Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 154-159.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

NPK Fertilizer Use Efficiency by Sesame Grown in Yellow Cinnamon Soil in Jianghuai Region

Zhao Li,Wang Qiang,Lin Yongxiang,Zhang Yi   

  1. Crop Institute,Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hefei 230031,Anhui,China
  • Received:2017-07-28 Revised:2017-09-18 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

Abstract:

In order to increase fertilizer utilization efficiency, the termed 3414 experimental design was carried out to increase the sesame yield in Jianghui area. The cultivar “Wanzhi 1” was grown in brown soil for 2 years with nutrition variation of NPK. The result showed that appropriate application of NPK not only improved the agronomic traits and the yield of sesame, but also increased the fertilizer use efficiency. The effect of interaction between NPK is NPK>NK>NP>PK. Based on our results, the recommended amount of nutrients could be obtained nitrogen 85-120kg/hm 2, phosphorus 20-30kg/hm 2, and potassium 75-110kg/hm 2.

Key words: Sesame, 3414 fertilizer efficiency, Yellow cinnamon soil, Agronomic trait, Yield

Table 1

The “3414” fertilization scheme on sesame"

编号
Code
处理
Treatment
水平Scale 肥料用量(kg/hm2)Amount of fertilizers
N P K N P2O5 K2O
1 N0P0K0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 N0P2K2 0 2 2 0 30 90
3 N1P2K2 1 2 2 45 30 90
4 N2P0K2 2 0 2 90 0 90
5 N2P1K2 2 1 2 90 15 90
6 N2P2K2 2 2 2 90 30 90
7 N2P3K2 2 3 2 90 45 90
8 N2P2K0 2 2 0 90 30 0
9 N2P2K1 2 2 1 90 30 45
10 N2P2K3 2 2 3 90 30 135
11 N3P2K2 3 2 2 135 30 45
12 N1P1K2 1 1 2 45 15 90
13 N1P2K1 1 2 1 45 30 45
14 N2P1K1 2 1 1 90 15 45

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on yield components of sesame"

处理
Treatment
株高(cm)
Plant height
始蒴部位(cm)
Length from the first capsule to base
空稍尖长(cm)
Top length without capsule
主茎果轴长(cm)
Length of capsule axis
2014 2015 平均Average 2014 2015 平均Average 2014 2015 平均Average 2014 2015 平均Average
N0P0K0 122.59 99.81 111.20 43.23 36.80 40.02 2.95 1.83 2.39 76.14 60.97 68.56
N0P2K2 134.27 93.82 114.05 46.40 33.93 40.17 3.09 1.79 2.44 84.75 58.64 71.70
N1P2K2 141.85 102.90 122.38 42.87 32.44 37.66 3.33 2.95 3.14 95.52 67.49 81.51
N2P0K2 151.42 108.07 129.75 42.91 37.85 40.38 2.45 2.41 2.43 90.29 67.72 79.01
N2P1K2 145.20 101.38 123.29 44.35 35.30 39.83 2.69 3.36 3.03 97.12 63.26 80.19
N2P2K2 145.94 105.87 125.91 46.51 36.98 41.75 2.26 2.79 2.53 106.35 65.93 86.14
N2P3K2 142.75 104.42 123.59 42.04 34.95 38.50 2.71 2.91 2.81 98.82 66.62 82.72
N2P2K0 140.07 108.03 124.05 42.98 39.02 41.00 2.36 3.42 2.89 94.80 65.52 80.16
N2P2K1 143.73 107.93 125.83 46.64 37.27 41.96 2.66 2.51 2.59 97.94 67.73 82.84
N2P2K3 154.63 107.95 131.29 46.48 35.46 40.97 2.65 3.14 2.90 105.62 69.35 87.49
N3P2K2 138.00 109.54 123.77 43.73 35.57 39.65 2.13 2.28 2.21 99.76 71.72 85.74
N1P1K2 139.70 102.39 121.05 44.46 36.99 40.73 2.87 2.96 2.92 92.14 63.72 77.93
N1P2K1 134.46 97.81 116.14 43.91 33.42 38.67 4.51 2.54 3.53 85.94 61.85 73.90
N2P1K1 139.94 102.51 121.23 40.90 32.31 36.61 2.23 2.90 2.57 93.95 67.40 80.68
处理
Treatment
单株蒴果数Capsules per plant 每蒴粒数Seeds per capsule 千粒重1000-grain weight (g)
2014 2015 平均Average 2014 2015 平均Average 2014 2015 平均Average
N0P0K0 38.50 35.00 36.75 37.60 53.10 45.35 2.92 3.01 2.96
N0P2K2 48.60 33.00 40.80 47.40 51.30 49.35 3.07 2.90 2.99
N1P2K2 54.70 38.40 46.55 48.30 52.80 50.55 3.10 3.16 3.13
N2P0K2 62.70 43.70 53.20 46.50 55.40 50.95 3.02 3.00 3.01
N2P1K2 64.90 36.20 50.55 49.70 55.50 52.60 3.04 3.08 3.06
N2P2K2 67.20 45.60 56.40 52.50 51.80 52.15 3.08 3.07 3.08
N2P3K2 66.10 40.00 53.05 45.60 56.10 50.85 3.00 3.00 3.00
N2P2K0 57.50 39.30 48.40 42.00 52.90 47.45 3.18 3.12 3.15
N2P2K1 62.60 41.70 52.15 46.50 59.00 52.75 3.07 3.13 3.10
N2P2K3 66.40 38.20 52.30 37.90 54.60 46.25 3.13 3.09 3.11
N3P2K2 61.70 48.30 55.00 39.90 57.20 48.55 3.03 3.18 3.11
N1P1K2 55.40 36.40 45.90 52.90 49.20 51.05 3.01 3.05 3.03
N1P2K1 49.80 34.80 42.30 48.00 45.60 46.80 3.04 3.16 3.10
N2P1K1 63.80 51.10 57.45 50.10 46.00 48.05 3.09 3.10 3.10

Table 3

Yied and variation analysis with the “3414” fertilization method"

处理
Treatment
小区产量(g)及差异分析Yield and variation analysis 平均产量(kg/hm2)
Average yield
比CK增产(%)
Increased yield
2014 5% 1% 2015 5% 1%
N0P0K0 1 553.08 d C 1 234.83 de BC 696.98 -
N0P2K2 2 223.98 b C 1 102.30 e C 831.57 19.31
N1P2K2 2 676.04 abc AB 1 507.83 abcd ABC 1 045.97 50.07
N2P0K2 2 684.84 abc AB 1 697.43 abc AB 1 095.57 57.19
N2P1K2 2 851.13 ab AB 1 672.83 abc AB 1 130.99 62.27
N2P2K2 2 974.29 a A 1 751.97 ab AB 1 181.57 69.53
N2P3K2 2 797.33 ab AB 1 603.00 abcd AB 1 100.08 57.84
N2P2K0 2 525.75 abc AB 1 657.17 abc AB 1 045.73 50.04
N2P2K1 2 742.29 ab AB 1 831.70 a A 1 143.50 64.06
N2P2K3 2 819.24 ab AB 1 729.83 abc AB 1 137.27 63.17
N3P2K2 2 649.04 abc AB 1 834.10 a A 1 120.79 60.81
N1P1K2 2 741.47 ab AB 1 372.27 bcde ABC 1 028.44 47.56
N1P2K1 2 412.00 bc AB 1 361.20 cde ABC 943.30 35.34
N2P1K1 2 506.89 abc AB 1 610.03 abcd AB 1 029.23 47.67

Table 4

Analysis on economic benefit in two years"

处理
Treatment
肥料成本(元/hm2)
Fertilizer cost (yuan/hm2)
年产值(元/hm2) Annual value of production (yuan/hm2) 平均纯收入(元/hm2)
Average income (yuan/hm2)
产投比
Outputs/Inputs
2014 2015 平均Average
N0P0K0 0.00 8 546.25 10 291.50 9 418.88 9 418.88 -
N0P2K2 729.60 12 238.05 9 186.75 10 712.40 9 982.80 14.68
N1P2K2 1 040.10 14 725.65 12 566.25 13 645.95 12 605.85 13.12
N2P0K2 1 100.70 14 773.95 14 145.75 14 459.85 13 359.15 13.14
N2P1K2 1 225.65 15 689.10 13 941.00 14 815.05 13 589.40 12.09
N2P2K2 1 350.60 16 366.80 14 600.25 15 483.53 14 132.93 11.46
N2P3K2 1 475.55 15 393.00 13 358.25 14 375.63 12 900.08 9.74
N2P2K0 870.90 13 898.55 13 810.50 13 854.53 12 983.63 15.91
N2P2K1 1 110.75 15 090.15 15 264.00 15 177.08 14 066.33 13.66
N2P2K3 1 590.45 15 513.60 14 415.75 14 964.68 13 374.23 9.41
N3P2K2 1 661.10 14 577.00 15 284.25 14 930.63 13 269.53 8.99
N1P1K2 915.15 15 085.65 11 436.75 13 261.20 12 346.05 14.49
N1P2K1 800.25 13 272.60 11 344.50 12 308.55 11 508.30 15.38
N2P1K1 985.80 13 794.75 13 416.75 13 605.75 12 619.95 13.80

Table 5

Interaction and efficiency of NPK"

处理
Treatment
产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
增产率(%)
Increased yield
占全肥比率(%)
Ratio of provided NPK in total nutrient
土壤供应量(kg/hm2)
Soil provided NPK
肥料利用率(%)
Efficiency of NPK
肥料农学效率(kg)
Agronomic nutrient efficiency
N0P0K0 696.98 - 58.99 - - -
N0P2K2 831.57 19.31 70.38 51.72 24.19 3.89
N2P0K2 1 095.57 57.19 92.72 31.44 8.23 2.87
N2P2K0 1 045.73 50.04 88.50 66.09 9.54 1.51
N2P2K2 1 181.57 69.53 - - - -

Fig.1

The relation between the yield and the applied nitrogen"

Fig.2

The relation between the yield and the applied phosphorus"

Fig.3

The relation between the yield and the applied potassium"

Table 6

Recommend fertilization amount based on the highest production or maximal benefit kg/hm2"

产量Yield N P2O5 K2O
NPK 产量最高 1 184.1 130.59 30.44 129.23
效益最大 1 177.1 117.66 26.80 111.54
NP 产量最高 1 166.1 106.08 21.85 -
效益最大 1 164.7 102.35 19.56 -
NK 产量最高 1 160.4 83.40 - 106.27
效益最大 1 152.5 106.74 - 52.34
PK 产量最高 1 161.4 - 33.33 72.73
效益最大 1 160.7 - 30.11 74.29
N 产量最高 1 167.5 100.31 - -
效益最大 1 166.8 95.73 - -
P 产量最高 1 163.9 - 24.15 -
效益最大 1 163.1 - 21.58 -
K 产量最高 1 178.3 - - 87.31
效益最大 1 175.7 - - 75.15
[1] 黄凤洪 . 花生芝麻加工技术.北京: 金盾出版社, 1995.
[2] 张子武, 沈阿林, 张桂兰 , 等. 夏播芝麻营养吸收规律与平衡施肥研究Ⅱ夏播芝麻的高产平衡施肥. 华北农学报, 1994,9(增刊):118-122.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1994.z1.025
[3] 魏林根, 周荣娇, 陈先茂 , 等. 芝麻氮磷钾最佳配比及其总用量与播种期对产量影响的研究. 江西农业学报, 1997,9(1):33-39.
[4] 赵莉, 汪强, 孔小卫 , 等. 施肥水平对芝麻氮磷钾养分吸收积累的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2013,35:381-387.
[5] 郭中义, 张四, 罗中伟 , 等. 河南驻马店市夏芝麻施肥模式及其应用研究. 土壤通报, 2006,37(1):96-98.
[6] 何水得, 付华亮, 肖国涪 , 等. 红壤旱地不同密度和施肥配方对芝麻产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2009,21(2):39-40.
[7] 姚殿立, 李录久, 丁楠 , 等. 芝麻高产高效的平衡施肥技术研究. 安徽农业科学, 2009,37(18):8413-8414.
[8] 石明权, 潘正茂, 魏美兰 , 等. 钾对芝麻的增产效果及施钾技术研究初报.农业科技通讯, 2009(12):64-66.
[9] 王小琳, 顾正清, 邱春霞 . 氮肥分配和种植方式对秋芝麻开花进程的影响. 湖北农学院学报, 2001,21(3):199-201.
[10] 李贵宝, 胡颖 . 芝麻吸钾特点与施用钾肥技术的研究.中国油料作物学报, 1996(4):49-51.
[11] 卫双玲, 高桐梅, 张海洋 , 等. NEB肥对芝麻干物质积累及物质转化能力的研究. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(5):127-132.
[12] 李中秀, 胡文秀, 徐宝庆 , 等. 不同氮钾用量对芝麻产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2007,19(4):117-118.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2007.04.046
[13] 余常兵, 谢立华, 李银水 , 等. 氮钾肥施用技术对芝麻养分积累、产量和品质的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2012,51(3):469-472.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2012.03.011
[14] 卫双玲, 李春明, 高桐梅 , 等. 芝麻氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(3):644-649.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0314
[15] 李真, 陈剑 . 不同氮磷钾肥配比对芝麻产量的影响试验初报. 安徽农学通报, 2011,17(12):175-177.
[16] 魏林根, 肖运萍, 汪瑞清 , 等. 红壤旱地肥料配施对秋芝麻生长发育和产量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2010,22(3):41-42.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2010.03.014
[17] 吴志勇, 杜之虎, 徐鸿 , 等. “3414”肥料效应试验原理与设计.新疆农垦科技, 2007(4):63-65.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wang Lei, Zhang Xiangping, Li Runxi, Niu Xiaoxia, . Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic#br# Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .