Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 152-158.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.01.025

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis on Suitable Sowing Date of Four Main Cultivars of Broomcorn Millet in Huining, Gansu

Ruiyu Ren,Jihong He,Kongjun Dong,Lei Zhang,Tianpeng Liu,Tianyu Yang   

  1. Crop Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2018-07-04 Revised:2018-11-20 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-02-01
  • Contact: Tianyu Yang

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

158

Abstract:

In Gansu Huining, 4 broomcorn millet varieties, such as Longmi 10 (B1), Longmi 11 (B2), Jinshu 9 (B3) and Longshu 21 (B4), were selected for 5 sowing stages of April 23rd (A1), May 4th (A2), May 12th (A3), May 24th (A4) and June 3rd (A5), and the different sowing stages were studied. The experiment was a split plot design to study the effects of different sowing stages on broomcorn millet varieties based on agronomic traits and yield. The results showed that the indexes of plant height, main panicle length, main stem diameter, spike weight per plant and straw weight per plant of B1 were the highest in the A2 sowing stage. The indexes of plant height and 1000-grain weight of B2 were the highest in the A1 sowing stage, and the indexes of main stem diameter, spike weight per plant and straw weight per plant were the highest in the A2 sowing stage. The indexes of plant height, main stem diameter and straw weight per plant of B3 were all higher in the A2 sowing stage and its spike weight per plant and 1000-grain weight were the highest in the A3 sowing stage. The indexes of main panicle length, main stem diameter, spike weight per pant, straw weight per plant and 1000-grain weight of B4 were the highest in the A4 sowing stage. The yields of B1, B2, B3 and B4 were highest in A2, A1, A3, A4 sowing stage, respectively. In conclusion the suitable sowing stage of Longmi 10 (B1) was around May 4th, and the suitable sowing stage of Longmi 11 (B2) was from April 23rd to April 28th; the suitable sowing stage of Jinshu 9 (B3) was from May 7th to May 12th (A3); and the suitable sowing stage for Longshu 21 (B4) was around May 24th.

Key words: Sowing date, Broomcorn millet, Main cultivars, Agronomic traits, Yield

Fig.1

Days of growth in different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates"

Fig.2

Plant height of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates The different capital letters indicate significant difference between different treatments at P=0.01, the same below"

Fig.3

Main panicle length of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates"

Fig.4

Main stem diameter of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates The different small letters indicate significant difference between different treatments at P=0.05, the same below"

Fig.5

Spike weight per plant of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates"

Fig.6

1000-grain weight of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates"

Fig.7

Straw weight per plant of different broomcorn varieties under different sowing dates"

Table 1

Yield difference among different sowing dates"

播种期
Sowing date		 小区产量
(kg/10m2)
Yield per plot		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield		 5%显著水平
0.05 level		 1%显著水平
0.01 level
A1 2.79 2 792.24 a A
A2 2.71 2 710.09 ab A
A3 2.81 2 806.40 a A
A4 2.68 2 683.42 b A
A5 2.42 2 423.71 c B

Table 2

Yield difference among different cultivars"

品种
Cultivar		 小区产量
(kg/10m2)
Yield per plot		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield		 5%显著水平
0.05 level		 1%显著水平
0.01 level
B1 3.13 3 133.23 a A
B2 2.76 2 762.05 b AB
B3 2.59 2 586.96 b AB
B4 2.25 2 250.46 c B

Table 3

The difference of yield between different varieties and sowing dates"

品种Cultivar 播种期Sowing stage 小区产量Yield per plot (kg/10m2) 产量Yield (kg/hm2) 5%显著水平0.05 level 1%显著水平0.01 level
B1 A1 3.29 3 291.71 ab AB
A2 3.41 3 413.31 a A
A3 3.24 3 243.29 ab AB
A4 3.08 3 076.54 b AB
A5 2.64 2 641.32 c C
B2 A1 3.60 3 603.47 a A
A2 2.66 2 664.67 b B
A3 2.66 2 663.00 b B
A4 2.55 2 549.61 b B
A5 2.33 2 329.50 c B
B3 A1 2.65 2 647.99 b AB
A2 2.82 2 821.41 a A
A3 2.88 2 883.11 a A
A4 2.37 2 374.52 c BC
A5 2.21 2 207.77 c C
B4 A1 1.63 1 625.81 d C
A2 1.94 1 940.97 c BC
A3 2.44 2 436.22 b A
A4 2.73 2 733.03 a A
A5 2.52 2 516.26 ab A

Table 4

Correlation between agronomic traits and yield of different varieties and sowing dates"

性状
Trait		 生育期
Period of
growth		 株高
Plant
height		 主穗长
Main panicle
length		 主茎粗
Main stem
diameter		 单株穗重
Spike weight per plant		 单株草重
Straw weight
per plant		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight		 产量
Yield
生育期Period of growth 1
株高Plant height 0.637** 1
主穗长Main panicle length 0.031 0.525** 1
主茎粗Main stem diameter 0.525** 0.759** 0.476** 1
单株穗重Spike weight per plant 0.324** 0.537** 0.390** 0.640** 1
单株草重Straw weight per plant 0.500** 0.805** 0.433** 0.816** 0.752** 1
千粒重1000-grain weight -0.076 -0.027 -0.270* 0.069 0.267* 0.051 1
产量Yield 0.103 0.235 0.091 0.260* 0.383** 0.237 0.372** 1
[1] 张研 . 我国小杂粮生产现状与发展策略. 河北农业大学学报(农林教育版), 2010,12(3):433.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6927.2010.03.031
[2] 董孔军, 杨天育, 何继红 . 糜子新品种陇糜9号. 中国种业, 2017(2):73-74.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-895X.2011.02.040
[3] 王显瑞, 赵敏, 张立嫒 , 等. 播量和施肥对糜子产量、农艺性状及生长的影响. 内蒙古农业科技, 2017(3):30-32.
doi: 10.3969/j.jssn.1007-0907.2012.03.014
[4] 柴岩 . 糜子. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1999: 2-3.
[5] 王君杰, 陈凌, 王海岗 , 等. 水肥耦合对糜子干物质运转和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(1):140-145.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.01.023
[6] 刘天鹏, 董孔军, 何继红 , 等. 不同生育阶段灌水处理对糜子农艺性状及产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(2):213-216.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.02.034
[7] 王显瑞, 赵敏, 柴晓娇 , 等. 施肥对糜子密度、产量及农艺性状的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(6):160-165.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.06.029
[8] Harriet V H, Michael G C, Matthew C L , et al. Genetic diversity and phylogeography of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) across eurasia. Molecular Ecology, 2011,20(22):4756-4771.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05318.x pmid: 22004244
[9] 胡银岗, 林凡云, 王士强 , 等. 糜子抗旱节水相关基因PmMYB的克隆及表达分析. 遗传, 2008,30(3):373-379.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2008.03.021
[10] 任瑞玉, 何继红, 董孔军 , 等. 渗水地膜覆盖栽培的土壤水温效应及对糜子生育的调控研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016,34(2):76-80.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.02.12
[11] 曹晓宁, 王君杰, 王海岗 , 等. 糜子栽培研究进展. 安徽农业科技, 2015,43(31):79-81,84.
[12] 吴芸紫, 段门俊, 刘章勇 , 等. 播种期对3个再生稻品种产量及产量构成因子的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):151-156.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.027
[13] 刘芳亮, 张保军, 张正茂 , 等. 播期和密度对普冰151小麦籽粒产量与品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016,34(6):1-8.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.06.01
[14] 杨桂霞, 赵广才, 许柯 , 等. 播期和密度对冬小麦籽粒产量和营养品质及生理指标的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(4):687-692.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.04.020
[15] 李筠, 王龙, 任立凯 , 等. 播期、密度和氮肥运筹对冬小麦连麦2号产量与品质的调控. 麦类作物学报, 2010,30(2):303-308.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.02.022
[16] 张耀辉, 宋建荣, 岳维云 , 等. 陇南雨养旱区播期与密度对冬小麦产量与品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011,29(6):74-78.
[17] 胡焕焕, 刘丽萍, 李瑞奇 , 等 . 播种期和密度对冬小麦品种河农822产量形成的影响 . 麦类作物学报, 2008, 28(3): 490, 495.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2008.03.111
[18] 姜小苓, 李淦, 胡铁柱 , 等. 播种期和种植密度对冬小麦百农898品质和产量的影响. 河南科技学院学报, 2012,40(3):1-4.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7516.2012.03.001
[19] 罗新兰, 崔佳龙, 蔡福 , 等. 播期对玉米生长发育和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(5):14-20.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.05.03
[20] 罗世武, 张尚沛, 杨军学 , 等. 不同播期对干旱地区糜子生长发育及产量的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2015,61(3):1-3.
[21] 李兰真, 汤景华, 汤海新 , 等. 不同类型小麦品种播期播量研究. 河南农业科学, 2007,7(11):38-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2007.11.010
[22] 徐恒勇, 赵振东, 刘建军 , 等. 群体调控对济南17号小麦产量性状的影响. 山东农业科学, 2017(1):7-9.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2001.04.002
[23] 贺晓, 梁鸡保, 高小丽 , 等. 不同播期密度对神木县糜子产量的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2016,62(4):12-14.
[24] 王德慧, 盛晋华, 张雄杰 , 等. 播期对糜子生长发育及产量影响的研究. 中国种业, 2017(4):61-64.
[25] 王宇先, 李清泉, 刘玉涛 , 等. 不同播期对糜子生长发育及产量的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2017(9):22-24.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2767.2013.09.006
[26] 王星玉, 王纶, 崔彩霞 , 等. 黍稷种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 38-39.
[27] 杨如达, 李海, 林凤仙 , 等. 糜子性状与产量的灰色关联度分析及品种选育侧重性状探讨. 作物杂志, 2017(4):50-57.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.009
[28] 谢天保, 曾春初, 徐述明 . 湘南地区春玉米播期试验初报. 作物研究, 2017(4):216-218.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2005.04.006
[29] 张东旗, 高小丽, 赵涛 , 等. 不同播期糜子抽穗后干物质积累及转运特性. 西北农业学报, 2016,25(6):849-856.
[30] 李玉环, 杨明君, 谷茂 . 播期对黍子籽粒产量及其主要经济性状的影响. 内蒙古农业科技, 2017(12):52-55.
[31] 冯佰利, 曾盛名, 蒋纪芸 , 等. 品种、播期与肥力对糜子籽粒蛋白质及其组分的影响. 山西农业科学, 2017(5):3-5.
[32] 傅永斌, 霍阿红, 杨德智 , 等. 播期和密度对张选1号黍子生育及产量的影响. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(3):81-85.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2011.03.016
[1] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[2] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[3] Zepeng Yang,Honglin Chen,Juan Guo,Changtao Wang,Dinghui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Lodging Traits of Rape in the Hilly Central Sichuan Basin, China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 150-155.
[4] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[5] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[6] Yunqing Gao,Shutong Li,Qibing Shang,Junchun Shi,Dongxu Xu. Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 164-167.
[7] Ying Fu,Yinan Shen,Yanchun Liu,Xiaojiao Chai,Xianrui Wang,Xiaolei Bai,Shutian Li. Correlation Analysis of Amylopectin Content, Nutritional Quality and Agronomic Traits in Spring Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 90-93.
[8] Huihui Tang,Yanli Xu,Qingyan Wang,Zhengbo Ma,Guangyan Li,Hui Dong,Zhiqiang Dong. Effects of Foliar Spraying 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Spring Maize Growth and Yield under Different Planting Densities [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 136-141.
[9] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[10] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[11] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[12] Kainan Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Ruiqi Ma,Yingjie Zhu,Zheli Xu,Baojun Zhang,Guangcai Zhao. Effects of Tridimensional Uniform Sowing and Fertilizer on Grain and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 103-110.
[13] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[14] Yang Zhang,Huilin Yu,Yanbo Wang. Study on Yield and Related Traits of Maize Varieties in Different Ecological Regions of Eastern North China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 38-43.
[15] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .