Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 145-150.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.027

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen,Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer in Pea

Li Ling1,Yang Tao2,Zong Xuxiao2   

  1. 1 Liaoning Institute of Cash Crops,Liaoyang 111000,Liaoning,China
    2 Institute of Crop Science,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
  • Received:2015-12-17 Revised:2016-01-19 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Xuxiao Zong

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

110

Abstract:

In order to explore the optimum fertilizing parameters of N, P and K in pea production, the effects of N, P, K fertilization were studied through potted experiment with the “3414”design by using a pea commercial variety Kewan 6. The accurate demand for N, P, K fertilizers in pea was clarified, and the appropriate fertilizing combination was selected. The results showed that appropriate applying quantity of N, P, K and their combination could significantly improve economic traits and yield of pea. N and K were the main nutrient factors limiting the pea yield, followed by P. Through the establishment of a functional equation, economic benefit analysis for different fertilizer treatments indicated that the most suitable amount of three fertilizers for the maximum yield of Kewan 6 were N 160.35kg/hm 2, P2O5 124.35kg/hm 2, K2O 57.45kg/hm 2, and the most suitable amount for the best economic benefit were N 169.95kg/hm 2, P2O5 4.50kg/hm 2, K2O 21.15kg/hm 2. Therefore, the application of N, P, K fertilizers of Kewan 6 should emphasize on increasing N with appropriate P and K.

Key words: Pea, N,P,K fertilizer, “3414” experimental design;, Optimized fertilization effect

Table 1

Fertilizer treatments"

编号
Code		 处理
Treatments		 施肥量[g/(盆·5株)]
Rate of fertilizers[g/(pot·5plants)]
N P K 硝铵 磷酸二氢钠 硫酸钾
1 N0P0K0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 N0P2K2 0 0.6750 0.8250 0 2.9605 2.8981
3 N1P2K2 0.4125 0.6750 0.8250 1.1786 2.9605 2.8981
4 N2P0K2 0.8250 0 0.8250 2.3571 0 2.8981
5 N2P1K2 0.8250 0.3375 0.8250 2.3571 1.4803 2.8981
6 N2P2K2 0.8250 0.6750 0.8250 2.3571 2.9605 2.8981
7 N2P3K2 0.8250 1.0125 0.8250 2.3571 4.4408 2.8981
8 N2P2K0 0.8250 0.6750 0 2.3571 2.9605 0
9 N2P2K1 0.8250 0.6750 0.4125 2.3571 2.9605 1.4490
10 N2P2K3 0.8250 0.6750 1.2375 2.3571 2.9605 4.3471
11 N3P2K2 1.2375 0.6750 0.8250 3.5357 2.9605 2.8981
12 N1P1K2 0.4125 0.3375 0.8250 1.1786 1.4803 2.8981
13 N1P2K1 0.4125 0.6750 0.4125 1.1786 2.9605 1.4490
14 N2P1K1 0.8250 0.3375 0.4125 2.3571 1.4803 1.4490

Fig.1

The effect of fertilizer treatments on plant height with single-factor model"

Fig.2

The effect of fertilizer treatments on dry mass with single-factor model"

Fig.3

The effect of fertilizer treatments on yield by N、P、K interaction"

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on pea economic character"

处理
Treatments		 施用量(kg/hm2)Rate of fertilizers 株高（cm）
Height		 单株有效荚数（个）
Available pods per plant		 单株粒重（g）
Seed weight per plant		 百粒重
100-seed weight
N P K
1N0P0K0 0 0 0 38.0 1.9 0.9 6.1
2N0P2K2 0 240 150 42.7 3.0 1.8 11.4
3N1P2K2 75 240 150 46.3 3.8 2.5 15.8
4N2P0K2 150 0 150 50.7 3.5 2.0 15.7
5N2P1K2 150 120 150 52.0 3.8 3.1 20.2
6N2P2K2 150 240 150 43.0 3.5 2.1 14.0
7N2P3K2 150 360 150 40.0 2.3 1.2 7.5
8N2P2K0 150 240 0 41.7 2.5 1.6 9.9
9N2P2K1 150 240 75 42.0 3.8 2.5 15.6
10N2P2K3 150 240 225 43.3 3.1 1.6 14.8
11N3P2K2 225 240 150 41.0 3.1 1.6 9.9
12N1P1K2 75 120 150 45.3 3.7 2.6 16.3
13N1P2K1 75 240 75 44.0 3.5 2.7 16.3
14N2P1K1 150 120 75 51.3 4.6 3.5 21.3

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on pea yield"

处理
Treatments		 施用量(kg/hm2)Rate of fertilizers 单株粒重(g)
Seed weight per plant		 产量（kg/hm2）
Yield
N P K
1N0P0K0 0 0 0 0.89 805.5kJ
2N0P2K2 0 240 150 1.78 1 600.5hG
3N1P2K2 75 240 150 2.54 2 283.0dD
4N2P0K2 150 0 150 2.04 1 834.5gF
5N2P1K2 150 120 150 3.09 2 785.5bB
6N2P2K2 150 240 150 2.10 1 887.0fF
7N2P3K2 150 360 150 1.18 1 059.0jI
8N2P2K0 150 240 0 1.57 1 416.0iH
9N2P2K1 150 240 75 2.45 2 208.0eE
10N2P2K3 150 240 225 1.60 1 440.0iH
11N3P2K2 225 240 150 1.55 1 398.0iH
12N1P1K2 75 120 150 2.57 2 313.0dD
13N1P2K1 75 240 75 2.73 2 460.0cC
14N2P1K1 150 120 75 3.48 3 127.5aA

Table 4

Effects of different treatments on economic benefit"

编号
Code		 处理
Treatments		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 肥料成本(元/hm2)
Fertilizer cost		 净收益(元/hm2)
Net benefit
处理14 N2P1K1 3 127.5 2 290.5 10 480.5
处理5 N2P1K2 2 785.5 3 010.5 7 879.5
处理13 N1P2K1 2 460.0 2 801.3 6 298.5
处理12 N1P1K2 2 313.0 2 657.3 5 634.0
处理3 N1P2K2 2 283.0 3 521.3 4 605.0
处理9 N2P2K1 2 208.0 3 154.5 4 558.5
处理4 N2P0K2 1 834.5 2 146.5 3 513.0
处理6 N2P2K2 1 887.0 3 874.5 2 074.5
处理2 N0P2K2 1 600.5 3 168.0 1 204.5
处理8 N2P2K0 1 416.0 2 434.5 924.0
处理10 N2P2K3 1 398.0 4 227.8 -969.0
处理11 N3P2K2 1 440.0 4 594.5 -1 105.5
处理7 N2P3K2 1 059.0 4 738.5 -3 345.0
处理1 N0P0K0 805.5
[1] 袁星星, 陈新, 陈华涛 , 等. 中国南方菜用豌豆新品种及高产栽培技术. 作物研究, 2010,24(3):192-194.
[2] 韩淑艳 . 北方豌豆高产栽培技术.北方园艺, 2013(9):55-56.
[3] 宗绪晓 . 食用豆类高产栽培与食品加工.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
[4] 李继明, 赵丽娟 . 干旱区豌豆配方施肥试验研究.甘肃农业科技, 2009(2):17-19.
[5] 顾国平, 叶静, 俞巧钢 , 等. 磷钾肥配施对豌豆产量及养分积累的影响.浙江农业科学, 2013(6):658-659.
[6] 马瑶, 师进霖, 宋云华 , 等. 甜脆豌豆施肥数学模型研究. 江西农业学报, 2006,18(6):95-97.
[7] 陈新平, 张福锁 . 通过“3414”试验建立测土配方施肥技术指标体系.中国农技推广, 2006(4):36-39.
[8] 王圣瑞, 陈新平, 高祥照 , 等. “3414”肥料试验模型拟合的探讨. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(4):409-413.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2002.0406
[9] 陶勤南 . 肥料试验与统计分析.北京: 农业出版社, 1994: 79-80.
[10] 唐启义 . “3414”肥料效应田间试验结果统计分析.
[11] 王兴仁, 张福锁 . 现代肥料试验设计.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996.
[1] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102-105.
[2] Chengxun Li,Aiping Li,Xiaoyu Xu,Kaibin Zheng. Discussion on the Mechanism of Stress Resistance of Pigeonpea and Application Prospect in Fujian Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 28-31.
[3] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8-12.
[4] Jiangchun Song,Shuanzhu Li,Jianyu Wang,Xiuge Zhang,Xuefeng Zhu,Jianli Qiao,Zhen Xiang. Advances in Breeding of High Oil Peanut in China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 25-31.
[5] Shuanzhu Li,Jiangchun Song,Jianyu Wang,Xiuge Zhang,Jianli Qiao,Ning Liu. Advances in Genetics and Breeding of High Oleic Acid Peanut [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 6-13.
[6] Dongxian Ning,Yukun Zhao,Cuiping Yan,Xiuli Yang,Junhong Xiao,Liping Yang. Analysis and Evaluation of Different Models for Yield Stability of Peanut Cultivars in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 39-43.
[7] Jinyun Wang,Xianguo Cheng,Jibin Guo,Li Wang. Soil Nutrients Changes and Evaluation for Peach Cultivation under Greenhouse Conditions [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 96-103.
[8] Xiaoli Gao,Wenhua Liao,Shanshan Wang,Wencai Yang,Xianglin Dai,Yuhong Zhang. Relationships among Major Agronomic Traits and Nutritional Characters of Pea based on Correlation/Grey Relational Analysis [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 56-60.
[9] Zhurong Zheng,Ruixiang Zhang,Tingting Yang,Lichao Wen,Xuefeng Shen. Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Roots in Peanut [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 142-145.
[10] Lijuan Zhang,Jianying Lu,Chang Wang,Gengmei Min,Xiaoming Yang. The Study on the Influence Factors of Callus and Adventitious Bud Induction in Pea [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 33-36.
[11] Yiming Liu,Zhao Ling,Yufen Han,Guimei Yang,Jingtao Wen. Effects of Selenium(Se) Fertilizer Concentration on Se Content of Red Peanut [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 105-106.
[12] Xiaoli Gao. Effects of Phosphorus on Pea Yield and Its Components [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(1): 125-128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .