Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 25-31.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.01.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clustering and Correlation Analysis of Earlier-Mauture Cotton Innovation Germplasm based on Biological Characters

Xu Min1,Hu Yushu1,Li Jinglin2,Jin Lulu1,Wang Zisheng1   

  1. 1Liaoning Cash Crop Institute,Liaoyang 111000,Liaoning, China
    2Agronomy College,Shenyang Agriculture University,Shenyang 110161,Liaoning,China
  • Received:2016-10-09 Revised:2016-10-27 Online:2017-02-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

153

Abstract:

For further determining the situation of cotton germplasm in Liaohe basin, 144 innovation materials were selected to conduct a clustering analysis and evaluation. The clustering analysis showed that the 144 materials were divided into 9 groups in Euclidean distance 8.01 based on 3 classes 9 biological characteristics. Each group was basically in line with the characteristic of the material itself and the genetic background of the evolution trend, which could be used as earlier maturer, disease resistance, large boll, high yield, high lint index, excellent quality material, respectively. Meanwhile the correlation between yield, quality and disease resistance characters were not significant, but the correlation between fiber length and strength was positively significant (r=0.6366) based on 3 classes 9 characters of innovation germplasm.

Key words: Cotton, Germplasm, Cluster analysis, Correlation analysis

Table 1

Code and source of materials tested"

编号Code 来源Source
1-64 辽宁省经济作物研究所
65-90 新疆西北内陆棉区
91-124 黄河流域棉区
125-128 长江流域夏播棉区
129-144 不详

Fig.1

Cluster result of cotton germplasma"

Table 2

Cluster result and characteristic of germplasms"

类群
Clusters		 资源编号
Germplasm No.		 主要特征
Main characteristics
Ⅰ(17份) 1、2、3、4、5、6、7、11、16、19、28、30、35、43、44、92、144 生育期适中,枯、黄萎病抗性一般,单铃重较低,衣分、产量较高,纤维品质居中
Ⅱ(11份) 9、12、46、47、49、85、99、119、121、133、135 生育期适中,高抗枯、黄萎病,单铃重大,衣分最高,产量较高,纤维品质较差
Ⅲ(24份) 20、22、40、48、50、67、72、79、87、88、89、102、104、108、112、114、117、118、125、130、134、138、139、141 生育期较短,高抗枯萎病,黄萎病抗性一般,单铃重及衣分较低,产量较低,纤维品质一般
Ⅳ(13份) 77、90、91、93、95、97、111、113、115、126、129、136、137 生育期短,抗枯耐黄,单铃重低,衣分适中,产量低,纤维品质一般
Ⅴ(1份) 94 生育期适中,高抗枯、黄萎病,单铃重较低,衣分、产量较高,纤维品质较差
Ⅵ(21份) 8、10、13、24、29、31、32、36、37、39、45、53、58、59、60、61、62、64、70、101、127 生育期适中,抗枯耐黄,单铃重、衣分、产量居中,纤维品质较优
Ⅶ(20份) 14、18、27、33、34、38、51、54、57、63、65、68、69、84、98、109、124、132、143 生育期适中,高抗枯、黄萎病,单铃重、衣分低,产量适中,纤维品质较优
Ⅷ(18份) 15、17、23、25、26、41、42、56、71、73、74、75、76、100、110、116、122、128 生育期较长,高抗枯、黄萎病,单铃重大,衣分较低,产量适中,纤维品质优
Ⅸ(19份) 21、52、66、78、80、81、82、83、86、96、103、105、106、107、120、123、131、140、142 生育期较短,高抗枯、黄萎病,单铃重大,衣分、产量较低,纤维品质较优

Table 3

Mean characters values of cotton germplasm group"

性状Characters 种质资源类群Germplasm group
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ
生育期(d)
Growth period		 118.65±2.26 120.09±2.17 114.50±8.53 105.00±4.56 115.00 120.24±2.82 120.81±3.67 128.17±6.18 116.32±6.35
枯萎病病情指数
Fusarium wilt index		 10.73±2.76 5.90±2.00 3.39±1.22 6.30±2.08 1.25 5.22±2.51 4.36±1.34 5.19±2.16 3.50±1.47
黄萎病病情指数
Verticillium wilt index		 17.84±7.22 9.24±3.14 16.83±7.46 31.08±7.09 6.25 24.11±5.16 18.04±5.85 5.76±4.58 9.52±3.26
单铃重(g)
Single boll weight		 6.47±0.68 7.60±0.40 6.18±0.63 6.16±0.78 6.43 6.88±0.85 6.21±0.71 7.27±0.68 7.72±0.85
衣分(%)
Ginning outturn		 42.70±1.92 44.33±1.64 40.51±2.24 41.45±2.53 43.86 42.77±2.34 40.54±2.17 40.20±1.81 40.70±1.58
皮棉产量
Lint yield (kg/hm2)		 1 276.34±238.37 1 105.18±491.83 995.79±240.23 920.29±184.99 1 339.58 1 042.41±268.51 1 011.56±479.05 1 064.06±562.88 922.43±237.43
纤维上半部平均长度
Upper half mean length of fibre (mm)		 27.95±1.41 26.86±1.64 27.27±1.35 27.41±1.46 25.74 28.84±1.32 29.47±1.09 30.97±0.90 29.12±0.77
断裂比强度
Breaking strength
(cN/tex)		 26.21±1.44 24.66±1.67 26.16±1.33 27.01±1.87 24.10 26.14±1.65 29.22±1.64 28.40±1.50 28.24±1.71
马克隆值
Incompatible micronaire		 5.17±0.33 5.70±0.24 5.34±0.38 5.23±0.37 5.79 4.70±0.29 4.48±0.50 4.87±0.36 5.36±0.41

Table 4

Correlation analysis of cotton germplasm characters"

性状Characters x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9
生育期x1 Growth period 1.0000
枯萎病病情指数x2 Fusarium wilt index 0.0114 1.0000
黄萎病病情指数x3 Verticillium wilt index -0.3344 0.1314 1.0000
单铃重x4 Single boll weight 0.2157 -0.0963 0.3991 1.0000
衣分x5 Ginning outturn -0.0411 0.2608 0.1184 -0.1540 1.0000
皮棉产量x6 Lint yield -0.1082 0.0275 -0.0625 -0.0336 0.2603 1.0000
纤维上半部平均长度x7 Upper half mean length of fibre 0.3613 0.0848 -0.1982 0.2698 -0.3358 -0.1160 1.0000
断裂比强度x8 Breaking strength 0.0239 -0.1611 -0.0585 0.0807 -0.3392 -0.1179 0.6366 1.0000
马克隆值x9 Incompatible micronaire -0.2196 -0.0431 -0.1079 0.1558 0.1666 -0.1502 -0.3466 -0.2264 1
[1] 李慧峰, 车根, 李林光 , 等. 果树资源遗传多样性研究进展.山东农业科学, 2009(5):32-35,40.
[2] 王建丽, 申忠宝, 潘多锋 , 等. 红三叶种质资源农艺性状的综合评价及聚类分析. 草原与草坪, 2013,33(2):33-37.
[3] 唐启义, 冯明光 . 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[4] 赵云彤, 范书华, 王艳 , 等. 黑龙江省晒烟创新种质资源生物学性状聚类及相关分析. 东北农业大学学报, 2016,47(4):79-85.
[5] 林国平, 蔡长春, 王毅 , 等. 白肋烟品种资源的聚类分析. 中国烟草学报, 2008,14(5):33-38.
[6] 宋军生, 党占海, 张建平 , 等. 油用亚麻品种资源农艺性状的主成分及聚类分析. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(2):492-495.
[7] 李瑞春, 金路路, 李憬霖 , 等. 棉花化控调节剂“棉太金”与“全精控”作用效果比较研究. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(33):102-108.
[8] 中华人民共和国国家标准GB 1103-2007棉花-细绒棉.
[9] 刘昌文, 宋义前, 张燕 , 等. 新疆主要早熟陆地棉农艺性状相关分析与评价研究. 新疆农业科学, 2008,45(5):791-796.
[10] 冯文林, 陈全家, 曲延英 . 棉花海陆棉杂交后代农艺与纤维品质性状相关性研究. 新疆农业科学, 2015,52(3):393-401.
[11] 顾双平, 常晓阳 . 棉花纤维品质性状的相关剖析. 江西农业学报, 2002,14(2):24-28.
[12] 徐崇志, 李青 . 陆地棉纤维品质性状的主成份分析. 新疆农业科学, 2006,43(2):121-124.
[13] 许乃银, 陈旭升, 狄佳春 , 等. 长江流域棉花纤维品质的区域特征研究. 棉花学报, 2003,15(4):221-226.
[14] 陈荣江, 朱明哲, 孙长法 . 棉花新品种产量品质性状的综合评价及聚类分析. 西北农业学报, 2007,16(4):264-268.
[15] 孙长法, 赵晖, 陈荣江 . 棉花新品种产量品质性状的聚类分析与综合评价. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(4):77-81.
[16] 蔡应繁, 谭永久, 何洪华 . 短季棉早熟性、产量和纤维品质的主成分和典型相关分析. 西南农业大学学报, 1996,18(4):346-349.
[17] 高进, 蔡立旺, 宋锦花 . 早熟棉花品种产量品质性状的综合评价与聚类分析. 西南农业学报, 2015,28(6):2425-2431.
[18] 董承光, 李成奇, 李生秀 , 等. 棉花种质资源主要农艺性状的综合评价及聚类分析. 新疆农业科学, 2011,48(3):425-429.
[19] 王沛政, 陈爱民, 阿布来提 , 等. 不同来源陆地棉数量性状主成分及聚类分析. 西北农业学报, 1999,8(4):50-52.
[20] 李武, 谢德意, 赵付安 , 等. 黄河流域棉花品种农艺性状的主成分及聚类分析. 江苏农业科学, 2015,43(8):82-85.
[21] Treure R, Soest L J, Hintum T H , et al. Marker-assisted rationalisation of genetic resource collections a case study in flax using AFLPs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2001,103:144-152.
doi: 10.1007/s001220100537
[22] Diederichsen A, Fu Y B . Phenotypic and molecular (RAPD) differentiation of four infraspecific groups of cultivated flax (Linum usitatissimum L.subsp.usitatissimum). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2006,53(1):77-90.
doi: 10.1007/s10722-004-0579-8
[23] 邓欣, 陈信波, 龙松华 . 10个亚麻品种亲缘关系的RAPD分析. 中国麻业科学, 2007,29(4):184-188.
[1] Wu Hao, Li Yanmin, Xie Chuanxiao. Research Advances on Physiological Basis and Gene#br# Discovery for Thermal Tolerance in Crops [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 1-9.
[2] Wu Ruixiang, Yang Jianchun, Wang Liqin, Guo Xiujuan. Evaluation of the Adaptability of Flax Drought#br# Resistance Based on Multiple Statistics Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 10-16.
[3] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[4] Wang Lei, Zhang Xiangping, Li Runxi, Niu Xiaoxia, . Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic#br# Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[5] Zhang Yizhong, Zhou Fuping, Zhang Xiaojuan, . Identification and Cluster Analysis of Photosynthetic#br# Characters and WUE in Sorghum Germplasm [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 45-53.
[6] Tang Liyuan, Li Xinghe, Zhang Sujun, Wang Haitao, . QTL Mapping for Photosynthesis#br# Related Traits in Upland Cotton [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 85-90.
[7] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[8] Bin Zhang,Jinxiu Li,Zhen Wang,Hao Feng,Jinbang Li. Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Wheat Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 57-60.
[9] Wen Zhang,Tao Lu,Yuxia Ye,Quanyi Liu,Yang Feng. Studies on the Effect of Mixed Defoliant on Cotton in Kuitun District, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 103-107.
[10] Shuai Zhang,Yuhui Pang,Zhenghong Wang,Liming Wang,Chunyan Chen,Zhankui Zeng,Chunping Wang. Variation of Agronomic Traits and Genetic Diversity in Wheat Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 44-51.
[11] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77-82.
[12] Lu Zhao,Zhiwei Yang,Liqun Bu,Ling Tian,Mei Su,Lei Tian,Yinxia Zhang,Shuqin Yang,Peifu Li. Analysis and Comprehensive Evalution of Phenotypic Genetic Diversity of Ningxia and Xinjiang Rice Germplasm [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 25-34.
[13] Haihua Luo,Deyi Shao,Gong Chen,Xiumin Xu,Xin Gao,Changkai Yuan,Jinjian Peng,Feiyu Tang. Comparative Analysis of Trait Correlation between Conventional Varieties (Lines) and Hybrids of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 31-37.
[14] Changhui Feng,Youchang Zhang,Shu Bie,Jiaohai Zhang,Xiaogang Wang,Songbo Xia,Cheng Zhang,Hongde Qin. Research Progress on Improvement for Verticillium Wilt Resistance by Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection in Cotton [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 21-25.
[15] ,Lili Zhang,Ying Shi. Screening of Drought Resistant Germplasm Resources in Potato [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 72-77.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .