Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 72-77.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Screening of Drought Resistant Germplasm Resources in Potato

,Zhang Lili,Shi Ying   

  1. College of Agriculture,Northeast Agricultural University,Harbin 150030,Heilongjiang,China
  • Received:2017-03-27 Revised:2017-06-19 Online:2017-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Ying Shi

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

255

Abstract:

Drought is becoming more and more serious to the agricultural production, and the drought resistant variety is one of the effective methods to deal with the drought in northeast region of China. In this experiment, field grown potato clones in two generation population of 210 as the materials, in vitro drought stress leaf material screening by 20% PEG-6000 solution, the physiological indexes of drought resistance evaluation, combined with the comprehensive analysis of yield traits were studied. We preliminary screened 90 materials, and obtained 14 materials with better performance in MDA content, conductivity, and relative water content through physiological indexes evaluation. Six high quality drought-resistance potato materials were recommended through the comprehensive evaluation using correlation analysis, physiological indexes yield traits evaluation and the main components analysis. This study provided a rapid and effective method for screening and evaluation for drought resistance potato germplasm resources.

Key words: Potato, Drought-resistance germplasm resource, Physiological index, Yield, Comprehensive evaluation

Fig.1

Different wilting degree of population materials after PEG-6000 stress"

Fig.2

Distribution of variation of physiological indexes From left to right is ZD1-41, DD1-21, ND1-28"

Table 1

Variation of physiological indexes and indexes relative to yield of potato"

材料
Material		 指标变化量Variation of index 产量相关指标Index relative to yield
MDA含量(μmol/g)
MDA content		 相对含水量(%)
Relative water content		 电导率(S/m)
Conductivity		 单株结薯数
Tuber number per plant		 单株产量(g)
Tuber yield per plant		 商品薯率(%)
Marketable tuber rate
ZD9 1.13 0.0199 60.27 9 600.0 67.60
ZD13 3.75 0.0807 37.00 10 826.7 69.90
ZD29 3.63 0.0824 29.70 7 939.3 87.00
ZD33 3.00 0.0785 14.97 7 991.0 87.00
ZD36 2.88 0.0720 31.93 11 630.0 73.33
DD6 2.95 0.1145 28.10 9 1 078.0 89.40
ND1 1.79 0.0143 29.73 4 375.0 40.00
ND2 2.72 0.0128 69.67 9 1 220.0 85.30
ND12 4.87 0.0511 8.20 8 890.0 77.15
ND15 5.57 0.0271 59.90 10 1 045.0 73.21
ND20 5.94 0.0102 72.93 7 701.0 72.04
ND22 1.44 0.0346 31.50 8 793.3 66.40
ND23 1.13 0.0491 11.53 13 1 456.7 82.60
ND25 1.15 0.0131 13.77 5 572.5 65.28

Table 2

Correlation analysis matrix of potato index"

指标Index MDA含量
变化量		 相对含水量
变化量		 电导率
变化量		 单株
结薯数		 单株
产量		 商品
薯率
MDA含量变化量Variation of MDA content 1
相对含水量变化量Variation of relative water content 0.26 1
电导率变化量Variation of conductivity 0.56* -0.11 1
单株结薯数Tuber number per plant 0.00 0.26 0.16 1
单株产量Tuber yield per plant 0.07 0.29 0.08 0.65** 1
商品薯率Marketable tuber rate 0.26 0.61** 0.03 0.47 0.76** 1

Table 3

Potato characteristic vector"

指标Index F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6
MDA含量变化量Variation of MDA content 0.21 0.67 -0.31 -0.13 -0.63 0.07
相对含水量变化量Variation of relative water content 0.40 -0.09 -0.65 0.48 0.29 0.30
电导率变化量Variation of conductivity 0.13 0.70 0.34 0.14 0.60 -0.01
单株结薯数Tuber number per plant 0.45 -0.13 0.49 0.61 -0.37 -0.19
单株产量Tuber yield per plant 0.52 -0.16 0.31 -0.45 0.02 0.63
商品薯率Marketable tuber rate 0.56 -0.10 -0.17 -0.39 0.18 -0.68

Table 4

Eigenvalue and cumulative contribution rate of potato"

主成分
Principle component		 特征值
Eigenvalue		 贡献率(%)
Percentage		 累计贡献率(%)
Cumulative percentage
F1 2.63 43.86 43.86
F2 1.49 24.92 68.78
F3 1.01 16.83 85.61
F4 0.46 7.68 93.29
F5 0.27 4.55 97.85
F6 0.13 2.15 100.00

Table 5

Scores of main components of different materials"

材料
Material		 主成分1
Principal
component 1		 主成分2
Principal
component 2		 主成分3
Principal
component 3
ZD9 -1.35 -0.26 1.03
ZD13 0.28 -0.06 -0.19
ZD29 0.63 0.27 -1.06
ZD33 0.57 0.81 -0.96
ZD36 0.04 -0.43 0.01
DD6 1.68 -0.86 -0.90
ND1 -4.20 0.09 -0.29
ND2 0.86 0.02 1.45
ND12 0.05 -0.08 -0.64
ND15 0.96 2.91 1.73
ND20 -0.84 1.86 0.07
ND22 1.14 -0.77 0.49
ND23 2.04 -2.13 1.83
ND25 -2.58 -0.83 -0.20
东农311
Dongnong 311		 1.58
 -0.44
 -0.89
定薯1号
Dingshu No.1		 1.42
 2.07
 -1.49
[1] 王希卓, 朱旭, 孙洁 , 等. 我国马铃薯主粮化发展形势分析.农产品加工, 2015(3):52-55.
doi: 10.3969/jissn.1671-9646(X).2015.02.016
[2] 曾凡逵, 许丹, 刘刚 . 马铃薯营养综述.中国马铃薯, 2015(4):233-243.
[3] 马晓东, 钟浩 . 马铃薯淀粉的研究及在工业中的应用.农产品加工, 2008(2):59-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9646-B.2008.02.016
[4] 张千友, 王万疆, 廖武霜 . 马铃薯主粮化与产业开发研究综述. 西昌学院学报(自然科学版), 2016,30(2):1-5.
[5] Schapendonk A H C M, Spitters C J T, Groot P J . Effects of water stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of five potato cultivars. Potato Research, 1989,32(1):17-32.
doi: 10.1007/BF02365814
[6] 王芳 . 干旱胁迫对马铃薯的危害. 马铃薯产业与小康社会建设, 2014.
[7] 王谧 . 马铃薯抗旱指标研究及抗旱性鉴定. 西宁:青海大学, 2014.
[8] Gopal J, Iwama K . In vitro screening of potato against water-stress mediated through sorbitol and polyethylene glycol. Plant Cell Reports, 2007,26(5):693-700.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0275-6
[9] 范敏, 金黎平, 刘庆昌 , 等. 马铃薯抗旱机理及其相关研究进展. 中国马铃薯, 2006,20(2):101-107.
[10] 武新娟 . 马铃薯不同品种的抗旱性评价及Fe-SOD基因的研究. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2008.
doi: 10.7666/d.y1403708
[11] 海梅荣, 陈勇, 周平 , 等. 干旱胁迫对马铃薯品种生理特性的影响.中国马铃薯, 2014(4):199-204.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2014.04.004
[12] 贾琼, 张冬红, 蒙美莲 , 等. PEG6000渗透胁迫对马铃薯生理特性的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2009,23(5):263-267.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2009.05.002
[13] 李志燕 . PEG-6000胁迫下马铃薯耐旱指标的筛选. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2015.
[14] 陈爱葵, 韩瑞宏, 李东洋 , 等. 植物叶片相对电导率测定方法比较研究. 广东第二师范学院学报, 2010,30(5):88-91.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8754.2010.05.016
[15] 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利 , 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(8):2667-2675.
[16] 余莉, 张时龙, 李清超 , 等. 秋播蚕豆主要农艺性状的主成分分析. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(27):108-113.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15060138
[17] 焦志丽 . 马铃薯干旱危害及提高抗旱性的研究. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学, 2012.
[18] 张弢 . PEG6000模拟干旱胁迫对油菜幼苗生理生化指标的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012,40(20):10363-10364.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2012.20.002
[19] 樊民夫, 杨明君, 李久昌 . 马铃薯抗旱资源评价与抗旱指标探讨. 山西农业科学, 1993,21(2):6-11.
[20] 丁玉梅, 马龙海, 周晓罡 , 等. 干旱胁迫下马铃薯叶片脯氨酸、丙二醛含量变化及与耐旱性的相关性分析. 西南农业学报, 2013,26(1):106-110.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2013.01.022
[21] 师进霖, 陈恩波, 姜跃丽 . PEG6000渗透胁迫对甜瓜幼苗叶片渗透调节物质及膜脂过氧化的影响. 西北农业学报, 2010,19(1):182-185.
[22] Deblonde P M K, Ledent J F . Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number,stem height,leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 2001,14(1):31-41.
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00081-2
[23] Büssis D, Heineke D . Acclimation of potato plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water deficit: II.Contents and subcellular distribution of organic solutes. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1998,49(325):1349-1360.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/49.325.1349
[24] 李锦树, 王洪春, 王文英 , 等. 干旱对玉米叶片细胞透性及膜脂的影响.植物生理学报, 1983(3):9-15.
[25] 徐建飞, 刘杰, 卞春松 , 等. 马铃薯资源抗旱性鉴定和筛选. 中国马铃薯, 2011,25(1):1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2011.01.001
[26] 张木清, 陈如凯, 余松烈 . 水分胁迫下蔗叶多胺代谢变化及其同抗旱性的关系.植物生理学报, 1996(3):327-332.
doi: 10.1007/BF02951625
[27] 胡树平, 苏治军, 于晓芳 , 等. 玉米自交系抗旱相关性状的主成分分析与模糊聚类. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016,34(6):81-88.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.06.13
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[3] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[4] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[5] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[6] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[7] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[10] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[11] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[12] Ying Chai,Yongqing Xu,Yao Fu,Xiuyu Li,Fumeng He,Yingqi Han,Zhe Feng,Fenglan Li. Characteristics of Cell Wall Degradation Enzyme Produced by Main Pathogenic Fusarium spp. in Potato Dry Rot [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 154-160.
[13] Jingwen Fang,Yan Wu,Zhihua Liu. Effects of Salt Stress on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Apocynum venetum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 167-174.
[14] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[15] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .