Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 135-142.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.01.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid and Ethephon on Photosynthetic Physiology of Leaves and Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China

Li Ruijie1,2(), Yan Peng1, Wang Qingyan1, Xu Yanli1, Lu Lin1, Dong Zhiqiang1(), Zhang Fenglu2()   

  1. 1Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Crop Eco-Physiology and Cultivation, Beijing 100081, China
    2College of Agronomy, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, Hebei, China
  • Received:2020-05-08 Revised:2020-07-16 Online:2021-02-15 Published:2021-02-23
  • Contact: Dong Zhiqiang,Zhang Fenglu E-mail:lrj15176380796@163.com;dongzhiqiang@caas.cn;nxyumi@hebau.edu.cn

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

271

Abstract:

Field experiments were conducted with maize variety Zhongdan 909 aiming to investigate the effect of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and ethephon (ETH) combined solution, spraying at jointing growth stage, on relieving canopy closure stress, improving net photosynthetic efficiency (Pn), enhancing organic supply capacity and ensuring stable and high yield in the Northeast China. The results showed that A2E1 (22.5g/hm2 5-ALA+450mL/hm2 ETH) treatment was better than other treatments and improved maize leaf physiological activity significantly. Under the A2E1 treatment, leaf chlorophyll content at V7 stage, the activities RuBP carboxylase (RuBPCase) and PEP carboxylase (PEPCase) at V12 stage were significantly increased by 8.9%, 65.2% and 87.1%, respectively, and the Pn at V8 and V12 stages were 14.8% and 24.5% higher than that of the control at the same growth stage. Meanwhile, leaf sucrose synthase (SS) activity at V12 stage and sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity at V11 stage were increased by 85.0% and 33.1%, respectively. Leaf sucrose contents at V7, V9 and V12 stage were increased by 69.2%, 16.8% and 78.6%, respectively. At harvest stage, ear length, kernel number per ear, and yield were increased by 5.4%, 6.2%, and 5.4%, respectively, and the bare tip length was shortened by 50.4%. Based on the above results, the 5-ALA and ETH combined solution could improve the physiological activity of maize leaves, increase kernel number per ear, and yield, and thus enhance the resisting canopy closure ability.

Key words: 5-ALA-ETH combined solution, Spring maize, Canopy closure effect, Physiological activity, Yield

Table 1

Amount of 5-aminolevulinic (5-ALA) and ethephon (ETH) used under different treatments in 2019"

处理Treatment 5-ALA (g/hm2) ETH (mL/hm2)
对照(CK) 0.00 0
A1 11.25 0
A2 22.50 0
A3 33.75 0
E1 0.00 450
A1E1 11.25 450
A2E1 22.50 450
A3E1 33.75 450
E2 0.00 900
A1E2 11.25 900
A2E2 22.50 900
A3E2 33.75 900

Fig.1

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on the chlorophyll content in leaves of maize at ear stage"

Fig.2

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on the activities of RuBPCase and PEPCase in leaves at trumpet stage (V12) Different small letters indicate significant difference among treatments at the 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.3

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of maize leaf at ear stage"

Fig.4

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on sucrose content of maize leaf at ear stage"

Fig.5

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on sucrose synthase (SS) activity of maize leaf"

Fig.6

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) activity of maize leaf"

Table 2

Effects of 5-ALA and ETH on spring maize yield and yield components"

处理
Treatment		 穗长
Ear length (cm)		 秃尖长
Bare tip length (cm)		 穗粗
Ear diameter (mm)		 穗粒数
Kernel number		 千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
CK 18.1±0.6bc 1.2±0.2abc 42.8±2.3ab 512.2±2.7abcd 376.4±6.9ab 13 357.5±233.8bc
A1 17.8±0.6c 0.9±0.1c 41.9±2.9ab 498.3±15.7cd 364.9±1.6abc 13 560.1±185.4bc
A2 18.9±0.2ab 1.4±0.1a 39.0±5.3ab 527.1±27.7abc 365.1±7.1abc 13 506.3±165.8bc
A3 18.4±0.6abc 1.2±0.2abc 45.3±0.3a 504.7±32.9bcd 378.7±3.1a 13 169.1±275.4c
E1 18.5±0.2abc 1.0±0.3bc 41.5±3.2ab 534.5±6.5ab 360.6±12.4abc 13 406.9±222.5bc
A1E1 18.2±0.3abc 1.1±0.1abc 36.7±2.1b 526.5±5.0abcd 360.2±5.0abc 13 645.0±126.1b
A2E1 19.1±0.4a 0.6±0.3d 39.9±5.3ab 544.1±27.3a 371.9±4.7abc 14 078.9±102.1a
A3E1 18.5±0.7abc 0.9±0.1cd 41.7±4.8ab 492.8±15.0d 357.6±12.8bc 13 497.2±266.7bc
E2 18.7±0.4abc 1.0±0.2abc 41.0±3.4ab 519.1±14.0abcd 369.8±1.9abc 13 218.0±105.3bc
A1E2 18.4±0.4abc 1.3±0.0ab 40.0±4.4ab 508.4±4.0bcd 371.4±9.9abc 13 231.4±348.6bc
A2E2 18.2±0.3abc 0.9±0.2bc 42.0±6.0ab 543.3±18.2a 354.9±21.7c 13 466.9±296.3bc
A3E2 18.3±0.4abc 1.1±0.1abc 46.1±0.4a 522.8±14.7abcd 363.1±15.8abc 13 294.5±149.6bc
5-ALA ns 0.023 ns ns ns ns
ETH ns ns 0.017 0.004 ns ns
5-ALA×ETH ns 0.001 ns ns ns 0.011
[1] 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2018.
[2] 赵久然, 郭景伦, 郭强, 等. 玉米不同品种基因型穗粒数及其构成因素相关分析的研究. 北京农业科学, 1997(6):2-3.
[3] Fischer K S, Palmer F E. Tropical maize//Goldsworthy P R,Fischer N M. The Physiology of Tropical Field Crops. Wiley, New York, 1984: 213-248.
[4] 龙海丽. 基于光照、温度、降水资源分布的东北地区春玉米生产措施研究. 石河子:石河子大学, 2015.
[5] Allison J C S, Wilson J H, Williams J H. Effect of partial defoliation during the vegetative phase on subsequent growth and grain yield of maize. Annals of Applied Biology, 2008,81(3):367-375.
doi: 10.1111/aab.1975.81.issue-3
[6] VonWettstein D, Gough S, Kannangara C G. Chlorophyll biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 1995,7:1039-1057.
pmid: 12242396
[7] Hotta Y, Tanaka T, Takaoka H, et al. Promotive effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on the yield of several crops. Plant Growth Regulation, 1997,22(2):109-114.
doi: 10.1023/A:1005883930727
[8] 孙阳, 王燚, 孟瑶, 等. 外源5-氨基乙酰丙酸对低温胁迫下玉米幼苗生长及光合特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2016(5):87-93.
[9] 程红玉, 肖占文, 宗盈晓, 等. ALA叶面肥对春小麦光合特性和灌浆速率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(5):572-577.
[10] 白文波, 吕国华, 张元成, 等. 植物多糖类复合制剂对冬小麦产量及物质转运的影响. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(4):1006-1012.
[11] 范理. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸的检测方法及其稳定性研究. 杭州:浙江大学, 2006.
[12] 梁彦洪, 林奋智, 胡根生, 等. 14C-乙烯利的合成. 核技术, 1980(5):60.
[13] 李瑞杰, 唐会会, 王庆燕, 等. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸和乙烯利复配剂对东北春玉米光合特性及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(2):125-133.
[14] 陈传晓, 董志强, 高娇, 等. 不同积温对春玉米灌浆期叶片光合性能的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013,24(6):1593-1600.
[15] 王维光, 李立人. 菠菜二磷酸核酮糖(RuBP)羧化酶简化提纯研究. 植物生理学报, 1980,6(3):33-38.
[16] 施教耐, 吴敏贤, 查静娟. 植物磷酸烯醇式丙酮酸羧化酶的研究Ⅰ.高粱叶片PEP羧化酶的分离和变构特性的比较. 植物生理学报, 1979,5(3):226-235.
[17] 李光彦, 王庆燕, 许艳丽, 等. 双重化控对春玉米灌浆期穗位叶和籽粒蔗糖代谢关键酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(8):1215-1223.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.01215
[18] 陈根山. 宿州市維桥区夏玉米大喇叭口期生育特点及关键管理技术. 现代农业科技, 2015(9):61.
[19] 张雨寒, 李楠, 刘攀, 等. 东北春玉米密植高产和机械化收获关键限制因素分析. 玉米科学, 2019,27(6):104-111.
[20] 高晶晶, 冯新新, 段春慧, 等. ALA提高苹果叶片光合性能与果实品质的效应. 果树学报, 2013,30(6):944-951.
[21] 徐铭, 徐福利. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸对日光温室油麦菜产量及品质的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008(3):133-137.
[22] 徐刚, 刘涛, 高文瑞, 等. ALA对低温胁迫下辣椒植株生长及光合特性的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2011,27(3):612-616.
[23] 蔡海琳. 外源甜菜碱和5-氨基乙酰丙酸对高羊茅抗旱性的影响. 南京:南京农业大学, 2013.
[24] 汪良驹, 姜卫兵, 黄保健. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸对弱光下甜瓜幼苗光合作用和抗冷性的促进效应. 园艺学报, 2004(3):321-326.
[25] 唐会会, 许艳丽, 王庆燕, 等. 叶面喷施5-氨基乙酰丙酸对不同密度春玉米生长特性和产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(2):136-141.
[26] 柴孟竹, 李钊, 秦东玲, 等. 乙烯利对玉米茎秆抗倒伏性的调控效应. 玉米科学, 2017,25(6):63-72.
[27] 唐军. 乙烯利对花生光合特性及衰老的影响. 桂林:广西大学, 2004.
[28] 李国辉, 崔克辉. 水稻蔗糖转运及其与产量形成的关系. 植物生理学报, 2014,50(6):735-740.
[29] 吕淑敏, 曲小菲, 王林华, 等. 不同沼液用量对夏玉米源库代谢关键酶及产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(2):338-343.
[30] 王俊忠. 施氮对高产夏玉米源库代谢特征的调控. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2010.
[31] 藏金萍, 赵艾佳, 赵亚林, 等. 油菜素内酯对玉米叶片捕光、CO2固定及有机物运输的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(21):4228-4234.
[32] 康秀晗, 李欢, 刘聪聪, 等. 树干乙烯利处理对橡胶树叶片蔗糖代谢的影响. 分子植物育种, 2018,16(13):4395-4402.
[33] 陈炜, 李红兵, 邓西平. 不同栽培模式下冬小麦灌浆过程中旗叶蔗糖代谢和籽粒淀粉积累特性. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(5):641-649.
[34] 魏中伟, 马国辉, 龙继锐, 等. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸叶面肥对杂交晚稻光合作用和产量的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2013(7):65-67,72.
[35] 姚素梅, 茹振钢, 刘明久, 等. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸(ALA)对冬小麦花后干物质生产和旗叶衰老的影响. 应用生态学报, 2011,22(2):383-388.
[36] 王海永, 陈小文, 牛晓雪, 等. 乙烯利对夏玉米果穗生长发育影响及生理机制探究. 玉米科学, 2014,22(5):64-70.
[1] Cao Xiaoyan, Wu Ailian, Wang Jinsong, Dong Erwei, Jiao Xiaoyan. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 108-115.
[2] Liu Akang, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Ma Ruiqi, Gao Tiantian, Wang Yujiao, Kan Mingxi, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Seedling Regulation on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Late Sowing Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 116-123.
[3] Zhang Xiaojuan, Zhang Shangpei, Cheng Bingwen, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Yang Junxue, Wang Xiaojun. Responses of Broomcorn Prosomillet Growth, Yield and Soil Environment to Different Film-Mulching Planting Patterns in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 124-129.
[4] Li Jie, Zhang Xiaoning, Jin Fansheng, Han Yanlong, Li Haijin. Response of Kidney Bean Growth and Yield to Planting Density in the Dry Year [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 140-146.
[5] Liu Ping, Shao Caihong, Zhang Honglin, Liu Guangrong. Effects of Dry-Wet Alternate Irrigation on Double Cropping Rice Yield and Quality during Late Development Stage under Seasonal Rain Condition [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 153-159.
[6] Li Candong, Guo Tai, Wang Zhixin, Zheng Wei, Zhao Haihong, Zhang Zhenyu, Xu Jiefei, Guo Meiling. Evaluation and Determination of Yield Evaluation Indicators of Soybean Mainly Cultivated Varieties in the Central and Eastern of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 45-51.
[7] Yang Yuchen, Du Zhimin, Zhang Xiaopeng, Li Kunyi, Shen Jiaqi, Xu Hai. Effects of Spraying Methyl Jasmonate on Yield and Grain Quality of Japonica Rice during Heading and Flowering Stage [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 71-76.
[8] Fu Jing, Yin Haiqing, Wang Ya, Yang Wenbo, Zhang Zhen, Bai Tao, Wang Yuetao, Wang Fuhua, Wang Shengxuan. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing Models on Root Growth and Grain Yield of Japonica Rice in the Region along Yellow River of Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 77-86.
[9] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[10] Li Wenxu, Wu Zhengqing, Lei Zhensheng, Jiang Guiying. The Characteristics of Climate Factors Change and Its Effects on Main Grain Crops Yield per Unit Area in Henan Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 124-134.
[11] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[12] Duan Huimin, Lu Xiao, Zhou Xiaojie, Li Gaofeng, Wen Guohong, Wang Yuping, Cheng Lixiang, Zhang Feng. Effects of Potato Leaf Type and Planting Density on Yield Components [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 160-167.
[13] Liu Yan, Gong Liang, Xing Yuehua, Bao Hongjing. Study on the Optimization of Organic-Inorganic Fertilization Model for Maize Based on Orthogonal Design [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 168-174.
[14] Suo Yanyan, Zhang Xiang, Si Xianzong, Li Liang, Yu Qiong, Yu Hui. Effects of Phosphorus and Calcium Applications on the Growth, Yield, and Phosphorus and Calcium Use Efficiency of Peanut [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 187-192.
[15] Gong Songling, Cao Pei, Gao Zhenzhen, Li Chengwei, Liu Zhangyong, Zhu Bo. Effects of Cropping Patterns on Crop Yield and Resource Utilization Efficiency in Southern China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 68-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[2] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[3] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[4] Ying Chai,Yongqing Xu,Yao Fu,Xiuyu Li,Fumeng He,Yingqi Han,Zhe Feng,Fenglan Li. Characteristics of Cell Wall Degradation Enzyme Produced by Main Pathogenic Fusarium spp. in Potato Dry Rot[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 154 -160 .
[5] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84 -88 .
[6] Yajun Liu,Qiguo Hu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Cultivation Methods and Planting Densities on the Yield and Storage Root Tuberization of Sweet Potato cv. "Shangshu 9"[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 89 -94 .
[7] Zhengui Yuan,Pingping Chen,Lili Guo,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Varietal Difference in Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Panicle of Rice Affected by Soil Cd Content[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 107 -112 .
[8] Liangmei Chen,Jiangxia Li,Zhaoyun Hu,Wenling Ye,Wenge Wu,Youhua Ma. Review on Application of Low Accumulation Crops on Remediation of Farmland Contaminated by Heavy Metals[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 16 -24 .
[9] Shanshan Lu,Chenglai Wu,Yan Li,Chunqing Zhang. The Molecular Basis of Holding the Feature and Genetic Purity for Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 41 -48 .
[10] Leiyue Geng,Wei Zhang,Tuo Zou,Zhenyu Zheng,Lige Geng,Juan Sun,Qixing Zhang. Analysis on Quality Traits Diversity of Rice Landraces in Hebei[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 49 -55 .