Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 151-156.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.027

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Yield Components of Three Varieties of Ratooning Rice

Wu Yunzi1,2,Duan Menjun1,2,Liu Zhangyong1,2,Chen Fu1,3,Jin Tao1,2   

  1. 1 Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland,Ministry of Education,Yangtze University,Jingzhou 434025,Hubei,China
    2 Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain Indusry,Yangtze University,Jingzhou 434025,Hubei,China
    3 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China
  • Received:2016-11-01 Revised:2017-01-19 Online:2017-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Tao Jin

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

293

Abstract:

In order to study the optimizing sowing date of ratooning rice and the main yield components factor which affects the grain yield in Hubei province, a field experiment was conducted in Shakou town, Honghu city, Hubei province from March to November in 2015 with widely used ratooning rice cultivars of Fengliang Youxiang 1, Deyou 8258 and Xinliangyou 223. Four sowing dates as March 18, March 24, March 30 and April 5 were used for all three ratooning rice cultivars. Results showed that the different sowing date had small effect on the main crop yield, but it could significantly affect the yield of ratooning crop (P<0.05). Both the Fengliang Youxiang 1 and Xinliangyou 223, which were sowed on March 24, had the highest yield of ratooning crop than the rest of sowing dates with the yield of 6 391.7kg/hm 2 and 5 843.91kg/hm 2, respectively. And the highest yield of ratooning crop of Deyou 8258 was observed in the sowing date of March 30 with the yield of 5 723.93kg/hm 2. In the study, the yield of ratooning crop was significantly increased with the increasing of regeneration bud, effective panicle number and seed setting rate (P<0.05). Therefore, the recommendation of optimizing sowing date for both Fengliang Youxiang 1 and Xinliangyou 223 could be March 24 and for Deyou 8258 it could be March 30 in Hubei province.

Key words: Ratooning rice, Main crop rice, Sowing date, Regeneration bud, Yield

Table 1

Effects of sowing dates on the plant height of the main crop and the ratooning rice cm"

播种期
Sowing date
(月/日)		 头季稻Main crop rice 再生季稻Ratooning rice
丰两优香1号
Fengliang Youxiang 1		 德优8258
Deyou 8258		 新两优223
Xinliangyou 223		 丰两优香1号
Fengliang Youxiang 1		 德优8258
Deyou 8258		 新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
3/18 113.67b 110.73b 111.33b 88.67a 89.56a 86.78a
3/24 104.67c 104.13b 105.73b 84.00a 86.22a 86.22a
3/30 112.06b 108.66b 112.20b 87.78a 87.89a 85.89a
4/05 121.60a 124.53a 118.60a 89.00a 86.78a 88.56a

"

播种期
Sowing date
(月/日)		 丰两优香1号
Fengliang Youxiang 1		 德优8258
Deyou 8258		 新两优223
Xinliangyou 223
3/18 364.89±14.13b 367.17±12.08b 379.82±10.01b
3/24 413.11±7.00a 404.73±15.01a 423.68±8.04a
3/30 342.89±17.01b 351.17±9.71b 372.67±7.03b
4/05 234.89±5.00c 214.32±5.14c 250.66±8.34c

Table 3

Effects of sowing date on yield and yield components of three varieties of the main crop rice"

品种
Variety		 播种期(月/日)
Sowing date		 有效穗数(万穗/hm2)
Effective panicles		 每穗粒数
Grain number		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 结实率(%)
Seeding set rate		 头季稻实际产量(kg/hm2)
Actual yield of main crop rice
丰两优香1号 3/18 431.11±17.88a 125.23 28.91 76.69 11 045.01±255.93a
Fengliang Youxiang 1 3/24 322.22±15.83b 142.71 29.88 80.70 10 711.65±207.98a
3/30 295.56±8.88c 155.36 29.26 85.73 10 656.01±370.99a
4/05 253.33±8.90d 177.56 29.14 87.17 10 589.43±292.93a
德优8258 3/18 406.81±18.80a 114.56 30.22 82.83 10 622.22±197.85a
Deyou 8258 3/24 361.04±20.85b 119.18 30.77 85.02 10 288.89±206.23a
3/30 322.07±17.85c 129.49 31.07 85.64 10 422.22±209.98a
4/05 263.52±7.91d 153.37 31.18 89.75 10 244.44±313.14a
新两优223 3/18 456.56±13.81a 106.07 29.52 83.62 10 911.11±145.16a
Xinliangyou 223 3/24 382.07±16.89b 114.71 29.03 87.47 10 588.89±110.10b
3/30 320.37±11.81c 131.26 30.11 88.31 10 308.88±171.80b
4/05 285.56±15.88d 147.81 30.01 90.14 10 277.78±158.06b

Table 4

Variance analysis of double factor of yield factors in the ratooning rice"

因素
Factor		 再生芽数
Regeneration
bud		 有效穗数
Effective panicles		 穗长
Panicle length		 实粒数
Solid grain number		 每穗粒数
Grain
number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 结实率
Seeding set rate		 再生季实际产量
Actual yield of
ratiooning rice		 两季实际总产量
Actual total yield
播种期
Sowing date		 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 0.017
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
品种
Variety		 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 0.037
 0.058
 0.004
 <0.001
 <0.001
播种期×品种
Sowing date×Variety		 0.233
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001
 0.427
 0.317
 <0.001
 <0.001
 <0.001

Table 5

Effects of sowing date on yield and yield components of the ratiooning rice"

品种
Variety		 播种期
(月/日)
Sowing date		 有效穗数
(万穗/hm2)
Effective panicles		 每穗实粒数
(粒/穗)
Solid grain number		 每穗粒数
(粒/穗)
Grain number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight		 结实率(%)
Seeding
set rate		 再生季实际产量
(kg/hm2)
Actual yield of
ratiooning rice		 两季实际总产量
(kg/hm2)
Actual total yield
丰两优香1号 3/18 354.89±7.27b 53.54±0.89b 72.66 28.64 73.69±1.26c 4 913.02±86.76c 15 958.46±63.31b
Fengliang Youxiang 1 3/24 377.73±13.19a 62.34±1.28a 76.08 28.85 81.94±0.96a 6 391.70±106.16a 17 103.68±96.15a
3/30 350.10±5.97b 55.47±0.78c 69.08 28.16 80.30±0.22b 5 080.81±75.02b 15 737.15±53.52c
4/5 334.50±6.24c 48.46±1.78d 65.07 29.62 74.47±0.34c 4 688.33±71.92d 15 278.09±124.80d
德优8258 3/18 348.46±8.36b 52.99±1.07b 71.89 30.07 73.71±0.33c 5 199.22±60.27c 15 821.77±60.82b
Deyou 8258 3/24 339.70±11.98b 55.35±1.78b 69.23 29.81 79.95±0.17b 5 291.02±76.12b 15 580.24±73.94c
3/30 363.70±13.18a 57.43±1.19a 70.37 30.27 81.61±0.11a 5 723.91±96.88a 16 146.46±67.23a
4/5 317.83±9.87c 49.48±0.89c 66.92 30.02 73.94±0.52c 4 626.83±100.32d 14 871.60±92.21d
新两优223 3/18 356.73±7.83b 53.58±0.88b 69.03 29.25 77.62±0.91c 5 242.32±86.23b 16 153.76±51.79b
Xinliangyou 223 3/24 373.36±15.29a 59.39±1.79a 71.97 28.84 82.52±0.32a 5 843.91±110.71a 16 423.10±103.07a
3/30 335.19±6.15c 55.04±0.89b 68.48 28.75 80.37±0.85b 4 817.62±61.22c 15 126.80±104.96c
4/5 330.79±9.37c 46.90±2.17c 61.04 29.44 76.83±1.16c 4 483.73±110.71d 14 761.84±91.88d

Table 6

Correlation analysis of yield components and yield in the ratiooning rice"

属性
Attribute		 再生季稻产量
Yield of ratiooning rice		 两季稻总产量
Total yield
显著
水平		 Pearson
相关性		 显著
水平		 Pearson
相关性
再生芽数
Regeneration buds		 0.006
 0.741**
 0.004
 0.757**
有效穗数
Effective panicles		 0.000
 0.895**
 0.000
 0.960**
实粒数
Solid grain number		 0.002
 0.802**
 0.000
 0.866**
穗粒数
Grain number		 0.264
 0.351
 0.231
 0.374
千粒重
1000-grain weight		 0.752
 -0.102
 0.747
 -0.104
结实率
Seeding set rate		 0.014
 0.685*
 0.018
 0.664*
[1] 朱永川, 熊洪, 徐富贤 , 等. 再生稻栽培技术的研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(36):1-8.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-0363
[2] 徐德利, 陆建飞 . 水稻可持续发展综述.作物杂志, 2010(3):1-4.
[3] 官春云, 黄璜, 黄国勤 , 等. 中国南方稻田多熟种植存在的问题及对策.作物杂志, 2016(2):1-7.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.001
[4] 柳开楼, 秦江涛, 张斌 . 播种期对轻简栽培方式再生稻源库关系的影响. 土壤, 2012,44(4):686-695.
[5] 熊洪, 冉茂林, 徐富贤 , 等. 南方稻区再生稻研究进展及发展. 作物学报, 2000,26(3):297-304.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2000.03.008
[6] Zhou X G . Rice main-crop cutting height affects severity of narrow brown leaf spot in the ratoon crop. Phytopathology, 2014,12(11):138-148.
[7] 邢志鹏, 曹伟伟, 钱海军 , 等. 播期对机插水稻产量构成特征的影响.农业工程学报, 2015(13):22-31.
doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.13.004
[8] 许轲, 孙圳, 霍中洋 , 等. 播期、品种类型对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(20):4222-4233.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.20.005
[9] 邢志鹏, 曹伟伟, 钱海军 , 等. 稻麦两熟地区机插水稻品质形成的播期效应.生态学杂志, 2016(1):1-10.
[10] 周奥, 何可佳, 李晓刚 . 湖南地区再生稻品种筛选及高产栽培技术研究. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(15):1-5.
[11] 吕泽林, 钟顺清, 杨航 . 再生稻高产稳产栽培技术研究. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(17):8886-8888.
[12] 俞道标, 赵雅静, 黄顽春 , 等. 低桩机割再生稻生育特性和氮肥施用技术研究. 福建农业学报, 2012,27(5):485-490.
[13] 张上守 . 播种期对超高产再生稻生育及干物质生产的影响. 福建农业学报, 2009,24(4):290-295.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2009.04.003
[14] 李阳 . 不同品种中稻蓄留再生稻产量形成的差异与再生芽化学调控初探. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2014.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y2566220
[15] Golam F, Rosna M T, Zakaria H P . Rice ratoon crop: A sustainable rice production system for tropical hill agriculture. Sustainability, 2014,6:5785-5800.
doi: 10.3390/su6095785
[16] Liu K L, Li Y Z, Hu H W . Predicting ratoon rice growth rhythm based on NDVI at key growth stages of main rice. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 2015,12(75):410-417.
[17] 杨东, 段留生, 谢华安 , 等. 不同生育期弱光对超级稻Ⅱ优航2号产量及品质的影响. 福建农业学报, 2013,20(2):107-112.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.02.003
[18] 何花榕, 房贤涛, 翁国华 , 等. 留茬高度对再生稻生长发育和产量的影响研究现状及展望. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(9):6-10.
[19] 谢晓金, 李秉柏, 朱红霞 , 等抽穗期高温对水稻叶片光合特性和干物质积累的影响. 中国农业气象, 2012,33(3):457-461.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2012.03.021
[20] 王连喜, 任景全, 李琪 . 未来气候变化情景下江苏水稻高温热害模拟研究Ⅱ:孕穗-抽穗期水稻对高温热害的适应性分析. 中国农业气象, 2014,35(2):206-213.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2014.02.014
[21] 何水清, 周明火, 王玉猛 . 不同播种期对再生稻丰源优272产量及产量构成的影响. 中国稻米, 2013,19(5):104-105.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2013.05.036
[22] 黄新杰, 屠乃美, 李艳芳 , 等. 杂交稻不同节位再生稻的产量形成及其与头季稻的关系. 湖南农学大学学报, 2012,38(5):470-475.
[23] 张上守, 卓传营, 姜照伟 , 等. 超高产再生稻产量形成和栽培技术分析. 福建农业学报, 2003,18(1):1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2003.01.001
[24] 何花榕, 翁国华, 郭灵灵 , 等. 影响再生稻腋芽萌发因素的研究进展.福建稻麦科技, 2008(3):61-63,43.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9799.2008.03.030
[25] 胡春花, 孟卫东, 陈健晓 , 等. 超级杂交稻Ⅱ优航2号再生稻配套栽培技术研究.杂交水稻, 2013(4):48-51.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[12] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[13] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[14] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[15] Yanli Fan,Hui Dong,Baishan Lu,Yaxing Shi,Ning Gao,Yamin Shi,Li Xu,Shengli Xi,Cuifen Zhang,Yanhui Liu. Effects of Sowing Date on Starch Gelatinization Characteristics of Different Waxy Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 79-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .