Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 61-67.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.02.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparision of Yield and Quality among Different Ratooning Rice Varieties

Duan Menjun1,Wu Yunzi2,Tian Yucong1,Liu Yongwu4,Liu Zhangyong1,Chen Fu3,Jin Tao1   

  1. 1 Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agricultural Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, Hubei, China
    2 Jingzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jingzhou 434000, Hubei,China
    3 College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
    4 Shakou Agricultural Technology Service Center, Jingzhou 433206, Hubei, China
  • Received:2017-11-07 Revised:2018-03-05 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-08-27

RichHTML

10

PDF (PC)

198

Abstract:

In order to study the main influencing factors on yield and quality of ratooning rice and screen suitable varieties of ratooning rice in Honghu City of Hubei Province, a field experiment was conducted in Shakou town, Honghu City, Hubei Province from March to November in 2016 with ratooning rice cultivars of Guangliangyou 1128, Xinliangyou 223, Liangyou 6326 and Chuangliangyou 558. The results showed that the main crop rice yield, ratooning rice yield and total yield of Chuangliangyou 558 were the highest, which were 8 087.4kg/hm 2, 5 916.7kg/hm 2 and 14 004 kg/hm 2, respectively. The brown rice rate and length-width ratio between four ratooning rice varieties were no significantly different. The polished rice rate, whole polished rice rate and amylose content of Chuangliangyou 558 were the highest, and the values were 70.2%, 65.5% and 24.5%, respectively. The amylose content of Xinliangyou 223 was significantly lower than other varieties, with value of 21.4%. The total protein content of chuangliangyou 558 were the highest, followed by Guangliangyou 1128, and the values were 9.14g/100g and 9.03g/100g, respectively, which was significantly higher than other varieties (P<0.05).The research shows that all 4 varieties were suitable for planting in Honghu area. The main rice yield, ratooning rice yield and total yield of Chaunglaingyou 558 were the highest, and the rice quality was the best. The main yield components affecting ratooning rice yield were grains per panicle, seed setting rate. The chalky grain rate, chalkiness degree and polished rice rate were the main factors affecting the whole polished rice rate of ratooning rice.

Key words: The main crop rice, Ratooning rice, Regeneration bud, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Comparison of yield and yield components of the main crop rice of different varieties"

品种Variety 有效穗数(×104/hm2)
Effective panicles		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 结实率(%)
Setting rate		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 头季稻实产(kg/hm2)
Actual yield of the main crop rice
广两优1128 Guangliangyou 1128 330.6±20.6b 128.1±11.7ab 63.6±3.8a 29.4±0.7a 7 170.3±246.9b
新两优223 Xinliangyou 223 373.3±14.0a 115.4±8.7b 58.1±2.0a 28.3±0.6b 6 920.1±144.4b
两优6326 Liangyou 6326 348.9±14.2b 114.1±10.1b 62.7±4.3a 28.9±0.2ab 7 086.9±351.4b
创两优558 Chuangliangyou 558 375.6±10.4a 140.1±14.7a 62.7±1.8a 26.8±0.1c 8 087.4±284.7a

Fig.1

Regeneration buds germination dynamic of different varieties"

Table 2

Comparison of yield and yield components of the rationing crop rice of different varieties"

品种Variety 有效穗数(×104/hm2)
Effective panicles		 穗粒数
Grains per panicle		 结实率(%)
Setting rate		 千粒重(g) 1000-grain weight 再生稻实产(kg/hm2)
Actual yield of the ratooning crop rice
广两优1128 Guangliangyou 1128 331.0±19.6b 71.4±3.2b 82.0±2.0bc 30.5±0.3a 5 416.7±288.7b
新两优223 Xinliangyou 223 368.4±28.9ab 66.9±3.6bc 86.7±1.5a 28.7±0.3b 5 666.7±144.3ab
两优6326 Liangyou 6326 396.3±10.9a 62.8±1.9c 79.7±1.2c 28.4±0.5b 5 500.0±250.0b
创两优558 Chuangliangyou 558 398.4±30.3a 81.7±4.3a 83.7±3.1ab 23.6±0.2c 5 916.7±144.3a

Fig.2

Yield comparison of different varieties of the ratooning crop rice"

Table 3

The comparison of main and ratooning growth period of different varieties"

品种
Variety		 头季稻The main crop rice 再生稻The ratooning crop rice 全生育期(d)
Whole growth period
播种(月/日)
Sowing
(Mouth/day)		 移栽(月/日)
Transplanting (Mouth/day)		 始穗(月/日)
Initial heading
(Mouth/day)		 齐穗(月/日)
Full heading
(Mouth/day)		 成熟(月/日) Maturation
(Mouth/day)		 生育期(d)
Growth period		 始穗(月/日)
Initial heading
(Mouth/day)		 齐穗(月/日)
Full heading
(Mouth/day)		 成熟(月/日) Maturation
(Mouth/day)		 生育期(d)
Growth period
广两优1128
Guangliangyou 1128		 3/25 4/27 7/10 7/14 8/15 143 9/8 9/17 10/31 77 220
新两优223
Xinliangyou 223		 3/25 4/27 7/7 7/12 8/12 140 9/8 9/14 10/26 75 215
两优6326
Liangyou 6326		 3/25 4/27 7/7 7/11 8/13 139 9/7 9/14 10/26 74 213
创两优558
Chuangliangyou 558		 3/25 4/27 7/10 7/14 8/15 143 9/9 9/16 10/31 77 220

Table 4

Comparison of process quality and appearance quality of the ratooning crop rice of different varieties"

品种Variety 糙米率(%)
Brown rice rate		 精米率(%)
Polished rice rate		 整精米率(%)
Whole polished rice rate		 垩白粒率(%)
Chalky grain rate		 垩白度(%)
Chalkiness degree		 长宽比
Length-width ratio
广两优1128 Guangliangyou 1128 79.4±1.8a 68.1±0.6b 59.9±0.4b 8.6±1.8a 2.0±0.4ab 2.8±0.1a
新两优223 Xinliangyou 223 80.5±0.1a 68.7±0.1b 62.2±0.5b 4.7±1.0ab 1.1±0.2bc 2.9±0.1a
两优6326 Liangyou 6326 79.6±0.8 a 68.0±1.4b 61.3±1.8b 5.6±1.8ab 1.3±0.4abc 2.9±0.1a
创两优558 Chuangliangyou 558 80.4±0.6 a 70.2±0.2a 65.5±2.3a 3.1±3.6b 0.7±0.1c 2.9±0.1a

Table 5

Comparison of amylose content and protein content of the ratooning crop rice of different varieties"

品种
Variety		 直链淀粉(%)
Amylose		 谷蛋白(g/100g)
Glutenin		 清蛋白(g/100g)
Albumin		 球蛋白(g/100g)
Globulin		 醇溶蛋白(g/100g)
Gliadin		 总蛋白(g/100g)
Total protein
广两优1128 Guangliangyou 1128 23.8±1.1ab 7.06±0.16ab 0.95±0.06a 0.57±0.05a 0.46±0.02ab 9.03±0.13a
新两优223 Xinliangyou 223 21.4±0.1c 6.85±0.04bc 0.91±0.09a 0.57±0.01a 0.43±0.02b 8.76±0.08b
两优6326 Liangyou 6326 22.3±0.1b 6.67±0.15c 1.00±0.08a 0.61±0.01a 0.44±0.02b 8.71±0.20b
创两优558 Chuangliangyou 558 24.5±0.1a 7.11±0.04a 0.91±0.05a 0.61±0.03a 0.52±0.06a 9.14±0.09a

Table 6

The correlation analysis between whole polished rice rate and quality indexs"

品质指标
Quality index		 再生稻整精米率
Whole polished rice rate
检验结果
Test result		 Pearson 相关性
Pearson relevance
垩白粒率Chalky grain rate 0.020 -0.542*
垩白度Chalkiness degree 0.035 -0.500*
长宽比Length-width ratio 0.211 0.310
糙米率Brown rice rate 0.792 0.067
精米率Polished rice rate 0.000 0.794**
直链淀粉含量Amylose content 0.652 0.348
[1] 夏桂龙, 欧阳建平, 柳开楼 , 等. 促芽肥用量和留茬方式对赣东北地区再生稻产量和再生能力的影响. 中国稻米, 2016,22(2):27-30.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2016.02.005
[2] Zhou X G . Rice main-crop cutting height affects severity of narrow brown leaf spot in the ratoon crop. Phytopathology, 2014,12(11):138-148.
[3] 周奥, 何可佳, 李晓刚 . 湖南地区再生稻品种筛选及高产栽培技术研究.中国农学通报, 2016(15):1-5.
[4] 马晓春 . 中稻蓄留再生稻品种筛选与头季收获方式对再生季产量的影响. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2015.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y2803618
[5] 刘成家, 高家旭, 陈丁 , 等. 中稻-再生稻优质高产栽培技术措施. 中国农业信息, 2015(18):117-120.
[6] 吴芸紫, 段门俊, 刘章勇 , 等. 播种期对3个再生稻品种产量及产量构成因子的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(2):151-156.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.027
[7] 柳开楼, 秦江涛, 张斌 . 播种期对轻简栽培方式再生稻源库关系的影响. 土壤, 2012,44(4):685.
[8] 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川 , 等. 杂交中稻再生力的鉴定方法. 作物学报, 2005,31(4):506-510.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.04.018
[9] 梁娟英, 林明龙 . 旱区超级稻再生栽培试验初报. 广西农业科学, 2009,40(4):362-365.
[10] 罗丽华, 肖应辉, 刘国华 , 等. 同类型水稻再生特性的比较研究. 广西农业科学, 2006(2):123-126.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2006.02.008
[11] 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林 , 等. 杂交中稻留桩高度对再生稻米质的影响及其与头季稻米质的关系. 中国稻米, 2014,20(1):86-87,89.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2014.01.021
[12] 贺梅, 宋冬明 . 环境因素对稻米品质的影响. 北方水稻, 2015,45(5):71-74.
[13] 向昌国, 卓儒洞, 李文芳 , 等. 两系杂交稻培矮64S/E32头季稻与再生稻米质比较. 杂交水稻, 2000,15(3):37.
[14] 郑苹立, 李清华, 林玲娜 . 头季稻与再生稻的米质比较分析. 福建稻麦科技, 2011(3):44-46.
[15] 刘代银, 丁明忠 . 洪水再生稻的蓄留及管理技术. 四川农业科技, 2007(8):23.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1028.2007.08.010
[16] 童浩 . 稻米品质的品种差异及与淀粉酶和蛋白组分的关系. 长沙:湖南农业大学, 2014.
[17] 李仁英, 李霖, 黄利东 , 等. 不同品种水稻的产量构成因素及其对氮磷吸收的差异研究. 土壤通报, 2016,47(6):1418-1424.
doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.2016.06.21
[18] 郭立 . 不同水稻品种氮素吸收与利用的差异及生理基础. 南宁:广西大学, 2007.
doi: 10.7666/d.y1113284
[19] 王清峰, 杨重法, 程子硕 , 等. 不同水稻品种的干物质生产及产量形成特性的比较研究. 热带作物学报, 2014,35(9):1699-1703.
[20] 张桂莲, 屠乃美, 袁菊红 , 等. 播种期对再生稻腋芽萌发和产量的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(3):229-232.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-1032.2005.03.001
[21] Bardhan R S K, Vergara B S, Patena G . Rice with ratoon ability for deepwater areas. In:IRRI. Proceedings of 1981 International Deepwater Rice Workshop. Los Banos:IRRI, 1982, 305-309.
[22] 罗丽华, 肖应辉, 刘国华 , 等. 不同类型水稻再生特性的比较研究. 广西农业科学, 2006(2):123-126.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2006.02.008
[23] 何花榕, 翁国华, 郭灵灵 , 等. 影响再生稻腋芽萌发因素的研究进展. 福建稻麦科技, 2008(3):61-63,43.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9799.2008.03.030
[24] 谢成林, 唐建鹏, 姚义 , 等. 栽培措施对稻米品质影响的研究进展. 中国稻米, 2017,23(6):13-18,22.
[25] 芮闯, 刘莹, 孙建平 . 蛋白质与大米食味品质的相关性分析. 食品科技, 2012(3):164-167,171.
[26] 陈莹莹 . 江苏早熟晚粳品种稻米品质对氮肥的响应及其类型. 扬州:扬州大学, 2012.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y2258041
[27] 张启莉 . 籼稻米蛋白质影响米饭蒸煮食味品质的研究. 成都:四川农业大学, 2012.
[28] 向远鸿, 唐启源, 黄燕湘 . 稻米品质性状相关性研究—I.籼型粘稻食味与其它米质性状的关系. 湖南农学院学报, 1990,16(4):325-330.
[29] 徐庆国, 童浩, 胡晋豪 , 等. 稻米蛋白组分含量的品种差异及其与米质的关系. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,41(1):7-11,41.
doi: 10.13331/j.cnki.jhau.2015.01.002
[30] 宁慧峰 . 氮素对稻米品质的影响及其理化基础研究. 南京:南京农业大学, 2011.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .