高粱的耐瘠性与养分高效利用研究现状与展望

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.06.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

施肥对作物增产具有重要作用，然而施肥对土壤等环境的影响也越来越严重。因此，如何鉴选与创制养分高效利用资源，选育高产、绿色品种已经成为目前高粱产业发展的重要研究方向。本文总结了国内外高粱种质资源耐瘠性鉴定、养分胁迫对高粱主要农艺性状的影响与生理学响应、养分效率的分子生物学研究、氮利用效率与根系分泌生物消化抑制等方面取得的研究进展，并对养分高效利用研究和氮高效利用品种选育进行了展望，为高粱新品种在中低产田产量提升、减施化肥和农业面源污染改善等方面提供技术支撑。

关键词: 高粱, 耐瘠性, 氮利用效率, 生物硝化抑制

Abstract:

Fertilization in crop production has played a major role, however, the impact of fertilization to soil and other environment is also becoming more and more serious. Therefore, how to select and create the efficient utilization of nutrient resources, and get high-yield and green varieties has become an important research direction of the sorghum industry development today. In this paper, we summarized the research progress in the identification of barren tolerance of sorghum germplasm resources at home and abroad, the effects of nutrient stress on main agronomic traits and physiological responses of sorghum, the molecular biology of nutrient efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency and biological nitrification inhibitors of root secretion. The research on nutrient efficient utilization and breeding of varieties with high nitrogen use efficiency were also prospected. These studies provided technical support for new sorghum varieties in improving yield of low and medium yield fields, reducing the application of chemical fertilizers, and improving agricultural non-point source pollution.

Key words: Sorghum, Barren tolerance, Nitrogen use efficiency, Biological nitrification inhibitors

张福耀, 平俊爱, 焦晓燕. 高粱的耐瘠性与养分高效利用研究现状与展望[J]. 作物杂志, 2023 (6): 26–34

Zhang Fuyao, Ping Jun’ai, Jiao Xiaoyan. Research Status and Prospects of Barren Tolerance and Nutrient Efficient Utilization in Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2023(6): 26–34

图/表 1

表1

参考文献 96

[1]	Morris G P, Ramu P, Deshpande S P, et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(2):453-458.
[2]	邹剑秋, 朱凯, 张志鹏, 等. 国内外高粱深加工研究现状与发展前景. 杂粮作物, 2002, 22(5):296-298.
[3]	张福耀, 赵威军, 平俊爱. 高能作物—甜高粱. 中国农业科技导报, 2006, 8(1):14-17.
[4]	高士杰, 刘晓辉, 郭中校, 等. 中国杂交高粱的种质基础及优势利用模式研究. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(10):106-108.
[5]	Lemaire G, Charrier X, Hebert Y. Nitrogen uptake capacities of maize and sorghum crops in different nitrogen and water supply conditions. Agronomie, 1996, 16(4):231-246. doi: 10.1051/agro:19960403
[6]	Oikeh S O, Chude V O, Kling G J, et al. Comparative Productivity of nitrogen-use efficient and nitrogen-inefficient maize cultivar and traditional grain sorghum in the moist Savanna of West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2007, 2(3):112-119.
[7]	Vogan P J, Sage R F. Water-use efficiency and nitrogen-use efficiency of C₃-C₄ intermediate species of Flaveria Juss. (Asteraceae). Plant,Cell and Environment, 2011, 34(9):1415- 1430. doi: 10.1111/pce.2011.34.issue-9
[8]	Frink C R, Waggoner P E, Ausubel J H. Nitrogen fertilizer: retrospect and prospect. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1999, 96(4):1175-1180.
[9]	米国华. 论作物养分效率及其遗传改良. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6):1525-1535.
[10]	陈范骏, 房增国, 高强, 等. 中国东华北部分地区玉米主推品种高产氮高效潜力分析. 中国科学:生命科学, 2013, 43(4):342-350.
[11]	张桂香, 赵学孟, 高儒萍, 等. 高粱遗传资源的耐瘠性鉴定研究. 山西农业科学, 1997, 25(3):12-16.
[12]	高儒萍, 张桂香, 张秋萍. 高粱耐瘠性状的基因表现. 山西农业科学, 2000, 28(2):30-32.
[13]	白文斌, 张福跃, 焦晓燕, 等. 中国高粱产业工程技术研究的定位思考. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(11):107-110.
[14]	张彦, 王劲松, 董二伟, 等. 中晚熟区主要高粱品种耐瘠性综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(23):4954-4968. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.23.003
[15]	王劲松, 焦晓燕, 丁玉川, 等. 粒用高粱养分吸收、产量及品质对氮磷钾营养的响应. 作物学报, 2015, 41(8):1269-1278.
[16]	王瑞, 平俊爱, 张福耀, 等. 高粱育种资源耐瘠性鉴定及评价. 作物杂志, 2020(6):30-37.
[17]	王玉斌, 平俊爱, 李慧明, 等. 高粱耐瘠薄品种的鉴定与分类. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(23):61-64.
[18]	刘鹏, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 不同基因型高粱的氮效率及对低氮胁迫的生理响应. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(16):3074-3083. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.16.004
[19]	刘鹏, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 不同基因型高粱的磷效率和磷素转运特性研究. 山西农业科学, 2018, 46(3):344-349.
[20]	Gelli M, Duo Y, Konda A R, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes between sorghum genotypes with contrasting nitrogen stress tolerance by genome-wide transcriptional profiling. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15(1):179. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-179
[21]	侯荷亭, 何策熙. 高粱晋辐1号的选育及其系谱分析. 山西农业科学, 1987(9):13-16.
[22]	张桂香, 赵学孟, 高儒萍, 等. 高粱遗传资源的耐瘠性鉴定研发. 山西农业科学, 1997, 25(3):12-16.
[23]	王成, 王劲松, 丁玉川, 等. 不同高粱基因型对氮磷钾缺乏的生物学响应. 山西农业科学, 2015, 43(9):1133-1137,1191.
[24]	运旺, 马洪波, 许仙菊, 等. 氮磷钾缺乏对甘薯前期生长和养分吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(3):486-495.
[25]	丁玉川, 陈明昌, 程滨, 等. 不同大豆品种磷吸收利用特性比较研究. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(9):1791-1797.
[26]	高雪, 朱林, 苏莹. 基于隶属函数法的甜高粱孕穗期耐盐性综合评价. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(9):1736-1744.
[27]	申瑞玲, 陈明, 任贵兴. 高粱淀粉的研究进展. 中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(7):123-128.
[28]	Fukunaga k, Kawase M, Kato K. Structural variation in the Waxy gene and differentiation in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.]: implication for multiple origins of the waxy phenotype. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2002, 268:214-222. pmid: 12395195
[29]	孔令旗, 张文毅, 李振武. 高粱籽粒淀粉含量的配合力与杂种优势分析. 辽宁农业科学, 1992(1):18-20.
[30]	詹鹏杰, 张福耀, 王瑞, 等. 不同淀粉类别高粱品种酿酒相关性能分析. 山西农业科学, 2013, 41(9):897-898,952.
[31]	余飞, 邓丹霞, 董婧, 等. 直连淀粉含量的影响因素及其应用研究进展. 食品科学, 2007, 28(10):604-607.
[32]	李超, 肖木辑, 周宇飞, 等. 不同播期对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2009, 40(6):708-711.
[33]	葛占宇, 马尚耀, 成慧娟, 等. 不同施氮水平对高粱子粒淀粉积累规律的影响. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(2):25-29.
[34]	曹昌林, 董良利, 宋旭东, 等. 氮、磷、钾配施对高粱籽粒淀粉含量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(5):68-70.
[35]	高欣, 肖木辑, 周宇飞, 等. 种植密度对高粱子粒淀粉积累的影响. 作物杂志, 2009(6):35-37.
[36]	黄瑞冬, 于泳, 肖木辑, 等. 施磷、钾肥对高粱籽粒淀粉积累规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2009(2):29-32
[37]	于泳, 黄瑞冬, 赵尚文, 等. 不同施氮水平对高粱籽粒淀粉积累规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2008(5):20-24.
[38]	尹静, 胡胜连, 肖佳雷, 等. 不同形态氮肥对春小麦品种籽粒淀粉及其组分的调节效应. 作物学报, 2006, 32(9):1294-1300.
[39]	王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 等. 不同肥力条件下施肥对粒用高粱产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22):4166-4176. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.22.020
[40]	卢庆善. 高粱学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999.
[41]	曹晓燕, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 施氮量对高粱产量,品质及氮利用效率的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(2):108-115.
[42]	戴廷波, 邹铁祥, 荆奇, 等. 氮、钾水平对小麦籽粒蛋白质合成关键酶活性的影响. 生态学报, 2009, 29(9):4976-4982.
[43]	Mulimani V H, Supriya D. Tannic acid content in sorghum (Sorghum bicolour M.): effects of processing. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 1994, 46(3):195-200. pmid: 7855089
[44]	宋高友, 苏益民, 陆伟. 酒用高粱育种方向的探讨. 核农学通报, 1996, 17(4):165-168.
[45]	王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 等. 灌溉时期与施氮量对矮杆高粱产量和品质的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2017, 36(增2):1-8.
[46]	Zhu Z, Li D, Wang P, et al. Transcriptome and ionome analysis of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium interactions in sorghum seedlings. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology, 2020 (32):271-285.
[47]	Schlegel A J, Havlin J L. Irrigated grain sorghum response to 55 years of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization. Agronomy Journal, 2021, 113(1):464-477. doi: 10.1002/agj2.v113.1
[48]	Hou X, Xue Q, Jessup K E, et al. Effect of nitrogen supply on stay-green sorghum in differing post-flowering water regimes. Planta, 2021, 254(4):63-74. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03712-2 pmid: 34477992
[49]	Cakmak I, Hengeler C, Marschner H. Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and carbohydrates in bean plant suffering from phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency. Journal of Experimental Bottany, 1994, 45(9):1245-1250.
[50]	Nath M, Tuteja N. NPKS uptake, sensing, and signaling and miRNAs in plant nutrient stress. Protoplasma, 2016, 253(3):767-786. doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0845-y pmid: 26085375
[51]	黄瑞冬, 阚魏, 蒋文春. 高粱叶片硝酸还原酶活性及含氮量与产量相关性分析. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2008, 39(5):611-614.
[52]	马建华, 王玉国, 孙毅, 等. 低磷胁迫对不同品种高粱苗期形态及生理指标的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(5):1083-1091.
[53]	Paungfoo-Lonhienne C, Lonhienne T G A, Rentsch D, et al. Plants can use protein as a nitrogen source without assistance from other organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008, 105(11):4524- 4529.
[54]	Näsholm T, Kielland K, Ganeteg U. Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. New Phytologist, 2009, 182(1):31-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02751.x pmid: 19210725
[55]	Krapp A, David L C, Chardin C, et al. Nitrate transport and signalling in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(3):789-798. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru001 pmid: 24532451
[56]	Tsay Y F, Chiu C C, Tsai C B, et al. Nitrate transporters and peptide transporters. FEBS Letters, 2007, 581(12):2290-2300. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.047
[57]	Sohlenkamp C, Shelden M, Howitt S, et al. Characterization of Arabidopsis AtAMT2, a novel ammonium transporter in plants. FEBS Letters, 2000, 467(2/3):273-278. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01153-4
[58]	Neuhäuser B, Dynowski M, Mayer M, et al. Regulation of NH₄⁺ transport by essential cross talk between AMT monomers through the carboxyl tails. Plant Physiology, 2007, 143(4):1651-1659. pmid: 17337531
[59]	Wang Y Y, Hsu P K, Tsay Y F. Uptake, allocation and signaling of nitrate. Trends in Plant Science, 2012, 17(8):458-467. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.006
[60]	Léran S, Varala K, Boyer J C, et al. A unified nomenclature of NITRATE TRANSPORTER1/PEPTIDE TRANSPORTER family members in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 2014, 19(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.08.008
[61]	Wittgenstein N V, Le C H, Hawkins B J, et al. Evolutionary classification of ammonium, nitrate, and peptide transporters in land plants. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2014, 14(1):1-11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-1
[62]	Chiba Y, Shimizu T, Miyakawa S, et al. Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana NRT1/PTR FAMILY (NPF) proteins capable of transporting plant hormones. Journal of Plant Research, 2015, 128(4):679-686. doi: 10.1007/s10265-015-0710-2
[63]	Bernard S M, Habash D Z. The importance of cytosolic glutamine synthetase in nitrogen assimilation and recycling. New Phytologist, 2009, 182(3):608-620. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02823.x pmid: 19422547
[64]	Urriola J, Rathore K S. Overexpression of a glutamine synthetase gene affects growth and development in sorghum. Transgenic Research, 2014, 24(3):397-407. doi: 10.1007/s11248-014-9852-6
[65]	Crawford N, Glass A. Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends Plant Science, 1998, 3(10):389- 395. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01311-9
[66]	Stitt M, Krapp A. The molecular physiological basis for the interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nutrients. Plant Cell Environment, 1999, 22:583-622. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x
[67]	Crawford N M, Campbell W H, Davis R W. Nitrate reductase from squash: cDNA cloning and nitrate regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1986, 83(21):8073-8076.
[68]	Lam H M, Coschigano K T, Oliveira I C, et al. The molecular- genetics of nitrogen assimilation into amino acids in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology & Plant Molecular Biology, 1996, 47(4):569-593.
[69]	Vidal E A, Araus V, Lu C, et al. Nitrate- responsive miR393/ AFB3 regulatory module controls root system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(9):4477- 4482.
[70]	Zhu Z, Li D, Cong L, et al. Identification of microRNAs involved in crosstalk between nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium under multiple nutrient deficiency in sorghum. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(2):465-475. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.07.005
[71]	Casa A M, Pressoir G, Brown P J, et al. Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Science, 2008, 48(1):30-40. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0080
[72]	Karen M, Campbell B C, Mace E S, et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals potential new targets for improving nitrogen uptake and utilization in Sorghum bicolor. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7:1544.
[73]	Cai H, Zhou Y, Xiao J, et al. Overexpressed glutamine synthetase gene modifies nitrogen metabolism and abiotic stress responses in rice. Plant Cell Reports, 2009, 28(3):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0665-z
[74]	Fan X R, Feng H M, Tan Y W, et al. A putative 6-transmembrane nitrate transporter OsNRT1.1b plays a key role in rice under low nitrogen. National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2016, 58(6):590-599.
[75]	Chiu C C, Lin C S, Hsia A P, et al. Mutation of a nitrate transporter, AtNRT1:4, results in a reduced petiole nitrate content and altered leaf development. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2004, 45 (9):1139-1148. pmid: 15509836
[76]	De Angeli A, Monachello D, Ephritikhine G, et al. The nitrate/ proton antiporter AtCLCa mediates nitrate accumulation in plant vacuoles. Nature, 2006, 442(7105):939-942. doi: 10.1038/nature05013
[77]	Upadhyaya H D, Pundir R P S, Dwivedi S L, et al. Developing a mini core collection of sorghum for diversified utilization of germplasm. Crop Science, 2009, 49(5):1769-1780. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2009.01.0014
[78]	Tesfamariam T, Yoshinaga H, Deshpande S P, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition in sorghum: the role of sorgoleone production. Plant and Soil, 2014, 379(1/2):325-335. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2075-z
[79]	Subbarao G V, Nakahara K, Ishikawa T, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) activity in sorghum and its characterization. Plant and Soil, 2013, 366(1/2):243-259. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1419-9
[80]	Talwar H S, Subbarao G V, Swarna R, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) potential and its role in improving the nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in sorghum. Breeding Science, 2020:209-230.
[81]	陆玉芳, 施卫明. 生物硝化抑制剂的研究进展及其农业应用前景. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3):545-557.
[82]	Subbarao G V, Rondon M, Ito O, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition (BNI)-is it a widespread phenomenon?. Plant and Soil, 2007, 294(1/2):5-18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-006-9159-3
[83]	Zakir H A K M, Subbarao G V, Pearse S J, et al. Detection, isolation and characterization of a root-exuded compound,methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate, responsible for biological nitrification inhibition by sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). New Phytologist, 2008, 180(2):442-451. doi: 10.1111/nph.2008.180.issue-2
[84]	Nardi P, Akutsu M, Pariasca-Tanaka J, et al. Effect of methyl 3-4-hydroxyphenyl propionate, a Sorghum root exudate, on N dynamic, potential nitrification activity and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria andarchaea. Plant and Soil, 2013, 367(1/2):627-637. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1494-y
[85]	Subbarao G V, Nakahara K, Ishikawa T, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) activity in sorghum and its characterization. Plant and Soil, 2013, 366(1/2):243-259. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1419-9
[86]	Zhu Y Y, Zeng H Q, Shen Q R, et al. Interplay among NH₄⁺ uptake, rhizosphere pH and plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase determine the release of BNIs in sorghum roots-possible mechanisms and underlying hypothesis. Plant and Soil, 2012, 358(1/2):131-141. doi: 10.1007/s11104-012-1151-5
[87]	Zeng H Q, Di T J, Zhu Y Y, et al. Transcriptional response of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase genes to ammonium nutrition and its functional link to the release of biological nitrification inhibitors from sorghum roots. Plant and Soil, 2016, 398(1/2):301-312. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2675-2
[88]	Liu Y Y, Wang R L, Zhang P, et al. The nitrification inhibitor methyl 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionate modulates root development by interfering with auxin signaling via the NO/ROS pathway. Plant Physiology, 2016, 171(3):1686-1703. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00670
[89]	Zhang X N, Lu Y F, Yang T, et al. Factors influencing the release of the biological nitrification inhibitor 1, 9-decanediol from rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Plant and Soil, 2019, 436(1/2):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-03933-1
[90]	Di T J, Afzal M R, Yoshihashi T, et al. Further insights into underlying mechanisms for the release of biological nitrification inhibitors from sorghum roots. Plant and Soil, 2018, 423(1/2):99-110. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3505-5
[91]	Czarnota M A, Paul R N, Weston L A, et al. Anatomy of sorgoleone-secreting root hairs of Sorghum species. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2003, 164(6):861-866. doi: 10.1086/378661
[92]	储成才, 王毅, 王二涛. 植物氮磷钾养分高效利用研究现状与展望. 中国科学:生命科学, 2021, 51(10):1415-1423.
[93]	Liu Y, Wang H, Jiang Z, et al. Genomic basis of geographical adaptation to soil nitrogen in rice. Nature, 2021, 590:600-605. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03091-w
[94]	Zhang M Q, Fan C H, Li Q L, et al. A 2-yr field assessment of the effects of chemical and biological nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen use efficiency in an intensively managed vegetable cropping system. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment, 2015, 201:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.003
[95]	张启发. 绿色超级稻培育的设想. 分子植物育种, 2005, 3(5):601-602.
[96]	Yang J, Wang M, Li W, et al. Reducing expression of a nitrate- responsive bZIP transcription factor increases grain yield and N use in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17(9):1823- 1833. doi: 10.1111/pbi.v17.9

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

根系分泌BNI BNI secreted by root	物质种类The kind of matter	参考文献Reference
对羟基苯丙酸甲酯Methyl p-hydroxyphenylpropionate	苯丙酸类	[81-82]
高粱酮Sorghum ketone	苯醌类	[83]
樱花素Sakuranin	黄酮类	[83]