Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 133-140.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.01.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Regulation Effects of Growth Regulators on Plant Characters, Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat

Ma Ruiqi1,2,Qi Zhen2,Chang Xuhong2,Wang Demei2,Tao Zhiqiang2,Yang Yushuang2,Feng Jinfeng3,Sun Min1,Zhao Guangcai2   

  1. 1 College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China
    2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology Ecology Ministry of Agriculture, P.R.China, Beijing 100081, China
    3 Keshiketeng Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau, Chifeng 025300, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2017-11-03 Revised:2018-01-02 Online:2018-02-20 Published:2018-08-24

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

204

Abstract:

Chemical control, as an effective anti-counter productive technology in production, can regulate the crop growth process, which has an impact on crop yield formation and quality formation. In order to explore the regulation effect of different kinds of chemical regulators on the yield, quality formation and plant characters of winter wheat, the wheat cultivars Zhongmai No.8 and Jingdong No.8 with different genetic backgrounds were used as test materials under field conditions, and different types of chemical regulators were used for chemical control in the wheat get-up period. The results showed that tamped-resistant Duntianbao, paclobutrazol and chlormequat chloride could significantly decrease plant height and gravity center height and significantly increase the mechanical properties such as bending resistance, puncture strength and compressive strength of stem base internodes, thereby significantly increased the plant lodging resistance. The responses of two winter wheat cultivars to different types of chemical regulators were different. To Zhongmai No.8, resistant Duntianbao could increase the grain yield. However, CCC, paclobutrazol and tamped-resistant Duntianbao could decrease grain yield. For Jingdong No.8, four chemical regulators all increased the protein, storage protein content, grain yield and glutenin/gliadin ratio, improving the processing quality such as flour quality parameters and gluten index.

Key words: Winter wheat, Plant growth regulator, Plant character, Yield, Quality

Table 1

Soil basic nutrient content"

土层(cm)
Soil depth		 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 全氮(g/kg)
Total nitrogen		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Nitrogen hydrolysis		 速效磷(mg/kg)
Available phosphorus		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available potassium
0~20 28.48 1.34 107.42 21.78 265.19

Table 2

Effects of four plant growth regulators on plant height, spike length, (L1+L2)/L, and L"

品种Cultivar 处理Treatment 株高Plant height (cm) 穗长Spike length (cm) 基部节间比例(L1+L2)/L 节间总长度L (cm)
中麦8号 矮壮素 77.7c 8.3a 20.62c 70.3b
Zhongmai No.8 多效唑 77.2c 8.3a 20.77c 69.80c
抗倒型吨田宝 79.1b 8.3a 21.49b 71.2b
抗逆型吨田宝 80.6a 8.4a 22.13a 72.3a
清水 80.7a 8.3a 22.41a 72.3a
京冬8号 矮壮素 97.2c 6.4b 24.75b 90.1c
Jingdong No.8 多效唑 97.0c 6.4b 25.80b 90.7c
抗倒型吨田宝 99.1b 6.3b 26.29b 92.8b
抗逆型吨田宝 101.8a 6.3b 29.06a 96.7a
清水 103.2a 6.2b 28.94a 97.11a
化控剂Growth regulator 72.0* 1.7
品种Cultivar 818.7** 211.6
化控剂×品种Growth regulator×Cultivar 3.1* 1.0

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on length of internodes||| L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 indicate the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th internode from the bottom, respectively. Different letters indicate significanty difference at the 0.05 probability level. The same below"

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on BR, CS, PS and HG||| BR. Breaking resistance; CS. Compressive strength; PS. Puncturing strength; HG. Height of gravity center"

Fig.3

Effects of different treatments on protein content and the protein components content"

Fig.4

Effects of different treatments on protein index"

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on components of yield"

品种Cultivar 处理Treatment 千粒重1000-grain weight (g) 穗数Ears (万/hm2) 穗粒数Grain per spike
中麦8号 矮壮素 35.4 637.3 33.1
Zhongmai No.8 多效唑 35.8 639.4 33.1
抗倒型吨田宝 35.6 633.1 32.5
抗逆型吨田宝 36.5 641.3 33.3
清水 36.4 642.4 32.0
京冬8号 矮壮素 44.7 547.0 30.8
Jingdong No.8 多效唑 44.7 540.6 29.5
抗倒型吨田宝 43.7 543.3 29.1
抗逆型吨田宝 42.7 539.6 29.3
清水 42.1 532.6 29.3

Fig.5

Effects of different treatments on yield of wheat"

Table 4

Effects of different treatments and cultivars on milling quality"

品种
Cultivar		 处理
Treatment		 容重(g/L)
Bulk density		 硬度
Rigidity		 出粉率(%)
Flour extraction
中麦8号 矮壮素 782b 68.5a 67.1b
Zhongmai No.8 多效唑 769c 68.7a 66.8c
抗倒型吨田宝 785ab 67.6b 67.3b
抗逆型吨田宝 788a 68.5a 68.9a
清水 770c 68.3a 67.4b
京冬8号 矮壮素 808ab 62.7b 73.6b
Jingdong No.8 多效唑 803c 62.4bc 73.2b
抗倒型吨田宝 801c 63.5a 72.3bc
抗逆型吨田宝 809ab 62.9b 74.3a
清水 811a 63.0b 73.1b

Table 5

Effects of different treatments on second processing quality"

品种
Cultivar		 处理
Treatment		 吸水率(%)
Water
absorption		 形成时间(min)
Development
time		 稳定时间(min)
Stable time		 弱化度
Softening
of dough		 粉质评价值 Farinograph
quality value		 湿面筋(%)
Wet gluten		 面筋指数(%)
Gluten index		 沉降值(mL)
Sedimentation
value
中麦8号 矮壮素 59.1b 3.1a 2.8a 54.6b 48.1a 24.8a 74.5a 24.5a
Zhongmai No. 8 多效唑 59.7a 2.9b 2.5b 58.3b 44.5b 24.6a 72.2a 24.3ab
抗倒型吨田宝 59.1b 2.7b 2.4b 66.3a 39.7b 24.0a 66.0b 23.8bc
抗逆型吨田宝 59.2b 2.8b 2.4b 67.7a 40.0b 24.2a 65.0b 23.8bc
清水 59.2b 2.8b 2.5b 68.3a 39.3b 24.9a 63.3b 24.0b
京冬8号 矮壮素 62.3a 3.3ab 2.4ab 44.0c 49.3bc 38.2a 57.3bc 33.8bc
Jingdong No.8 多效唑 62.3a 3.3ab 2.5ab 42.0c 50.3b 37.4b 57.5bc 34.5a
抗倒型吨田宝 61.9b 3.3ab 2.4ab 43.0c 50.0b 38.0a 59.0b 33.5c
抗逆型吨田宝 62.1a 3.5a 2.7a 47.0b 52.7a 37.7b 59.9a 34.5a
清水 61.6b 3.2b 2.4b 48.3a 48.7a 37.1c 56.2c 34.0b
化控剂Growth regulator 3.3* 3.4* 3.1* 118.0** 125.0** 12.0** 3.0* 2.0
品种Cultivar 13.1** 23.6** 8.3** 532.2** 873.3** 187.5** 5.6** 201.6**
化控剂×品种Growth regulator×Cultivar 0.6 2.5* 3.0* 0.9 23.2** 1.0 1.4 1.5
[1] 蔡铁, 徐海成, 尹燕枰 , 等. 外源IAA、GA3和ABA影响不同穗型小麦分蘖发生的机制. 作物学报, 2013,39(10):1835-1842.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.01835
[2] 姚海坡, 董志强, 吕丽华 , 等. 不同植物生长调节剂对冬小麦茎秆特性和产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2015,30(增刊):152-156.
[3] 马少康, 赵广才, 常旭虹 , 等. 氮肥和化学调控对小麦品质的调节效应. 华北农学报, 2010,25(增刊):190-193.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2010.S1.043
[4] 吴九林, 刘蓉蓉, 刘文广 . 多效唑对弱筋小麦宁麦9号产量和品质的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2007,35(2):468-470.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2007.02.074
[5] 李金才, 尹钧, 魏凤珍 . 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31(5):662-666.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.05.023
[6] 肖世和, 张秀英, 闫长生 , 等. 小麦茎秆强度的鉴定方法研究. 中国农业科学, 2002,35(1):7-11.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2002.01.002
[7] 陈晓光, 石玉华, 王成雨 , 等. 氮肥和多效唑对小麦茎秆木质素合成的影响及其与抗倒伏性的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(17):3529-3536.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2011.17.005
[8] 孙岩, 张宏纪, 辛文利 , 等. 苗期镇压与矮壮素结合处理对小麦生育及其基部节生长的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2013(2):14-16.
[9] 吴传万, 杜小凤, 文廷刚 , 等. 喷施抗倒调理剂劲丰对小麦增产抗倒的生物学效应. 江苏农业学报, 2013,29(5):946-952.
[10] 苏珮, 蒋纪云, 王春虎 . 小麦蛋白质组分的连续提取分离法及提取时间的选择. 河南职业技术师范学院学报, 1993,21(2):1-4.
[11] 唐启义, 冯明光 . 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[12] 何丽香, 傅兆麟, 宫晶 . 小麦灌浆中期倒伏对种子产量与质量的影响. 种子, 2013,32(7):80-82.
[13] 房稳静, 陈英慧, 武健华 , 等. 倒伏对小麦生长及产量的影响试验研究//天气、气候与可持续发展. 河南省气象学会2010年年会论文集, 2010.
[14] 丰光, 黄长玲, 邢锦丰 . 玉米抗倒伏的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2008(4):12-14.
[15] 朱新开, 王祥菊, 郭凯泉 , 等. 小麦倒伏的茎秆特征及对产量与品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006,26(1):87-92.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.01.020
[16] 邵云, 张黛静, 冯荣成 , 等. 3种化学调控剂对西农979抗倒伏性的影响. 西北农业学报, 2011,20(4):53-57.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2011.04.011
[17] 杨胜海, 吴军, 潘兴书 , 等. 化控剂对玉米品种正大999群体生长及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2013(5):90-93.
[18] 王成雨, 李静, 张一 , 等. 化控剂对冬小麦茎秆抗倒性能、植株整齐度及产量的影响. 中国农业气象, 2015,36(2):170-177.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2015.02.007
[19] Burnell J N . The Biochemistry of Manganese in Plants//Manganese in Plants and Soils. Springer, 1988: 125-137.
[20] 冯金凤, 赵广才, 张保军 , 等. 化学调控对冬小麦产量、品质及旗叶部分生理指标的影响. 华北农学报, 2013,28(增刊):142-146.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7091.2013.z1.027
[21] 杨忠义, 范春晖, 郭平毅 . 氮肥与多效唑对冬小麦叶片生理功能的调控. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2008,14(5):947-950.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2008.0520
[22] 王长年, 孙成亮 . 喷施“吨田宝”对高产田块小麦生长及产量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2015(1):11-12.
[23] 郭平毅, 姚满生, 来改英 , 等. 乙烯利对冬小麦的调节效应. 山西农业大学学报, 1996(2):109-114.
[24] 秦武发, 董永华, 张彩英 , 等. 植物激素对小麦品质的影响. 河北农业大学学报, 1996,19(4):93-95.
[25] 雷振生, 徐立新, 吴政卿 , 等. 水肥运筹和化学调控对强筋小麦品质的影响. 华北农学报, 2006,21(4):71-74.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2006.04.018
[26] 张松林, 赵首彩, 董庆士 , 等. 干旱区小麦多功能高分子植物生长调节剂增产和品质改善试验研究. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(9):263-265.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Wang Hanxia, Shan Fuhua, Tian Liping, Ma Qiaoyun, . Analysis of Stability and Adaptability of Winter#br# Wheat Varieties in the Regional Trials of#br# the Northern Wheat Region of China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 40-44.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Li Shaokun, Zhang Wanxu, Wang Keru, Han Dongsheng, . Study on Maize Mechanical Grain#br# Harvest in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 127-131.
[8] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[9] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[10] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1-7.
[11] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102-105.
[12] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106-113.
[13] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[14] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[15] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .