Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 103-107.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.016

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Studies on the Effect of Mixed Defoliant on Cotton in Kuitun District, Xinjiang

Zhang Wen,Lu Tao,Ye Yuxia,Liu Quanyi,Feng Yang   

  1. Agricultural Production Division 7, Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Kuitun 833200, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2017-11-03 Revised:2018-03-23 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

125

Abstract:

In order to screen the best defoliants for cotton in Kuitun reclamation area, field experiment was conducted to study the effect of different deodorizing agents on cotton leaf removal efficiency, yield and quality. The results showed that up to 20 days after spraying, all leave removal rate reached more than 70%, and the removal rates of Ruituolong and Tuotulong treatment had little difference, but T1 and T2 treatments were significantly higher than the single application of ethephon treatment. The boll opening rate of each treatment was more than 90%, and the difference between defoliant treatments was not significant, which indicated that all the defoliants had good ripening effect. There was no significant difference between the treatment and control in cotton yield, single bell weight, clothing and sub-index, length, uniformity index, break strength, micronaire, maturity ratio, short fibre index, indicating that sprying defoliation ripening agent had little effect on cotton yield and quality. On the basis of the number of spraying, the defoliation and boll opening effect of the twice spray was better than that of the once spraying, but the quality of cotton was slightly lower than that of the once spray. The results indicated that Ruituolong had the best accelerating effect in Kuitun reclamation area for its high efficiency and low cost.

Key words: Defoliant, Cotton, Defoliant, Boll opening, Quality

Table 1

Test treatment"

处理Treatment 脱叶剂组合Defoliant combination 喷施时间(月-日) Spraying time (Month-Day) 用量Dosage (g/hm2)
T1 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利Ruituo dragon+assistant+ethephon 9-5 525+225+1500
T2 瑞脱龙+助剂+乙烯利Ruituo dragon+assistant+ethephon 9-5, 9-10 525+225+1500
T3 脱吐隆+速捷+乙烯利Tuotulong+ assistant+ethephon 9-5 225+1350+1500
T4 脱吐隆+速捷+乙烯利Tuotulong+ assistant+ethephon 9-5, 9-10 225+1350+1500
T5 乙烯利Ethephon 9-5 1500
T6 乙烯利Ethephon 9-5, 9-10 1500
T7 对照Contrast - -

Fig.1

Daily minimum temperature, maximum temperature and average temperature statistics before and after spray"

Table 2

Effects of different defoliation treatment on cotton leaf abscission rate %"

处理
Treatment		 施后2d
2d after spray		 施后4d
4d after spray		 施后6d
6d after spray		 施后8d
8d after spray		 施后10d
10d after spray		 施后15d
15d after spray		 施后20d
20d after spray
T1 4.6±0.2a 21.4±2.0a 50.1±4.7a 73.0±7.6a 78.0±7.3ab 83.6±8.7a 87.1±9.3a
T2 5.5±1.6a 21.7±3.1a 46.4±6.1a 73.1±5.7a 82.1±3.5a 86.9±2.5a 91.5±4.2a
T3 5.9±1.5a 16.3±5.2a 41.5±2.2abc 69.9±1.9a 74.4±3.7b 79.3±0.1ab 81.5±0.5ab
T4 4.7±1.0a 15.6±4.6a 42.0±8.1ab 66.4±5.9a 71.2±5.6b 79.7±7.3ab 81.9±6.9ab
T5 5.9±0.7a 15.9±0.5a 30.7±8.6bc 51.5±8.1b 59.6±7.8c 68.6±12.2bc 71.2±7.6b
T6 5.7±2.1a 19.7±4.7a 32.1±2.3bc 50.5±8.0b 55.1±8.4c 63.5±6.2c 71.6±1.2b
T7 3.2±0.1a 14.1±0.7a 17.7±3.8d 27.5±5.6c 32.3±6.8d 37.7±5.5d 41.2±5.6c

Table 3

Effects of different defoliation treatment on cotton boll opening rate %"

处理
Treatment		 施前
Before spray		 施后2d
2d after spray		 施后4d
4d after spray		 施后6d
6d after spray		 施后8d
8d after spray		 施后10d
10d after spray		 施后15d
15d after spray		 施后20d
20d after spray
T1 30.0±6.8ab 36.8±8.2ab 43.0±2.1ab 52.6±5.9ab 65.1±5.4ab 69.9±6.1ab 83.4±2.4ab 95.0±3.4a
T2 33.4±2.4ab 44.9±4.9a 52.3±0.1a 62.2±1.1a 70.7±0.7a 75.6±3.5a 86.5±0.7ab 94.4±1.2a
T3 30.0±8.1ab 37.9±10.5ab 46.4±5.9ab 59.4±8.4a 71.4±7.3a 76.6±8.6a 90.1±1.8a 93.3±0.3a
T4 40.2±8.5a 43.6±9.9a 47.6±10.6a 54.8±11.0ab 63.8±10.3ab 79.0±1.5a 91.7±3.1a 96.5±4.9a
T5 25.0±2.1b 30.5±1.5ab 40.2±6.5ab 49.4±4.9ab 61.1±6.0ab 66.3±8.2ab 80.8±5.8ab 90.6±1.0a
T6 21.6±7.6b 33.7±2.8ab 40.4±4.7ab 47.4±9.7ab 65.6±6.5ab 72.4±9.4ab 86.4±4.3ab 93.8±4.8a
T7 19.6±1.3b 25.4±1.4b 28.5±1.8b 33.7±0.3b 50.4±8.7b 54.8±7.4b 71.5±5.0b 79.5±9.7b

Table 4

Effects of different defoliation treatment on cotton yield and its related traits"

处理Treatment 单铃重Boll weight (g) 子指Seed (g) 衣分Lint percentage (%) 籽棉产量Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) 实际密度Actual density (plant/hm2)
T1 6.4a 11.2a 42.5a 4 884 ±29a 104 805±123a
T2 6.1a 11.2a 41.1a 4 901 ±218a 103 695±108a
T3 6.2a 11.0a 42.1a 5 067±333a 101 132±46a
T4 6.3a 11.5a 41.3a 4 901±444a 103 561±189a
T5 6.2a 11.2a 40.8a 5 084±153a 103 321±213a
T6 6.0a 10.7a 41.5a 4 950±100a 102 987±186a
T7 6.1a 11.2a 41.6a 4 950±312a 103 389±98a

Table 5

Effects of different defoliation treatment on cotton quality"

处理
Treatment		 绒长(mm)
Fibre length		 整齐度指数(%)Uniformity index 马克隆值
Micronaire		 断裂比强度(cN/tex)
Breaking tenacity		 短纤维指数(%)
Short fiber index		 棉纤维成熟度比
Cotton fiber maturity
T1 31.54a 86.57a 4.35a 33.85a 6.67a 0.84a
T2 32.18a 85.63a 4.27a 34.38a 6.42a 0.84a
T3 31.95a 86.38a 4.19a 33.95a 6.52a 0.84a
T4 32.13a 86.53a 4.20a 35.00a 6.48a 0.84a
T5 32.34a 85.92a 4.38a 34.22a 6.42a 0.85a
T6 32.25a 85.73a 4.50a 32.92a 6.45a 0.84a
T7 32.02a 86.22a 4.30a 34.20a 6.48a 0.84a
[1] 董合忠 . 棉花重要生物学和栽培特性及其在丰产简化栽培中的应用. 中国棉花, 2013,40(9):1-4.
doi: 1000-632X(2013)09-0001-03
[2] 王爱玉, 高明伟, 王志伟 , 等. 棉花化学脱叶催熟技术应用研究进展. 农学学报, 2015,5(4):20-23.
doi: 10.11923/j.issn.2095-4050.2014-xb0680
[3] 田晓莉, 李召虎, 段留生 , 等. 棉花化学催熟与脱叶技术. 中国棉花, 2006,33(1):4-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2006.01.002
[4] 贾军成, 樊庆鲁 . 不同种类棉花脱叶剂比较试验研究. 新疆农垦科技, 2011,34(3):44-46.
[5] 雷斌, 张云生, 李忠华 , 等. 棉花脱叶剂的田间效果筛选. 新疆农业科学, 2011,48(12):2321-2324.
[6] 陈兵, 韩焕永, 张国蕾 , 等. 4种脱叶催熟剂在棉花上的应用效果研究. 中国棉花, 2017,44(1):26-28.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201701008
[7] 孙泽江 . 稀植机采棉脱叶剂应用技术. 农村科技, 2013(10):9-10.
[8] 毕双杰, 刘政 . 催脱通悬浮剂在棉花上的应用效果评价. 新疆农垦科技, 2013(5):45-46.
[9] 王谊, 杨丽红 . 脱叶剂对棉花脱叶率和产量的影响. 中国棉花, 2014,41(4):28-30.
[10] 周春江, 田晓莉, 李松林 , 等. 增效乙烯利在棉花上的催熟脱叶效果. 中国棉花, 2007,34(1):15-16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-632X.2007.01.008
[11] 王灵燕, 王学军, 李锦辉 , 等. 南疆棉区棉花脱叶剂的筛选. 新疆农业科学, 2004,41(5):392-394.
[12] 高丽丽, 李淦, 徐新霞 , 等. 4种棉花脱叶剂脱叶效果的比较研究. 新疆农业大学学报, 2016,39(1):35-39.
[13] 李飞, 郭利双, 何叔军 , 等. 不同脱叶剂在洞庭湖植棉区直播棉上的应用研究. 中国棉花, 2016,43(9):15-17.
doi: 10.11963/issn.1000-632X.201609003
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Tang Liyuan, Li Xinghe, Zhang Sujun, Wang Haitao, . QTL Mapping for Photosynthesis#br# Related Traits in Upland Cotton [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 85-90.
[3] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[4] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[5] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[6] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[7] Jingjing Yang,Jianglu Chen,Ruizhi Xie,Xiaowei Zhang,Bianhong Ding,Xinming Wu,Shaokun Li,Dongfang Li. Effects of Seed Weight Difference on the Evenness of Related Germination Indexes in Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 180-184.
[8] Yaning Wang,Jinpeng Yang,Chunlei Yang,Fangsen Xu,Xiang Zhang,Liang Li. Effects of Well-Cellar Transplanting with Triangulation on Growth, Development,Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 116-122.
[9] Zhiqiang Tang,Liqiang Dong,Rui Li,Liying Zhang,Na He,Yuedong Li. Effects of Nitrogen and Soil Type on Seedling Quality and Nutrient Absorption in Rice [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 141-147.
[10] Lili Zhang,Yizhou Zhao,Xin Li,Ting Mao,Yan Liu,Zhan Zhang,Shanjun Ni,Fucai Liu. Mutant Analysis on Quality Trait of Different Japonica Rice Progenies Induced by 60Co-γ Ray Irradiation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 51-56.
[11] Zhibo Zhou,Yake Yi,Guanghui Chen. Effects of Sowing Amount, Medium and Chemical Treatment on Seedling Quality and Yield of High Quality Late-Rice Variety of Yuzhenxiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 129-135.
[12] Huijuan Tang,Gonggu Zang,Chaohua Cheng,Qing Tang,Yujun Li,Lining Zhao. Correspondence Analysis of Yield and Quality Traits of Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 52-55.
[13] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
[14] Suihua Huang,Haowen Luo,Xingge Huang,Pingshan Fan,Leilei Kong,Zhuojun Zhong,Xiangru Tang. Effects of Seeds Dressing Agent on Morphologyand Biochemical Characteristics of Direct-Sowing Rice Seeding [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 171-176.
[15] Yinghui Liu,Ming Guo,Shuli Jia,Jianguo Yin. Advance on the Factors Effecting on Maize Forage Nutritive Value [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 6-10.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .