Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 130-134.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Application of Soil Amendments in Yinshan Mountain Area of Inner Mongolia

Jia Youyu1,Ren Yongfeng1,2,Gao Yu1,Zhao Peiyi1,Yin Xiulan3,Li Bin1,Meng Meili3   

  1. 1 Institute of Resources Environment and Detection Technology,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,Inner Mongolia,China;
    2 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China
    3 Wuchuan Farming and Animal Husbandry Bureau,Hohhot 011700,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2016-12-20 Revised:2017-02-07 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Yongfeng Ren

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

180

Abstract:

The successive growing of crops like potato in agro-pastoral ecotone near the northern foot of Yinshan Mountain in Inner Mongolia can cause Agricultural ecological deterioration such as the change of soil texture and slow restoration of soil fertility. Four kinds of soil amendments, humic acid, sheep manure, polyacrylamide, and bacterial fertilizer were used to analyze the effects on soil improvement for oats farmland by measuring such indicators as soil nutrient content, soil compaction, dry matter accumulation,leaf area and yield traits of the plant. The result showed: 1) The soil with the treatment of sheep manure had the highest organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium levels, which were 21.2g/kg, 62mg/kg, 6.9mg/kg and 81mg/kg, and 38.6% ,47.6%, 54.3% and 52.8% higher than that of the control treatment; 2) It was significantly different among the treatments in soil compaction reduction compared with the control treatment; 3) There was significant difference in leaf area and dry weight among the treatments, and the ranking was sheep manure > polyacrylamide > humic acid > bacterial fertilizer. The leaf area under the treatment of sheep manure and polyacrylamide were 145.8% and 99.3%, higher than the control treatment, and 82.6% and 66.8% higher in dry matter accumulation; 4) The yield under the treatment of sheep manure and polyacrylamide had better performance, which were 2 071.04kg/hm 2 and 2 031.02kg/hm 2, 41.3% and 38.6% higher than the control treatment. Therefore, sheep manure and polyacrylamide were proved to be better soil amendments, which could not only enhance soil nutrient content, but also improve soil structure and promote plant growth and yield.

Key words: Soil amendments, Soil nutrient, Soil compaction, Dry weight, Leaf area, Yield

Table 1

The differences of soil nutrient among the treatments"

处理Treatment 有机质
Organic matter (g/kg)		 碱解氮
Available nitrogen (mg/kg)		 速效磷
Available phosphorus (mg/kg)		 速效钾
Available potassium (mg/kg)
羊粪Sheep manure 21.2aA 62aA 6.9aA 81aA
聚丙烯酰胺Polyacrylamide 20.6bB 58bB 6.4bB 72bB
腐植酸Humic acid 19.6cC 56cC 6.2cB 69cC
生物菌肥Bacterial manure 17.4dD 52dD 5.1dC 57dD
CK 15.3eE 42eE 4.6eD 53eE

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on soil compaction"

Table 2

The comparison of plant leaf area and dry matter weight in different treatments"

处理Treatment 叶面积(cm2)
Leaf area		 干物质积累量(g)
Dry matter weight
羊粪Sheep manure 163.22Aa 5.66Aa
腐植酸Humic acid 112.06Cc 4.78cC
聚丙烯酰胺Polyacrylamide 132.31bB 5.17bB
生物菌肥Bacterial manure 77.59dD 3.32dD
CK 66.40eE 3.10eE

Table 3

The comparison of oats yield in different treatments"

处理Treatment 产量Yield (kg/hm2)
羊粪Sheep manure 2 071.04Aa
腐植酸Humic acid 1 880.94Bb
聚丙烯酰胺Polyacrylamide 2 031.02Aa
生物菌肥Bacterial manure 1 500.75Cc
CK 1 465.73Cc
[1] 范锦龙, 李贵才, 张艳 . 阴山北麓农牧交错带植被变化及其对气候变化的响应. 生态学杂志, 2007,26(10):1528-1532.
[2] 赵举 . 阴山北麓农牧交错带风蚀荒漠化治理的保持耕作模式研究. 北京:中国农业大学, 2002.
doi: 10.7666/d.y451666
[3] 邢海峰 . 内蒙古阴山北麓滴灌条件下高产马铃薯群体发育、磷素营养特点及磷肥运筹策略研究. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2015.
[4] 吕建桥 . 论欠发达地区农民增收问题——以内蒙古阴山北麓地区为例. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2007.
[5] 吴增芳 . 土壤结构改良剂.北京: 科学出版社, 1976: 24-34.
[6] 陈义群, 董元华 . 土壤改良剂的研究与应用进展. 生态环境, 2008,17(3):1282-1289.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2008.03.078
[7] 邵玉翠, 张余良 . 天然矿物改良剂在微咸水灌溉土壤中应用效果的研究. 水土保持学报, 2005,19(4):100-103.
[8] 宋明元, 吕贻忠, 李丽君 , 等. 土壤综合改良措施对科尔沁风沙土保水保肥能力的影响. 干旱区研究, 2016,33(6):1345-1350.
doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2016.06.27
[9] Busscher W J, Novak J M , Caesar-Tonthat T C.Organic matter and polyacrylamide amendment of Norfolk loamy sand. Soil & Tillage Research, 2007,93(1):171-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.still.2006.03.023
[10] 栗丽, 洪坚平, 谢英荷 , 等. 生物菌肥对采煤塌陷复垦土壤生物活性及盆栽油菜产量和品质的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2010,18(5):939-944.
[11] 王日鑫, 秦慧娟 . 腐植酸的增氮解磷促钾作用.腐植酸, 2008(4):27-32.
[12] 毛家伟, 张翔, 叶红朝 , 等. 水氮耦合对土壤紧实度、土壤盐分和烤烟经济性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(19):25-29.
[13] 鲁如坤 . 土壤农业化学分析方法.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2000: 20-131.
[14] 武天云 . 土壤有机质概念和分组技术研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2004,15(4):717-722.
[15] 何牡丹, 李志忠, 刘永泉 . 土壤有机质研究方法进展. 新疆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,26(3):249-251.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9659.2007.03.077
[16] 李文芳, 杨世俊, 文赤夫 , 等. 土壤有机质的环境效应.环境科学动态, 2004(4):31-32.
[17] 潘剑玲, 代万安, 尚占环 , 等. 秸秆还田对土壤有机质和氮素有效性影响及机制研究进展. 中国生态农业学报, 2013,21(5):526-535.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2013.00526
[18] Atwell B J . The effect of soil compaction on wheat during early tillering.III.fate of carbon transported to the roots. New Phytologist, 2006,115(1):37-41.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00919.x
[19] 贺明荣, 王振林 . 土壤紧实度变化对小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响. 西北植物学报, 2004,24(4):649-654.
[20] 王慧杰, 郝建平, 冯瑞云 , 等. 微孔深松耕降低土壤紧实度提高棉花产量与种籽品质. 农业工程学报, 2015,31(8):7-14.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.08.002
[21] 孙焕顷, 苏长青 . 腐植酸钾对黄冠梨土壤肥力的影响.北方园艺, 2009(7):100-101.
[22] 刘慧军, 刘景辉, 于健 , 等. 土壤改良剂对燕麦土壤理化性状及微生物量碳的影响. 水土保持学报, 2012,26(5):68-72.
[23] 邱学礼, 高福宏, 方波 , 等. 不同土壤改良措施对植烟土壤理化性状的影响. 西南农业学报, 2011,24(6):2270-2273.
[24] 员学锋, 吴普特, 冯浩 . 聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)在土壤改良中的应用进展. 水土保持研究, 2002,9(1):141-145.
[25] 程治良, 全学军, 代黎 , 等. 羊粪好氧堆肥处理研究进展. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,27(11):36-41.
[26] 王雪, 李菊梅, 徐明岗 , 等. 聚丙烯酰胺对沙土改土保肥的作用. 生态环境, 2008,17(5):2086-2089.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2008.05.071
[27] 郑海霞, 齐莎, 赵小蓉 , 等. 连续5年施用氮肥和羊粪的内蒙古羊草(Leymus chinensis)草原土壤颗粒状有机质特征. 中国农业科学, 2008,41(4):1083-1088.
[28] 刘东, 任树梅, 杨培岭 . 聚丙烯酰胺(PAM)对土壤水分蓄渗能力的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2006,25(4):56-58.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3317.2006.04.013
[29] 董英, 郭绍辉, 詹亚力 . 聚丙烯酰胺的土壤改良效应.高分子通报, 2004(5):83-87.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[12] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[15] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84-88.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .