Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 179-186.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.01.022

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate, Planting Density and Retained Leaf Number on Yield and Quality of Xiangyan 7 in Tobacco Region of Western Hunan

Zhu Zijian1(), Chen Nana1, Wu Yueying1, Rang Zhongwen1, Dai Linjian1, Tian Minghui2, Tian Feng2(), Yi Zhenxie1()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    2Xiangxi Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company, Jishou 416000, Hunan, China
  • Received:2023-07-25 Revised:2024-03-25 Online:2025-02-15 Published:2025-02-12

Abstract:

In order to determine the supporting cultivation techniques of the new flue-cured tobacco variety “Xiangyan 7” in tobacco-growing area of western Hunan, the nitrogen application rate (N1: 112.5 kg/ha; N2: 135.0 kg/ha; N3: 157.5 kg/ha), planting density (D1: 15 150 plants/ha; D2: 16 665 plants/ha; D3: 18 510 plants/ha) and the number of leaves retained (L1: 14 pieces; L2: 16 pieces; L3: 18 pieces) on yield, output value, chemical composition content and physical properties of “Xiangyan 7” tobacco leaves. The results showed that with the increase of nitrogen application, the yield and output value of tobacco leaves increased, the contents of total nitrogen and nicotine increased, and the contents of total sugar and reducing sugar decreased. With the increase of planting density, the yield, output value and the proportion of superior tobacco first decreased and then increased, and the high density led to the uncoordinated chemical composition of the middle leaves. With the increase of the number of leaves retained, the yield and output value of tobacco increased, the average price and proportion of superior tobacco decreased significantly, the content of nicotine decreased, and the contents of total sugar and reducing sugar increased. Treatment 7 (nitrogen application rate was 157.5 kg/ha, planting density was 15 150 plants/ha, number of leaves retained was 18) showed the best economic performance. The chemical composition and physical properties of C3F and B2F tobacco were better in treatments 7 and 9 (nitrogen application rate was 157.5 kg/ha, planting density was 18 510 plants/ha, number of leaves retained was 16). According to the combination of economic characteristics, chemical composition and physical characteristics of tobacco leaves, the appropriate cultivation techniques for Xiangyan 7 in tobacco area of western Hunan were nitrogen application rate of 157.5 kg/ha, planting density of 15 150 plants/ha and number of leaves retained of 18.

Key words: Xiangyan 7, Tobacco region of western Hunan, Nitrogen application rate, Planting density, Number of leaves retained, Yield, Quality

Table 1

L9(34) orthogonal design table for nitrogen application rate, planting density, and retained leaf number"

处理
Treatment
组合
Combination
施氮量
Nitrogen application rate (kg/hm2)
种植密度(株/hm2
Planting density (plant/hm2)
留叶数
Retained leaf number
1 N1D1L1 112.5 15 150 14
2 N1D2L2 112.5 16 665 16
3 N1D3L3 112.5 18 510 18
4 N2D1L2 135.0 15 150 16
5 N2D2L3 135.0 16 665 18
6 N2D3L1 135.0 18 510 14
7 N3D1L3 157.5 15 150 18
8 N3D2L1 157.5 16 665 14
9 N3D3L2 157.5 18 510 16

Table 2

Fertilization plan of this experiment kg/hm2"

施氮量
Nitrogen application rate
烟草专用基肥
Tobacco base fertilizer
硫酸钾
Potassium sulfate
有机肥
Organic fertilizer
提苗肥
Seedling fertilizer
烟草专用追肥
Tobacco topdressing
N1 750 375 225 75 300.0
N2 750 375 225 75 517.5
N3 750 375 225 75 742.5

Table 3

Evaluation standards for chemical composition of tobacco leaves"

指标Index 100 100~90 90~80 80~70 70~60 <60
烟碱Nicotine (%) 2.20~2.80 2.20~2.00 2.00~1.80 1.80~1.70 1.70~1.60 <1.60
2.80~2.90 2.90~3.00 3.00~3.10 3.10~3.20 >3.20
总氮Total nitrogen (%) 2.00~2.50 2.50~2.60 2.60~2.70 2.70~2.80 2.80~2.90 >2.90
2.00~1.90 1.90~1.80 1.80~1.70 1.70~1.60 <1.60
还原糖Reducing sugar (%) 18.00~22.00 18.00~16.00 16.00~14.00 14.00~13.00 13.00~12.00 <12.00
22.00~24.00 24.00~26.00 26.00~27.00 27.00~28.00 >28.00
糖碱比Sugar/alkali 8.5~9.5 8.50~7.00 7.00~6.00 6.00~5.50 5.50~5.00 <5.00
9.50~12.00 12.00~13.00 13.00~14.00 14.00~15.00 >15.00
氮碱比Nitrogen/alkali 0.95~1.05 0.95~0.80 0.80~0.70 0.70~0.65 0.65~0.60 <0.60
1.05~1.20 1.20~1.30 1.30~1.35 1.35~1.40 >1.40

Table 4

Effects of different cultivation measures on chemical composition of cured tobacco leaves of Xiangyan 7"

处理
Treatment
C3F B2F
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total sugar
(%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total sugar
(%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
1 1.93de 2.05abc 29.41a 22.43ab 10.94 0.94 2.02ab 3.19d 20.30ab 16.60ef 5.20 0.63
2 1.86e 2.07abc 28.22a 23.67ab 11.43 0.90 1.93b 2.53f 22.03ab 19.52b 7.72 0.76
3 1.94cd 1.82c 28.46a 23.89a 13.13 1.07 2.02ab 2.90e 23.94a 18.84bcd 6.50 0.69
4 2.04b 2.09abc 24.51bc 23.15ab 11.08 0.98 2.11a 3.78ab 21.65ab 17.47de 4.62 0.56
5 1.99bcd 2.22ab 25.37b 22.31b 10.05 0.90 2.10a 3.60bc 23.29ab 22.82a 6.34 0.58
6 2.01bc 1.92bc 29.33a 22.88ab 11.92 1.05 2.03ab 3.50c 21.74ab 17.89cde 5.11 0.58
7 2.14a 2.37a 25.10b 19.06c 8.04 0.90 2.15a 3.40cd 20.26b 19.04bc 5.60 0.63
8 2.08b 2.38a 21.91d 19.40c 8.15 0.87 2.08a 3.98a 16.50c 15.43f 3.88 0.52
9 1.99bcd 2.27a 23.37cd 19.73c 8.69 0.88 2.04ab 2.64ef 22.64ab 19.37b 7.33 0.77

Table 5

Marginal values of chemical properties of cured tobacco leaves under different cultivation measures"

栽培因子
Cultivation
factor
C3F B2F
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total
sugar (%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total
sugar (%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
N1 1.91c 1.98b 28.70a 23.33a 11.91a 0.98a 1.99b 2.88c 22.09a 18.32ab 6.48a 0.70a
N2 2.01b 2.08b 26.40b 22.78a 11.05a 0.98a 2.08a 3.63a 22.23a 19.39a 5.34b 0.57c
N3 2.07a 2.34a 23.46c 19.40b 8.34b 0.89b 2.09a 3.34b 19.80b 17.85b 5.61b 0.64b
D1 2.04a 2.17a 26.34ab 21.55a 10.04b 0.94ab 2.09a 3.46a 20.74ab 17.70b 5.15b 0.61b
D2 1.97b 2.22a 25.17b 21.79a 9.90b 0.89b 2.04a 3.37a 20.61b 19.26a 5.98a 0.62b
D3 1.98b 2.00b 27.05a 22.17a 11.36a 1.01a 2.03a 3.02b 22.77a 18.70ab 6.33a 0.68a
L1 2.00ab 2.12a 26.88a 21.57a 10.34a 0.95a 2.04a 3.56a 19.52b 16.64b 4.74b 0.58c
L2 1.96b 2.14a 25.37a 22.18a 10.47a 0.92a 2.03a 2.98c 22.11a 18.79a 6.55a 0.70a
L3 2.02a 2.14a 26.31a 21.75a 10.50a 0.96a 2.09a 3.30b 22.50a 20.23a 6.16a 0.64b
极差Range
N 0.16 0.36 5.24 3.93 3.57 0.09 0.10 0.75 2.29 1.54 1.14 0.13
D 0.07 0.22 1.88 0.62 1.46 0.12 0.06 0.44 2.16 1.56 1.18 0.07
L 0.06 0.02 1.51 0.61 0.16 0.04 0.06 0.58 2.89 3.59 1.81 0.12

Table 6

Effects of different cultivation measures on the physical properties of cured tobacco leaves"

处理
Treatment
C3F B2F
含梗率
Stem ratio
(%)
含水率
Moisture
content (%)
单叶重
Single leaf
weight (g)
单叶叶面积
Single leaf
area (cm2)
含梗率
Stem ratio
(%)
含水率
Moisture
content (%)
单叶重
Single leaf
weight (g)
单叶叶面积
Single leaf
area (cm2)
1 29.45b 14.64a 8.32de 896.25ab 26.02bcd 12.99abc 12.52a 736.84ab
2 25.73d 13.94abc 9.79b 836.05de 26.81ab 13.16ab 9.21cd 646.80cd
3 28.93b 13.91abc 7.42e 808.31e 26.45abc 12.23c 8.81d 629.27d
4 29.68b 14.47ab 9.33bc 850.04cd 27.72a 12.81bc 10.94ab 727.84ab
5 26.02d 14.05abc 9.46bc 796.60e 24.58d 13.79a 8.06d 724.27b
6 27.81c 14.10abc 8.58cd 888.68abc 27.34ab 12.80bc 11.22ab 733.62ab
7 25.85d 13.36c 10.02b 858.13bcd 27.58ab 12.88bc 10.64bc 667.50cd
8 30.75a 14.32ab 8.19de 906.38a 28.09a 12.85bc 10.95ab 766.27a
9 24.40e 13.87bc 11.13a 874.04abcd 25.21cd 12.89bc 11.01ab 670.78c

Table 7

Marginal values of physical properties of cured tobacco leaves under different cultivation measures"

栽培因子
Cultivation
factor
C3F B2F
含梗率
Stem ratio
(%)
含水率
Moisture
content (%)
单叶重
Single leaf
weight (g)
单叶叶面积
Single leaf
area (cm2)
含梗率
Stem ratio
(%)
含水率
Moisture
content (%)
单叶重
Single leaf
weight (g)
单叶叶面积
Single leaf
area (cm2)
N1 28.04a 14.16a 8.51c 846.87b 26.43a 12.79a 10.18b 670.97b
N2 27.84a 14.21a 8.91b 845.11b 26.55a 12.87a 10.41ab 728.58a
N3 27.00a 13.85a 9.78a 879.52a 26.96a 13.13a 11.16a 701.52a
D1 28.33a 14.16a 9.01a 868.14a 27.11a 12.89ab 11.37a 710.73a
D2 27.50a 14.10a 9.15a 846.34a 26.49a 13.27a 10.03b 712.45a
D3 27.05a 13.96a 9.04a 857.01a 26.33a 12.64b 10.35b 677.89b
L1 29.34a 14.35a 8.36b 897.10a 27.15a 12.88a 11.85a 745.58a
L2 26.60b 14.09ab 9.87a 853.38b 26.58a 12.95a 10.39b 681.81b
L3 26.93b 13.77b 8.97ab 821.01c 26.20a 12.96a 9.50b 673.68b
极差Range
N 1.04 0.36 1.27 34.41 0.53 0.34 0.98 57.61
D 1.28 0.20 0.14 21.80 0.78 0.63 1.34 34.56
L 2.74 0.58 1.51 76.09 0.95 0.08 2.35 71.90

Table 8

Effects of different cultivation measures on the yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
产值(元/hm2
Output value (yuan/hm2)
均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/kg)
上等烟比例
Proportion of superior tobacco (%)
1 2254.02d 60 171.37c 26.67a 46.70a
2 2268.29d 57 370.19c 25.29abc 42.50b
3 2691.51b 67 848.59b 25.22abc 35.47c
4 2395.67cd 59 163.83c 24.70bc 34.67c
5 2397.91cd 58 271.95c 24.29c 32.82c
6 2562.44bc 68 061.40b 26.56ab 44.80ab
7 2928.38a 74 428.99a 25.41abc 43.57ab
8 2703.43b 69 755.99b 25.80abc 45.71ab
9 2650.58bc 67 499.80b 25.47abc 42.37b

Table 9

Marginal values of different cultivation measures on the yield and output value of flue-cured tobacco"

栽培因子
Cultivation factor
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
产值(元/hm2
Output value (yuan/hm2)
均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/kg)
上等烟比例
Proportion of superior tobacco (%)
N1 2404.61b 61 796.72b 25.73a 41.55ab
N2 2452.01b 61 832.39b 25.18a 37.43b
N3 2760.80a 70 561.59a 25.56a 43.88a
D1 2526.03ab 64 588.06ab 25.59a 41.65a
D2 2456.55b 61 799.38b 25.13a 40.34a
D3 2634.84a 67 803.26a 25.75a 40.88a
L1 2506.63b 65 996.25a 26.34a 45.74a
L2 2438.18b 61 344.61b 25.15b 39.85b
L3 2672.60a 66 849.85a 24.97b 37.29b

Table 10

Comparison on chemical composition content in cured tobacco leaves between demonstration area and control area"

处理
Treatment
C3F B2F
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total
sugar (%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
总氮
Total
nitrogen (%)
烟碱
Nicotine
(%)
总糖
Total
sugar (%)
还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)
糖碱比
Sugar/
alkali
氮碱比
Nitrogen/
alkali
示范Demonstrate 1.95 2.27 23.85 20.52 9.04 0.86 2.37 3.49 20.06 18.4 5.27 0.68
对照Control 1.69 2.03 26.68 21.46 10.57 0.83 1.93 2.40 23.54 19.47 8.11 0.80

Table 11

Comparison on economic traits of flue cured tobacco leaves between demonstration area and control area"

处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/hm2)
产值(元/hm2
Output value (yuan/hm2)
中上等烟比例
Ratio of mid-upper class tobacco (%)
示范Demonstrate 2714.37 26.29 71 360.79 98.14
对照Control 2258.30 25.58 57 766.04 94.56
[1] 王红丽, 杨惠娟, 苏菲, 等. 氮用量对烤烟成熟期叶片碳氮代谢及萜类代谢相关基因表达的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(5):116-120.
[2] 林翠丽, 张跃王, 高卫红, 等. 不同施氮量对烤烟产质量的影响. 新农业, 2019(3):7-9.
[3] 侯冰清, 邢雪霞, 赵喆, 等. 密度、施氮量和留叶数对烤烟产质量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(9):46-51,55.
[4] 王志勇. 不同群体结构对烟草生长发育及产质量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(14):35-38.
[5] 韩锦峰. 烟草栽培生理. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[6] 王三根, 张建奎. 山地烟叶的生理特性与栽培调控. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014.
[7] 沈杰, 蔡艳, 何玉婷, 等. 种植密度对烤烟养分吸收及品质形成影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(10):51-58.
[8] 刘国. 施氮量、种植密度对红大品种生长发育与产质量的影响. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2011.
[9] 谢孔华, 刘坤华, 谭雪庆, 等. 不同种植密度对烤烟产量和质量的影响. 广东农业科学, 2013, 20(20):16-18.
[10] 王瑞, 刘国顺, 倪国仕, 等. 种植密度对烤烟不同部位叶片光合特性及其同化物积累的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(12):2288-2295.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.02288
[11] 林朗. 施氮量及种植密度对烤烟云烟87产量和质量的影响. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2010.
[12] 黄敏. 种植密度、施氮量及留叶数对烤烟新品种云烟99的影响. 昆明:云南农业大学, 2017.
[13] 高贵, 田野, 邵忠顺, 等. 留叶数和留叶方式对上部叶烟碱含量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2005(5):26-27.
[14] 邱标任, 林桂华, 沈焕梅, 等. 提高龙岩岩区上部叶可用性的途径. 中国烟草科学, 2000, 21(2):18-20.
[15] 王付锋, 赵铭钦, 张学杰, 等. 种植密度与留叶数对烤烟农艺性状及品质的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2010, 26(3):487-492.
[16] 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[17] 程传玲, 唐琦, 汪文良, 等. 烤烟常规化学成分与感官质量的典型相关分析. 贵州农业科学, 2011, 39(1):59-61.
[18] 甄安忠, 何文高, 陈懿, 等. 施氮量和留叶数对烤烟K326碳代谢和品质的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(9):20-25.
[19] 杨隆飞, 占朝琳, 郑聪, 等. 施氮量与种植密度互作对烤烟生长发育的影响. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(6):46-48.
[20] 谭军, 郭芳军, 孙兆旭, 等. 不同施氮量对烤烟产量和质量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2008, 20(11):24-26.
[21] 潘广为, 向炳清, 孔伟, 等. 高海拔地区烟草留叶数对烤烟产量、质量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(14):3338-3341.
[1] Ren Yongfu, Li Jiayi, Chen Guopeng, Pu Tian, Chen Hong, Wang Xiaochun. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on the Yield and Efficiency of Maize in Strip Intercropping System [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 101-108.
[2] Zhang Jiazhi, Zhao Yuhan, Ding Junjie, Yao Liangliang, Qiu Lei, Zhang Maoming, Wang Zijie, Gao Xuedong, Huang Chengliang, Cui Shize, Yang Xiaohe. Effects of “Double-Exemption Dense Seedling” Technique on Seedling Quality and Enzyme Activity of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 109-114.
[3] Tian Wenqiang, Wang Hongyi, Nie Lingfan, Sun Ganggang, Zhang Jun, Zhang Qiangbin, Yu Shan, Li Jiahao, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. The Effects of Sowing Date and Sowing Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Extremely Late-Sown Wheat Population [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 115-122.
[4] Zhang Shengchang, Wei Yuming, Ma Lina, Yang Zhao, Liu Wenyu, Huang Jie, Liu Huan, Yang Farong. Effects of Planting Density and Fertilization on Growth Characteristics of Forage Quinoa [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 128-134.
[5] Ji Jinghong, Liu Shuangquan, Ma Xingzhu, Hao Xiaoyu, Zheng Yu, Zhao Yue, Wang Xiaojun, Kuang Enjun. Effects of Different Controlled-Release Urea on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Cold Region Rice [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 149-154.
[6] Mi Dongming, Zhou Zuoyan, Zhang Xiaoyan, Fan Zhenjie, Sun Peijie, Huang Xiao, Ren Aixia, Sun Min, Ren Yongkang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Matter Transfer and Protein Content in Black Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 155-161.
[7] Zhang Jili, He Jinghao, Wei Jianyu, Huang Chongjun, Wang Wei, Cai Yixia. Effects of Application Period of Microbial Inoculants on Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Diversity, Enzyme Activity and Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 162-171.
[8] Jin Dandan, Sui Shijiang, Chen Yue, Li Bo, Qu Hang, Gong Liang. Effects of Straw Returning with Nitrogen Application Reduction on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Liaohe Plain [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 172-179.
[9] Zhang Lina, Yang Wenping, Su Miao, Zhang Zhixuan, Li Junhui, Aamir Ali, Chen Jie, Gao Zhiqiang, Yang Zhenping. Effect of Foliar Application of Selenium onNutritional Quality of Oat Grain [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 196-206.
[10] Li Yunxia, Yang Jiashuo, Li Yangyang, Xiang Shipeng, Yu Jinlong, Li Bin, Zheng Weiwei, Liu Lu. Effects of Different Transplanting Periods on the Growth, Development and Yield Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Tobacco-Rice Rotation Area [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 222-227.
[11] Li Junzhi, Dou Shuang, Wang Xiaodong, Zhang Meng, Xiao Jibing. Effects of Different Intercropping Patterns on Sorghum Growth and Development [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 234-240.
[12] Zhao Lingling, Li Guifang, Cheng Chu, Zheng Mingjie, Hu Min, Zhu Jianfeng, Shen Ayi, Shen Aga, Wang Junzhen, Shao Meihong. Preliminary Report on Introduction Experiment of New Buckwheat Varieties in Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 86-92.
[13] Luo Jianke, Zhang Kehou, Wang Zeyu, Zhang Pingzhen, Nan Ming. Research on the Production Performance of 18 Oat Varieties (Lines) in the Irrigation Area along the Yellow River in Baiyin City [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 93-100.
[14] Long Weihua, Xian Zhihui, Zhang Zheng, Alibieligen·Hazitai , Zulehumaer·Wusimanjiang , Pu Huiming, Hu Maolong. Adaptability Analysis of Non-Transgenic Herbicide-Resistant Hybrid Rapeseed Lines from Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River in Ili River Valley, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 111-116.
[15] Chu Zhaokang, Wang Shiji, Bi Jianjian, Zhang Lin, Peng Chen, Chen Xiang, Wu Wenming. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield and Filling Characteristics of Summer Maize in the Central Yangtze-Huaihe Region [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(1): 117-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .