
XJ2A 11.717 4.251 72.183 1.294
XWA 11.450 4.131 72.328 1.163
72A 11.322 3.834 72.911 1.171
01A 11.300 3.904 73.433 1.263
黑恢1 Heihui 1 11.033 3.746 73.683 1.068
HD31 11.722 3.905 72.661 1.169
HM65红 HM65 hong 11.239 3.770 73.050 1.110
1383-2 11.828 4.256 71.933 1.272
晋五 Jinwu 11.706 4.373 72.267 1.233
三尺三 Sanchisan 11.511 4.109 72.750 1.232

Table 4

Extreme value and combination of special combining ability analysis"

性状 Character 极大值Maximum 极大值组合
Maximum value combination		 极小值
Minimum		 极小值组合
Minimum value combination
蛋白质含量Protein centent 4.44999 T239·2087A×1383-2 -4.09592 T239·2087×三尺三
T239·2087×Sanchisan
脂肪含量Fat centent 8.34713 72A×黑恢172A×Heihui 1 -15.82506 72A×晋五 72A×Jinwu
总淀粉含量Total starch centent 1.09496 T239·2087×三尺三
T239·2087×Sanchisan		 -1.73156 01A×HM65红
01A×HM65 hong
单宁含量Tannincentent 35.96801 东北1-26×黑恢1
Dongbe1-26×Heihui 1		 -42.03717 T239·2087×黑恢1
T239·2087×Heihui 1

Table 5

Genetic parameters analysis"

项目 Project 蛋白质含量
Protein centent		 脂肪含量
Fat centent		 总淀粉含量
Total starchcentent		 单宁含量
Tannin centent
P1基因型方差 P1 genotypic variance 0.0216 0.0219 0.1466 0.0011
P2基因型方差 P2 genotypic variance 0.0879 0.0583 0.3216 0.0000
P1×P2基因型方差 P1 ×P2genotypic variance 0.0411 0.0541 0.2633 0.0397
环境方差 Environmental variance 0.0393 0.0088 0.1372 0.0053
一般配合力方差 General combining ability variance 72.73% 59.72% 64.01% 2.71%
特殊配合力方差 Special combining ability variance 27.27% 40.28% 35.99% 97.29%
广义遗传力 Broad-sense heritability 79.30% 93.86% 84.21% 88.44%
狭义遗传力 Narrow-sense heritability 57.68% 56.05% 53.90% 2.40%
[1] 卢庆善 .高粱学.北京:中国农业出版社, 1997: 225-230.
[2] 李巍, 王艳秋, 邹剑秋 , 等. 甜高粱亲本系主要农艺性状配合力分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2012,17(6):98-102.
[3] 李继洪, 李玉发, 高士杰 , 等. 高粱新选亲本配合力分析. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35(7):1930-1931.
[4] 张桂香, 史红梅, 宋旭东 , 等. 新引进印度高粱不育系配合力分析. 山西农业科学, 2007,35(1):30-32.
[5] 赵甘霖, 丁国祥 . 基于AMMI模型的杂交高粱籽粒淀粉含量的配合力分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(27):11701-11702.
[6] 张阳, 赵威军, 张福耀 , 等. 新选甜高粱不育系和恢复系的配合力分析.作物杂志, 2010(5):102-105.
[7] 曹文伯 . 甜高粱茎秆糖锤度配合力的测定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2002,3(4):23-27.
[8] 白志良, 王呈祥, 王良群 , 等. 高粱航天新不育系与恢复系的配合力分析. 山西农业科学, 2007,35(3):21-23.
[9] 徐忠成, 李金凤 . 高粱亲本系主要性状配合力的研究. 杂粮作物, 2006,26(3):180-181.
[10] 张素萍 . 高粱新的不育系与恢复系的综合遗传分析. 杂粮作物, 2006,26(1):9-10.
[11] 马尚耀, 孟繁盛 . 高粱主要农艺性状的配合力分析及群体遗传参数的研究.内蒙古农业科技, 1999(2):7-9.
[12] 闫凤霞, 梁笃, 段冰 , 等. 新选高粱亲本系的配合力分析. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(30):55-59.
[13] 丁国祥, 李天炬 . 糯高粱籽粒淀粉含量及组分的配合力分析. 绵阳经济技术高等专科学校学报, 1999,16(2):18-20.
[14] 柳青山, 李团银, 侯爱斌 , 等. 高粱恢复系黑恢1的选育及利用研究. 山西农业科学, 2002,30(2):28-30.
[15] 韦耀明, 李团银, 李三棉 , 等. 高赖氨酸高粱265—IY选育研究初报. 山西农业科学, 1995,23(1):3-6.
[16] 唐启义, 冯明光 . 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[17] 余世权, 苟才明, 黄宁 , 等. 高粱新选亲本系的育种潜势分析. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(22):81-86.
[18] 刘来福, 毛盛贤, 黄远樟 . 作物数量遗传.北京: 农业出版社, 1984: 250-262.
[19] 王立新, 成慧娟, 马尚耀 , 等. 粒用高粱新选亲本配合力分析.作物杂志, 2014(6):56-60.
[20] 王艳秋, 卢峰, 邹剑秋 , 等. 群体改良法新育成高粱雄性不育系的配合力分析.江苏农业科学, 2009(1):81-83.
[21] 张文毅 . 高粱品质性状的研究.辽宁农业科学, 1980(2):37-43.
[22] 赵婧, 张福耀, 詹鹏杰 , 等. 高粱酿造品质性状配合力分析. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(33):44-47.
[23] 李团银, 柳青山, 侯爱斌 , 等. 优质高粱喂猪效果研究初报. 山西农业科学, 1999,27(4):79-80.
[1] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[2] Huijuan Tang,Gonggu Zang,Chaohua Cheng,Qing Tang,Yujun Li,Lining Zhao. Correspondence Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 52-55.
[3] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[4] Jizhen Yu,Rui Wang,Pengjie Zhan,Jun'ai Ping,Fuyao Zhang. Diversity of Agronomic and Quality Traits of Major Sorghum Hybrids in China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 49-54.
[5] Gouliang Song,Xiaolei Feng,Guangyu Fan,Gaolei Shi,Shuangdong Li,Feng Wang,Xiaoming Wang,Zhihai Zhao. Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 44-50.
[6] Haitao Cheng,Zhaohui Ma,Guilin Liu,Ping Cao,Wenyan Lü. Canonical Correlation Analysis between RVA Profile Characteristics and Quality Traits of Japonica Rice Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 59-66.
[7] Bingsheng Lu,Hongmin Gao,Yongxiang Yao,Xiangli Bai,Zengqi Chen. Combining Ability and Genetic Parameters of Ear Characters of Ten Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 23-28.
[8] Xiefei Zhu,Shenghua Li,Sen Wang. Combining Ability Analysis of Verticillium Wilt-Resistance in Five Resistant Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 33-37.
[9] Xianlin Ni,Wenjing Long,Ganlin Zhao,Tianpeng Liu,Jiongling Hu,Guoxiang Ding. The Relationship between Combining Ability and Heterosis of Main Agronomic Traits in Glutinous Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 50-55.
[10] Shiwen Luo,Yuanping Yang,Qianyun Liang,Xin Xian,Guocai Luo. Application and Improvement of Mobai Germplasm in Northwest Guizhou [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 39-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .