Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 30-34.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.02.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco

Xu Jie,Pan Lei,Yang Shuai,Chen Yunsong,Deng Shengbin,Yang Xiaodong,Ma Wenguang   

  1. Yuxi Zhongyan Tobacco Seed Company, Yuxi 653100, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2017-11-10 Revised:2018-01-02 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-08-27

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

121

Abstract:

15 hybrids were goten by crossing 5 genotypes of flue-cured tobacco with different potassium content selected according to GriffingⅡ model. The research on genetic effects was conducted for potassium content in leaf in fast-growing stage of flue-cured tobacco under plenty of potash via pot cultivating method. According to the results, there were significant differences in potassium content in leaf in fast-growing stage of 15 flue-cured tobacco genotypes, and the variance of the general combining ability and special combining ability both reached the extremely significant level, suggesting that additive and non-additive genes work together in the inheritance of this trait. Its broad-sense heritability was 71.84% and its narrow-sense heritability was 33.09%, indicating that the variance was mainly controlled by genetic factors. The heritability of potassium content of flue-cured tobacco was mainly controlled by dominance effect, and the heterosis of F1 generation was also stronger: 70% of F1 combinations showed a mid-parent advantage. High potassium content flue-cured tobacco could be obtained through heterosis utilization. Qinyan 96, Nongda 203 and Nongda 202 could be choosen as materials to breed flue-cured tobacco varieties (lines) of high potassium content for their high general combining ability.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Potassium, Heritability, Combining ability, Heterosis

Table 1

The selected five parents and F1 hybrid combination"

编号Numbering 亲本Parents
1 农大202 Nongda 202
2 NC628
3 秦烟96 Qinyan 96
4 农大203 Nongda 203
5 云烟85 Yunyan 85
编号Numbering F1
6 NC628×农大202 NC628×Nongda 202
7 秦烟96×农大202 Qinyan 96×Nongda 202
8 农大203×农大202 Nongda 203×Nongda 202
9 云烟85×农大202 Yunyan 85×Nongda 202
10 农大203×NC628 Nongda 203×NC628
11 云烟85×NC628 Yunyan 85×NC628
12 秦烟96×NC628 Qinyan 96×NC628
13 秦烟96×云烟85 Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85
14 农大203×秦烟96 Nongda 203×Qinyan 96
15 云烟85×农大203 Yunyan 85×Nongda 203

Fig.1

The K content difference of flue-cured tobacco leaves between genotypes"

Table 2

Combining ability ANOVA of K content of flue-cured tobacco leaves"

变异来源
Source of variation		 自由度
Degree of freedom		 烟叶钾含量
K content
GCA 4 36.76**
SCA 10 14.53**
误差Deviation 28 0.74
GCA/SCA 2.53

Table 3

GCA and SCA effects of K content of flue-cured tobacco leaves between genotypes"

亲本
Parents		 一般配合力
GCA		 F1 特殊配合力
SCA		 F1 特殊配合力
SCA
农大203 Nongda 203 2.29 NC628×农大202
NC628×Nongda 202		 1.17 云烟85×NC628
Yunyan 85×NC628		 6.22
秦烟96 Qinyan 96 1.49 秦烟96×农大202
Qinyan 96×Nongda 202		 1.82 秦烟96×NC628
Qinyan 96×NC628		 -3.15
农大202 Nongda 202 0.84 农大203×农大202
Nongda 203×Nongda 202		 -0.99 秦烟96×云烟85
Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85		 1.92
云烟85 Yunyan 85 -1.28 云烟85×农大202
Yunyan 85×Nongda 202		 -4.01 云烟85×农大203
Yunyan 85×Nongda 203		 1.86
NC628 -3.35 农大203×NC628
Nongda 203×NC628		 5.21 农大203×秦烟96
Nongda 203×Qinyan 96		 -0.36

Table 4

Heterosis of K content of flue-cured tobacco leaves %"

F1 中亲优势In the pro-advantage 超高亲优势Super pro-affinity 超低亲优势Ultra-low pro-affinity
NC628×农大202 NC628×Nongda 202 9.39 -10.27 40.08
秦烟96×农大202 Qinyan 96×Nongda 202 3.49 3.25 3.73
农大203×农大202 Nongda 203×Nongda 202 -0.16 -1.40 1.12
云烟85×农大202 Yunyan 85×Nongda 202 -8.61 -18.21 3.55
秦烟96×NC628 Qinyan 96×NC628 -2.27 -19.98 25.51
农大203×NC628 Nongda 203×NC628 28.42 6.39 61.95
云烟85×NC628 Yunyan 85×NC628 35.91 23.05 51.75
农大203×秦烟96 Nongda 203×Qinyan 96 2.91 1.39 4.47
秦烟96×云烟85 Qinyan 96×Yunyan 85 9.89 -1.86 24.82
云烟85×农大203 Yunyan 85×Nongda 203 13.84 3.04 27.19
[1] 陆景陵 . 植物营养学. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 50-59.
[2] Bowing J D, Bowan D E . Role of potash in growth and nutrition of Marryland tobacco. Technical Bulletins, 1947: 933.
[3] 刘国顺 . 烟草栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 143-145.
[4] 牛佩兰, 石屹, 刘好宝 , 等. 烟草基因型间钾效率差异研究初报.烟草科技, 1996(1):33-35.
[5] 解燕, 王文楷, 赵杰 , 等. 烟草钾素营养与钾肥研究. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(8):302-307.
[6] 闫慧峰, 石屹, 李乃会 , 等. 烟草钾素营养研究进展. 中国农业科技导报, 2013,15(1):123-129.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2013.01.20
[7] 熊维亮, 李舟, 高明 , 等. 我国烟草钾素营养研究进展. 四川农业科技, 2013(1):46-47.
[8] 曹志洪, 周秀如, 李仲林 , 等. 我国烟叶含钾状况及其与植烟土壤环境条件的关系. 中国烟草, 1990(3):6-13,20.
[9] 伍宏业, 曾宪坤, 黄景 , 等. 论提高我国化肥利用率. 磷肥与复肥, 1999,14(2):11-13.
[10] Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of High Plant. London: Academic Press, 1986.
[11] 郭强, 赵久然, 滕海涛 , 等. 不同玉米基因型对钾素吸收利用的研究. 玉米科学, 2000,8(1):74-76.
[12] 杨铁钊, 张小全, 李群平 , 等. 烤烟新品种豫烟6号的选育及特征特性. 中国烟草科学, 2010,31(3):7-12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2010.03.002
[13] 焦芳婵, 肖炳光, 李永平 , 等. 烤烟新品种“云烟203”的选育及特征特性. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(3):625-628.
[14] 何冰 . 烟草基因型间钾吸收特性差异及其吸收机理的探讨. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[15] 孙渭, 陈志强, 马英明 , 等. 烤烟新品种秦烟96的选育及其特征特性. 中国烟草科学, 2012,33(2):28-33.
[16] 王毅, 林国平, 黄文昌 , 等. 白肋烟烟碱、总氮含量及氮碱比的配合力与遗传力分析. 中国烟草学报, 2007,13(3):52-56.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2007.03.011
[17] Satti M, Lopez S . Effect of increasing potassium levels for alleviating sodium chloride stress on the growth and yield of tomato. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1994,25(15):2807-2823.
[18] Gabelman W H, Louughman B C . Genetic Aspects of Plant Mineral Nutrition. Martiugs Nijhoff Publishers, 1987: 369-382.
doi: 10.2307/2404582
[19] Pinton R, Varanini Z, Maggioni A . Properties of potassium uptake by seedling roots of grape cultivars. Plant and Soil, 1990,123(2):175-179.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2053-8_19
[20] 舒海燕, 常胜合, 杨铁钊 . 烟草生育后期烟叶钾含量杂种优势及遗传分析. 河南农业科学, 2005(7):39-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2005.07.013
[21] 胡日生, 詹莜国, 朱列书 , 等. 烤烟胞质雄性不育杂种化学品质性状的遗传分析. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,34(6):643-647.
[22] 潘著, 戴林建, 吴成林 . 不同供钾水平下烤烟高钾新品系钾含量的配合力. 烟草科技, 2012(7):76-80.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0861.2012.07.017
[1] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[2] Haibin Luo, Shengli Jiang, Chengmei Huang, Huiqing Cao, Zhinian Deng, Kaichao Wu, Lin Xu, Zhen Lu, Yuanwen Wei. Cloning and Expression of ScHAK10 Gene in Sugarcane [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 53-61.
[3] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[4] Yingfen Jiang,Xinjie Wu,Weixin Fei,Fengxiang Chen. Research Progress on Recessive Genic Male Sterility of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 11-16.
[5] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
[6] Linjian Dai,Wu Chen,Tian Zhou,Jun Zhong. Selection Mutant of Resistant to Black Shank on Tobacco by Anther Culture [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 66-70.
[7] Shuguang Wang,Yugang Shi,Huawei Shi,Yaping Cao,Daizhen Sun. Research on Relationship between Photosynthetic Characteristics and Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 23-29.
[8] Han Yan,Hanglin Song,Li Zhang,Jing Yan,Xianji Shi,Shimiao Zhu,Lu Liu,Hulin Li. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Agronomic Traits and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 156-161.
[9] Genhui Chen,Qimao Guo,Zilong Lin,Yanxia Huang,Liming Yang. Effects of Different Application Rate of Potassium Fertilizer on the Yield and Agronomic Traits of Longshu 28 [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 91-95.
[10] Qian Jia,Shipeng Liao,Tao Ren,Xiaokun Li,Yangyang Zhang,Rihuan Cong,Jianwei Lu. Effects of Different Potassium-Silicon Fertilizer Application Rate on Rice-Rape Growth, Potassium Absorption and Potassium Balance [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 104-109.
[11] Gouliang Song,Xiaolei Feng,Guangyu Fan,Gaolei Shi,Shuangdong Li,Feng Wang,Xiaoming Wang,Zhihai Zhao. Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 44-50.
[12] Bingsheng Lu,Hongmin Gao,Yongxiang Yao,Xiangli Bai,Zengqi Chen. Combining Ability and Genetic Parameters of Ear Characters of Ten Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 23-28.
[13] Na Chang,Xuejiao Zhang,Lulu Ma,Jingjing Shi,Wei Jia,Yongzhi Qi,Baozhong Yin,Wenchao Zhen. Effects of Microbial Agents on Growth and Prevention of Soil Borne Diseases of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 155-160.
[14] Qingli Liu,Zhihong Li,Yanli Xu,Junying Li,Yungui Zhang. Research on the Cooperative Technology of Flue-Cured Tobacco based on Transplanting-Date, Fertilization and Variety in Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 128-134.
[15] Qiang Hu,Baofeng Jin,Pufan Zheng,Fucai Chen,Sitong Li,Kailun Mao,Hailun Liu,Yonghong Tang,Lixin Zhang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and IAA on Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Shaanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 135-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .